The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Legally take away a gift

Cody Nash Cody Nash Registered User new member
So around Christmas I asked for a computer and it was paid for and purchased buy my dads girlfriend. It was given to me as present. I took the computer to my moms house and have been using it ever since. But I missed my birthday at my dads and she believes I don't spend enough time at his house so she's making me take the computer to my dads (which by the way I would be unable to use there to do internet problems) but my question is

Can she make me take the computer she gave me to my dads. She bought it but gave it to me as a present. Is it mine or hers legally ?

Posts

  • DaimarDaimar A Million Feet Tall of Awesome Registered User regular
    A present is yours to do with as you see fit.

    However, it sounds like you are a minor (apologies if you are not) so I don't know what property ownership rules around minors are. It shouldn't matter though since your dad's girlfriend sounds like she is trying to use the gift to manipulate you, I'd try to have a conversation with him about it since she is not your guardian.

    steam_sig.png
  • FoomyFoomy Registered User regular
    I am assuming your under 18.

    It is yours legally, but parental guardians have the right to take away possessions from minors as long as they aren't selling/destroying them.

    As she's just your dads girlfriend you don't have to listen to her, but that may put strain on any relationship between you and your dad as he would have to get in the middle of it.

    Steam Profile: FoomyFooms
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Foomy has it.

    If it's at your mother's how is it going to get to your father's without your involvement? Being underage means property is essentially your guardians, though, I don't think selling/destroying covers minor's property either.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    ...a computer is an extraordinarily expensive gift to just give someone. I think you should cut her some slack and bring it back to your dads. Sure, you technically may not have to but it's probably the right thing to do. Unless you can make a legitimate argument that you spend the school week at your moms, and need it for school work. In which case move it when school gets out for summer.

  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    dispatch.o wrote: »
    ...a computer is an extraordinarily expensive gift to just give someone. I think you should cut her some slack and bring it back to your dads. Sure, you technically may not have to but it's probably the right thing to do. Unless you can make a legitimate argument that you spend the school week at your moms, and need it for school work. In which case move it when school gets out for summer.

    Counterpoint: If you have to bribe a kid into liking you the issue is probably not the bribe.

    Though that the Dad's attitude towards this hasn't been mentioned isn't a great sign. I'd advise OP to talk to the Dad alone about this and forget the legal aspect.

    Edit: I mean, personally I'd just mail the fucking computer back to her since I hate that sort of controlling shit but I appreciate that young folks have much less access to resources like that.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    dispatch.o wrote: »
    ...a computer is an extraordinarily expensive gift to just give someone. I think you should cut her some slack and bring it back to your dads. Sure, you technically may not have to but it's probably the right thing to do. Unless you can make a legitimate argument that you spend the school week at your moms, and need it for school work. In which case move it when school gets out for summer.

    And she is attempting to be extremely controling and manipulative. This is not something that leads to healthy productive relationships. I would recommend talking with his father about it and just ignoring her as much as possible. She does not appear interested in a healthy relationship.

    Gifts are not weapons nor leverage to be used against someone. You don't get to give something then dictate terms since she is not a custodial guardian.

  • Forbe!Forbe! Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    Edit: I mean, personally I'd just mail the fucking computer back to her since I hate that sort of controlling shit but I appreciate that young folks have much less access to resources like that.

    This.

    Having dealt with this type of narcissistic bullshit before, I would just take the computer back to your dad's house, and never use it. Honestly, people like this give gifts and think it provides them some sort of leverage over you, as if they are giving you a gift with the sole intent that some sort of attention, or favor will be returned at a future date.

    If you don't return it and your father stays with this person for a while, you will certainly hear about it again.

    Assuming you are underage, I would probably just bring it back to be in compliance with your guardian and not cause yourself further problems. Is it right? Probably not. But honestly, I would just do it to avoid any further headache, and figure out how to get your own computer.

    Edit:

    To more directly answer the ops question, it all probably hinges on your status as a minor or adult. IANAL, as an adult, a gift is yours, unless there are extenuating circumstances, like the gifted object not being lawfully obtained by the gift giver. If you are a minor, you are probably out of luck, or any legal course you take would probably put a much more significant strain on your familial relationship than the strain of simply complying with your father/father's girlfriend's wishes.

