The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

computer rebooting -- MB, NIC or something else?

NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
edited April 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
We have a MyBook external HD connected directly to our router. Over the past couple of days, I've been setting up a password-protected share and transferring my work files over to it so that in the event of total system failure (i.e. power supply going out, etc.) I can still work on another computer.

However, when I access these folders via my work computer, it will occasionally cause the computer to reboot, which is a pain. (Sometimes just opening a folder, sometimes trying to run a program I wrote, mostly when it is trying to overwrite a file such as a re-compile).

Note that this ONLY happens when accessing stuff on the external HD, although I haven't really tried accessing any other shares on the network (we really don't have many others now that we got the external). It does not happen with any other network access (browser, download, connecting to VPN, and pcAnywhere all seem to work ok) It ONLY happens with my work computer, so I'm pretty sure it's the computer not the external drive.

I am NOT running a wireless card on the work machine, only a 10/100 standard LinkSys card. I've got a hub between the computer and the router, and another computer connected to the same hub has no problem.

Nerissa on

Posts

  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    So this router, it has a drive attached to it via USB -- it is sharing that drive using Windows filesharing (SMB)?

    If it's a Windows system that's crashing, check your C:\Windows\Minidump directory for memory dumps that may have been created at the time of the crash. If you have a kernel debugger....um...know what, just post them somewhere and I can show you what they say about the cause of the crashes.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Fristle wrote: »
    So this router, it has a drive attached to it via USB -- it is sharing that drive using Windows filesharing (SMB)?

    If it's a Windows system that's crashing, check your C:\Windows\Minidump directory for memory dumps that may have been created at the time of the crash. If you have a kernel debugger....um...know what, just post them somewhere and I can show you what they say about the cause of the crashes.

    I believe that it is using SMB, but I'm honestly not 100% sure... I plug it in and use the router configuration pages to set up shares, users, etc. so the underlying system could be magic for all I could swear to.

    The system that is crashing is XP Pro -- I found the memory dumps, but obviously opening them in a plain text editor doesn't make them very readable. Is there something I can download from somewhere (if there isn't a decent free tool, I'm willing to pay a little bit, but not a lot) to try to decypher them? I also have Visual Studio 6 (with all of the tools up to Enterprise level) on this machine, so if there is something in there I can use, that would work too.

    Nerissa on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    You can download the Windows Debugging Tools from Microsoft for free, Windbg can open .dmp files.

    How do you access the remote drive?

    A) It's a "lettered" network drive (eg G:\ or N:\)

    B) It's access by typing in the unc path (eg \\mybook\mysecurefolder\)

    C) It's accessed via FTP (eg ftp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/mysecurefolder)

    D) Other.

    Ruckus on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    I'll check out the Windows download stuff when I get a chance on a computer which can do it... I'm also in the midst of trying to figure out why some of our computers are having trouble downloading stuff (including the Windows Genuine BS) from MS, but that's a separate problem entirely.

    It's something I will be accessing frequently throughout the work day, so I have it set up as a mapped drive (i.e. option A). Is there really a functional difference (other than convenience and potential security risks) between a mapped drive and using the UNC path?

    Nerissa on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Nerissa wrote: »
    I'll check out the Windows download stuff when I get a chance on a computer which can do it... I'm also in the midst of trying to figure out why some of our computers are having trouble downloading stuff (including the Windows Genuine BS) from MS, but that's a separate problem entirely.

    It's something I will be accessing frequently throughout the work day, so I have it set up as a mapped drive (i.e. option A). Is there really a functional difference (other than convenience and potential security risks) between a mapped drive and using the UNC path?

    If you use it as a mapped network drive, I think Windows handles the interface via Logical Disk Management and the Workstation service, I think there may be a slight (tiny) amount of additional overhead when using that method versus a straight UNC path.

    I'd say try it for a week using the mapped drive, then try it for a week using a shortcut on your desktop pointing to the UNC path, and then decide if either is obviously more stable than the other.

