The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Ebay Issue as a seller

OrestusOrestus Registered User regular
Just looking for some Ebay advice from anyone w/ more experience than I have.

About a month ago my wife asked me to sell a bunch of pieces of Jewelry that was found when she was going through her mother's old things (who passed away several years ago). I sold a few pieces over the last few weeks (this stuff is all in the 10 to 100 dollar range) and recently sold a gold necklace for $70. When I took it upstairs my wife flipped out...apparently this necklace had great sentimental value and was not intended to be in that pile, she had been looking for it for a long time, etc.

I immediately contacted the buyer, explained the situation, apologized, and refunded their money. I submitted a cancellation request through Ebay which requires the buyer to also confirm whether they agree to cancel the transaction or not. This morning I got a notification that the buyer had not agreed to cancel it and as such i would still be charged the Ebay sale fee as if I had sold the item (fine, no problem). Ebay lists the dispute as "closed".

I also got a message from the buyer attached to their refusal notification basically saying they wanted the necklace as a gift, that they understood my situation but that Ebay selling is not a game and that if necessary they would pursue legal action.

I get that I am in the wrong here but at the end of the day I'm more concerned about keeping my wife happy than getting negative Ebay feedback. The only thing that concerns me is this guys statement he would pursue legal action. I can't imagine someone would go to the trouble of filing a lawsuit against me to force me to complete a transaction made on Ebay (he's not out any $$ as I refunded him immediately) but who knows what kind of crazy people are out there. My plan at this point was just to ignore it from here on since Ebay is telling me the case is closed, but I wanted to run this by people w/ more experience. Is there anything I should do now to protect myself further? Should I respond back to the guy and tell him I'm sorry but I'm not going to be completing the transaction?

Posts

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Do you have proof you refunded his money?

    Paying ebay their share is small potatoes, the guy has no legal ground to stand on, as far as I know, since you gave him his money back. I'm not a lawyer, though.

    Keep records of everything, and tell him feel free to seek legal action against you. It's just a threat, there's nothing behind it he's just being a jerk because he can.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • GrisloGrislo Registered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    Do you have proof you refunded his money?

    Paying ebay their share is small potatoes, the guy has no legal ground to stand on, as far as I know, since you gave him his money back. I'm not a lawyer, though.

    Keep records of everything, and tell him feel free to seek legal action against you. It's just a threat, there's nothing behind it he's just being a jerk because he can.

    Don't do that, just on principle.

    But yeah, just have your documentation in order, and read up on Ebay's terms as they apply to you as the seller.

    Don't contact the buyer. Unless Ebay requests any further action from you, you're done.

    This post was sponsored by Tom Cruise.
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Yeah that's probably a good idea actually. Keep your heirloom.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • OrestusOrestus Registered User regular
    Yeah this was all done through paypal so I have the records that a refund was issued. I'll take some screenshots and print some copies of that transaction just so I can prove it if necessary.

    As much as I'd like to tell him to go ahead and sue me if he wants to waste his time I recognize nothing positive will come from that so my intention is to just not reply.

  • Dr. FrenchensteinDr. Frenchenstein Registered User regular
    edited September 2014
    yeah, don't reply to him anymore. people seem to think threatening legal action will make other people do whatever they want, even though they have no legal standing whatsoever. IANAL, but in a civil case you have to prove damages, since you refunded his money i doubt any judge in his right mind would award damages beyond that. this is no different from ordering something from amazon, them realizing the price was incorrect, and canceling your order. Annoying? yes. Actionable? no.

    Dr. Frenchenstein on
  • SixSix Caches Tweets in the mainframe cyberhex Registered User regular
    Yep, just ignore him.

    If you're really concerned, you might want to call eBay support. I've actually been impressed with the help they've given me in the past.

    can you feel the struggle within?
  • tarnoktarnok Registered User regular
    From a legal standpoint he _may_ technically be in the right, but I'm not certain a court would force you to sell it, not sure the buyer could figure out what court to sue you in, not sure he would even be able to serve you, and am dead certain that you'd both end up spending way more money than it would cost for him to just find another necklace.

