The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The [Coronavirus] Pandemic Thread - SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

BogartBogart Streetwise HerculesRegistered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
edited March 2020 in Debate and/or Discourse
WHAT:
BBZZrPr.img?h=416&w=799&m=6&q=60&u=t&o=f&l=f

The virus is officially designated SARS-CoV-2, formerly temporarily called and the disease it causes COVID-19. Since these are clunky names introduced after the outbreak was already widespread, the names haven't stuck all that well in common parlance. The virus is alternately called "novel coronavirus," "Wuhan coronavirus" (especially in Taiwan), and often just "the coronavirus" (also some racist things I will not mention). I personally have been calling it SARS2 but no one else has, so I'm not going to be picky about names here (unless you're going to be racist about it). We should know what we're talking about.

Coronaviruses are a class of viruses that affect mammals and birds, usually causing respiratory tract infections but occasionally also infecting the digestive tract. Four strains already circulate worldwide causing 15-30% of all common colds. Two other strains, SARS and MERS, were small outbreaks of novel coronaviruses with very high death rates but without being as contagious so they could be eliminated. This newest virus seems to be closely related to SARS, though not as deadly, but far more contagious.

Symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, coughing, fatigue, and others that typically resemble to be cold or flu. The incubation period (the time between infection and the onset of symptoms) typically ranges from a day to a couple weeks. People become contagious before symptoms appear, and some people never develop symptoms. In 15-20% of symptomatic cases, however, the disease can progress from what appears to be a cold into pneumonia which can be fatal. Death rates are highest among the elderly (over 14% of those age 80 and above) and apparently nonexistent to children under 10.

Tips for protecting yourself against this coronavirus are listed below.



WHERE: Basically everywhere, even if not officially yet.
The pandemic started in Wuhan (population over 11 million), capital of Hubei province in China. Many of the earliest cases were linked specifically to Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which despite its name was also known for selling bushmeat (wild exotic animals, usually unregulated). From Wuhan it spread rapidly through China, aided by the travel of Chinese New Year, and then via air travel around the world.

If your country claims not to have it, it's probably because they aren't testing enough for it.


WHEN: Through now, starting likely in November as the first case was retroactively noticed on the 1st of December, 2019. It might not ever end if this strain becomes the fifth worldwide circulating coronavirus strain, which it is on its way of doing.


WHO: World Health Organization, currently headed by Tedros Adhanom. They are in charge of declaring a pandemic. Despite this obviously being a pandemic with spread and deaths across the world on multiple continents, it's only called a "public health emergency of international concern."

The outbreak was first noticed by a group of doctors in Wuhan, who noted the disease's resemblance to SARS. A group of 8 or 10 were together in a WeChat private group discussing their findings, worried that this deadly new coronavirus might be the return of SARS. They were threatened by local police and officials who sought to suppress negative news, and this coverup cost the world valuable time that likely lead to the virus reaching a point where it could not be contained.
The face of these whistleblower doctors became Dr. Li Wenliang, a 33 year old ophthalmologist.

Li_Wen_Liang.jpg

Dr. Li still continued to treat patients despite the admonishment and coverup, attempting to warn others before the official warnings finally came out, but soon after contracted COVID-19 and died. It is widely rumored that medical aid was withheld to ensure his death and silence him.


WHY: This coronavirus, like its cousin SARS before it, appears to be a zoonotic virus, which jumped over from an animal resevoir to start infecting humans. Most human diseases started this way, jumping over from an animal host to us, from us being in close contact with animals due to domestication or habitat loss for those animals forcing them in closer contact with us.

Specifically, both SARS and SARS2 seem to be derived from bat coronaviruses. Bats, because they fly, have a higher core body temperature than other mammals. Viruses therefore must be tougher in order to survive in bats, since fever is a reaction to help fight off diseases and effectively to any non-bat-infecting disease, bats are always in a fever state. Therefore, diseases that get transferred from bats tend to be nastier than other zoonotic diseases. Other examples for instance include the hemorrhagic fevers Nipah and Ebola.


