The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Superheroics and You] A Practical Guide

CenoCeno pizza timeRegistered User regular
edited November 2013 in Social Entropy++
QUESTION 1:

Are you a superhero?

If you answered "yes" to the above question, go be in a movie! If you answered "no", just watch these movies!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLWsK1ZFunA

Thor: the Dark Woold (out now!)

Captain America: The Winds of Winter - coming sooon!

Guardians of Galactus - coming sooon!

Avengers: Age of Voltron

These are just a few of the superhero movies you can enjoy in the movie theater at some point in the future!

On DVD and bluray you can watch such hits as:

Iron Men 1 2 and 3
The Incredible Hunk
Captain America: The Frist Avenger
Thor
The Frist Avengers movie (not Captain America)

And DC made some stuff too.

Ceno on
«134567100

Posts

  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    ....I would watch Age of Voltron.

    CYpGAPn.png
  • AtomicTofuAtomicTofu She's a straight-up supervillain, yo Registered User regular
    I watch that Winter Soldier trailer every time I see it linked.

  • MysstMysst King Monkey of Hedonism IslandRegistered User regular
    edited November 2013
    you know, I'm really excited to see the Captain America exhibit in the Smithsonian. like, black and white lifesize cutouts or Erskine and Stark and shit

    Mysst on
    ikbUJdU.jpg
  • Grey GhostGrey Ghost Registered User regular
    Mysst wrote: »
    you know, I'm really excited to see the Captain America exhibit in the Smithsonian

    Do you mean in the movie or are they putting an actual exhibit in the actual Smithsonian

  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    i would just like to mention that i am super happy with warren ellis on moon knight, especially with the dropping of the D.I.D. angle, and am excited to see him back in NYC. I would love to see him show up in the MCU in a second wave of Netflix shows, after the initial launch.

  • MysstMysst King Monkey of Hedonism IslandRegistered User regular
    Grey Ghost wrote: »
    Mysst wrote: »
    you know, I'm really excited to see the Captain America exhibit in the Smithsonian

    Do you mean in the movie or are they putting an actual exhibit in the actual Smithsonian

    the movie, I doubt the Smithsonian is going to put a Cap exhibit in. and even if they did, I ain't travelling that way in a while to find out

    ikbUJdU.jpg
  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    so, Chris Sims wrote an extremely lengthy and very interesting look at "The Problem" when it comes to DC and Marvel
    http://comicsalliance.com/dc-comics-marvel-golden-age-silver-age-comics-history/
    namely, that DC wants to be like Marvel and has for literally years
    it's a really good read that I whole-heartedly recommend, but what's interesting is the conversation that's sparked from it
    Gail Simone is disagreeing heavily with it, it seems, while Kurt Busiek and Mark Waid are backing up Sims' claims and adding details and anecdotes for support

  • LadaiLadai Registered User regular
    edited November 2013
    So I just watched the latest episode of Arrow.
    God dammit. I was just thinking about how much I enjoyed Count Vertigo as a recurring villain when Ollie straight up kills him.

    And then, as if the show knew I was bummed out about the loss of a fun villain, they bring back B(ad)arrowman.

    I really do hope they bring the Count back at some point though. I don't know what it is, but I really enjoy watching that actor devour scenery.

    Ladai on
    ely3ub6du1oe.jpg
  • HermanoHermano Registered User regular
    I watched Captain America for the first time this week.

    It's a very enjoyable movie!


    PSN- AHermano
  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    PNk1Ml4.png
  • EtchwartsEtchwarts Eyes Up Registered User regular
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    I was thinking
    it was in the inbetween period where Jane waited a couple of days, when Thor was in Asgard

  • KilroyKilroy timaeusTestified Registered User regular
    everyone should go to kickstarter and back the Compiler Comic Binder so I finally have a good way to organize all my single issues

  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker
    Or it was during the two-day gap when Thor was still on Asgard before he came back to see Jane.

    SHIELD not being able to get a message to an alien planet only accessible through wormhole doesn't really make them seem weak to me.

    CYpGAPn.png
  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
  • ToxTox I kill threads they/themRegistered User regular
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.

    Discord Lifeboat | Dilige, et quod vis fac
  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    Tox wrote: »
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.
    Really?

    I have always got the feeling that if SHIELD could control them all, they would.

  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    Solar wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.
    Really?

    I have always got the feeling that if SHIELD could control them all, they would.
    Fury and SHIELD are separate entities.

    Fury specifically goes out of his way to make sure the Avengers are left pretty untouched, and since he is being attacked by Winter Soldier, who is definitely working for Robert Redford, he probably keeps his track record of being kind of an asshole but one that believes in the Avengers,

    CYpGAPn.png
  • Grey GhostGrey Ghost Registered User regular
    No wait @Antimatter

    Man of Steel: Knightcall feat. Lovebattt

  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    Blankzilla wrote: »
    Solar wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.
    Really?

    I have always got the feeling that if SHIELD could control them all, they would.
    Fury and SHIELD are separate entities.