    Ruckus on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    If you download the Windows Debugging Tools (freeware), run WinDbg and open the minidump file, and then at the console in WinDbg type "!analyze -v" I think. It will show you the driver responsible for the crash and the fault that caused the crash.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    ok, here's the debugger analysis... what does it tell me?
    kd> !analyze -v
    *******************************************************************************
    *                                                                             *
    *                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
    *                                                                             *
    *******************************************************************************
    
    UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP_M (1000007f)
    This means a trap occurred in kernel mode, and it's a trap of a kind
    that the kernel isn't allowed to have/catch (bound trap) or that
    is always instant death (double fault).  The first number in the
    bugcheck params is the number of the trap (8 = double fault, etc)
    Consult an Intel x86 family manual to learn more about what these
    traps are. Here is a *portion* of those codes:
    If kv shows a taskGate
            use .tss on the part before the colon, then kv.
    Else if kv shows a trapframe
            use .trap on that value
    Else
            .trap on the appropriate frame will show where the trap was taken
            (on x86, this will be the ebp that goes with the procedure KiTrap)
    Endif
    kb will then show the corrected stack.
    Arguments:
    Arg1: 00000008, EXCEPTION_DOUBLE_FAULT
    Arg2: 80042000
    Arg3: 00000000
    Arg4: 00000000
    
    Debugging Details:
    ------------------
    
    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.
    
    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.
    
    
    MODULE_NAME: AN983
    
    FAULTING_MODULE: 804d7000 nt
    
    DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  3bd7b441
    
    BUGCHECK_STR:  0x7f_8
    
    CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT:  3
    
    DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  WRONG_SYMBOLS
    
    LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from 81a6d470 to f8627d71
    
    STACK_TEXT:  
    WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
    f262effc 81a6d470 00210032 00790053 00490073 AN983+0x1d71
    f262f000 00210032 00790053 00490073 00410050 0x81a6d470
    f262f004 00790053 00490073 00410050 00640064 0x210032
    f262f008 00490073 00410050 00640064 00650072 0x790053
    f262f00c 00410050 00640064 00650072 00730073 0x490073
    f262f010 00640064 00650072 00730073 00320033 0x410050
    f262f014 00650072 00730073 00320033 00630000 0x640064
    f262f018 00730073 00320033 00630000 006d006f 0x650072
    f262f01c 00320033 00630000 006d006f 00740063 0x730073
    f262f020 00630000 006d006f 00740063 0033006c 0x320033
    f262f024 006d006f 00740063 0033006c 002e0032 0x630000
    f262f028 00740063 0033006c 002e0032 006c0064 0x6d006f
    f262f02c 0033006c 002e0032 006c0064 0000006c 0x740063
    f262f030 002e0032 006c0064 0000006c 00790053 0x33006c
    f262f034 006c0064 0000006c 00790053 00500073 0x2e0032
    f262f038 00000000 00790053 00500073 00670061 0x6c0064
    
    
    STACK_COMMAND:  kb
    
    FOLLOWUP_IP: 
    AN983+1d71
    f8627d71 55              push    ebp
    
    SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  0
    
    FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner
    
    IMAGE_NAME:  AN983.sys
    
    SYMBOL_NAME:  AN983+1d71
    
    BUCKET_ID:  WRONG_SYMBOLS
    
    Followup: MachineOwner
    ---------
    

    Nerissa on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Based on the name of the faulting driver, it is most likely the ADMtek AN983/AN985/ADM951X NDIS5 Driver. "NDIS5" refers to a Microsoft driver interface layer for network devices. ADMtek (a Taiwanese company bought out by Infineon in 2004, manufacturer of your PCI network card perhaps?) has written a faulty driver. You are somehow evoking the fault in their driver code when you are exchanging network traffic with your router and accessing the files it is sharing on its attached drive.

    So, it's a third-party driver problem, and the solution would be "get a fixed version of this driver" -- if this company was still in business. As is, you're going to have a hell of a time finding a driver update online. I Googled it and came up with no official support page for this manufacturer.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Oddly enough, I'm using a LinkSys card. I know this for a fact because we go out of our way to make sure to not mix companies with our networking hardware to minimize compatibility problems, so all of our cards, hubs, and routers are LinkSys. However, it is quite possible that I am using the drivers that came with XP -- I'll have to shut down my machine to get the model number and such to get the correct drivers, and I can't do that until the end of the work day, but I think that's probably my next step. If that doesn't work, it's not like network cards are expensive, I guess.

    Nerissa on
  • s-wordss-words Registered User new member
    edited April 2007
    Hi, I'm having the same problem with my desktop machine. It reboots for no apparent reason, my graphics card and CPU temperature are well below overheating temp.