HOW to protect myself:
#1: Hygiene - Wash your hands frequently using proper technique (see below), don't touch your face, cough and sneeze into your sleeve (elbows work), and wear a mask if available when you are sick to prevent further spread.

Proper handwashing technique:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IisgnbMfKvI

edca8c37521ae27ad3f12130bff44cf5389dcc75de6431b5fa2d90db4d8eb026.jpg

Why is this long process necessary?

ESHNN9KWoAYpwQi?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RisoBy8lX0

#2: Social distancing - stay away from crowds, work from home if at all possible, stay home when sick, maintain distance between yourself and others (especially those showing coughing and sneezing)
#3: If you haven't already, get a flu shot and make sure your other immunizations are up to date. It won't help directly with preventing this coronavirus, but comorbidities (including co-infections) make it much nastier. You don't want this virus AND the flu at the same time.
#4: Get enough sleep and stay hydrated. Sleep deprivation makes symptoms worse and causes diseases to be harder in most other cases, and I doubt SARS2 is any different. Being dehydrated can exasperate symptoms, and having any sort of cold or flu means water leaving the body faster (through coughed droplets, phlegm, runny noses and the like), so make sure there's enough to start with and keep replacing it. You'll recover better and faster, no matter what the illness.
#5: Have politicians who are being dumbasses (spreading conspiracy theories and false information, suggesting idiotic measures, firing your country's pandemic response team, etc.) and have an upcoming election? Vote the bums out.

Finally, don't eat bats, y'all. I don't care if it's a bit too late for this one. Living bats have important roles in their ecosystems, eating insects, pollinating flowers, and spreading fruit seeds. Dead bats are all sorts of full of diseases as mentioned earlier. You know what would make this pandemic worse? Also getting a novel hemorrhagic fever outbreak at the same time. Just leave the little winged fuzzballs alone.


Also:

DO NOT consider this OP to be all-inclusive and all the information you need. Check the links below and keep up with the news for updates, the latest findings, and warnings.


Useful links (with thanks again from @boogedyboo):


General Info

US CDC on nCov 2019
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/summary.html

WHO on nCOV 2019
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/novel-coronavirus-china

Live updates from Netherlands-based news aggregator BNO News:
https://twitter.com/BNODesk

Good video summary from the Guardian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aerq4byr7ps

Wikipedia pages, updated frequently:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019–20_coronavirus_outbreak

Links to separate pages by country and territory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019–20_coronavirus_outbreak_by_country_and_territory


Situation Reports

WHO Daily Sit-reps
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/

US CDC Case count
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-in-us.html


Visualization

Updated mapping visualization by John Hopkins University
https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
[Up to date, usually marking by country but also state and Chinese province]

Live updates, number tracking (no map)
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Real Time Tracking of cases in China (in Chinese)
http://3g.dxy.cn/newh5/view/pneumonia

BNO News Timeline and tracker:
https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/02/the-latest-coronavirus-cases/
[Note: the map marks individual cities but this has been falling behind as cases accelerate.]


Academic

Completed sequence of viral genome
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

TWiV 584: Year of the coronavirus - Discussion panel of virologists about the outbreak.
http://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-584/

Twitter thread keeping track of academic papers both published and preprint (biorxiv.org) on the virus.
Maintained by Dr Cevik of University of St Andrews


Credit to Mayabird for the OP.

Bogart on
«13456799

Posts

  • WACriminalWACriminal Dying Is Easy, Young Man Living Is HarderRegistered User regular
    The more I read, the more I'm becoming convinced that the current numbers we have for the USA (and in fairness probably other places as well) are a Chernobyl "how many roentgen?" situation. We're not getting the actual numbers, we're getting the numbers they have. This thing was apparently in the wild here for at least a week before we knew to take action about it -- there's no fucking way we only have ~1000 cases here. The next week is gonna see that number shoot up.

