The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
Heads up for everyone intrigued by that shocker of a mid-credits scene for Teen Titans Go to the Movies (and you should be), apparently the next episode of Teen Titans Go airing on August 13 will directly deal with the events of the movie. Maybe we'll find out more? Chances are decent since the movie ended with "to be continued on Cartoon Network."
Here's a video of the scene, click fast before it vanishes.
Oooh DC if you pretend that you are going to make Teen Titans again and instead mock me with yet another "Why so serious" episode of Teen Titans GO, then I'm going to be REAL pissed off. I promise to be just as grumpy and upset about Teen Titans GO as I was at the start and to instead never subscribe to your streaming service ever!
"That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
0
daveNYCWhy universe hate Waspinator?Registered Userregular
So I watched Suicide Squad... that was a mistake. I feel as though I can't quite articulate how poorly done the movie is. Not bad, the performances are good as far as that goes, the FX are fine, I didn't see the boom mike hitting anyone on the head, but the quality of the writing is just god awful. I'll just start a list of things and see how many of them end up starting with "The worst thing is..."
I really didn't like any of the characters in the movie. The only person they spent any real time trying to humanize was Deadshot, and it did that in the laziest way possible. Look! He has a kid! You like kids, right? El Diablo had a hell of a lot more depth, but they dropped his backstory in there way late in the movie. Everyone else was basically a horrible person that for some reason we were supposed to root for, and that includes all the regular people too. By the end of the movie, I really didn't care if the bad guys won.
Will Smith was bad casting. He does a good Will Smith, but Will Smith just didn't work as Deadshot for me.
Margot Robbie was great casting. She did a great job as a bubbly psycho killer nut job. I'm not that interested in the Birds of Prey movie because I don't exactly like her character (DCU Harley Quinn seems pretty evil, so a movie with her as the protagonist seems eh...), but she carried the hell out of every scene she was in.
Amanda Waller's plan is stupid, she is stupid, and in fact would probably be a better villain for the setting except she's such a no-talent assclown that I wouldn't be able to take her seriously. The bit where she capped her office guys was just so damn stupid. Not to mention that the suicide squad guys probably should have reacted a little more, because if she's willing to do that to people who actually work for her then I'd be thinking that any 'deal' I make with her is worthless. I think I've heard that in the comics Waller is pretty horrible, but her character in the movie is just unworkable.
On the subject of the Suicide Squad, the pitch was that if the next Superman ends up being evil, then they have these idiots to try and take care of business... and then the team gets shot down on the way to the first mission by some randos with machine guns. Two members of the team are a hot chick with a baseball bat and revolver and a dude who throws boomerangs, so... yeah... Deadshot and Diablo are the only two who really bring something to the team, Croc isn't horrible, but it's really just those two who are anything special, and even then Deadshot is just a low rent version of John Wick.
Leto's Joker wasn't that bad? He absolutely didn't need to be in the movie and the movie suffered because of that plot line, but his take wasn't bad.
Slipknot was horrible. They introduce everyone on the team and then just shove this guy in from out of nowhere and then kill him. They couldn't even manage use his death to provide an air of 'shit be serious so anyone can die', it was just to show that the microexplosives were a thing.
Katana, I think she had three lines? What's the point of even having her? Either the micro-explosives work and Flagg has some sort of dead man's switch (did they establish that? because they were really concerned about him being killed for some reason) or they need a few more heavies to keep the squad in line. Also, way to drop the ball on the fact that her husband's soul was in her sword. Either mention a little earlier in the movie and have it mean something or just don't bother if it isn't actually going to make a difference.
The action scenes were all bad. All of them.
Enchantress: So once she got her heart back the direction to Delevingne was 'stand there and waggle your hips a lot'. Plus they didn't really do much with her, Ronan was a more fleshed out character. Enchantress was down at the Apocalypse level of wanting to kill everyone and rule the world because reasons.
Pacing and other stuff. The introductions of the team members were all bad. Xtreme graphics flash with dossier data in a kewl font and a pointless exposition dump. I think I was an hour into the movie before it settled on who the bad guy was going to be. The bar scene was kinda nice, but also didn't really fit because at no point did the movie really develop the idea that these guys were a team and liked each other. The soundtrack was gratuitous, in that they started a scene immediately lit in with licensed popular song. The songs never meant anything or enhanced the movie in any way. It was like someone watched GotG and thought that the secret to a good soundtrack was popular songs but had no idea how to actually use those songs. Most of the DCEU is like that though, they copy the basics of what Marvel is doing, but without actually grasping why Marvel's stuff works.