    Forbe! on
    bv2ylq8pac8s.png
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    Except it depends on the reason he was given the computer. If she bought a PS4 so they could play games together and then he just took it to his moms the reaction would be different I suspect. I've known families who enjoyed playing flight sims and strategy games together sharing a single PC. If you accept a gift and then just take it and fuck you see you next year, that's kind of bullshit. It may not be intentional, but depending on the spirit of the gift it may be how she views it. I also suspect just the birthday isn't the entire story as to why she wants it brought back.

    Edit: I would also agree that gifts and bribes are not a way to make someones kid like you. Talking legal ways of keeping something that was given as a gift to a minor doesn't seem reasonable to me unless you want to escalate the situation and put dad in a horrible position. Which I guess may be the goal.

    Edit2: Christmas was only 5 months ago. This seems like a strange escalation in 5 months.

    dispatch.o on
  • kimekime Queen of Blades Registered User regular
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    Battle.net ID: kime#1822
    3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
    Steam profile
  • Forbe!Forbe! Registered User regular
    kime wrote: »
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    Yeah, it just sounds familiar and tugged at my emotions a bit.

    But honestly, without more information, op, both sides of the story are completely valid.

    bv2ylq8pac8s.png
  • LostNinjaLostNinja Registered User regular
    kime wrote: »
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    This. Her saying OP doesn't spend enough time at their dad's makes me think it's something him (OP's dad )and her have discussed with him showing remorse over it, and this is just her attempt at trying to help the situation.

    This of course is just an alternate possibility.

  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    kime wrote: »
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    I am open to this concept, but can't think of a single way in which it would really play out. Giving gifts and then trying to leverage that into specific behavior is by definition manipulative and controlling. There's no two ways about that. Now there is certainly a lot of room in this story for the girlfriend to not be some terrible person but just a person out of their depth dealing with a teenager. That doesn't change the facts of this specific interaction though.

  • kimekime Queen of Blades Registered User regular
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    kime wrote: »
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    I am open to this concept, but can't think of a single way in which it would really play out. Giving gifts and then trying to leverage that into specific behavior is by definition manipulative and controlling. There's no two ways about that. Now there is certainly a lot of room in this story for the girlfriend to not be some terrible person but just a person out of their depth dealing with a teenager. That doesn't change the facts of this specific interaction though.

    Not for a minor necessarily, no. If you give a teenager (not saying the OP necessarily is, but continuing your example) a PS4, and then they spend 30 hours a week in the basement playing it, it is not "manipulative and controlling" to say "you don't get to play any more video games until you spend more time with your family."

    I mean, I guess technically it is "manipulative and controlling," but only technically and not at all with the meaning that you were intending.

    For the OP's scenario, only they can really tell. I think, like others have recommended (yourself included), talking with the Dad and maybe the girlfriend together is the best way to go about this. I just think that for you to advise going into that with the attitude that the girlfriend is being "extremely controlling and manipulative" is bad advice for the OP given what we know, and has the potential to cause more problems than it solves.

    Battle.net ID: kime#1822
    3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
    Steam profile
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    kime wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    kime wrote: »
    There is certainly an interpretation of the story where she isn't being "extremely controlling and manipulative," though. It may be good to keep that in mind before assuming she's that bad with only a glimpse of the events here.

    I am open to this concept, but can't think of a single way in which it would really play out. Giving gifts and then trying to leverage that into specific behavior is by definition manipulative and controlling. There's no two ways about that. Now there is certainly a lot of room in this story for the girlfriend to not be some terrible person but just a person out of their depth dealing with a teenager. That doesn't change the facts of this specific interaction though.

    Not for a minor necessarily, no. If you give a teenager (not saying the OP necessarily is, but continuing your example) a PS4, and then they spend 30 hours a week in the basement playing it, it is not "manipulative and controlling" to say "you don't get to play any more video games until you spend more time with your family."

    I mean, I guess technically it is "manipulative and controlling," but only technically and not at all with the meaning that you were intending.