    Anyway, my partner (who has to use a lot of public transit options and needs relatively frequent doctor's visits) has been feeling a little under the weather most of the afternoon, and may have been running a fever tonight just before bed. I'm doing my best to put on a confident face about it with her ("Nah, you almost certainly don't have it. And anyway even if you do, you're young and feisty, so you'll definitely be fine.").

    But tonight I was standing in Kroger grabbing grocery necessities in case she wakes up with a fever tomorrow and we both have to quarantine for a bit to make sure it's not The Thing. Doing my best not to touch anything that wasn't leaving the store with me (I picked something up, changed my mind about it, and then realized that I'd already touched it, so I bought it anyway). Doing my best not to think about all the outbreak fiction I've ever consumed -- The Stand, etc.

    And mostly just thinking about how in a sane world, I would feel confident that the situation was being addressed by competent experts at every level, but instead I'm worrying about how long I'll be allowed to work from home and how long it will take before the powers that be in this country stop trying to treat the virus as a hoax and whether it's better to get it early when there might still be hospital beds available if you need them, or get it later when they might have figured out a more effective way to treat it.

    I'm not panicking, and I don't think anyone should. As a species, we're gonna get through this, and the vast majority of us will get through it as individuals too. But this stage of the process sucks from every angle, and rationally I know it's probably going to get worse before it gets better -- but, rationally, I also know that it will get better.

  • OremLKOremLK Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    My wife and I were planning to move to Colorado in June, potentially without her having a job already lined up there (I work from home but make a lot less money than she does). We've been wanting to get out of Texas since 2016, and kind of even before that, for a variety of reasons. She'll be getting paychecks through the summer since she works for a school district here, and we have a place to stay with my parents up there... but even with those advantages I'm still thinking it might be a bad idea if she can't find a job before we pull the trigger. Seems like this thing will really be blowing up across the country over the next month or two (and possibly for some time after). Am I overreacting to be rethinking things?

    OremLK on
    My zombie survival life simulator They Don't Sleep is out now on Steam if you want to check it out.
  • Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Cybertronian Paranormal Eliminator Registered User regular
    The State of Alaska has suspended out if state travel for state employees and the State Legislature is discussing amending rules to allow for voting over the phone in case a quarentine happens.

    No confirmed cases in the State as of yet.

  • HappylilElfHappylilElf Registered User regular
    OremLK wrote: »
    My wife and I were planning to move to Colorado in June, potentially without her having a job already lined up there (I work from home but make a lot less money than she does). We've been wanting to get out of Texas since 2016, and kind of even before that, for a variety of reasons. She'll be getting paychecks through the summer since she works for a school district here, and we have a place to stay with my parents up there... but even with those advantages I'm still thinking it might be a bad idea if she can't find a job before we pull the trigger. Seems like this thing will really be blowing up across the country over the next month or two (and possibly for some time after). Am I overreacting to be rethinking things?

    That seems like a bit of risky proposition before even factoring in anything to do with COVID-19.

    A place to stay helps a lot but (without knowing the details of your finances) if the primary earner doesn't have a job lined up it kinda strikes me as not a great idea? Not to say it's a terrible idea or anything but if your lifestyle means you both need to have jobs then I'm thinking her having at the very least some solid job prospects lined up would be a much better situation to move forward with.

    I dunno, I might just be overly-cautious because I have a friend who moved to AZ to work for the city of Phoenix and then got screwed because her college had a fire and lost all records before like 1996 (she graduated in the early 80s). Since she didn't have her diploma anymore she ended up stranded in AZ for awhile with no job because while the city had told her she had a job and they'd pay the moving expenses? Once she got there the city said because they couldn't verify her degree: "Lawl sorry, our bad, but now kindly fuck off"

  • Giggles_FunsworthGiggles_Funsworth Blight on Discourse Bay Area SprawlRegistered User regular
    OremLK wrote: »
    My wife and I were planning to move to Colorado in June, potentially without her having a job already lined up there (I work from home but make a lot less money than she does). We've been wanting to get out of Texas since 2016, and kind of even before that, for a variety of reasons. She'll be getting paychecks through the summer since she works for a school district here, and we have a place to stay with my parents up there... but even with those advantages I'm still thinking it might be a bad idea if she can't find a job before we pull the trigger. Seems like this thing will really be blowing up across the country over the next month or two (and possibly for some time after). Am I overreacting to be rethinking things?

