The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
We now return to our regularly scheduled PA Forums. Please let me (Hahnsoo1) know if something isn't working. The Holiday Forum will remain up until January 10, 2025.

Vaccination:Clark County Washington, Failing the rest of the state Since Inception

1568101194

Posts

  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    SyphonBlue wrote: »
    Marathon wrote: »
    This "alternative schedule" stuff is exactly what I'm talking about. No proof exists that it is medically necessary and all it does is further push distrust of vaccines at its core.

    Oooo this is a good point

    As soon as you start making concessions to these people, everyone starts saying "Oh so there is something fishy with these things or they wouldn't have done this!"

    Nobody moves a goalpost quite like an antivaxxer.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • This content has been removed.

  • CabezoneCabezone Registered User regular
    You're now arguing that because there are bad doctors, it totally makes sense for parents to disregard science.

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    I trust a doctor's years of experience, education, and familiarity with their patient to know if a child can start solid foods early.

    I do not trust SKFM's gut feeling on how long children can wait to be vaccinated.

  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    But you're comparig two completely dissimilar things. One is the motor skills of a child and the other is the function of their immune system.

    And you also talk about this as if the vaccination guidelines are made up arbitrarily, on the fly. I guarantee you a significant amount of study was done before recommending a specific vaccine at a specific time. Are those times universally good for every child, of course not, but I would be willing to bet you anything that it was selected to maximize benefit and reduce risk as much as possible.

  • This content has been removed.

  • SpaffySpaffy Fuck the Zero Registered User regular
    Spaffy wrote: »
    All this talk of the placebo effect is making wonder why we aren't investigating a ton of money into training better hypnotists.

    It's going to be awhile before that happens. Why don't you pass the time by playing a little solitaire?
    mcqueen.jpg

    WHY DID I JUST WAKE UP IN MY NEIGHBOURS YARD

    ALRIGHT FINE I GOT AN AVATAR
    Steam: adamjnet
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    If you have a parent with questions and concerns, you discuss them with the parent and tell them that the current vaccine schedule is safe and won't overload their child's immune system.

    You don't placate them by indulging their unfounded concerns, because all that does is add credence to the false impression that a real danger exists and spacing out the schedule is safer.

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited January 2015
    It's worth keeping in mind that doctors and medical scientists are not the same thing. Doctors are more like mechanics than engineers. A lot of doctors will happily ignore the science when it clashes with their opinions. Some doctors also don't consider Western medicine to be the only valid one, and will point patients toward something that their books wouldn't. Second opinions are a thing because of the fallibility of doctors.

    Incenjucar on
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    Today: "Why not just wait a little longer? Is that too much to ask? Y'know, just to be safe?"

    Tomorrow: "They agreed that it's safer to wait a little longer, clearly there's something to our beliefs, or they wouldn't have agreed to it!"

    Feeding people's unfounded concerns legitimizes them, which literally does more harm than good (both in their further decreased trust in the system/science, and leaving children unprotected for longer than necessary).

    Q: "What is the harm?"

    A: "The child becomes a potential disease vector, thereby potentially endangering themselves and others for no tangible public benefit. Assuaging irrational concerns in a possibly self-fulfilling manner is, full stop, counter productive."

    Whether or not a child is vaccinated and what that timeframe is should be based on working with a trained medical professional, not gut feeling and truthiness.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    That is not what I'm saying at all. I am saying that I can understand why parents would feel the way they do, and I don't think there is anything to gain by being as dismissive and condescending towards them as people often are.

    No, that is exactly what you are saying.
    AAP reccomendation is 12-15 months for MMR. 24 months is not that much longer, but is long enough to confirm a child is verbal in most cases. If that is enough to ease fears, then I think there should be real consideration given to moving it, just like how they removed the thimerisol for no real reason other than to make people more comfortable.

    "Real consideration" was put in to the schedule when it was created. "Real consideration" was put in to it when it was peer reviewed by other doctors/scientists. Anyone doubting that isn't looking for "real consideration. They're looking for an excuse.