    Fury specifically goes out of his way to make sure the Avengers are left pretty untouched, and since he is being attacked by Winter Soldier, who is definitely working for Robert Redford, he probably keeps his track record of being kind of an asshole but one that believes in the Avengers,
    Well

    Fury and SHIELD are not seperate entities given that Fury is the Director

    But it might be argued that Fury directs SHIELD in ways that is not always parallel to their general view of things

  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    Solar wrote: »
    Blankzilla wrote: »
    Solar wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.
    Really?

    I have always got the feeling that if SHIELD could control them all, they would.
    Fury and SHIELD are separate entities.

    Fury specifically goes out of his way to make sure the Avengers are left pretty untouched, and since he is being attacked by Winter Soldier, who is definitely working for Robert Redford, he probably keeps his track record of being kind of an asshole but one that believes in the Avengers,
    Well

    Fury and SHIELD are not seperate entities given that Fury is the Director

    But it might be argued that Fury directs SHIELD in ways that is not always parallel to their general view of things
    Fury answers to the council and also it seems like Director in the MCU isn't the highest rank, since Redford seems to be above him.

    But yes I get what you're saying

    CYpGAPn.png
  • LarsLars Registered User regular
    Antimatter wrote: »
    so, Chris Sims wrote an extremely lengthy and very interesting look at "The Problem" when it comes to DC and Marvel
    http://comicsalliance.com/dc-comics-marvel-golden-age-silver-age-comics-history/
    namely, that DC wants to be like Marvel and has for literally years
    it's a really good read that I whole-heartedly recommend, but what's interesting is the conversation that's sparked from it
    Gail Simone is disagreeing heavily with it, it seems, while Kurt Busiek and Mark Waid are backing up Sims' claims and adding details and anecdotes for support

    When DC rebooted their universe with the New 52, they also somehow managed to reboot actual people as well. They managed to somehow turn Gail Simone into a corporate stooge (some of the justifications she gave for getting rid of Oracle were downright painful to read) and lower her writing talent to boot. Now she's saying Marvel doesn't innovate and implying they're a company full of rip-off characters.

  • ToxTox I kill threads they/themRegistered User regular
    In the MCU it would appear that Fury runs SHIELD but does not control it.

    Like, he's not the top dog, but he's responsible largely for the day-to-day runnings of the organization.

    And he likely serves as the pleasure of the council. Meaning it's very likely he'll get fired at some point in the story.

    Discord Lifeboat | Dilige, et quod vis fac
  • Centipede DamascusCentipede Damascus Ho! Ho! Ho! Drink Coke!Registered User regular
    Antimatter wrote: »
    so, Chris Sims wrote an extremely lengthy and very interesting look at "The Problem" when it comes to DC and Marvel
    http://comicsalliance.com/dc-comics-marvel-golden-age-silver-age-comics-history/
    namely, that DC wants to be like Marvel and has for literally years
    it's a really good read that I whole-heartedly recommend, but what's interesting is the conversation that's sparked from it
    Gail Simone is disagreeing heavily with it, it seems, while Kurt Busiek and Mark Waid are backing up Sims' claims and adding details and anecdotes for support

    from what I'm reading of the conversation, Simone's gone off on a strange tangent about how she doesn't like when Marvel creates characters that are homages to DC characters and also how when she was at Marvel they had three different books ripping off Buffy(???)

  • NocrenNocren Lt Futz, Back in Action North CarolinaRegistered User regular
    Is it bad I was hoping you'd go with "The Fist Avenger"?

    newSig.jpg
  • Centipede DamascusCentipede Damascus Ho! Ho! Ho! Drink Coke!Registered User regular
    Solar wrote: »
    Blankzilla wrote: »
    Solar wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    -Tal wrote: »
    I figured out what bothered me about last episode of shield
    they're looking at the staff and can't figure out what the markings mean but they know they're asgardian and skye says "hey why don't we call thor"

    and coulson responds that shield can't find him

    what do you mean you can't find him

    you're shield! you're supposed to be everywhere all the time!

    and he's at the most obvious place he could be, at jane foster's house

    that's the only time I really felt the budget constraints but more importantly it made shield look weaker

    What others have said, but also
    I think per Fury SHIELD "officially" doesn't know where any of them are. Like, they're making a point not to explicitly keep tabs on any of them, as far as all official information and sources go. Obviously they know where Stark is, but otherwise the ending of Avengers seemed to indicate that SHIELD is trying to make it seem like they can't track them down on a whim, in order to prevent the oversight people/group from trying to run them like an asset.
    Really?

    I have always got the feeling that if SHIELD could control them all, they would.
    Fury and SHIELD are separate entities.

    Fury specifically goes out of his way to make sure the Avengers are left pretty untouched, and since he is being attacked by Winter Soldier, who is definitely working for Robert Redford, he probably keeps his track record of being kind of an asshole but one that believes in the Avengers,
    Well

    Fury and SHIELD are not seperate entities given that Fury is the Director

    But it might be argued that Fury directs SHIELD in ways that is not always parallel to their general view of things
    Fury often considers himself separate from SHIELD in that he funnels money away from the organization to build his own safehouses and maintains his own intelligence network separate from SHIELD's.

