The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Trump just announced that he is going to pardon Dinesh D’Souza, who was previously convicted of making illegal campaign contributions in 2014.
Now, if I were a cynical person, I might imagine that this is a way of signaling that he plans to pardon others who have made illegal campaign contributions, as long as they don't flip and give up more treason related evidence on Trump himself.
But I'm sure there is a perfectly legitimate reason for doing this.
The President being able to just pardon people who have been convicted of federal crimes seems like an extremely stupid power for someone to have.
It's supposed to be a check on the judiciary, and an acknowledgement that the judiciary is not infallible.
The main reason given in the federalist papers was that sentences under the law could be harsh and pardons allowed "exceptions in the case of unfortunate guilt."
Yeah this seems awful shitty. Every pardon so far seems to be a signal that, "Hey, if you break the law to help the Republican party, we'll pardon and forgive you."
I sincerely don't even know what can be done about this.
Look at me. Look at me. Look at how large the monster inside me has become. Crunch Crunch! Munch Munch! Chomp Chomp! Gulp!
But then you'd have to have a political party in power that actually gives a damn about things like the constitution, checks and balances, and the people they represent.
It's a miracle that we got as far along as we did as a country before it became irreparably clear that none of our institutions are built on foundations solid enough to stand against flagrant abuse of power.
Yeah this seems awful shitty. Every pardon so far seems to be a signal that, "Hey, if you break the law to help the Republican party, we'll pardon and forgive you."
I sincerely don't even know what can be done about this.
This isn't even "hey if you help republicans..."
This is literally, "if you do rich white people crime, Trump will let you off the hook. "
Yeah this seems awful shitty. Every pardon so far seems to be a signal that, "Hey, if you break the law to help the Republican party, we'll pardon and forgive you."
I sincerely don't even know what can be done about this.
This isn't even "hey if you help republicans..."
This is literally, "if you do rich white people crime, Trump will let you off the hook. "
Blagojevich was a Democrat
but it's a signal to his team that they can just do what he did
Trump told reporters Thursday that Blagojevich had said something "stupid" and called his lengthy sentence "really unfair." The president added that "plenty of other politicians could have said a lot worse" than Blagojevich and suggested he was more interested in "curtailing his sentence" than granting a full pardon to the former governor.
What. Blagovich was about as clear a case of corruption as you can find.
+30
AstaerethIn the belly of the beastRegistered Userregular
Trump is not necessarily doing this strategically. Remember, he’s extremely suggestible and these could easily be the result of anybody getting his ear that he likes or wants to impress.
Trump told reporters Thursday that Blagojevich had said something "stupid" and called his lengthy sentence "really unfair." The president added that "plenty of other politicians could have said a lot worse" than Blagojevich and suggested he was more interested in "curtailing his sentence" than granting a full pardon to the former governor.
What. Blagovich was about as clear a case of corruption as you can find.
It does double duty to attempt to normalize their graft. The Nixon crew tried to do the same thing, normalizing their dirty tricks during Watergate.
Yeah this seems awful shitty. Every pardon so far seems to be a signal that, "Hey, if you break the law to help the Republican party, we'll pardon and forgive you."
I sincerely don't even know what can be done about this.
This isn't even "hey if you help republicans..."
This is literally, "if you do rich white people crime, Trump will let you off the hook. "
Blagojevich was a Democrat
It's charades.
Can't say it out loud so you ape the act.
Trump supporter like Arpaio? Pardoned
Broke election law like Souza? Pardoned
Lied to the FBI like Stewart? Pardoned
Corrupt politician like Blagojevich? Pardoned
Its like setting out eligibility for the shitbird scholarship.
RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
Come Overwatch with meeeee
Trump is not necessarily doing this strategically. Remember, he’s extremely suggestible and these could easily be the result of anybody getting his ear that he likes or wants to impress.
It would be really depressing if this was the reason.
It's a miracle that we got as far along as we did as a country before it became irreparably clear that none of our institutions are built on foundations solid enough to stand against flagrant abuse of power.
It's not flagrant abuse of power, it's just partisanship.
The pardon power is a holdover from monarchical powers under common law imported in by the founders. It's only check is congress. Except why would Congress check the power of someone within their own party?
Like so many US institutions it is incapable of surviving any contact with organized coherent political organizations.