  • programjunkieprogramjunkie Registered User regular
    And to reiterate, the reason we wait till 12 months to give MMR is because children are protected from those diseases "too well" up to that point. The goal is to have as as close to zero gap as possible without burning through extra doses of vaccine. You could actually be increasing length of susceptibility by tenfold, depending on the individual.

    I'm sure there is a specific estimate of number of dead babies per additional year of delay somewhere, I might try to track it down later.

  • Bluedude152Bluedude152 Registered User regular
    Iron_Lung_ward-Rancho_Los_Amigos_Hospital.gif

    Woops guess we waited to long my bad

    p0a2ody6sqnt.jpg
  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    It's worth keeping in mind that doctors and medical scientists are not the same thing. Doctors are more like mechanics than engineers. A lot of doctors will happily ignore the science when it clashes with their opinions. Some doctors also don't consider Western medicine to be the only valid one, and will point patients toward something that their books wouldn't. Second opinions are a thing because of the fallibility of doctors.

    The only time my wife heard her boss drop an f-bomb was when she was talking to him about anti-vaccers. He is a top rheumatologist that runs a research unit at one of the best research universities in the world.

    I will comfortably accept any arguments from authority on the topic he may make.

    When you personally know the people setting these standards, the ones who did the reawarch and peer review, you really realize the people calling them quacks really don't deserve any credit as should have their ridiculous beliefs mocked mercilessly.

  • tinwhiskerstinwhiskers Registered User regular
    I have three children, and because I breastfed and my third child was born at home I intersect with a community that believes in all of this stuff - the homeopathy, the chiro, and not vaccinating. You think that people who are anti-vax just read heard some rumor, or read some unsourced fear mongering on a mommy blog somewhere. That's incorrect. They have studied. They have read things. Unless any of you are medical professionals or work in public health I doubt you would be able to even argue with them on a fact basis, because they have all of these studies and statistics and what-have-you that they believe prove that they are right, and they have spent far more time on it than you have. They don't just have Jenny McCarthy and the one debunked Wakefield study. They didn't just hear a friend say "this has mercury in it" and that sounded scary and so they decided against it on a whim. The thing is I believe in vaccination, and my brother is a med student besides. So *I* haven't done the research they have done, so I can't say whether or not I would find it compelling. I just did what my kids' pediatrician said to do, and there are people who would say that is irresponsible. Hell, a tiny part of ME feels that not understanding why we do the things we do and just doing what we're told is irresponsible. Anyway, the point is that these people who don't vaccinate are the same people who spend a lot of time advocating for "evidence based" birth practices. They want science, they are looking for science to back them up, and they believe they have it. If I went to these people, these friends of friends, and asked them for sources for why they don't vaccinate I would be buried under an avalanche of things to read. I am not interested in reading those things, but I can do it if anyone is interested.

    The issue is the internet, as someone mentioned, but not just because like-minded people can more easily find each other. We are inundated with information. There are few barriers to it anymore. Even "mainstream" news sources will often run garbage. Now more than ever you have to be your own filter. And people who purvey "junk" science in order to sow doubt, or sell you something, or get their industries out of regulatory legislation (I have on and off been reading a fascinating book called Doubt is their Product by David Michaels but it is dense and long), are very good at what they do. I don't believe that the schooling most people had prepared them to be critical and skeptical of the sources of information we are now exposed to daily. Hell, I have a bachelor's degree in history and I don't feel that there was enough instruction on how to evaluate sources. There should be an entire course on nothing else.

    Anyway, I agree it is a problem for public health, I do vaccinate my kids, but you need to understand these people do not think their opinions are better than your facts. They don't believe it is an opinion, and they think they know better than you do.

    The bolded part is the key thing though. They don't "want science" they wan't science that supports what they already believe.

    6ylyzxlir2dz.png
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    I wonder what would happen if someone were asked "what evidence would be sufficient to change your mind?"

  • am0nam0n Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    I wonder what would happen if someone were asked "what evidence would be sufficient to change your mind?"

    The universe would collapse in on itself.

  • So It GoesSo It Goes We keep moving...Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    I wonder what would happen if someone were asked "what evidence would be sufficient to change your mind?"