    I tried a reformat but it crashed right after successfully installing windows.

    Here is my debug


    Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.6.0007.5
    Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.


    Loading Dump File [C:\WINDOWS\Minidump\Mini041107-01.dmp]
    Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available

    Symbol search path is: *** Invalid ***
    ****************************************************************************
    * Symbol loading may be unreliable without a symbol search path. *
    * Use .symfix to have the debugger choose a symbol path. *
    * After setting your symbol path, use .reload to refresh symbol locations. *
    ****************************************************************************
    Executable search path is:
    *********************************************************************
    * Symbols can not be loaded because symbol path is not initialized. *
    * *
    * The Symbol Path can be set by: *
    * using the _NT_SYMBOL_PATH environment variable. *
    * using the -y <symbol_path> argument when starting the debugger. *
    * using .sympath and .sympath+ *
    *********************************************************************
    Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2
    *** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntoskrnl.exe
    *** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for ntoskrnl.exe
    Windows XP Kernel Version 2600 (Service Pack 2) UP Free x86 compatible
    Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS Personal
    Kernel base = 0x804d7000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x805531a0
    Debug session time: Wed Apr 11 02:02:13.250 2007 (GMT-4)
    System Uptime: 0 days 6:22:02.905
    *********************************************************************
    * Symbols can not be loaded because symbol path is not initialized. *
    * *
    * The Symbol Path can be set by: *
    * using the _NT_SYMBOL_PATH environment variable. *
    * using the -y <symbol_path> argument when starting the debugger. *
    * using .sympath and .sympath+ *
    *********************************************************************
    Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2
    *** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntoskrnl.exe
    *** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for ntoskrnl.exe
    Loading Kernel Symbols
    ....................................................................................................................
    Loading User Symbols
    Loading unloaded module list
    ..........
    ERROR: FindPlugIns 8007007b
    *******************************************************************************
    * *
    * Bugcheck Analysis *
    * *
    *******************************************************************************

    Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.

    BugCheck 1000008E, {c0000005, 805d3a97, b4c15af8, 0}

    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

    *** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for win32k.sys
    *** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for win32k.sys
    Probably caused by : win32k.sys ( win32k+d2b9 )

    Followup: MachineOwner

    Any help would be greatly appreciated as it happens 2-3 times a day.

    s-words on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Nerissa wrote: »
    Oddly enough, I'm using a LinkSys card. I know this for a fact because we go out of our way to make sure to not mix companies with our networking hardware to minimize compatibility problems, so all of our cards, hubs, and routers are LinkSys. However, it is quite possible that I am using the drivers that came with XP -- I'll have to shut down my machine to get the model number and such to get the correct drivers, and I can't do that until the end of the work day, but I think that's probably my next step. If that doesn't work, it's not like network cards are expensive, I guess.

    Could it be an on-board ethernet adapter? If you are using a LinkSys card that is good news, it means you can possibly just disable this ADMTek adapter in the Device Manager and delete its driver (AN983.sys) and just never worry about it again.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    s-words wrote: »
    Hi, I'm having the same problem with my desktop machine. It reboots for no apparent reason, my graphics card and CPU temperature are well below overheating temp.

    I tried a reformat but it crashed right after successfully installing windows.

    Here is my debug

    ..........

    BugCheck 1000008E, {c0000005, 805d3a97, b4c15af8, 0}

    Probably caused by : win32k.sys ( win32k+d2b9 )

    Followup: MachineOwner

    Any help would be greatly appreciated as it happens 2-3 times a day.

    Did you run the command "!analyze -v" in WinDbg? Your problem looks a little tougher since the dump file is pointing at win32k.sys, a Microsoft driver. Microsoft drivers are usually the last thing I blame when looking at a problem like this (it's just been my experience in debugging drivers, you blame MS last). So even though WinDbg says the crash was caused by win32k.sys, the actual problem probably lies in some other component that win32k.sys interacts with, depends upon, or is servicing at the time of the crash.

    Win32k.sys is the Kernel side of the Win32 "subsystem" in the Windows kernel. Its area of responsibility involves the infrastructure of the graphical user interface. When people have a problem with this driver, usually it is actually their graphics card or driver that is the problem. If you can, check to see that you are using the latest video card drivers available. If this doesn't fix it, at least you know what to focus on -- the video card.