    Wii Code:
    0431-6094-6446-7088
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    No one is going to sue for a 70 dollar item for which they got the money back. They are being a holes.

    Have your wife look through the rest of the stuff so it doesn't happen again.

    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Technically you are breaching the contract. I'm not sure what the remedy is since you already refunded his money. Like at the extreme outside it might be possible he gets a court order that you surrender the necklace but I'm not the least bit certain that would actually happen. To do that he will have spent multiple times the worth of that necklace to make it happen.

    Probably ignore it and be more careful in the future.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    Also wouldn't it not be actionable as the seller in this case wasn't the owner of the item anyhow (which would be the wife), making the contract immaterial?

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Enc wrote: »
    Also wouldn't it not be actionable as the seller in this case wasn't the owner of the item anyhow (which would be the wife), making the contract immaterial?

    You could probably argue that both ways, husbands and wives sharing assets, etc. It could also be an estate that they're clearing up.

    Either way, no judge in their right mind would give this dude anything.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    While I'd tell them to fuck right off your best course of action is to not engage anymore.

    Ebay was the broker and they consider the matter resolved.

    Generally I've found people who threaten to sue never do (it's just a tactic to get you to do what they want), and when you get sued you are totally blindsided. They certainly don't give you notice.

  • MyiagrosMyiagros Registered User regular
    Anyone with enough time and money to pursue legal action over a $70 ebay sale shouldn't be shopping on ebay.

    iRevert wrote: »
    Because if you're going to attempt to squeeze that big black monster into your slot you will need to be able to take at least 12 inches or else you're going to have a bad time...
    Steam: MyiagrosX27
  • kaliyamakaliyama Left to find less-moderated fora Registered User regular
    edited September 2014
    The measure of their dmages would be the spread between sale price and however much it cost them to find a comparable necklace. Spend a minute searching on eBay and get prices of comparable necklaces priced the same or less, and take screenshots of those too.

    Even if he filed a small claims action to be a nuisance, he'd have to serve you. So don't give him your address. He might be able to subpoena eBay for it, at which point t you've won because he's expended more effort and money finding you than he'd recover from you.

    kaliyama on
    fwKS7.png?1
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    kaliyama wrote: »
    The measure of their dmages would be the spread between sale price and however much it cost them to find a comparable necklace. Spend a minute searching on eBay and get prices of comparable necklaces priced the same or less, and take screenshots of those too.

    Even if he filed a small claims action to be a nuisance, he'd have to serve you. So don't give him your address. He might be able to subpoena eBay for it, at which point t you've won because he's expended more effort and money finding you than he'd recover from you.

    This is what I was thinking. First off: Don't respond to anything from him anymore that isn't actually a subpoena. He'll never get around to suing you, it'd be crazy.

    And if he was a batshit billionaire who WAS willing to sue you over a $70 necklace, worst case finding against you would be for like $100 anyway. And I'm sure you'd pay $100 to keep your wife happy if the necklace is that important. (And you won't have to, but seriously, impossible never gonna happen worst case scenario.)

    What is this I don't even.
  • BouwsTBouwsT Wanna come to a super soft birthday party? Registered User regular
    $0.02 I'm also guessing the legal threat is a scare tactic only, but possibly due to the fact that you've removed the item after sale for a reasonable amount they might be thinking this thing has some SERIOUS value? Like, now you don't want to sell it because it has a five figure value, kinda deal.

    Between you and me, Peggy, I smoked this Juul and it did UNTHINKABLE things to my mind and body...
  • alltheolivealltheolive Registered User regular
    Some people are just really angry. 98% of the time, if you did the same thing, the buyer would say "Ugh, bummer," and if possible MAYBE give negative feedback.

    Someone sent me a series of increasingly angry texts, eventually threatening to sue, because I didn't sell them a bike I advertised on Craigslist after I waited at our meeting place for 20 minutes and then had to leave for a meeting ("my sister is almost there and u will sell bike to her, 15 min"). There are individuals who can't handle the emotional roller coaster of amateur commerce, or I guess they sometimes get their way with these completely juvenile threats. I laugh about it now, but at the time I was worried the text message harassment wouldn't stop.

