The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

starcraft 2 beta -- PRETTY OBVIOUSLY FAKE NEWS DUDES

Boot2TheHeadBoot2TheHead Registered User regular
edited April 2007 in Games and Technology
I thought I'd be really excited about this... yet I'm not. I read that wiki post and I thought, meh, sounds like an upgrade to Starcraft. New units. New race. I call that an expansion.

Or it's all just a hoax.

http://www.maxfreak.com/starcraft2/archives/starcraft-2-wiki/

http://www.maxfreak.com/starcraft2/archives/ign-starcraft-2-beta-by-year-end/

Boot2TheHead on

Posts

  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Wait, what?!

    EDIT: I don't buy it. Blizzard has never shut down servers to ensure success of a sequel, ever. Diablo I and Warcraft II servers are still running, for fuck's sake. And if they're wrong about that they could well be wrong about everything else.

    Daedalus on
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Wait, what?!

    Sounds like what someone wants Starcraft 2 to be.

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • DeswaDeswa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    I dont trust a Wiki. Seems like a bunch of crap, everyone knows its a terrain/zerg hybrid for a fourth race.

    Deswa on
    gobassgo wrote:
    "It ain't rape, it's surprise sex!"
    wii : 3788 3264 2419 8070
  • MaladictMaladict Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    The articles in those links are pretty retarded..

    Maladict on
  • DroolDrool Science! AustinRegistered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Look at the names for the "new" Zerg units. "Hyperlisk, King, Bladeling," Blizzard is much better at coming up with cool names then that. They are also just bigger versions of other units. This is just one reason why you should take everything written in a Wiki with a grain of salt.

    Drool on
  • SlyJokerSlyJoker Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Deswa wrote: »
    I dont trust a Wiki. Seems like a bunch of crap, everyone knows its a terrain/zerg hybrid for a fourth race.

    I guess you didnt play the bonus Protoss missions in Brood War where you find tanks containing a prototype zerg/protoss... Including (I dont rmember his name, one of the later protoss heroes, he flew a ship)

    SlyJoker on
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    I smell another steaming pile of bullshit.

    STATE OF THE ART ROBOT on
  • AndorienAndorien Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    ITT: links to rampant speculation

    Andorien on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Andorien wrote: »
    ITT: links to rampant speculation

    One of these days, a Starcraft 2 thread will be made here with info straight from the horse's mouth.

    Henroid on
  • DeswaDeswa Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    SlyJoker wrote: »
    Deswa wrote: »
    I dont trust a Wiki. Seems like a bunch of crap, everyone knows its a terrain/zerg hybrid for a fourth race.

    I guess you didnt play the bonus Protoss missions in Brood War where you find tanks containing a prototype zerg/protoss... Including (I dont rmember his name, one of the later protoss heroes, he flew a ship)
    I may have, but that was ages ago. I do miss my exploding terrains.

    Deswa on
    gobassgo wrote:
    "It ain't rape, it's surprise sex!"
    wii : 3788 3264 2419 8070
  • darunia106darunia106 J-bob in games Death MountainRegistered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Sounds more like an expansion then an actual game. I call shenanigans.

    darunia106 on
    pHWHd2G.jpg
  • SamphisSamphis Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    If this is true, at all, we should see Starcraft 2 on like the ESRB pages or something, right?

    Samphis on
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Also, the regular starcraft players are going to come bitching up a storm if (probably) this isin't true.

    STATE OF THE ART ROBOT on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Samphis wrote: »
    If this is true, at all, we should see Starcraft 2 on like the ESRB pages or something, right?

    Games aren't typically rated until they go gold.

    Daedalus on
  • MinionOfCthulhuMinionOfCthulhu Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    It's a whole new game and each side gets two new units? That sounds more like an expansion then a whole new game.

    MinionOfCthulhu on
    mgssig.jpg1152dt.gif
  • EQDuffyEQDuffy Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    How many new units did humans get in Warcraft 3? Wasn't all that many. Orcs did better, and NE/Undead were both completely new, but still.

    Also, 2 brand new units and significant changes to existing units could make for a pretty different experience.

    EQDuffy on
  • Omnicron9999Omnicron9999 Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Guys, really?

    This is BS.

    Omnicron9999 on
  • MittenMitten Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Almost certainly bullshit.

    Mitten on
  • CarnivoreCarnivore Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Bitch wrote: »
    certainly bullshit.

    Carnivore on
    hihi.jpg
  • Little JimLittle Jim __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2007
    woah, guys, woah, what if the siege tanks fired zerglings?

    ZERGCANNON RUSH

    Little Jim on
    th_crabz.png
  • SimBenSimBen Hodor? Hodor Hodor.Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Any talk of sequel that describes a "couple new units" and "some new buildings" can't be anything but bull. We'll hear about new gameplay features long before any of that more-technical stuff.

