The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
There's famously a really old article about how Gandalf could be reasonably replicated as a fifth-level magic-user, this being back in the 0th Edition D&D days. The argument back in the 70's was pretty much the same as the one Gabe is using: because magic is more subtle in Tolkien's work, Gandalf doesn't really use many spells of note. And the spells he does use aren't really all that impressive in D&D terms: explosive pinecones, locked doors, magical symbols, lighting fires...
I don't think he ever Talks To Moths, though - I guess that's from the movies?
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Seriously, it's "level" (or "hit dice", or "challenge rating", or "challenge") went from 10 to 8+8 to 13 to 20 to 27 to 19. That kind of just goes to show how varied the answers to this question are going to be depending on what game you're talking about.
I think Jim would probably win in a magical fight and Gandalf in a nonmagical one? Dude's divine and is pretty good at just straight-up stabbing people. Movie Gandalf might have a chance in a magical duel, though.
Look, all Gabe wants is the info, you know? He needs this so that he can analyze their weapons, armor, and skill, to determine who would win some sort of battle to the death.
0
Andy JoeWe claim the land for the highlord!The AdirondacksRegistered Userregular
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Reminds me of a thing I saw once arguing that Gandalf was really a melee fighter character who had multiclassed into being able to use some magical objects who was pretending to be a wizard.
So, the one piece of sustained and impressive combat magic we see from Gandalf is resolved mostly off-camera. As Gandalf the Grey (so, his weaker self), he faces down all nine nazgul at once at Weathertop, at night. When the hobbits and Aragorn arrive they find the entire place blasted by fire, but more importantly, on the night it happened, Frodo sat up and watched flashes of light emanating from that place for hours. That's a LOT of spell slots, because you know no at-will cantrip is gonna phase those guys. The incident is often overlooked because the story addresses it from miles or days away, but holding off nine wraiths with nine rings of power at bay all night? Gandalf is an abjurer, and a very high level one.
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Reminds me of a thing I saw once arguing that Gandalf was really a melee fighter character who had multiclassed into being able to use some magical objects who was pretending to be a wizard.
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Reminds me of a thing I saw once arguing that Gandalf was really a melee fighter character who had multiclassed into being able to use some magical objects who was pretending to be a wizard.
I'd argue it beats it. "LOTR is just the story of the skeevy homeless stoner from The Hobbit getting clean and trying to atone for all the shit he caused while High."
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Reminds me of a thing I saw once arguing that Gandalf was really a melee fighter character who had multiclassed into being able to use some magical objects who was pretending to be a wizard.
Even in the Two Towers his spells are limited. Instead of launching a fireball into the massed Uruk Hai he simply takes 20 on a nature check to see when the sun will crest the hill and times his charge appropriately.
I read the comment and immediately ran to the forums to discuss what I, as a loyal Holkinite think must necessarily be the key question raised by this strip: does "lich" rhyme with "bitch"? I always thought lich was like "Bach" and ended with a gargly throat clear. Am I wrong?
Ah, Tthe old story about the impossibility of comparing the power level of characters from different fantasy worlds. Whenever it is done it is always a joke (intentionally or not). BTW, Gandalf would win if they battled in Middle Earth, because Jim's spells do not exist there, so he could not do anything. Gandalf would still win on a real-world-like non-magical neutral ground, because he is probably better at fighting without magic. And Gandalf would lose in the whatever fantasy world where Jim is native.
I read the comment and immediately ran to the forums to discuss what I, as a loyal Holkinite think must necessarily be the key question raised by this strip: does "lich" rhyme with "bitch"? I always thought lich was like "Bach" and ended with a gargly throat clear. Am I wrong?
Word Origin and History for lich
n.
also litch, lych, "body, corpse," southern England dialectal survival of Old English lic "body, dead body, corpse," cognate with Old Frisian lik, Dutch lijk, Old High German lih, German leiche "dead body," Old Norse lik, Danish lig, Gothic leik, from Proto-Germanic *likow. Cf. litch-gate "roofed gate to a churchyard under which a bier is placed to await the coming of the clergyman."
tl;dr Gabe is right from the old English cognate, you're right from the word's likely original roots.
I read the comment and immediately ran to the forums to discuss what I, as a loyal Holkinite think must necessarily be the key question raised by this strip: does "lich" rhyme with "bitch"? I always thought lich was like "Bach" and ended with a gargly throat clear. Am I wrong?