    I was browsing the "vaccine" tag on imgur and remember one image where a woman said "Nothing you can show me will ever change my mind." So, there's an answer

  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    It's worth keeping in mind that doctors and medical scientists are not the same thing. Doctors are more like mechanics than engineers. A lot of doctors will happily ignore the science when it clashes with their opinions. Some doctors also don't consider Western medicine to be the only valid one, and will point patients toward something that their books wouldn't. Second opinions are a thing because of the fallibility of doctors.

    To be fair to modern medicine, a lot of medical schools are requiring medical students to take more laboratory science courses, work on research projects led by MD/PhDs and learn to practice "evidence-based" medicine. The fact that this is both necessary and still somewhat controversial with practicing doctors is an indictment of the previous state of medical education.

    And, if you get the School of Medicine faculty alone, they'll tell you that the reason universities are pushing this so hard is that they are tired of seeing their alumni backing junk science.

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    I wonder what would happen if someone were asked "what evidence would be sufficient to change your mind?"

    Moving-the-goalposts-300x2402.jpg

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    zagdrob wrote: »
    I'll note that one major blow in the developing world to vaccination efforts was the CIA using vaccinations as a way to get DNA samples to verify identities (i.e. in the hunt for Osama). That caused a distrust of WHO efforts and directly led to a resurgence of polio. Not that I think the CIA had a bad idea, but keep that kind of shit under wraps.

    It was a goddamn awful idea. Polio has killed more people than bin Laden could ever have dreamed of, and we had it nearly extinct.

  • SanderJKSanderJK Crocodylus Pontifex Sinterklasicus Madrid, 3000 ADRegistered User regular
    Removing thimerosal from vaccination has probably killed and wrecked a ton of lives. .. In Africa.

    The cost for vaccination has risen immensely and even countries that are stable and growing economically are getting into trouble paying for them.

    This massive increase is partially due to many new vaccines, but even if you compare the 6 earliest vaccines you are looking at a 600% increase in cost over the last 15 years.

    Steam: SanderJK Origin: SanderJK
  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    And thanks to the CIA's little stunt, Polio will kill more people then 9/11 in the future, including more then a few Americans.

    Thanks a lot assholes.

    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
  • HuuHuu Registered User regular
    We did in fact meet the anti-vaxers with respect and consideration and we did in fact accommodate their fears and beliefs. We did it by removing Thimerosol (sp?). That didn't make a single dent in the anti-vax movement. They just went on to the next thing (overloading their babies with too many pathogens I believe was the next one).

    So why should we meet them with respect and consideration and accommodate their beliefs this time?

  • tinwhiskerstinwhiskers Registered User regular
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    And thanks to the CIA's little stunt, Polio will kill more people then 9/11 in the future, including more then a few Americans.

    Thanks a lot assholes.

    There hasn't been a naturally occurring case of US polio since 1979, and even with the recent setbacks polio's global footprint was far larger through most of that time than it is now.

    6ylyzxlir2dz.png
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    edited January 2015
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    It's worth keeping in mind that doctors and medical scientists are not the same thing. Doctors are more like mechanics than engineers. A lot of doctors will happily ignore the science when it clashes with their opinions. Some doctors also don't consider Western medicine to be the only valid one, and will point patients toward something that their books wouldn't. Second opinions are a thing because of the fallibility of doctors.

    I, for one, have had several of my co-workers relate to me things their doctors told them that you can discredit with a quick check at Snopes. It's also not very reassuring that the medical community is increasingly questioning whether or not saturated fats cause heart disease when it was taken for granted for decades.

    It really is strange how pervasive certain public misconceptions about health are. For example, more people are apparently frightened by aspartame or brominated vegetable oil in sodas than they are the 40+ grams of sugar in a serving of non-diet pop.

    Hexmage-PA on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    One of the big issues with medicine being private and not public is that there's a lot more room for ulterior motives trumping science, which gives just enough BS for confirmation bias to go bonkers. Of course that WHO debacle also makes it easy to wonder at the government. There's a lot of room for paranoia when it's not always wrong. :(

  • This content has been removed.