    First off though, make sure you don't have a more general issue. Run MemTest86 (download the free ISO, burn the CD, boot from that CD, let it run the diagnostics). If you have memory errors, your memory timings might be off (fixable with a BIOS setting), or you might be running with non-recommended RAM for the motherboard, or just plain defective RAM.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Fristle wrote: »
    Nerissa wrote: »
    Oddly enough, I'm using a LinkSys card. I know this for a fact because we go out of our way to make sure to not mix companies with our networking hardware to minimize compatibility problems, so all of our cards, hubs, and routers are LinkSys. However, it is quite possible that I am using the drivers that came with XP -- I'll have to shut down my machine to get the model number and such to get the correct drivers, and I can't do that until the end of the work day, but I think that's probably my next step. If that doesn't work, it's not like network cards are expensive, I guess.

    Could it be an on-board ethernet adapter? If you are using a LinkSys card that is good news, it means you can possibly just disable this ADMTek adapter in the Device Manager and delete its driver (AN983.sys) and just never worry about it again.

    As near as I can tell, the MB doesn't have on-board ethernet ... The only thing I'm seeing under net Network Adapters in the device manager is my LinkSys card, my disabled wireless card, also LinkSys (which we tried to use when we first upgraded the router, but it failed in bad weather, which was unacceptable), and a 1394 adapter, although I don't see a FireWire connector anywhere either.

    Now that I think about it, this may very well be the only computer we have left NOT using either wireless or on-board ethernet, so I am starting to suspect it's a combination of the XP-included drivers with the LinkSys card.

    Nerissa on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Nerissa wrote: »
    Fristle wrote: »
    Could it be an on-board ethernet adapter? If you are using a LinkSys card that is good news, it means you can possibly just disable this ADMTek adapter in the Device Manager and delete its driver (AN983.sys) and just never worry about it again.

    As near as I can tell, the MB doesn't have on-board ethernet ... The only thing I'm seeing under net Network Adapters in the device manager is my LinkSys card, my disabled wireless card, also LinkSys (which we tried to use when we first upgraded the router, but it failed in bad weather, which was unacceptable), and a 1394 adapter, although I don't see a FireWire connector anywhere either.

    Now that I think about it, this may very well be the only computer we have left NOT using either wireless or on-board ethernet, so I am starting to suspect it's a combination of the XP-included drivers with the LinkSys card.

    If you run System Information (from Start Menu->Programs->Accessories->System), go to Components, then Network, then Adapter, can you find any adapter that thinks it is using AN983.sys for its driver?

    The driver "AN983.sys" does not ship with the OS. I am starting to think LinkSys uses an ADMTek chip on their cards. Do you have the Linksys LNE100TX Fast Ethernet Adapter? This model turns up alongside "AN983.sys" in Googling. If that's what you have, maybe you could download the latest driver from LinkSys and give that a shot. As for which one of those downloads is the correct one for you, it looks like you have to look at the card itself for the version you have.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Nerissa wrote: »
    ...my disabled wireless card, also LinkSys (which we tried to use when we first upgraded the router, but it failed in bad weather, which was unacceptable)

    It just occurred to me how bizarre it is, what you said. The LinkSys wireless card would not work when it rained outside? Seriously?

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Hmm...

    My card says it's LNE100TX v4.1 so I download the appropriate driver pack and extract it.

    I run the dos-based diagnostic and it says it can't find the card. I've just used the card to copy the drivers from the machine where I downloaded them, so I know it's seated properly, etc.

    It also doesn't seem to have XP drivers... Windows drivers I see are NT, ME, 2000, 98, 95, and (!) WFW3.11

    I'm thinking it's time to shell out the $10 or so for a new network card that comes with XP drivers.

    Nerissa on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Fristle wrote: »
    Nerissa wrote: »
    ...my disabled wireless card, also LinkSys (which we tried to use when we first upgraded the router, but it failed in bad weather, which was unacceptable)

    It just occurred to me how bizarre it is, what you said. The LinkSys wireless card would not work when it rained outside? Seriously?

    Well, it wasn't so much that it didn't work at all, it was more like the connection kept going up and down and my bandwidth dropped pretty harsh, but with several pcAnywhere sessions open at once much of the time, this really wasn't going to work for me. And it was a pretty heavy storm, like lightning and all.