    SimBen on
    sig.gif
  • OlivawOlivaw good name, isn't it? the foot of mt fujiRegistered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Seriously, it isn't even written very well.

    I have a feeling if Blizzard ever makes Starcraft 2, the announcement will be a total spectacle. At some big games show or convention or a press conference or some such. Not the editing of a Wikipedia entry. I mean it's Starcraft 2 for god's sake.

    Olivaw on
    signature-deffo.jpg
    PSN ID : DetectiveOlivaw | TWITTER | STEAM ID | NEVER FORGET
  • rayofashrayofash Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Is the Korean bit true? I thought it was confirmed that people from Blizzard met with top ranking Korean SC players to discuss gameplay elements of SC2.

    I guess only time will tell.

    rayofash on
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Casa GrandeRegistered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Man thats some asshole taking the Korean SC2 rumors from a week or 2 ago and then adding his own shit.

    Also SC2 isn't that farfetched, think these rumors come out and Blizzard announces Blizzcon within the same week.

    bloodyroarxx on
  • zhen_roguezhen_rogue Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Bullshit until I see it on blizzard's own website.

    zhen_rogue on
  • DoomninjaDoomninja Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Starcraft 2 will undoubtedly feature a Starbucks mini game, where a player can zerg rush his local Starbucks and acquire delicious venti zergling dolce lattes.

    starbucksw2copy.jpg

    (I just wanted to repost this >>.....<<...)

    Doomninja on
    1154825-1.png
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    You know, an expansion - rather than sequel - sounds somewhat plausible: the game is such a classic with such an entrenched fan-base, they may not want to update it significantly.

    But seriously, could anyone possibly read this line:
    and (one of our favorites), the ability to eject from a vehicle. Let’s say a Siege Tank is about to be destroyed, you can eject the person inside, and you’ll be able to run away, thus saving a person for later use. The people inside the vehicles will be statistically better than Marines, they’ll have more health, do more damage, and have better range.
    And not think that it was completely made up? :lol:

    Andrew_Jay on
  • ArcSynArcSyn Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    You know, an expansion - rather than sequel - sounds somewhat plausible: the game is such a classic with such an entrenched fan-base, they may not want to update it significantly.

    But seriously, could anyone possibly read this line:
    and (one of our favorites), the ability to eject from a vehicle. Let’s say a Siege Tank is about to be destroyed, you can eject the person inside, and you’ll be able to run away, thus saving a person for later use. The people inside the vehicles will be statistically better than Marines, they’ll have more health, do more damage, and have better range.
    And not think that it was completely made up? :lol:

    Completely made up.

    That, and if a siege tank is about to blow up, whatever is killing it is sure to kill that puny unit that comes out of it in short order.

    ArcSyn on
    4dm3dwuxq302.png
  • lordswinglordswing Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    It's a whole new game and each side gets two new units? That sounds more like an expansion then a whole new game.

    Rumors are that the three existing races get two new units, as well as a new race is added, while all being updated with a new engine. I think that warrants the term "new game"

    lordswing on
    D2:LoD East -> *FlipPaulHewitt
  • Omnicron9999Omnicron9999 Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    It's a whole new game and each side gets two new units? That sounds more like an expansion then a whole new game.

    Seriously, Blizzard wouldn't wait this long to come up with a few new units and buildings. SC2 will be much more deep than this.

    Look at any other huge franchise. Halo, Zelda, DMC, jesus there are too many... They all took a good deal of time between each iteration, and they added or changed a good deal between each.




    Blizzard knows what they're doing, its not this.

    Omnicron9999 on
  • CarnivoreCarnivore Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    zhen_rogue wrote: »
    Bullshit until I see it on store shelves

    Carnivore on
    hihi.jpg
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    Carnivore wrote: »
    zhen_rogue wrote: »
    Bullshit until I see it on store shelves, buy it, play it, and then read the ridiculous speculations about StarCraft 3 on the internet.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • FuruFuru Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    lordswing wrote: »
    It's a whole new game and each side gets two new units? That sounds more like an expansion then a whole new game.

    Rumors are that the three existing races get two new units, as well as a new race is added, while all being updated with a new engine. I think that warrants the term "new game"

    Considering how different every Blizzard sequel ever has been?

    I don't think so.

    It's poorly written bullshit on a Wiki with no confirmed sources backing it up whatsoever.

    Furu on
  • Captain KCaptain K Registered User regular
    edited April 2007
    man, what the shit, are you serious


    my thoughts on this thread are contained in the edited thread title.

    Captain K on
This discussion has been closed.