  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Opty wrote: »
    There's a difference between removing thimerisol to appease wackjobs and keeping a child unvaccinated an extra year past the time their mother-given immunities start to disappear to appease wackjobs. The first is bad because it drives up the costs of vaccines due to their shelf life not being as long but it doesn't affect the patient in any way. The latter is bad because you're extending the time a child is first susceptible to infectious diseases from a month or so to a full year to appease wackjobs, potentially putting the child in danger.

    Also consider that, in the US, thimerosal started to be removed in 1999, as part of a nationwide review of mercury exposure from all sources. This was before the Wakefield study was thoroughly debunked, long before the Geiers started doing the talk show circuit, before Jenny McCarthy got in on the action, and before most of the huge meta-analyses establishing the lack of a link between autism and vaccines.

    At the time, given what was known then, removing thimerosal was a reasonable precaution. The risk was very low, but it wasn't zero. The maneuver wasn't merely appeasing whackjobs.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • mare_imbriummare_imbrium Registered User regular
    All of you advocating for calling CPS on anti-vaxxers and having their children taken away and forcibly vaccinated against their parents' wishes scare the bejeezus out of me. Do any of you advocating this have children of your own? Because goddamn. Some of the posts in here are bloodthirsty and it makes me worry what the next thing everyone will decide is child abuse. Yes, yes, everyone will say this is a special case due to the contagion factor, but the person advocating this stance said that we already do this with other non-contagious health issues and didn't seem incensed about that.

    Are there a lot of people in here who believe "so long as you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about?" I didn't think so, but maybe I was wrong. My greatest fear is someone deciding they don't like me, or don't like or misunderstand something I did or said to my kids and deciding that they need to get CPS involved. And then it isn't about the law, it isn't about freedom, it isn't about parenting philosophies or the government, it becomes making sure that you stay on the good side of someone who doesn't know you, making sure you don't piss them off or do anything wrong and hoping you don't have some personal, legal parenting practices that they don't happen to like or your kids are gone and you've got to get a lawyer and spend maybe months getting them back. You cooperate, and you say whatever they want you to say and do whatever they want you to do, no matter if you don't agree with it or they shouldn't be doing it or it's humiliating to have to go to parenting classes or whatever they make you do because they have a gun to your head called taking your kids.

    I cannot imagine mandatory vaccination will be a thing that happens. A much worse disease than measles is going to have to come back before that happens. They have mandated vaccination for years in the form of requiring them to attend public school, and even then they have always had a religious exemption. I can't imagine them ever being able to successfully do a blanket mandate for all, with no exemptions whatsoever except medical necessity. This is about what you can and cannot do with your own children and people would fight it and they would win. Because it will never become law, it seems more practical to me to figure out how we can increase compliance with the recommendations voluntarily. As has been mentioned, there has been some element of distrust in immunizations since the very beginning, but it waxes and wanes. We just need to make it wane again.

    But please understand that these people who choose not to vaccinate their children for whatever reason love their children and are trying to do what they think is best for them, and whatever it is you're doing - venting? - you're basically wishing for the second worst thing in the world to happen to them. I know you believe what's at stake is the worst thing in the world happening, but you know, these anti-vax people aren't saying "boy, I hope I cause some people's kids to die today." Nobody wants any kids to die. This is a complicated issue. I've been trying to figure out if the 1976 swine flu immunization program was mandatory or if they were just strongly urging everyone to get vaccinated and were immunizing everyone on the government's tab. Does anyone know? But if you're not familiar with the program, it is regarded as a disaster. I recommend reading up on it. I've seen mention of the CIA messing with immunization programs in other countries and damaging the trust people there had in the WHO. Why is it not also a priority to have the trust of our own people? No, instead we just advocate rounding them all up and ripping their kids out of their arms. Sheesh.

    v2zAToe.jpg
    Wii: 4521 1146 5179 1333 Pearl: 3394 4642 8367 HG: 1849 3913 3132
  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    edited January 2015
    All of you advocating for calling CPS on anti-vaxxers and having their children taken away and forcibly vaccinated against their parents' wishes scare the bejeezus out of me. Do any of you advocating this have children of your own? Because goddamn. Some of the posts in here are bloodthirsty and it makes me worry what the next thing everyone will decide is child abuse. Yes, yes, everyone will say this is a special case due to the contagion factor, but the person advocating this stance said that we already do this with other non-contagious health issues and didn't seem incensed about that.