    For the OP's scenario, only they can really tell. I think, like others have recommended (yourself included), talking with the Dad and maybe the girlfriend together is the best way to go about this. I just think that for you to advise going into that with the attitude that the girlfriend is being "extremely controlling and manipulative" is bad advice for the OP given what we know, and has the potential to cause more problems than it solves.

    There is a difference in the stated case here. Not allowing someone to goof off because they have work to do and you are attempting to teach work ethic is one thing. This is not remotely the case here.

    There is no discernable long term benefit to spending time with one parent over another independent of a lot of other variables. Nor is it the girlfriends place to strong arm a better developed relationship between the two which is what she is trying to do. Forcing this type of interaction will accomplish squat long term, and cause the person to form serious resentment.

    There are reasons the OP is not over there more often. Reasons that this does not address. This is removing an object of some importance to the person in an effort to strong arm them past the other resistance and not deal with the underlying issues.

    Basically just because an action is justifiable some of the time with a child does not make it always justifiable. Teens are also a fully different beast than smaller children and this kind of strong arm tactics do not work under the best of circumstances.

    Edit: I would also add this is the girlfriend injecting herself into the relationship between the two. Apparently with limited to no involvement from the father here as he was not brought in as a factor. Its a mess of bad stuff going on here.

    Gnizmo on
  • kimekime Queen of Blades Registered User regular
    You don't know what the case is here. The context wasn't given. For now, only the OP knows that, so all I suggested was it's best to not make assumptions on that context when you don't know it. You seem to just be making more and more assumptions as we go, too :(.

    If the OP would like more specific advice, they could always give more details. I just don't think it's very responsible to give the OP advice that is assuming one of two extremes without any evidence to back that up. That's all :)

    Battle.net ID: kime#1822
    3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
    Steam profile
  • Inquisitor77Inquisitor77 2 x Penny Arcade Fight Club Champion A fixed point in space and timeRegistered User regular
    Seriously, the OP is clearly a minor in what appears to be a complex family situation. I would caution against projecting based on extremely limited information, which a lot of people seem to be doing.

    Using words like words like "manipulative" and "controlling" is a huge leap of logic that none of us should feel comfortable using, especially given the OP is apparently considering legal options for what appears to be a rather simple case of a parental figure giving a gift and then trying to add stipulations to its use (e.g., I bought you this video game system but you can't use it unless you have finished all your homework). There is just way too much floating around right now for anyone to be giving definitive advice either way.

    OP, if you're looking for actual legal advice, then I recommend you visit a lawyer. Even as a minor, you do have that option. Otherwise, I'm not sure what you are looking for here, as going on the internet to get people's opinions is not going to help make your case in this situation. What are you going to do, tell your dad's girlfriend that, "People on the internet said this is legally mine so I can do what I want with it"? Even if that were factually true, it would not lead to a meaningful resolution of the situation. In fact, it would likely escalate whatever problems are going on.

  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Eh, assuming "dads girlfriend" is a parental figure is a bit of a stretch especially given that it is heavily implied that dad is non-custodial.

    I don't see how you can argue the attempt to dictate the terms of how a gift may be used is anything but manipulative. We give a pass to parents manipulating their children but I really do not think we've been given anything here to imply she is a "parent" except that she's in a relationship with OPs father.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • kimekime Queen of Blades Registered User regular
    We've barely been given anything. It's like, a hundred words. I think you could be filling in the blanks with your own preconceptions. Which is fine until we start using that to pass off advice which could be very wrong.

    Battle.net ID: kime#1822
    3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
    Steam profile
  • Local H JayLocal H Jay Registered User regular
    My (divorced) parents pulled this crap all the time as a kid. I say, unless it really hurts your relationship with your father and his girlfriend, just keep it at your mom's. Unless she handed it to you with explicit instructions to use it only in your father's house, she doesn't have ground to stand on. Tell them if they want you to use the computer there to figure out the internet first, especially if you use the computer for school and not just gaming/entertainment. If she didn't want to to use it however you wanted, she should have gotten it for herself and said you can use it with her permission.

  • hsuhsu Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    A $1000 gift comes with strings attached. If you don't like the strings, return the gift.