I've always heard lich rhymed with "itch" or "sick". According to Webster's, it comes from 'lik' which means corpse. So I guess it originally rhymed with sick. But now I think it's whatever people want, since the overwhelming majority of users learned the word from fantasy books.
... But now I think it's whatever people want, since the overwhelming majority of users learned the word from fantasy books.
That is certainly my route to learning the word. "Tomb of Horrors" didn't come with a pronunciation guide and my DM pronounced a hard-C followed by an audible "h". As with most things a DM does, it just seemed like a good idea to go with it. And I guess I've been doing that for 30 years.
0
Andy JoeWe claim the land for the highlord!The AdirondacksRegistered Userregular
I read the comment and immediately ran to the forums to discuss what I, as a loyal Holkinite think must necessarily be the key question raised by this strip: does "lich" rhyme with "bitch"? I always thought lich was like "Bach" and ended with a gargly throat clear. Am I wrong?
Remember that "Life's a lich and then you never die" T-shirt the PA store used to sell?
I remember when I was on the LotR Strategy Battle Game forums and they introduced goblin spellcasters, so then we were looking through all the books to see if there's any justification for goblins being able to use magic. Closest I could find was in the Hobbit, where the party go to sleep in a cave, and the goblins presumably use magic or something to open up the door in the back of it.
0
admanbunionize your workplaceSeattle, WARegistered Userregular
Honestly, the older I get the more I appreciate LotR-style magic as tricks, knowledge, and a strong connection to the natural world, and the less I like Whee Magic Spells.
Look, all Gabe wants is the info, you know? He needs this so that he can analyze their weapons, armor, and skill, to determine who would win some sort of battle to the death.
What would you call a concept like this?
Hmm, something like... Death Batt- no, Kill Fight. Or Kill-Battle Death-Fight. One of the two.
I read the comment and immediately ran to the forums to discuss what I, as a loyal Holkinite think must necessarily be the key question raised by this strip: does "lich" rhyme with "bitch"? I always thought lich was like "Bach" and ended with a gargly throat clear. Am I wrong?
Cognate to german "Leiche", and older forms use simple k-sound, but english likes the tch, possibly since anglo-saxon days.
Gandalf is a good example of a character using "weak" spells to great effect. Speak with Animal to escape a prison is a good example. Or how he used a simple Turn Evil on the charge at Helms Deep. Think how that downhill cavalry charge would have turned out if the Urukhai *hadn't* pulled back their hundreds of pikes, recoiling from his staff...
Of course, you also have to keep in mind that this is a setting where good guys really don't use magic much. Heck, the Elven rings of power were basically used as construction equipment, and that was considered a pretty big deal.
Gandalf is a good example of a character using "weak" spells to great effect. Speak with Animal to escape a prison is a good example. Or how he used a simple Turn Evil on the charge at Helms Deep. Think how that downhill cavalry charge would have turned out if the Urukhai *hadn't* pulled back their hundreds of pikes, recoiling from his staff...
Makes him sound more like a Sorcerer (by current D&D standards). Someone with a limited knowledge of magic, but a huge innate ability to supercharge the spells he does know.
Of course, you also have to keep in mind that this is a setting where good guys really don't use magic much. Heck, the Elven rings of power were basically used as construction equipment, and that was considered a pretty big deal.
True. Magic in Middle Earth was really rare. Not many people could even sense it yet alone use it.
That, and Gandalf, Saruman, Radaghast, and Sauron were immensely powerful demi-gods that purposefully hid their true power. Well, Sauron kinda flaunted it, but see how that turned out for him?
Gandalf is kind of an asshole. One time during a raid he told the party to retreat, and then he stayed and finished off the boss alone and took all the XP and loot. Then he stays offline for weeks and the next time he shows up, he just flaunts all his new gear in front of everyone else. What a jerk.
Ah, Tthe old story about the impossibility of comparing the power level of characters from different fantasy worlds. Whenever it is done it is always a joke (intentionally or not). BTW, Gandalf would win if they battled in Middle Earth, because Jim's spells do not exist there, so he could not do anything. Gandalf would still win on a real-world-like non-magical neutral ground, because he is probably better at fighting without magic. And Gandalf would lose in the whatever fantasy world where Jim is native.