The 'twist' of who they were rescuing was actually not that bad. Stupid as hell as far as why you couldn't monitor things remotely (or even just send a helicopter to the roof of the building without needing to send the team in first), but not a bad twist.
I think it would have been a better movie if they'd gone all in on Diablo's quasi-penance/redemption thing. He's the only guy who had anything like a character arc, everyone else just started off saying "We're bad guys." and then suddenly decided to save the world at the end without any actual development along the way. Plus his transformation was the only notably cool thing in the movie.
Long story short, everyone involved in this movie (except the actual actors, they were OK) should be fired, set on fire, then fired into the sun. There's a sequel penciled in for 2019, and I wouldn't see it if it had twice the Margot Robbie in half the clothes.
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
+5
ShadowenSnores in the morningLoserdomRegistered Userregular
One of my favorite "nerdy but accessible and not-ragey deep dive" videos is Dan "Foldable Human" Olson taking a look at Suicide Squad.
Specifically, on how garbage the editing is. He points out how bad everything else is too but he focuses on the editing, which is aptly demonstrated by a shot during the climactic battle; the segment on that specific big failure starts at 10:35.
So I watched Suicide Squad... that was a mistake. I feel as though I can't quite articulate how poorly done the movie is. Not bad, the performances are good as far as that goes, the FX are fine, I didn't see the boom mike hitting anyone on the head, but the quality of the writing is just god awful. I'll just start a list of things and see how many of them end up starting with "The worst thing is..."
Apparently the film was rushed to be made at the last minute, though I don't know the reason why. The director's shooting script had to be done in 2 weeks before starting, for instance. Which explains a lot since the director has produced superior movies and scripts in the past (Training Day, Street Kings etc). During and/or after the film was made the WB brass meddled further as a reaction to B vs S. Under better circumstances I think Ayer could have made a serviceable movie, which is a shame.
Harry Dresden on
0
daveNYCWhy universe hate Waspinator?Registered Userregular
So I watched Suicide Squad... that was a mistake. I feel as though I can't quite articulate how poorly done the movie is. Not bad, the performances are good as far as that goes, the FX are fine, I didn't see the boom mike hitting anyone on the head, but the quality of the writing is just god awful. I'll just start a list of things and see how many of them end up starting with "The worst thing is..."
Apparently the film was rushed to be made at the last minute, though I don't know the reason why. The director's shooting script had to be done in 2 weeks before starting, for instance. Which explains a lot since the director has produced superior movies and scripts in the past (Training Day, Street Kings etc). During and/or after the film was made the WB brass meddled further as a reaction to B vs S. Under better circumstances I think Ayer could have made a serviceable movie, which is a shame.
Do you have a source on that? Because pulling a rush job on the movie while still getting Smith and Robbie in those roles seems weird. Though I guess that it's possible that they absolutely wanted those two and let their availability dictate everything else. That seems like the sort of half-assed thinking that WB is good at.
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
Not all hope is lost for Suicide Squad (the movie), maybe 15 years for now it will be viewed as a "so bad its good" movie, to be collected alongside Street Fighter, Mario Bros or Steel
Yes, with a quick verbal "boom." You take a man's peko, you deny him his dab, all that is left is to rise up and tear down the walls of Jericho with a ".....not!" -TexiKen
0
daveNYCWhy universe hate Waspinator?Registered Userregular
Not all hope is lost for Suicide Squad (the movie), maybe 15 years for now it will be viewed as a "so bad its good" movie, to be collected alongside Street Fighter, Mario Bros or Steel
Eh... Street Fighter and Mario Bros had mains that were at least aware of what sort of movie they'd gotten into and were content to ham it up and chew scenery. The only one remotely like that in this movie was Robbie, and that was mostly just playing the character. Everything else is being played straight with the full DCEU grim faced seriousness that we all know and love.