    If you keep the gift, you need to play by the unspoken rules (although they were spoken loud and clear in this case) or there will be repercussions in the future.

    Even my family where my parents stuck together through thick and thin, this shit happened all the time with my siblings and I. You either accept the strings or refuse the gift. Accepting the gift, but refusing the strings, is the worst option, and will come back to bite you 10 times harder later than simply accepting the strings or refusing the gift.

    hsu on
    iTNdmYl.png
  • Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    hsu wrote: »
    A $1000 gift comes with strings attached. If you don't like the strings, return the gift.

    If you keep the gift, you need to play by the unspoken rules (although they were spoken loud and clear in this case) or there will be repercussions in the future.

    Are you willing to be disowned by your dad? Because that's worse case scenario here.

    thats a bit much

  • MichaelLCMichaelLC In what furnace was thy brain? ChicagoRegistered User regular
    I'd go buy/find the cheapest piece of crap computer I could find in a dumpster or garage sale and bring that over to the father's house.

    Really though, return to the girlfriend and have a chat with your dad & gf about this. This is not good behavior regardless of anyone's age.

  • KarlKarl Registered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    hsu wrote: »
    A $1000 gift comes with strings attached. If you don't like the strings, return the gift.

    If you keep the gift, you need to play by the unspoken rules (although they were spoken loud and clear in this case) or there will be repercussions in the future.

    Are you willing to be disowned by your dad? Because that's worse case scenario here.

    thats a bit much

    He did say "worst case" here.

    Honestly I would speak to the Dad. If this has boiled down to you not spending enough time with him, maybe you should do that and this will be forgotten.

  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    hsu wrote: »
    A $1000 gift comes with strings attached. If you don't like the strings, return the gift.

    If you keep the gift, you need to play by the unspoken rules (although they were spoken loud and clear in this case) or there will be repercussions in the future.

    Even my family where my parents stuck together through thick and thin, this shit happened all the time with my siblings and I. You either accept the strings or refuse the gift. Accepting the gift, but refusing the strings, is the worst option, and will come back to bite you 10 times harder later than simply accepting the strings or refusing the gift.

    That is extremely unhealthy to say the least. Using gifts as leverage is never the best idea. I don't disagree there will be repercussions for ignoring the request, but you should never give nor receive a gift with strings attached. Solving problems through manipulation is never something you should plan on.

    There is a key difference I think people might be missing, and this will likely be my last post on the subject. You don't give a kid a PS4 as a way to take it away from them later for misbehaving. You give them one because you feel they deserve it using whatever definition of deserve you like. If later this proves to be a distraction then you limit use, but never go in with the intention of using it as a weapon. I also advise against using it to force family interaction, but that is just my general professional opinion on ways to bond with your kid. Or half of it. The other half being engage in something they actually want to do rather than force them into what you want. Obviously there are exceptions.

    To bring it I guess fully on topic the ultimate decision is up to your mother kid. Supposing you are a minor she has full control over anything in her house. Your father clearly does not have court mandated custodial rights which pretty much kills any options he has. His girlfriend has zero rights to any of your stuff, or anything to do with you at all honestly.

  • SatanIsMyMotorSatanIsMyMotor Fuck Warren Ellis Registered User regular
    @Gnizmo you're making a mountain out of a molehill here and are potentially looking at the world through rose colored glasses. The OP is pretty clearly a minor and very often times giving gifts to children really do come with strings attached - and there's no real problem with that. Filling a young person's head with ideas that they're being manipulated is potentially misleading.

    Here's a scenario for you, maybe OP's dad's GF knows OP likes to play games and didn't have a way to do so previously @ his father's. Buying him said PC could be a means to provide him a gaming outlet WHILE at his father's. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact it's extremely generous.

    I'm not saying that IS the scenario (as OP hasn't given those details) but it's every bit as likely as the conclusions you're jumping to.

    OP - my advice to you is the same as some others. Talk to your dad and his GF about this. It's not about the PC - it's about spending time with your family.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    It's likely a simpler explanation rather than "strings attached".