    I'd be trying to hunker down at whatever job you got right now with what the markets are doing.

    But I had the misfortune of starting my career during the Recession, and I'm trying to get a new job after several years focusing on activism right as another one seems like it's popping off; so I've lived through a very worst case scenario and am probably a little biased.

  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca
    Here’s what I’m going to cover in this article, with lots of charts, data and models with plenty of sources:

    How many cases of coronavirus will there be in your area?

    What will happen when these cases materialize?

    What should you do?

    When?
    Very informative article

    autono-wally, erotibot300 on
    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • y2jake215y2jake215 certified Flat Birther theorist the Last Good Boy onlineRegistered User regular
    I really hope they tell me to start working from home because I work in health care, around a bunch of hospitals, and take public transport to that area every day

    I’m gonna get it soon if they don’t

    C8Ft8GE.jpg
    maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
  • This content has been removed.

  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    mcdermott wrote: »
    https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca
    Here’s what I’m going to cover in this article, with lots of charts, data and models with plenty of sources:

    How many cases of coronavirus will there be in your area?

    What will happen when these cases materialize?

    What should you do?

    When?
    Very informative article

    From the article:
    This is the least I would order. If you want to be safe, do it Wuhan style. People might complain now, but they’ll thank you later.

    I disagree. They won’t thank you later, because you’ll be unable to prove what was avoided. It’s the Y2K issue. I’ve heard people today talk about how such a huge deal was made about that, and it turned out to be nothing. Ignoring that it turned out to be nothing because such a huge deal was made about it, and due to the massive efforts to ensure it turned out to be nothing.

    Nobody thanks you for preventing a catastrophe they never saw. Even today, I feel like the bulk of Americans are looking at Italy as something that can’t happen here, because...reasons. So even if we took the most drastic measures, and prevented the bulk of the health impact, those people would remain convinced that it would never have happened here anyway, and all that economic cost was for no good reason.

    Look at Italy. Lombardy has a case fatality rate of 8.2% now, because they have no more capacity for treatment.

    Edit. If people can't see that.. Either they need to change their minds, or they will suffer the consequences

    autono-wally, erotibot300 on
    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • DisruptedCapitalistDisruptedCapitalist I swear! Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    mcdermott wrote: »
    https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca
    Here’s what I’m going to cover in this article, with lots of charts, data and models with plenty of sources:

    How many cases of coronavirus will there be in your area?

    What will happen when these cases materialize?

    What should you do?

    When?
    Very informative article

    From the article:
    This is the least I would order. If you want to be safe, do it Wuhan style. People might complain now, but they’ll thank you later.

    I disagree. They won’t thank you later, because you’ll be unable to prove what was avoided. It’s the Y2K issue. I’ve heard people today talk about how such a huge deal was made about that, and it turned out to be nothing. Ignoring that it turned out to be nothing because such a huge deal was made about it, and due to the massive efforts to ensure it turned out to be nothing.

    Nobody thanks you for preventing a catastrophe they never saw. Even today, I feel like the bulk of Americans are looking at Italy as something that can’t happen here, because...reasons. So even if we took the most drastic measures, and prevented the bulk of the health impact, those people would remain convinced that it would never have happened here anyway, and all that economic cost was for no good reason.

    Americans are also really bad at statistics. Even if there is an absurd fatality rate like almost 10% there will still be a lot of people who won't personally know anyone who had it bad. And as we know, if something doesn't directly affect conservative voters, they don't give a shit.