  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    BouwsT wrote: »
    $0.02 I'm also guessing the legal threat is a scare tactic only, but possibly due to the fact that you've removed the item after sale for a reasonable amount they might be thinking this thing has some SERIOUS value? Like, now you don't want to sell it because it has a five figure value, kinda deal.

    IANAL, but even if that's the case I don't think it matters. The value of the necklace would be what someone is willing to pay for it, and that's well established as $70.

    In either case, since the buyer's money was fully refunded and in a timely manner, I don't think they would have any legal case.

  • BouwsTBouwsT Wanna come to a super soft birthday party? Registered User regular
    zagdrob wrote: »
    BouwsT wrote: »
    $0.02 I'm also guessing the legal threat is a scare tactic only, but possibly due to the fact that you've removed the item after sale for a reasonable amount they might be thinking this thing has some SERIOUS value? Like, now you don't want to sell it because it has a five figure value, kinda deal.

    IANAL, but even if that's the case I don't think it matters. The value of the necklace would be what someone is willing to pay for it, and that's well established as $70.

    In either case, since the buyer's money was fully refunded and in a timely manner, I don't think they would have any legal case.

    I agree, just might explain some motive as to why an internet stranger would threaten to go to court over $70. I do agree though, it's very ridiculous.

    Between you and me, Peggy, I smoked this Juul and it did UNTHINKABLE things to my mind and body...
  • Anon the FelonAnon the Felon In bat country.Registered User regular
    It mortifies me that there is a human being who reads: "This was my wife's, and she didn't want me to sell it, and we miscommunicated and I accidentally listed it! Here's your money, sorry about the mistake!"

    And then makes a threat.

    Mortifies me.

  • OrestusOrestus Registered User regular
    It mortifies me that there is a human being who reads: "This was my wife's, and she didn't want me to sell it, and we miscommunicated and I accidentally listed it! Here's your money, sorry about the mistake!"

    And then makes a threat.

    Mortifies me.

    That's my main takeaway as well. I cannot conceive of a situation where my reaction would be the same as his, but its just more evidence that this type of person is out there and probably in greater numbers than any of us would like.

    I also forgot to mention in the OP that I'm fairly sure his message that this purchase was intended as a "precious gift" for someone is BS. Upon winning the auction he immediately sent me a note asking that when I send the item i provide the "gram weight" of the necklace in either an email or included in the shipment, so I'm fairly sure he is just a reseller or jeweler who is going to recycle it for the gold value...browsing through his feedback shows alot of purchases from Ebay usernames that sound like jewelry sellers as well.

    I greatly appreciate all the advice in this thread. It was greatly helpful in talking about what we should or shouldn't do w/ my wife the evening after I posted it. I don't really have an update at this point, I haven't heard anything further from him and I've not communicated with him at all after receiving his msg and having Ebay's automated service advise the case is closed. He has not yet left negative feedback either, maybe he still thinks I'll be sending the necklace...


  • darqnessdarqness KCMORegistered User regular
    Just refund them and be prepared for the eventual negative feedback. There's no legal recourse for this guy and he's trying to intimidate you. In my experience I get threatened with legal action over an eBay sale at least once per year. No one follows through, especially over a $70 item.

    If you don't have a great feedback score then this negative will also probably kill any future selling potential.

  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    darqness wrote: »
    Just refund them and be prepared for the eventual negative feedback. There's no legal recourse for this guy and he's trying to intimidate you. In my experience I get threatened with legal action over an eBay sale at least once per year. No one follows through, especially over a $70 item.

    If you don't have a great feedback score then this negative will also probably kill any future selling potential.
    Agreed, this is why there is a feedback system to begin with. I have had a couple of sellers refuse to sell me something and refund me the money, and in those cases I do the same thing. Neutral feedback, seller did not sell me item because of X, refunded money.

Sign In or Register to comment.