    It was probably just a simple gift. However, they probably assumed you would keep it in their house since it was their gift, and it wasn't really a cheap one. Adults, like all human beings, are not logical or perfect beings. They likely feel slighted that you're using this at your mothers as it was a gift from them/her. And thus, reacted like someone who is emotional would.

    The proper course, like others have said, is to talk and explain why it's impractical. Talk about the pros and cons of what you're doing and what they want you to do. Explain how you're using it for school and need (good) internet access (hopefully those are the reasons).

    However, maybe just bring it with you back and forth might be a simple enough solution!

    Something like this might work:
    http://www.amazon.com/ThinkGeek-GearGrip-Pro-Large-Size/dp/B00021UJ62

    Don't come at this like you're angry or upset and throwing accusations that someone's manipulative because that will just exacerbate the situation.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • CambiataCambiata Commander Shepard The likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered User regular
    Young people can be manipulated unhealthily by adults just as fellow adults can. Granted that by parents there is some allowable manipulation (as with the example of a parent telling a child they can't play on the computer until their homework is done), but the girlfriend is not a parent. Telling kids that any manipulation is OK is not a healthy thing to impart. "If someone buys you something expensive then it's OK for them to control you" is a pretty icky message, and can lead to some dark places if the kid internalizes it.

    In this day and age, a computer is absolutely necessary just to be able to do homework. Given that the dad's place doesn't have reliable internet, it seems like the girlfriend is just crippling his ability to do homework. If I were him I'd speak to his actual parents about this and see what they say.

    "excuse my French
    But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
    - Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    Gnizmo you're making a mountain out of a molehill here and are potentially looking at the world through rose colored glasses. The OP is pretty clearly a minor and very often times giving gifts to children really do come with strings attached - and there's no real problem with that. Filling a young person's head with ideas that they're being manipulated is potentially misleading.

    Here's a scenario for you, maybe OP's dad's GF knows OP likes to play games and didn't have a way to do so previously @ his father's. Buying him said PC could be a means to provide him a gaming outlet WHILE at his father's. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact it's extremely generous.

    I'm not saying that IS the scenario (as OP hasn't given those details) but it's every bit as likely as the conclusions you're jumping to.

    OP - my advice to you is the same as some others. Talk to your dad and his GF about this. It's not about the PC - it's about spending time with your family.

    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    There is also no ambiguity as to the child being manipulated, and hiding that is far, far worse than the alternative. There simply is no argument as to whether or not "do what I say or else stuff" is anything but controlling and manipulative. The only room for discussion is if the manipulation and control exerted is in the child's best interest. I have made my case for why I think it is not.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Cambiata wrote: »
    Young people can be manipulated unhealthily by adults just as fellow adults can. Granted that by parents there is some allowable manipulation (as with the example of a parent telling a child they can't play on the computer until their homework is done), but the girlfriend is not a parent. Telling kids that any manipulation is OK is not a healthy thing to impart. "If someone buys you something expensive then it's OK for them to control you" is a pretty icky message, and can lead to some dark places if the kid internalizes it.

    In this day and age, a computer is absolutely necessary just to be able to do homework. Given that the dad's place doesn't have reliable internet, it seems like the girlfriend is just crippling his ability to do homework. If I were him I'd speak to his actual parents about this and see what they say.

    It's hard to say one way or another because we're getting a kid's view of what's happening. And we're probably not getting all the information. But it's always a better tactic to act sane and rational when talking to someone who's manipulative. If you act in kind, it just makes everything that much worse.

    On the plus side, if they start screaming about this or that because you're acting kind and not throwing accusations, you have your answer on if they were being manipulative.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • SatanIsMyMotorSatanIsMyMotor Fuck Warren Ellis Registered User regular
    To say there's no ambiguity to a situation whereby you're only given one POV seems somewhat presumptuous. I stand by my post above.

    OP - just talk to your parents.

  • kimekime Queen of Blades Registered User regular
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    That's actually the exact thing I was trying to tell you :). I can't quite figure out the proper/polite way to say this, so apologies for the bluntness:

    You are very biased in this situation, and this bias is causing you to make many assumptions about the OP's situation. The advice you are giving could very negatively impact the OP's relationship with their dad/mom/dad's girlfriend/etc. I think you should take a step back and tone down the rhetoric until/unless we learn more about the situation.