    It's a Wireless-B card, connected to a Wireless-G router (the G card wouldn't stay connected for more than a few seconds at a time on this machine, I suspect it was a bad card). It worked wonderfully until the first thunderstorm hit. I'm in Florida, it's not like thunderstorms aren't going to be a daily occurrence once summer rolls around.

    Also, I'm notoriously bad for electronic devices. I once owned a cheapy digital watch that ran twice as fast as it should have, but only when I was actually wearing it. So this may all actually be my fault. :P


    ...and yes, System Information shows the AN983 driver for the LinkSys card. :(

    Nerissa on
  • s-wordss-words Registered User new member
    edited April 2007
    hmm, im burning the memtest iso right now, heres another dump with the lanalyze:

    ERROR: FindPlugIns 8007007b
    *******************************************************************************
    * *
    * Bugcheck Analysis *
    * *
    *******************************************************************************

    BAD_POOL_HEADER (19)
    The pool is already corrupt at the time of the current request.
    This may or may not be due to the caller.
    The internal pool links must be walked to figure out a possible cause of
    the problem, and then special pool applied to the suspect tags or the driver
    verifier to a suspect driver.
    Arguments:
    Arg1: 00000020, a pool block header size is corrupt.
    Arg2: 89649550, The pool entry we were looking for within the page.
    Arg3: 89649590, The next pool entry.
    Arg4: 0a080005, (reserved)

    Debugging Details:

    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

    ***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

    *************************************************************************
    *** ***
    *** ***
    *** Your debugger is not using the correct symbols ***
    *** ***
    *** In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path ***
    *** must point to .pdb files that have full type information. ***
    *** ***
    *** Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not ***
    *** contain the required information. Contact the group that ***
    *** provided you with these symbols if you need this command to ***
    *** work. ***
    *** ***
    *** Type referenced: nt!_POOL_HEADER ***
    *** ***
    *************************************************************************
    *************************************************************************
    *** ***
    *** ***
    *** Your debugger is not using the correct symbols ***
    *** ***
    *** In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path ***
    *** must point to .pdb files that have full type information. ***
    *** ***
    *** Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not ***
    *** contain the required information. Contact the group that ***
    *** provided you with these symbols if you need this command to ***
    *** work. ***
    *** ***
    *** Type referenced: nt!_POOL_HEADER ***
    *** ***
    *************************************************************************
    *************************************************************************
    *** ***
    *** ***
    *** Your debugger is not using the correct symbols ***
    *** ***
    *** In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path ***
    *** must point to .pdb files that have full type information. ***
    *** ***
    *** Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not ***
    *** contain the required information. Contact the group that ***
    *** provided you with these symbols if you need this command to ***
    *** work. ***
    *** ***
    *** Type referenced: nt!_POOL_TRACKER_BIG_PAGES ***
    *** ***
    *************************************************************************
    Cannot get _POOL_TRACKER_BIG_PAGES type size

    MODULE_NAME: nt

    FAULTING_MODULE: 804d7000 nt

    DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 42250a1d

    BUGCHECK_STR: 0x19_20

    POOL_ADDRESS: 89649550

    CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 2

    DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WRONG_SYMBOLS

    LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 80543c86 to 804f8925

    STACK_TEXT:
    WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
    bad0ba48 80543c86 00000019 00000020 89649550 nt+0x21925
    bad0ba98 ba5566ad 89649558 00000000 bad0baf8 nt+0x6cc86
    bad0baac ba5834fd 89649558 89cf0260 e15e1d20 Ntfs+0x66ad
    bad0bad0 ba55657a 8901b008 bad0baf8 bad0bb03 Ntfs+0x334fd
    bad0bb1c ba577d00 8901b008 89cf0100 e34ecc58 Ntfs+0x657a
    bad0bb74 ba552759 8901b008 e34ecd20 00000000 Ntfs+0x27d00
    bad0bba0 ba5756eb 8901b008 014ecd20 00000000 Ntfs+0x2759
    bad0bc24 ba57548a 8901b008 e34ecd20 e34ecc58 Ntfs+0x256eb
    bad0bcc4 804eddf9 89cf0020 899de780 89d3a740 Ntfs+0x2548a
    bad0bcdc 804eddf9 89d369a0 899de780 899de780 nt+0x16df9
    bad0bd24 805af547 00a83510 89a834f8 00000000 nt+0x16df9
    bad0bd40 80521e47 89a83510 00000000 00000000 nt+0xd8547
    bad0bd64 80507192 80557838 89336398 806d02d0 nt+0x4ae47
    bad0bd8c 80508936 e2ba6360 00000000 89e3e378 nt+0x30192
    bad0bdac 805c4a06 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt+0x31936
    bad0bddc 80540fa2 80508898 00000000 00000000 nt+0xeda06
    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt+0x69fa2