Nah, I think Jim is native to D&D, where Balors exist and are considered a valid challenge for a full 4-person party of characters of higher level than I seem to remember Jim being? And Gandalf soloed the thing that Balors are a ripoff from! So even in D&D-world, unless he flies the heck out of there Jim is getting turned into a shish-kebab by Gandalf's superior stabbing skills and unnecessarily large set of resistances.
Posts
I don't think he ever Talks To Moths, though - I guess that's from the movies?
Of course, the actual answer is that he isn't even a wizard at all and is instead just some sort of angel with a magic ring and a power limiter. And he's evenly matched with a Balrog in a straight-up melee fight, which isn't really something that you can say for most D&D magicians. Especially not when the Balrog (or Balor or Type VI Demon, post-Eldritch Wizardry) keeps getting stronger with every edition they put out.
Seriously, it's "level" (or "hit dice", or "challenge rating", or "challenge") went from 10 to 8+8 to 13 to 20 to 27 to 19. That kind of just goes to show how varied the answers to this question are going to be depending on what game you're talking about.
I think Jim would probably win in a magical fight and Gandalf in a nonmagical one? Dude's divine and is pretty good at just straight-up stabbing people. Movie Gandalf might have a chance in a magical duel, though.
Reminds me of a thing I saw once arguing that Gandalf was really a melee fighter character who had multiclassed into being able to use some magical objects who was pretending to be a wizard.
Ah, here it is.
http://www.henneth-annun.net/events_view.cfm?evid=190
That stoner explanation ties it, though.
I'd argue it beats it. "LOTR is just the story of the skeevy homeless stoner from The Hobbit getting clean and trying to atone for all the shit he caused while High."
Genius.
Inquisitor77: Rius, you are Sisyphus and melee Wizard is your boulder
Tube: This must be what it felt like to be an Iraqi when Saddam was killed
Bookish Stickers - Mrs. Rius' Etsy shop with bumper stickers and vinyl decals.
Word Origin and History for lich
n.
also litch, lych, "body, corpse," southern England dialectal survival of Old English lic "body, dead body, corpse," cognate with Old Frisian lik, Dutch lijk, Old High German lih, German leiche "dead body," Old Norse lik, Danish lig, Gothic leik, from Proto-Germanic *likow. Cf. litch-gate "roofed gate to a churchyard under which a bier is placed to await the coming of the clergyman."
tl;dr Gabe is right from the old English cognate, you're right from the word's likely original roots.
I've always heard lich rhymed with "itch" or "sick". According to Webster's, it comes from 'lik' which means corpse. So I guess it originally rhymed with sick. But now I think it's whatever people want, since the overwhelming majority of users learned the word from fantasy books.
That is certainly my route to learning the word. "Tomb of Horrors" didn't come with a pronunciation guide and my DM pronounced a hard-C followed by an audible "h". As with most things a DM does, it just seemed like a good idea to go with it. And I guess I've been doing that for 30 years.
Remember that "Life's a lich and then you never die" T-shirt the PA store used to sell?
What would you call a concept like this?
Hmm, something like... Death Batt- no, Kill Fight. Or Kill-Battle Death-Fight. One of the two.
Cognate to german "Leiche", and older forms use simple k-sound, but english likes the tch, possibly since anglo-saxon days.
Of course, you also have to keep in mind that this is a setting where good guys really don't use magic much. Heck, the Elven rings of power were basically used as construction equipment, and that was considered a pretty big deal.
Makes him sound more like a Sorcerer (by current D&D standards). Someone with a limited knowledge of magic, but a huge innate ability to supercharge the spells he does know.
True. Magic in Middle Earth was really rare. Not many people could even sense it yet alone use it.
That, and Gandalf, Saruman, Radaghast, and Sauron were immensely powerful demi-gods that purposefully hid their true power. Well, Sauron kinda flaunted it, but see how that turned out for him?
Nah, I think Jim is native to D&D, where Balors exist and are considered a valid challenge for a full 4-person party of characters of higher level than I seem to remember Jim being? And Gandalf soloed the thing that Balors are a ripoff from! So even in D&D-world, unless he flies the heck out of there Jim is getting turned into a shish-kebab by Gandalf's superior stabbing skills and unnecessarily large set of resistances.
Whatever Christopher. Maybe try writing at least one book on your own.