The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Tomorrow's my Probability/Statistics final, and I was just going over some review questions, wherein I got stonewalled by this one:
Let X1 and X2 be independently and identically distributed with a common probability density function f(x)=(lamba)[e^(-lamba * x)] for x>0 and lamba>0. Let U = X1 + 2 * X2 and V = 2 * X1 + X2. What is the joint probability density function g(u,v) for u>0 and v>0?
I have no clue how to proceed from here, seeing as U and V look exactly identical.
I have no clue how to proceed from here, seeing as U and V look exactly identical.
But they're not exactly identical simply because X1 and X2 are different, independent variables. It may turn out sometimes that X1 and X2 have the same values and thus U and V are identical, but this won't always happen.
I have to think about this a little more as it's been a while since I did stats, but I thought I'd mention the above.
I should be able to help you because I also have my prob/stats final coming up.. something like this was on my midterm. Allow me to look it up and I shall return.
Are you familiar with moment generating functions?
Moment generating functions (mgf) are derived from the functional
m(theta) = E[e^(theta*x)] = Expectation of (e^(theta*x))
In this case, the mgf is
m(theta) = E[e^(theta*(x1 + 2x2))]
= E[e^(theta*x1) * e^(theta*x2) * e^(theta*x2)]
= E[e^(theta*x1)]*E[e^(theta*x2)]*E[e^(theta*x2)] (since x1 and x2 are iid)
= (lambda/(lambda-theta))^3
= mgf of erlang pdf where n=3
Use a similar process for part 2 of your question.
I could follow that all the way up to "= E[e^(theta*x1)]*E[e^(theta*x2)]*E[e^(theta*x2)] (since x1 and x2 are iid)", then I'm not sure how you got to the next step. Also, we didn't learn the Erlang pdf in this course, so I somehow doubt that it's part of the answer, heh.
Posts
So you would do 2 * X2 and then add X1 for U.
And you would do 2 * X1 and then add X2 for V.
I have to think about this a little more as it's been a while since I did stats, but I thought I'd mention the above.
I should know this. Ruh oh.
m(theta) = E[e^(theta*x)] = Expectation of (e^(theta*x))
In this case, the mgf is
m(theta) = E[e^(theta*(x1 + 2x2))]
= E[e^(theta*x1) * e^(theta*x2) * e^(theta*x2)]
= E[e^(theta*x1)]*E[e^(theta*x2)]*E[e^(theta*x2)] (since x1 and x2 are iid)
= (lambda/(lambda-theta))^3
= mgf of erlang pdf where n=3
Use a similar process for part 2 of your question.
I could follow that all the way up to "= E[e^(theta*x1)]*E[e^(theta*x2)]*E[e^(theta*x2)] (since x1 and x2 are iid)", then I'm not sure how you got to the next step. Also, we didn't learn the Erlang pdf in this course, so I somehow doubt that it's part of the answer, heh.