    STACK_COMMAND: kb

    FOLLOWUP_IP:
    nt+21925
    804f8925 5d pop ebp

    SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 0

    FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner

    IMAGE_NAME: ntoskrnl.exe

    SYMBOL_NAME: nt+21925

    BUCKET_ID: WRONG_SYMBOLS

    Followup: MachineOwner


    Any more insight would be greatly appreciated.

    s-words on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Nerissa wrote: »
    Hmm...

    My card says it's LNE100TX v4.1 so I download the appropriate driver pack and extract it.

    I run the dos-based diagnostic and it says it can't find the card. I've just used the card to copy the drivers from the machine where I downloaded them, so I know it's seated properly, etc.

    It also doesn't seem to have XP drivers... Windows drivers I see are NT, ME, 2000, 98, 95, and (!) WFW3.11

    I'm thinking it's time to shell out the $10 or so for a new network card that comes with XP drivers.

    Well, since we've gone to all this trouble, maybe there's still hope. I just downloaded this package for 4.1 myself to look. Ugh...g-h-e-t-t-o...and yea you're right, no XP drivers. But, you should be able to install the Windows 2000 driver and not have any issues. It will at least get rid of that disaster of a driver ADMTek wrote.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Fristle wrote: »
    Nerissa wrote: »
    Hmm...

    My card says it's LNE100TX v4.1 so I download the appropriate driver pack and extract it.

    I run the dos-based diagnostic and it says it can't find the card. I've just used the card to copy the drivers from the machine where I downloaded them, so I know it's seated properly, etc.

    It also doesn't seem to have XP drivers... Windows drivers I see are NT, ME, 2000, 98, 95, and (!) WFW3.11

    I'm thinking it's time to shell out the $10 or so for a new network card that comes with XP drivers.

    Well, since we've gone to all this trouble, maybe there's still hope. I just downloaded this package for 4.1 myself to look. Ugh...g-h-e-t-t-o...and yea you're right, no XP drivers. But, you should be able to install the Windows 2000 driver and not have any issues. It will at least get rid of that disaster of a driver ADMTek wrote.
    At this point, it can't hurt to try the W2K drivers, I guess... I was going to go pick up a newer model card last night, but I didn't have a chance to get out until it was too close to closing time to bother trying to get to Best Buy, and probably won't have another chance until Saturday. If the W2K drivers work, it'll save me a trip.

    Thanks muchly for all of your help :)

    Nerissa on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Damn computer is awfully insistant on using the an983 file... I uninstall the card and then do a scan for new hardware, and it installs using the file from the CAB before I even get a chance to tell it to use something else.

    !@#$%;^&*()

    Nerissa on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Update -- bought a newer version of the network card over the weekend (LNE100TX v5.1) and installed it, along with the provided XP drivers. I did it as thoroughly as I know how (uninstall card, shut down, remove card, boot up, kill remaining drivers, shut down, install new card, boot up, install provided drivers) so now it just remains to be seen whether it solves the problem or not. Since it came with XP drivers, and the newest version of the card to have drivers on the web site is 5.0, I figured I'd stick with what's on the CD for now.

    Oddly enough, the v4 card with the an983 driver is still showing up as the first thing under system info, and I had to scroll WAY down to find the actual (new) card, but it is, in fact, there.

    Nerissa on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Further update... it just reset again. This time, the culprit seems to be the LNE100V5 driver. *sigh*

    Could it be an actual hardware problem, like with the PCI slot or something?

    Alternately, maybe it's time to change brands...

    Nerissa on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Sorry to hear the problem persists. It really did look like it was the network driver, it could be time to look for something else. Have you done a RAM check? If not, download and burn the ISO for MemTest86 and boot from that so it can do the diagnostics. After that test, if you pass, you can have confidence that it's not the RAM.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.