    Are there a lot of people in here who believe "so long as you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about?" I didn't think so, but maybe I was wrong. My greatest fear is someone deciding they don't like me, or don't like or misunderstand something I did or said to my kids and deciding that they need to get CPS involved. And then it isn't about the law, it isn't about freedom, it isn't about parenting philosophies or the government, it becomes making sure that you stay on the good side of someone who doesn't know you, making sure you don't piss them off or do anything wrong and hoping you don't have some personal, legal parenting practices that they don't happen to like or your kids are gone and you've got to get a lawyer and spend maybe months getting them back. You cooperate, and you say whatever they want you to say and do whatever they want you to do, no matter if you don't agree with it or they shouldn't be doing it or it's humiliating to have to go to parenting classes or whatever they make you do because they have a gun to your head called taking your kids.

    I cannot imagine mandatory vaccination will be a thing that happens. A much worse disease than measles is going to have to come back before that happens. They have mandated vaccination for years in the form of requiring them to attend public school, and even then they have always had a religious exemption. I can't imagine them ever being able to successfully do a blanket mandate for all, with no exemptions whatsoever except medical necessity. This is about what you can and cannot do with your own children and people would fight it and they would win. Because it will never become law, it seems more practical to me to figure out how we can increase compliance with the recommendations voluntarily. As has been mentioned, there has been some element of distrust in immunizations since the very beginning, but it waxes and wanes. We just need to make it wane again.

    But please understand that these people who choose not to vaccinate their children for whatever reason love their children and are trying to do what they think is best for them, and whatever it is you're doing - venting? - you're basically wishing for the second worst thing in the world to happen to them. I know you believe what's at stake is the worst thing in the world happening, but you know, these anti-vax people aren't saying "boy, I hope I cause some people's kids to die today." Nobody wants any kids to die. This is a complicated issue. I've been trying to figure out if the 1976 swine flu immunization program was mandatory or if they were just strongly urging everyone to get vaccinated and were immunizing everyone on the government's tab. Does anyone know? But if you're not familiar with the program, it is regarded as a disaster. I recommend reading up on it. I've seen mention of the CIA messing with immunization programs in other countries and damaging the trust people there had in the WHO. Why is it not also a priority to have the trust of our own people? No, instead we just advocate rounding them all up and ripping their kids out of their arms. Sheesh.

    I don't need to understand these people or give a moments thought to whether they love their children. I understand the history of vaccination and the dangers of uncontrolled communicable diseases. I, quite literally, could not give a fuck what goes through the heads of people who do not vaccinate their children.

    This is not about them and their special feelings. It is about the children they put in danger by their ignorance. Fuck them. Bring the boot down hard before they start a pandemic.

    Phillishere on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    But please understand that these people who choose not to vaccinate their children for whatever reason love their children and are trying to do what they think is best for them

    The same could be said of somebody who puts a baby in a microwave to warm him up on a cold day.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    edited January 2015
    I have two children and I will be damned if I sit by and let someone endanger my children because some other parents are of the opinion that their unfounded concerns are more valid than decades of established science. Your right to do whatever you please with your children ends when those actions will also put my kids in danger.

    Dozens of innocent children that were visiting Disney Land, a place that children universally adore, are now at risk of contracting a disease that can disable them for the rest of their lives because of a group of parents that care more about their supposed instincts as a parent than actual evidence. They should feel horrible and we as a society should make sure they understand the severe consequence of their selfish actions.

    Marathon on
  • programjunkieprogramjunkie Registered User regular
    All of you advocating for calling CPS on anti-vaxxers and having their children taken away and forcibly vaccinated against their parents' wishes scare the bejeezus out of me. Do any of you advocating this have children of your own? Because goddamn. Some of the posts in here are bloodthirsty and it makes me worry what the next thing everyone will decide is child abuse. Yes, yes, everyone will say this is a special case due to the contagion factor, but the person advocating this stance said that we already do this with other non-contagious health issues and didn't seem incensed about that.