Rod Blagojevich's former TV boss, Donald Trump, says he "feels bad" for the disgraced Illinois Governor, who was convicted Monday on 17 corruption charges.
Trump tells Forbes, “Well, he was convicted. That’s a rough thing for him and his family; I feel badly for him and his family. It’s a tragedy."
Blagojevich made it through four episodes of Celebrity Apprectice before Trump fired him.
Trump adds, “I got to know [Blagojevich] based on the fact that he was in The Apprentice and I always felt bad for him. It just seemed like he was in over his head, you know what I mean?”
I don't know what offends me more - the corruption, or how stupid it all is.
It's about precedence, both legal and in public opinion. Like when you get convicted of something and the judge gives you an excessive sentence, you can go back and say "These 20 people were convicted of the same offense but received a lesser sentence."
Except Trump has the authority to retroactively change people's sentences for crimes he is being investigated for, which may affect the precedent applied to himself and his associates. It's about creating an environment where a pardon for corruption is no big deal, and then when Cohen or Flynn gets pardoned the attitude is "eh, if Marth Stewart got pardoned for it why not this guy".
Trump told reporters Thursday that Blagojevich had said something "stupid" and called his lengthy sentence "really unfair." The president added that "plenty of other politicians could have said a lot worse" than Blagojevich and suggested he was more interested in "curtailing his sentence" than granting a full pardon to the former governor.
What. Blagovich was about as clear a case of corruption as you can find.
Yeah, this all strikes me not entirely about sending signals and more so about Trump being a petty moron with no respect for the powers he has or restraint when wielding any power he has ever had.
There is no process here. No review. He's simply deciding in a fit of pique that he doesn't like what happened to X person so he's going to let them get away with it.
Because Trump looks at these people and sees "Oh, this person is my friend!" or "This person does things that piss off people I don't like!" instead of "This person flagrantly violated federal laws and was in prison for a damned good reason".
If someone is unjustly imprisoned, then the law is wrong and must be changed and them freed through that. If they are not, then they should not simply be able to walk free.
This power in the hands of an active, political figure is really quite abuseable, as seen in the cases above.
Because Trump looks at these people and sees "Oh, this person is my friend!" or "This person does things that piss off people I don't like!" instead of "This person flagrantly violated federal laws and was in prison for a damned good reason".
He's got no better reason than that to do this.
Basically "for my friends anything, for my enemies the law."
+2
HakkekageSpace Whore Academysumma cum laudeRegistered Userregular
It is at moments like these that I really feel the gravity of being powerless in the face of unchecked authority. What does it matter to me if blagojevich is pardoned, or Martha Stewart gets her record wiped? Well, sure, nothing directly. But it does make it clear that there are rules for me but not for thee, and I don’t know how we can fix this when all the beneficiaries of lopsided power are the ones who have to check themselves against abuse of it. It’s frustrating af.
Because Trump looks at these people and sees "Oh, this person is my friend!" or "This person does things that piss off people I don't like!" instead of "This person flagrantly violated federal laws and was in prison for a damned good reason".
He's got no better reason than that to do this.
Basically "for my friends anything, for my enemies the law."
Not even the law, as his friends can do anything they want to his enemies and it'd be ok by him.
President Trump on Rod Blagojich per pool: “18 yrs in jail for being stupid & saying things that every other politician, you know that many other politicians say...What he did does not justify 18 yrs in a jail. And he’s a Democrat. ... But I thought that he was treated unfairly.”
Yamiche Alcindor is a reporter for PBS.
That's the explanation - in his mind, blatant corruption is how our government works.
It is at moments like these that I really feel the gravity of being powerless in the face of unchecked authority. What does it matter to me if blagojevich is pardoned, or Martha Stewart gets her record wiped? Well, sure, nothing directly. But it does make it clear that there are rules for me but not for thee, and I don’t know how we can fix this when all the beneficiaries of lopsided power are the ones who have to check themselves against abuse of it. It’s frustrating af.
Trump is basically showcasing why the pardon power being so broad and so unchecked is insane.
Like so many things, it's always been broken, he's just crass enough to bring that into the spotlight.
I think I’m taking crazy pills, because I legit think it’s more likely Trump to pardon people that were on his old show, than playing some political game of sending signals to his cronies that he has their backs.
We truly live in interesting times.