    Battle.net ID: kime#1822
    3DS Friend Code: 3110-5393-4113
    Steam profile
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    Gnizmo you're making a mountain out of a molehill here and are potentially looking at the world through rose colored glasses. The OP is pretty clearly a minor and very often times giving gifts to children really do come with strings attached - and there's no real problem with that. Filling a young person's head with ideas that they're being manipulated is potentially misleading.

    Here's a scenario for you, maybe OP's dad's GF knows OP likes to play games and didn't have a way to do so previously @ his father's. Buying him said PC could be a means to provide him a gaming outlet WHILE at his father's. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact it's extremely generous.

    I'm not saying that IS the scenario (as OP hasn't given those details) but it's every bit as likely as the conclusions you're jumping to.

    OP - my advice to you is the same as some others. Talk to your dad and his GF about this. It's not about the PC - it's about spending time with your family.

    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    There is also no ambiguity as to the child being manipulated, and hiding that is far, far worse than the alternative. There simply is no argument as to whether or not "do what I say or else stuff" is anything but controlling and manipulative. The only room for discussion is if the manipulation and control exerted is in the child's best interest. I have made my case for why I think it is not.

    This was never said. We got a paragraph where he states "she's making me take the computer to my dad's". Which.. I don't know what that means.

    Did she said "or else" or did she ask him politely if he would do it? What? We don't have the information to make any of these assumptions.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    kime wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    That's actually the exact thing I was trying to tell you :). I can't quite figure out the proper/polite way to say this, so apologies for the bluntness:

    You are very biased in this situation, and this bias is causing you to make many assumptions about the OP's situation. The advice you are giving could very negatively impact the OP's relationship with their dad/mom/dad's girlfriend/etc. I think you should take a step back and tone down the rhetoric until/unless we learn more about the situation.

    The counterpoint you are ignoring is that her actions are manipulative. We do not know, yet you continue to assume, she should enjoy the pass we give to parents manipulating their children for their own good despite we have been told she is not the OPs parent.

    Further, we know that the stated goal of this manipulation is to increase the time spent at the OPs fathers. I would submit that such actions are highly suspect and not how you go about improving any healthy relationship. She may have laudable goals but trying to build a relationship on manipulation is a huge red flag.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    edited April 2016
    bowen wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    Gnizmo you're making a mountain out of a molehill here and are potentially looking at the world through rose colored glasses. The OP is pretty clearly a minor and very often times giving gifts to children really do come with strings attached - and there's no real problem with that. Filling a young person's head with ideas that they're being manipulated is potentially misleading.

    Here's a scenario for you, maybe OP's dad's GF knows OP likes to play games and didn't have a way to do so previously @ his father's. Buying him said PC could be a means to provide him a gaming outlet WHILE at his father's. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact it's extremely generous.

    I'm not saying that IS the scenario (as OP hasn't given those details) but it's every bit as likely as the conclusions you're jumping to.

    OP - my advice to you is the same as some others. Talk to your dad and his GF about this. It's not about the PC - it's about spending time with your family.

    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    There is also no ambiguity as to the child being manipulated, and hiding that is far, far worse than the alternative. There simply is no argument as to whether or not "do what I say or else stuff" is anything but controlling and manipulative. The only room for discussion is if the manipulation and control exerted is in the child's best interest. I have made my case for why I think it is not.

    This was never said. We got a paragraph where he states "she's making me take the computer to my dad's". Which.. I don't know what that means.

    Did she said "or else" or did she ask him politely if he would do it? What? We don't have the information to make any of these assumptions.

    We do. Spend more time at your Dad's or else we are taking to computer from where you willingly spend most of your time. I don't disagree with anything you have suggested, but it takes zero assumptions to see the control and manipulation through gifts here. We just came in at the end after the kid has called the bluff.