    Are there a lot of people in here who believe "so long as you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about?" I didn't think so, but maybe I was wrong. My greatest fear is someone deciding they don't like me, or don't like or misunderstand something I did or said to my kids and deciding that they need to get CPS involved. And then it isn't about the law, it isn't about freedom, it isn't about parenting philosophies or the government, it becomes making sure that you stay on the good side of someone who doesn't know you, making sure you don't piss them off or do anything wrong and hoping you don't have some personal, legal parenting practices that they don't happen to like or your kids are gone and you've got to get a lawyer and spend maybe months getting them back. You cooperate, and you say whatever they want you to say and do whatever they want you to do, no matter if you don't agree with it or they shouldn't be doing it or it's humiliating to have to go to parenting classes or whatever they make you do because they have a gun to your head called taking your kids.

    A situation which may both kill your kids and other people's kids is a higher standard than CPS normally operates on. I'm a big believer it balancing risk vs. other benefits, but unsupervised bomb making (for fun, not for intentionally malicious terrorism), which you allow the kids to bring said bombs to school, perhaps not such a good idea.
    I cannot imagine mandatory vaccination will be a thing that happens. A much worse disease than measles is going to have to come back before that happens. They have mandated vaccination for years in the form of requiring them to attend public school, and even then they have always had a religious exemption. I can't imagine them ever being able to successfully do a blanket mandate for all, with no exemptions whatsoever except medical necessity. This is about what you can and cannot do with your own children and people would fight it and they would win. Because it will never become law, it seems more practical to me to figure out how we can increase compliance with the recommendations voluntarily. As has been mentioned, there has been some element of distrust in immunizations since the very beginning, but it waxes and wanes. We just need to make it wane again.

    Honestly, the easier way to do it would be to just have jabs at school. Actually having people lose custody would take a Christmas miracle, because too many stupid parents who get their kids raped in the most obvious possible way to get a kid raped retain custody to worry about parents who are less terrible than that.
    But please understand that these people who choose not to vaccinate their children for whatever reason love their children and are trying to do what they think is best for them, and whatever it is you're doing - venting? - you're basically wishing for the second worst thing in the world to happen to them. I know you believe what's at stake is the worst thing in the world happening, but you know, these anti-vax people aren't saying "boy, I hope I cause some people's kids to die today." Nobody wants any kids to die. This is a complicated issue. I've been trying to figure out if the 1976 swine flu immunization program was mandatory or if they were just strongly urging everyone to get vaccinated and were immunizing everyone on the government's tab. Does anyone know? But if you're not familiar with the program, it is regarded as a disaster. I recommend reading up on it. I've seen mention of the CIA messing with immunization programs in other countries and damaging the trust people there had in the WHO. Why is it not also a priority to have the trust of our own people? No, instead we just advocate rounding them all up and ripping their kids out of their arms. Sheesh.

    Very few abusers, including those who kill their kids, claim they didn't love them. Their claims they love their kids, despite endangering them, mean nothing. Besides, it is a public safety issue. Even if I were to be so cruel as to let them kill their kids, I am far too selfish to allow them to kill me or my family.

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    The frothing really isn't super useful. Genuine anger doesn't require frothing to be expressed.

  • mare_imbriummare_imbrium Registered User regular

    This is not about them and their special feelings. It is about the children they put in danger by their ignorance. Fuck them. Bring the boot down hard before they start a pandemic.


    I didn't realize it was kosher on these boards to essentially wish death or other trauma on people who disagree with you. I was trying to demonstrate that, for those of us who actually have children, the threat of dealing with CPS is a serious thing and should not be taken lightly. We should try to keep this in mind instead of (to paraphrase) saying nothing because I was not an anti-vaxxer because we hope someone will stand up when they come for us.

    What about what I said about gaining the trust of our own citizens, the same way that we root for the WHO and various foundations to go in and vaccinate children in other countries for polio and various other diseases? Or do you also encourage armed forces to go into African villages and vaccinate and medicate children by force?