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
Do you have a source on that? Because pulling a rush job on the movie while still getting Smith and Robbie in those roles seems weird. Though I guess that it's possible that they absolutely wanted those two and let their availability dictate everything else. That seems like the sort of half-assed thinking that WB is good at.
Warners chief Kevin Tsujihara announced the project in October 2014 as part of a slate of 10 DC films stretching into 2020. Though the studio believed there was enough time to get the movie done, a source with ties to the project says it was a sprint from the start. "[Ayer] wrote the script in like, six weeks, and they just went," he says, arguing that the whole process would have benefited if Ayer, 48, had been given more time to work. But another source closely involved with the film says once it was dated, pushing back the release was not an option: "It's not just that you've told the public the movie is coming, you've made huge deals around the world with huge branding partners, with merchandise partners. It's a really big deal to move a tentpole date."
***
A source with knowledge of events says Warners executives, nervous from the start, grew more anxious after they were blindsided and deeply rattled by the tepid response to BvS. "Kevin was really pissed about damage to the brand," says one executive close to the studio. A key concern for Warners executives was that Suicide Squad didn't deliver on the fun, edgy tone promised in the strong teaser trailer for the film. So while Ayer pursued his original vision, Warners set about working on a different cut, with an assist from Trailer Park, the company that had made the teaser.
Everything else is being played straight with the full DCEU grim faced seriousness that we all know and love.
I disagree. IMO the film very much aimed at Guardians of the Galaxy-style irreverence with its cast of villain protagonists. It just did so in bad, boring, obvious, hamfisted ways, while shouting in your face, "Isn't this fun?"
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
+1
daveNYCWhy universe hate Waspinator?Registered Userregular
Everything else is being played straight with the full DCEU grim faced seriousness that we all know and love.
I disagree. IMO the film very much aimed at Guardians of the Galaxy-style irreverence with its cast of villain protagonists. It just did so in bad, boring, obvious, hamfisted ways, while shouting in your face, "Isn't this fun?"
I disagree with your interpretation, but I can't exactly say that you're wrong because I could easily see WB thinking that the guy who killed his family and the woman who is introduced licking the bars on a cage and then trying to shiv a guard with a toothbrush are just like a homicidal genius raccoon and a tree with a three word vocabulary. That's how not good they are at this.
daveNYC on
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
0
That_GuyI don't wanna be that guyRegistered Userregular
If you want to see how to make a GOOD SS movie go watch Assault on Arkham and Hell to Pay. Both do these characters far better than their live action counterparts.
If you want to see how to make a GOOD SS movie go watch Assault on Arkham and Hell to Pay. Both do these characters far better than their live action counterparts.
That’s not fair. I mean, aren’t all DC characters better in their animated versions?
0
That_GuyI don't wanna be that guyRegistered Userregular
If you want to see how to make a GOOD SS movie go watch Assault on Arkham and Hell to Pay. Both do these characters far better than their live action counterparts.
That’s not fair. I mean, aren’t all DC characters better in their animated versions?
If you want to see how to make a GOOD SS movie go watch Assault on Arkham and Hell to Pay. Both do these characters far better than their live action counterparts.
That’s not fair. I mean, aren’t all DC characters better in their animated versions?
It's Super GIRL, not Super Woman. Bowden from 10 years ago, MAYBE. BUT if we're just throwing names out there, Hayden Panettiere would have made an awesome Supergirl.
It's Super GIRL, not Super Woman. Bowden from 10 years ago, MAYBE. BUT if we're just throwing names out there, Hayden Panettiere would have made an awesome Supergirl.
I reckon Melissa Benoist would make a pretty decent Supergirl. Long shot I know
+14
That_GuyI don't wanna be that guyRegistered Userregular
It's Super GIRL, not Super Woman. Bowden from 10 years ago, MAYBE. BUT if we're just throwing names out there, Hayden Panettiere would have made an awesome Supergirl.
I reckon Melissa Benoist would make a pretty decent Supergirl. Long shot I know
In all fairness, she was 24 she was cast as Supergirl.
Late to the party, but on the topic of SS, i think it really needs to be stressed that in a movie that had so little going on it had so much fat; it's like they got to the end and realized that they didn't have enough footage for it to be feature length and went back to collect all the scenes that they were planning on discarding because they didn't make sense.