    Edit: Or if you like, if you want to use that computer you like/need then you better do it over here. Want to take "your" property wherever you like? Meet my demands. All of this is relatively normal from a parent. Parents are often controlling and manipulative with kids and that can be good or bad. She is not a parent.
    kime wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    I assure you the one thing I can never do again is look at interactions with children through rose colored glasses. I am looking at it through the lenses of someone who has spent years and years as a social worker and counselor working with children and families this entire time.

    That's actually the exact thing I was trying to tell you :). I can't quite figure out the proper/polite way to say this, so apologies for the bluntness:

    You are very biased in this situation, and this bias is causing you to make many assumptions about the OP's situation. The advice you are giving could very negatively impact the OP's relationship with their dad/mom/dad's girlfriend/etc. I think you should take a step back and tone down the rhetoric until/unless we learn more about the situation.

    I have been pulling back. Notice I am only responding to people @ing and quoting me. My last bit of direct advice was a simple analysis of the legal situation which is what has been requested. In fact I have held of any in depth analysis since it appears beyond the purview of the initial request.

    Edit: I would also point out my suggestion was to talk to the father here. I am uncertain what part of that needs pulling back?

    The presumption of me being the only biased one here is also very interesting. What we know: the op doesn't want to spend time with their father. Your assumption is because the kid just can't be bothered to spend time with family. I assure you, from years of experience, this is the least likely scenario. Consider your own bias and lack of experience.

    Gnizmo on
  • BloodySlothBloodySloth Registered User regular
    To the OP, I am not a lawyer, but if you're a minor, then this is a little grey, but it still seems that since she's not your parent or guardian, your dad's girlfriend probably doesn't have legal grounds for moving your computer from your mom's place to your dad's place.

    That being said, what would or would not hold up in a court of law is totally different from what is and isn't cool in the context of your family dynamics, and there's a whole host of things that we folk on the internet can't account for when giving you advice, especially given your short post. I would suggest taking some time to consider how your response would affect your relationship with your family. Ask your mom about it. We can't know the answers because we don't know your family, and you haven't given us anything to go on.

    There are a lot of gaps in the story here, and a number of people in this thread are filling them with their own conclusions. Whether or not those are helpful to you, I still suggest talking to your family and not going overboard.

  • Inquisitor77Inquisitor77 2 x Penny Arcade Fight Club Champion A fixed point in space and timeRegistered User regular
    I think what some of us are saying is that we don't have enough information to say, either way. On the other hand, it seems that others are more than willing to say that there is manipulation and control going on.

    I am not a social worker, but I have worked with kids for pretty much my entire life, and I can say with 100% confidence that unless you have actually stepped into a given situation and tried to unravel it, there is no way you actually know what is going on. Yes, there are patterns and probabilities, but: (a) given the OP is a minor and (b) all we have is this single, ambiguous report, I would caution against jumping to conclusions.

    Even assuming that some of you are correct and that there is something going on here, perhaps something that even rises to the level of abuse, I have yet to see any recommendations that a minor can follow through by themselves that would lead to a better, meaningful resolution of the situation beyond "call this lady out on her bullshit", which I can assure you if the situation is dire, will only serve to exacerbate things.

  • IrukaIruka Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    There's a lot going on in here that has nothing to do with giving the OP actual advice and just speculating on how well each of you can read between the lines. Pull up on that.

  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    I think what some of us are saying is that we don't have enough information to say, either way. On the other hand, it seems that others are more than willing to say that there is manipulation and control going on.

    I am not a social worker, but I have worked with kids for pretty much my entire life, and I can say with 100% confidence that unless you have actually stepped into a given situation and tried to unravel it, there is no way you actually know what is going on. Yes, there are patterns and probabilities, but: (a) given the OP is a minor and (b) all we have is this single, ambiguous report, I would caution against jumping to conclusions.

    Even assuming that some of you are correct and that there is something going on here, perhaps something that even rises to the level of abuse, I have yet to see any recommendations that a minor can follow through by themselves that would lead to a better, meaningful resolution of the situation beyond "call this lady out on her bullshit", which I can assure you if the situation is dire, will only serve to exacerbate things.

    I think what everyone is missing is that both sides are saying the exact same thing and it has devolved into an argument about the OPs life.

Sign In or Register to comment.