    I sincerely hope you are never within spitting distance of a position of authority on public policy.

    v2zAToe.jpg
    Wii: 4521 1146 5179 1333 Pearl: 3394 4642 8367 HG: 1849 3913 3132
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular


    I didn't realize it was kosher on these boards to essentially wish death or other trauma on people who disagree with you. I was trying to demonstrate that, for those of us who actually have children, the threat of dealing with CPS is a serious thing and should not be taken lightly. We should try to keep this in mind instead of (to paraphrase) saying nothing because I was not an anti-vaxxer because we hope someone will stand up when they come for us.

    I would contend that innocent children contracting deadly but preventable diseases is also not something to take lightly.

    Every reasonable, and even a few unreasonable, accommodations have been made for parents with concerns about vaccines and now that accomidation is coming back to hurt people who did the right thing.

  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    edited January 2015

    This is not about them and their special feelings. It is about the children they put in danger by their ignorance. Fuck them. Bring the boot down hard before they start a pandemic.


    I didn't realize it was kosher on these boards to essentially wish death or other trauma on people who disagree with you. I was trying to demonstrate that, for those of us who actually have children, the threat of dealing with CPS is a serious thing and should not be taken lightly. We should try to keep this in mind instead of (to paraphrase) saying nothing because I was not an anti-vaxxer because we hope someone will stand up when they come for us.

    What about what I said about gaining the trust of our own citizens, the same way that we root for the WHO and various foundations to go in and vaccinate children in other countries for polio and various other diseases? Or do you also encourage armed forces to go into African villages and vaccinate and medicate children by force?

    I sincerely hope you are never within spitting distance of a position of authority on public policy.

    This isn't some philosophical debate with people I don't agree with. As I said, I could give a fuck about what is inside their heads. It's the microbes in their children's bodies that I worry about.

    I actually am quite often in spitting distance of people with authority in public health. I work with them. They are furious at the anti-vaccination movement, because they have the mathematical knowledge of how many children will die because of these beliefs.

    And that's what this conversation is about. A small group of hardened ideologues are going to cause other people's children to die. That's not an exaggeration. That's not hyperbole. It's simply what will happen. Slow, painful death for innocent children that is 100 percent avoidable.

    Phillishere on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Or do you also encourage armed forces to go into African villages and vaccinate and medicate children by force?

    There are additional complications regarding international law, colonialism, and diplomacy in your example. But if we were talking domestically, we did once have armed men go door to door to forcibly vaccinate people against smallpox.

    I do not advocate forced vaccinations at this time - however, neither do I find the prospect intrinsically horrifying.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • programjunkieprogramjunkie Registered User regular
    edited January 2015

    This is not about them and their special feelings. It is about the children they put in danger by their ignorance. Fuck them. Bring the boot down hard before they start a pandemic.


    I didn't realize it was kosher on these boards to essentially wish death or other trauma on people who disagree with you. I was trying to demonstrate that, for those of us who actually have children, the threat of dealing with CPS is a serious thing and should not be taken lightly. We should try to keep this in mind instead of (to paraphrase) saying nothing because I was not an anti-vaxxer because we hope someone will stand up when they come for us.

    What about what I said about gaining the trust of our own citizens, the same way that we root for the WHO and various foundations to go in and vaccinate children in other countries for polio and various other diseases? Or do you also encourage armed forces to go into African villages and vaccinate and medicate children by force?

    I sincerely hope you are never within spitting distance of a position of authority on public policy.

    FWIW, as I mentioned, while smallpox is worse than any other communicable disease, we absolutely used force, not just police but actual military force, to vaccinate everyone regardless of their wishes. And the last case of smallpox was in 1978. It is nearly certain that no human will ever again get smallpox.

    There are multiple other diseases in the world today that would either be entirely eradicated, or nearly so, if it weren't for people refusing vaccination. People who don't get these vaccinations are not only harming people today, they are harming people decades, or god forbid, centuries from now.

    To me, preventing an evil from being vanquished from the entire rest of human existence is both totally incomprehensible, and exceedingly wicked.

    programjunkie on
Sign In or Register to comment.