Paradoxically, despite having 3 openings in a row, we have a bunch of characters that are in this movie and don't actually do anything; boomerang and Katana basically add nothing to the plot and nothing is improved by virtue of their presence.
Don't even get me started on the joker in this movie.
Late to the party, but on the topic of SS, i think it really needs to be stressed that in a movie that had so little going on it had so much fat; it's like they got to the end and realized that they didn't have enough footage for it to be feature length and went back to collect all the scenes that they were planning on discarding because they didn't make sense.
Paradoxically, despite having 3 openings in a row, we have a bunch of characters that are in this movie and don't actually do anything; boomerang and Katana basically add nothing to the plot and nothing is improved by virtue of their presence.
Don't even get me started on the joker in this movie.
Outside of the terrible TERRIBLE Joker, I thoroughly enjoyed Suicide Squad. It's not a great movie, but it is entertaining from start to finish, IMO. I waited a long time to see it though, and went in with the lowest expectations possible. SO that probably helped.
Everyone has a price. Throw enough gold around and someone will risk disintegration.
Outside of the terrible TERRIBLE Joker, I thoroughly enjoyed Suicide Squad. It's not a great movie, but it is entertaining from start to finish, IMO. I waited a long time to see it though, and went in with the lowest expectations possible. SO that probably helped.
That definitely helps, when I watch it I had a similar reaction, as "It wasnt as bad as people claimed it was. (except for the joker, wich is worse than what can be described)".
There were even a couple of good moments, like, I enjoyed the banter in the gun range with Will Smith and the guard
Yes, with a quick verbal "boom." You take a man's peko, you deny him his dab, all that is left is to rise up and tear down the walls of Jericho with a ".....not!" -TexiKen
Late to the party, but on the topic of SS, i think it really needs to be stressed that in a movie that had so little going on it had so much fat; it's like they got to the end and realized that they didn't have enough footage for it to be feature length and went back to collect all the scenes that they were planning on discarding because they didn't make sense.
Paradoxically, despite having 3 openings in a row, we have a bunch of characters that are in this movie and don't actually do anything; boomerang and Katana basically add nothing to the plot and nothing is improved by virtue of their presence.
Don't even get me started on the joker in this movie.
I hear he's
damaged
I could have fucking dealt with the whole hot topic shtick if the joker sub plot had meant anything at all, but it not only has zero effect on the plot of the movie, it undermines the DCEU as a whole since there is no way that this joker is either out on the street given how blatent he is or *alive* given how psychotic this batman is.
0
TexiKenDammit!That fish really got me!Registered Userregular
But they're also saying it's Harley, Canary, Huntress, Renee Montoya and a young Cassandra Cain. And the latter part worries me because that's a weird thing to point out if she's not going to be the 18ish year old when she first appeared, which means despite her being created before X-23 that's what it's going to feel like a knockoff of, especially with her whole "more karate cuz can't speak" upbringing and the R rating.
Eh, even if X-23 were better known (and I'd argue she's not among the general audience) I'd say there's still plenty of room to differentiate Caassandra Cain, especially if they go with the mute angle.
Why the crap did I ever make my original name "cloudeagle?"
+2
valhalla13013 Dark Shield Perceives the GodsRegistered Userregular
So I have been a DC guy for a long time. My favorite superhero is from DC. My second and third favorite superhero are from DC. I love the Titans and Young Justice comics, and the Young Justice cartoon was fantastic.
This show looks so bad and poorly written on all levels. Robin shooting dudes and stepping on their necks. The F Batman moment. Starfire is horrendously miscast and looks horrible and apparently they forgot to look up what her powers actually are. Hawk and Dove being murderous jerks. At least Raven fits in with these psychopath 'heroes.'
At least I have the extended Arrow-verse for my DC needs. They aren't always the best, but I'm always entertained. Flash, Arrow, Supergirl, Legends, and Black Lightning each give me their own flair on the DC Universe that is both taken seriously and has fun with the universe that is mostly faithful to the source material.
I've said it since the 90s. Grimdark should have begun and ended with Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Its like the TV and movie side of WB learned all the wrong lessons from the 90s.
+1
daveNYCWhy universe hate Waspinator?Registered Userregular
So I have been a DC guy for a long time. My favorite superhero is from DC. My second and third favorite superhero are from DC. I love the Titans and Young Justice comics, and the Young Justice cartoon was fantastic.
