New Avengers #19 If I must become this thing, then let it be at a time of my own chasing
Starlight #4 Uh, I don't think I'm the one who's too heavy, sir
A hero remembers.
"Ride or Die?" asked Goku
"Ride or Die" confirmed Dominic Toretto, as they took off to find the Dragon Balls in hopes of reviving their friend Sonic
+5
Posts
// Switch: SW-5306-0651-6424 //
Because that's the noblest thing their awesome hero-world can do - give up their own world, which had a good run, for the people who still need a chance to turn things around and become awesome.
Would've sworn there were people who could negotiate the positioning of planets.
Diablo 3 - ArtfulDodger#1572
Minecraft - ArtfulDodger42
Dr. van Damme will explain:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D01mdGW9-Zg
The Great Society is so JLA they even had a clever mother box reference in the issue, but I wonder just how far Hickman will take it. I could see them doing what Golden Yak says but wouldn't that also be meta admitting DC has better heroes than Marvel? I wonder if that might be too on the nose.
I keep thinking it's going to move from pre-DCnU to commentary on current DC, like the incursion changes the JLA into being assholes or something next issue.
https://gofund.me/fa5990a5
Greatest. Day. Ever!
Sex & the Cthulhu Mythos
EDIT: Also, using retarded as a pejorative is a real classy movie, FYI.
They've sort've done that before, when they had full-on actual Avengers/JL crossovers - not so much 'better heroes', but a world where those types of heroes can actually exist. There's never been 'mutantphobia' mass-fear of superhuman stuff going on in DC world, for example (at least as far as that crossover story was concerned.)
I've only read his FF run but if you feel that RISE and what followed wasn't satisfying well I guess we are just two different people. But then you are talking about New Avengers like its really bad which makes that clear.
Also odd that you're talking as if your extremely niche feelings on the matter are the norm. I'm not saying your opinions are worth less because they don't match with the majority. I just find it strange you are acting like they are.
EDIT:Just to be clear I know the events I hinted at didn't happen at the end of Hickmans run, I just thought it was the best example of an extremely satisfying end of long running plot threads.
https://gofund.me/fa5990a5
Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
Not like 'a device that destroys one world but [somehow saves everyone on it and takes them into a new universe or something]'
Just 'we're gonna kill all of you! ziiiing'
And that sort've just clicks now. They just realize what they've come to.
JL - So you made a bomb to blow up our planet.
Illu - But we wanna try other stuff first!
JL - And if that stuff doesn't work, you'll blow up our planet. With that bomb you made.
Illu - Well.. yeah, but we're really hoping to find another way!
JL - And if you don't you'll use that bomb you made to blow up our planet. That is a scenario you are prepared for.
At which point everyone's pulling at their collar and looking sheepish.
Illuminati should have been "Well, since if we AREN'T prepared for that possibility, we sacrifice not only everyone on our world AND our universe, but in your universe as well; all for a population of people who will die anyway if we choose to do nothing. That said, your world is as deserving of living as ours, so deciding which Earth to blow up will of course be difficult, but if it comes down to it, that is the only choice left; not whether to blow up a world, but which one.
We can't condemn two universes to death so we can maintain our morality right up until everything is destroyed. Hell, at that point, can you even call it moral?
Bring us OPTIONS, not incredulous looks."
I kinda just, wanna know.
Though that might depend on your definition of fix. If you define "fix" as "No more incursions forcing us to blow up other planets" then you've got a lot more leeway than you do if your definition requires you to not have blown up the other planets at all.
The main problem with time traveling is that, almost inevitably, it's going to be the time travellers who went back to stop the whole mess that wind up causing the thing by accident.
I'd like to see the illuminati work out how to build a multi-verse hopping, original incursion detecting time machine so they can go back and end this thing before it starts, only to have their future selves pop up in the time machine they're about to build and tell themselves it's a bad idea to stop the multiversal collapse process once it's in motion. Maybe even give them an explanation as to why. Of course, any explanation is going to be a lie and the future illuminati just prevented the present day ones from starting the whole mess in the first place. Then issue wave after wave of No-Prizes to every person who points out the paradox that is created.
And that's why I don't write comic books.
"For all intents and purposes"
Those aren't Hickman stories, but he hasn't been ignoring it. Thanos, for one, directly stated that the end of AoU convinced him that Earth needed to be put down.
"Ride or Die" confirmed Dominic Toretto, as they took off to find the Dragon Balls in hopes of reviving their friend Sonic
https://gofund.me/fa5990a5
This is basically the theme of this current arc - Marvelish Realism vs DCish Idealism. In this case, within a universe were the rules are such that DCish Idealism can actually save the day.
Another possible solution, though arguably more difficult and costly
But I'm presuming that more Incursions are happening to Earth-616 because of the destruction of more universes due to other Incursions, and not just continually jostling of universes due to the original start of the whole thing.
Michael Scott disagrees.
Irregardless, Hickman is a tight end of the industry.