  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    so uh

    remember that enormous post I made the other day w/r/t the IDW comics

    I kinda put that on tumblr for shits and giggles, partly so that folk could get into the two ongoings and read good comics

    well
    the typical colorist of mtmte, josh burcham, liked that post
    that's a thing

  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    I think that article has a lot of truth in it

    You can essentially wring it down to a single statement

    Marvel is comfortable in it's own skin. It knows what it is and it's entirely okay with that.

    DC is not comfortable in it's own skin. It knows what it was, but it wants to be something it's not.

  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    did robert redford's role exist before the avengers?

    I was under the impression they needed a higher position because shield was expanding and didn't put fury in the seat because he has openly defied the council before

    PNk1Ml4.png
  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    We don't know yet

    CYpGAPn.png
  • TurambarTurambar Independent Registered User regular
    Cap 2 looks like it could be my favourite solo superhero movie

    Steam: turamb | Origin: Turamb | 3DS: 3411-1109-4537 | NNID: Turambar | Warframe(PC): Turamb
  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    yeah I think if Cap 2 lives up to what we have seen so far it will be pretty amazing

  • BlankZoeBlankZoe Registered User regular
    New costumes aside:
    1385153817.jpg
    1385153806.jpg

    Fantastic Four is gonna be a pretty good looking book

    CYpGAPn.png
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    Redford's character seems likely to be a stand in for

    spoilery speculation based on brubaker's run
    Alexander Lukin

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • TurambarTurambar Independent Registered User regular
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Redford's character seems likely to be a stand in for

    spoilery speculation based on brubaker's run
    Alexander Lukin

    Yeah, I've been thinking the same
    I'd freakin love it if Redford turned out to be Red Skull

    Steam: turamb | Origin: Turamb | 3DS: 3411-1109-4537 | NNID: Turambar | Warframe(PC): Turamb
  • HeatwaveHeatwave Come, now, and walk the path of explosions with me!Registered User regular
    Finally had time to go pick up Volume 5 of Transformers MTMTE.

    I want Alex Milne and James Roberts to continue drawing/writing this book forever. The only bad part was issue 22's art. It just doesn't mix with the feel of the book; too cold and mechanical, as opposed to the cartoony, yet natural, look of the rest of the book. In other words, I hope Milne returns for the next volume ALL the volumes.

    P2n5r3l.jpg
    Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
  • AntimatterAntimatter Devo Was Right Gates of SteelRegistered User regular
    edited November 2013
    Heatwave wrote: »
    Finally had time to go pick up Volume 5 of Transformers MTMTE.

    I want Alex Milne and James Roberts to continue drawing/writing this book forever. The only bad part was issue 22's art. It just doesn't mix with the feel of the book; too cold and mechanical, as opposed to the cartoony, yet natural, look of the rest of the book. In other words, I hope Milne returns for the next volume ALL the volumes.

    well
    the artist for 22, James Raiz, is continuing with the Lost Light stuff for Dark Cybertron in both Robots in Disguise and More Than Meets the Eye
    but other artists are contributing to Dark Cybertron, including Atilio Rojo, Phil Jimenez, Andrew Griffith, Brendan Cahill, Livio Ramondelli, Nick Roche, and Robert Gill
    and Milne will be back for Season Two of MTMTE, after Dark Cybertron finishes

    Antimatter on
  • HeatwaveHeatwave Come, now, and walk the path of explosions with me!Registered User regular
    Antimatter wrote: »
    Heatwave wrote: »
    Finally had time to go pick up Volume 5 of Transformers MTMTE.

    I want Alex Milne and James Roberts to continue drawing/writing this book forever. The only bad part was issue 22's art. It just doesn't mix with the feel of the book; too cold and mechanical, as opposed to the cartoony, yet natural, look of the rest of the book. In other words, I hope Milne returns for the next volume ALL the volumes.

    well
    the artist for 22, James Raiz, is continuing with the Lost Light stuff for Dark Cybertron in both Robots in Disguise and More Than Meets the Eye
    but other artists are contributing to Dark Cybertron, including Atilio Rojo, Phil Jimenez, Andrew Griffith, Brendan Cahill, Livio Ramondelli, Nick Roche, and Robert Gill
    and Milne will be back for Season Two of MTMTE, after Dark Cybertron finishes
    I guess I'll be waiting even longer for my cartoony Transformer fix :/

    P2n5r3l.jpg
    Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
  • StiltsStilts Registered User regular
    edited November 2013
    Grey Ghost wrote: »
    No wait Antimatter

    Man of Steel: Knightcall feat. Lovebattt

    I feel like it should be "feat. Most Excellent Superbat"

    But maybe that's just cuz I want to see the Super Young Team in way more things.

    Stilts on
    IKknkhU.gif
This discussion has been closed.