This show looks so bad and poorly written on all levels. Robin shooting dudes and stepping on their necks. The F Batman moment. Starfire is horrendously miscast and looks horrible and apparently they forgot to look up what her powers actually are. Hawk and Dove being murderous jerks. At least Raven fits in with these psychopath 'heroes.'
At least I have the extended Arrow-verse for my DC needs. They aren't always the best, but I'm always entertained. Flash, Arrow, Supergirl, Legends, and Black Lightning each give me their own flair on the DC Universe that is both taken seriously and has fun with the universe that is mostly faithful to the source material.
I've said it since the 90s. Grimdark should have begun and ended with Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Its like the TV and movie side of WB learned all the wrong lessons from the 90s.
That implies that those divisions of WB are even capable of learning lessons.
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
So I have been a DC guy for a long time. My favorite superhero is from DC. My second and third favorite superhero are from DC. I love the Titans and Young Justice comics, and the Young Justice cartoon was fantastic.
This show looks so bad and poorly written on all levels. Robin shooting dudes and stepping on their necks. The F Batman moment. Starfire is horrendously miscast and looks horrible and apparently they forgot to look up what her powers actually are. Hawk and Dove being murderous jerks. At least Raven fits in with these psychopath 'heroes.'
At least I have the extended Arrow-verse for my DC needs. They aren't always the best, but I'm always entertained. Flash, Arrow, Supergirl, Legends, and Black Lightning each give me their own flair on the DC Universe that is both taken seriously and has fun with the universe that is mostly faithful to the source material.
I've said it since the 90s. Grimdark should have begun and ended with Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Its like the TV and movie side of WB learned all the wrong lessons from the 90s.
That implies that those divisions of WB are even capable of learning lessons.
Strictly speaking they have; the only consistently successful property they have is batman and people have told them in 300, watchmen, V and wonderwoman that people want grimdark colorless serious movies.
Heads up that if The Thing hinted at in the end of the Teen Titans Go movie is going to happen, it'll most likely happen during the next TTG episode set to air tomorrow at 6 pm eastern on Cartoon Network.
Why the crap did I ever make my original name "cloudeagle?"
Heads up that if The Thing hinted at in the end of the Teen Titans Go movie is going to happen, it'll most likely happen during the next TTG episode set to air tomorrow at 6 pm eastern on Cartoon Network.
If it happens during a teen titans go episode then it didn't happen. Because if you just like, randomly put on an episode of real teen titans during TTG then the little kids might be upset. Unless they like, announce the air date then our something.
Heads up that if The Thing hinted at in the end of the Teen Titans Go movie is going to happen, it'll most likely happen during the next TTG episode set to air tomorrow at 6 pm eastern on Cartoon Network.
If it happens during a teen titans go episode then it didn't happen. Because if you just like, randomly put on an episode of real teen titans during TTG then the little kids might be upset. Unless they like, announce the air date then our something.
I wouldn't count it out. The synopsis is an extremely vague "we learn what happens after the events of the movie." And if they were worried about confusing kids, they wouldn't have put what they did at the end of the movie.
Why the crap did I ever make my original name "cloudeagle?"
I saw that yesterday, and was genuinely shocked the backlash and harassment was from the LGBTQ community because the openly gay woman isn't "gay enough" to play Batwoman... what even...? She should leave Twitter, though. Everyone should just abandon twitter, nothing good happens there.
Everyone has a price. Throw enough gold around and someone will risk disintegration.
Posts
Oooh DC if you pretend that you are going to make Teen Titans again and instead mock me with yet another "Why so serious" episode of Teen Titans GO, then I'm going to be REAL pissed off. I promise to be just as grumpy and upset about Teen Titans GO as I was at the start and to instead never subscribe to your streaming service ever!
Long story short, everyone involved in this movie (except the actual actors, they were OK) should be fired, set on fire, then fired into the sun. There's a sequel penciled in for 2019, and I wouldn't see it if it had twice the Margot Robbie in half the clothes.
Specifically, on how garbage the editing is. He points out how bad everything else is too but he focuses on the editing, which is aptly demonstrated by a shot during the climactic battle; the segment on that specific big failure starts at 10:35.