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
If someone is unjustly imprisoned, then the law is wrong and must be changed and them freed through that. If they are not, then they should not simply be able to walk free.
This power in the hands of an active, political figure is really quite abuseable, as seen in the cases above.
"This power can be abused" is a poor argument for removing the power of pardon. The answer is to hold abuse accountable.
President Trump on Rod Blagojich per pool: “18 yrs in jail for being stupid & saying things that every other politician, you know that many other politicians say...What he did does not justify 18 yrs in a jail. And he’s a Democrat. ... But I thought that he was treated unfairly.”
Yamiche Alcindor is a reporter for PBS.
That's the explanation - in his mind, blatant corruption is how our government works.
He's a true believing Fox News viewer. Of course he views the government that way.
Hell, it's not even partisan. That's standard anti-current-government populism for ya. It's the same kind of thing backing Congress' low approval ratings.
Posts
I sincerely don't even know what can be done about this.
Crunch Crunch! Munch Munch! Chomp Chomp! Gulp!
The founding fathers clearly outlined abuse of the pardon for personal or political reasons as a sufficient reason for impeachment.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
Commuting Blagojevich would also signal that being a corrupt politician is okay.
Because her crime was lying to the feds.
Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
Fuck Joe Manchin
Smokescreen? Can’t be accused of playing politics if someone isn’t a politician, “that’s fake news” style situation?
Edit: llpala is probably right.
This isn't even "hey if you help republicans..."
This is literally, "if you do rich white people crime, Trump will let you off the hook. "
Blagojevich was a Democrat
oh
but it's a signal to his team that they can just do what he did
Daniel Dale is a political reporter for the Toronto Star.
Yup, it's him helping someone he personally knows.
Oh FUCK OFF!
Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
Fuck Joe Manchin
It does double duty to attempt to normalize their graft. The Nixon crew tried to do the same thing, normalizing their dirty tricks during Watergate.
It's charades.
Can't say it out loud so you ape the act.
Trump supporter like Arpaio? Pardoned
Broke election law like Souza? Pardoned
Lied to the FBI like Stewart? Pardoned
Corrupt politician like Blagojevich? Pardoned
Its like setting out eligibility for the shitbird scholarship.
Come Overwatch with meeeee
It would be really depressing if this was the reason.
That is just amazingly brazen corruption.
It's not flagrant abuse of power, it's just partisanship.
The pardon power is a holdover from monarchical powers under common law imported in by the founders. It's only check is congress. Except why would Congress check the power of someone within their own party?
Like so many US institutions it is incapable of surviving any contact with organized coherent political organizations.
Here's what he said in 2011:
I don't know what offends me more - the corruption, or how stupid it all is.
Except Trump has the authority to retroactively change people's sentences for crimes he is being investigated for, which may affect the precedent applied to himself and his associates. It's about creating an environment where a pardon for corruption is no big deal, and then when Cohen or Flynn gets pardoned the attitude is "eh, if Marth Stewart got pardoned for it why not this guy".
Yeah, this all strikes me not entirely about sending signals and more so about Trump being a petty moron with no respect for the powers he has or restraint when wielding any power he has ever had.
There is no process here. No review. He's simply deciding in a fit of pique that he doesn't like what happened to X person so he's going to let them get away with it.
He's got no better reason than that to do this.
I can has cheezburger, yes?
Also does he not know what Blagojevich did?
If someone is unjustly imprisoned, then the law is wrong and must be changed and them freed through that. If they are not, then they should not simply be able to walk free.
This power in the hands of an active, political figure is really quite abuseable, as seen in the cases above.
Basically "for my friends anything, for my enemies the law."
NNID: Hakkekage
Not even the law, as his friends can do anything they want to his enemies and it'd be ok by him.
He knows, but thinks that it's business as usual:
Yamiche Alcindor is a reporter for PBS.
That's the explanation - in his mind, blatant corruption is how our government works.
Trump is basically showcasing why the pardon power being so broad and so unchecked is insane.
Like so many things, it's always been broken, he's just crass enough to bring that into the spotlight.
We truly live in interesting times.
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
"This power can be abused" is a poor argument for removing the power of pardon. The answer is to hold abuse accountable.
He's a true believing Fox News viewer. Of course he views the government that way.
Hell, it's not even partisan. That's standard anti-current-government populism for ya. It's the same kind of thing backing Congress' low approval ratings.