Apparently the film was rushed to be made at the last minute, though I don't know the reason why. The director's shooting script had to be done in 2 weeks before starting, for instance. Which explains a lot since the director has produced superior movies and scripts in the past (Training Day, Street Kings etc). During and/or after the film was made the WB brass meddled further as a reaction to B vs S. Under better circumstances I think Ayer could have made a serviceable movie, which is a shame.
Do you have a source on that? Because pulling a rush job on the movie while still getting Smith and Robbie in those roles seems weird. Though I guess that it's possible that they absolutely wanted those two and let their availability dictate everything else. That seems like the sort of half-assed thinking that WB is good at.
Eh... Street Fighter and Mario Bros had mains that were at least aware of what sort of movie they'd gotten into and were content to ham it up and chew scenery. The only one remotely like that in this movie was Robbie, and that was mostly just playing the character. Everything else is being played straight with the full DCEU grim faced seriousness that we all know and love.
Yep.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/suicide-squads-secret-drama-rushed-916693
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
I disagree with your interpretation, but I can't exactly say that you're wrong because I could easily see WB thinking that the guy who killed his family and the woman who is introduced licking the bars on a cage and then trying to shiv a guard with a toothbrush are just like a homicidal genius raccoon and a tree with a three word vocabulary. That's how not good they are at this.
That’s not fair. I mean, aren’t all DC characters better in their animated versions?
No
true
just like 95% of the time
Norm Macdonald as the voice of Streaky
It's Super GIRL, not Super Woman. Bowden from 10 years ago, MAYBE. BUT if we're just throwing names out there, Hayden Panettiere would have made an awesome Supergirl.
I reckon Melissa Benoist would make a pretty decent Supergirl. Long shot I know
In all fairness, she was 24 she was cast as Supergirl.
Paradoxically, despite having 3 openings in a row, we have a bunch of characters that are in this movie and don't actually do anything; boomerang and Katana basically add nothing to the plot and nothing is improved by virtue of their presence.
Don't even get me started on the joker in this movie.
I hear he's
damaged
That definitely helps, when I watch it I had a similar reaction, as "It wasnt as bad as people claimed it was. (except for the joker, wich is worse than what can be described)".
There were even a couple of good moments, like, I enjoyed the banter in the gun range with Will Smith and the guard
I could have fucking dealt with the whole hot topic shtick if the joker sub plot had meant anything at all, but it not only has zero effect on the plot of the movie, it undermines the DCEU as a whole since there is no way that this joker is either out on the street given how blatent he is or *alive* given how psychotic this batman is.
But they're also saying it's Harley, Canary, Huntress, Renee Montoya and a young Cassandra Cain. And the latter part worries me because that's a weird thing to point out if she's not going to be the 18ish year old when she first appeared, which means despite her being created before X-23 that's what it's going to feel like a knockoff of, especially with her whole "more karate cuz can't speak" upbringing and the R rating.
I've said it since the 90s. Grimdark should have begun and ended with Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns. Its like the TV and movie side of WB learned all the wrong lessons from the 90s.
That implies that those divisions of WB are even capable of learning lessons.
Strictly speaking they have; the only consistently successful property they have is batman and people have told them in 300, watchmen, V and wonderwoman that people want grimdark colorless serious movies.
If it happens during a teen titans go episode then it didn't happen. Because if you just like, randomly put on an episode of real teen titans during TTG then the little kids might be upset. Unless they like, announce the air date then our something.
I wouldn't count it out. The synopsis is an extremely vague "we learn what happens after the events of the movie." And if they were worried about confusing kids, they wouldn't have put what they did at the end of the movie.
Don't be silly now, TTG is a perfectly decent show, but it is not ever violent or scary. Teen Titans original sometimes was, to great effect.
You're absolutely right. TTG never, ever dreams of being scary or viole
Yes, that short scene of purely comic scuffling is definitely not violent or scary in any way, and is exactly what I expect from teen titans go.
Did Robin totally boob punch Starfire at 3 mins for no reason?
I don't think so, but if you want an awkward Starfire/Robin scene this is a better example
and this scene in Young Justice because it's hilarious
Ruby Rose exits Twitter amid Batwoman casting backlash