    DisruptedCapitalist on
    "Simple, real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." -Mustrum Ridcully in Terry Pratchett's Hogfather p. 142 (HarperPrism 1996)
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    Look at the cold numbers. If only 20% of Americans get it, that's 65 million sick. 13 million of those will need treatment to survive, going by every other country on the world.
    How many won't get that treatment?

    This thing is really nasty. It's just slow enough and "harmless" enough to spread everywhere and be ignored until it's too late.

    autono-wally, erotibot300 on
    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    Look at the cold numbers. If only 20% of Americans get it, that's 65 million sick. 13 million those will need treatment to survive, going by every other country on the world.
    How many won't get that treatment?

    This thing is really nasty. It's just slow enough and "harmless" enough to spread everywhere and be ignored until it's too late.

    Americans are also fighting the headwinds of one political party that is denying it and an opposition party that is silent on it. Every decision maker who understands has to fight headwinds of elected officials, board members, and donors who are becoming radicalized around the idea that this is a made up issue - a minor cold sensationalized by the media.

  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    I am trying not to be... well, I want to say I'm trying not to be overly negative or apocalyptic, but my first instinct was to say I'm trying not to be Cassandra, which I suspect is grimly correct.

    Truthfully, I think we're too late for this to be Y2K. This virus has insane contagiousness and a high incubation period. If we somehow arrested all transmission within the next week, which is a truly absurd situation that is literally impossibly rosy, we will still probably be rationing care and refusing to treat people over 65 in some regions by the end of March. The dam has broken.

  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    My wife works in (mental) healthcare and I'm mulling the possible effectiveness, given its insane contagiousness, of any measures taken in the home. I rarely leave the house, so she's the biggest threat. But it's so contagious that I can't accurately gauge how effective any given measure will be in protecting me. I'm going to get it eventually, we all probably are (though who knows, with how much I've been washing my hands and not touching my face, I may be fine for a while). I just want to delay getting it until after the healthcare system is triaging everyone.

  • ahavaahava Call me Ahava ~~She/Her~~ Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    And that has me terrified.

    Mum is going to be 66 this year. Three time cancer survivor. Congestive heart failure and lung damage from one of the radiation therapies she had in the late 70s. She's got a pacemaker.

    And I'm putting her in a plane and sending her back to the US on Friday. And if she gets this thing, and it gets bad, will I be able to travel to be at home with her? Will I not?

    It's so hard to not spiral.

  • furbatfurbat Registered User regular
    My wife works in infection prevention. She cautions that the data we have is shitty. We know people are dying with Corona virus. We have no idea how many of those are dying from Corona virus. We don't have good data on who or how many have it.

    That said, I'm about to go into a few weeks of field training where I am completely isolated from the outside world. No phones. No news. No internet. Zero contact.

    When we get back I expect a 30 days later scenario. I want to see barren streets and trash blowing around.

  • DirtmuncherDirtmuncher Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8096955/amp/Around-58-MILLION-Germans-infected-coronavirus-Angela-Merkel-warns.html

    hwil3j30kudv.jpg

    60% of Germany will be infected says Angela Merkel. As my country is right next to it and has community spread I conclude that we are facing the same scenario.
    In a country of 16m we already have 380 infected and 4 dead.

    Dirtmuncher on
    steam_sig.png
  • MayabirdMayabird Pecking at the keyboardRegistered User regular
    edited March 2020
    Finally got that confirmation that there's an outbreak in Indonesia, just in time for them to report a death to emphasize they've had it for a while:




    Additionally the Iranian parliament is shut down, the [uel=https://www.ibtimes.com/european-parliament-speaker-self-isolates-after-italy-visit-2937145]European parliament is holding only truncated sessions with most activities cancelled and the speaker is self-isolating[/url] and the World Trade Organization has cancelled all meetings for the next nine days. The virus doesn't care if you're powerful; we're all just meat to it.




    Also is it just me or were the announcement of cases in Michigan delayed until after the primary?

    Mayabird on
  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • MayabirdMayabird Pecking at the keyboardRegistered User regular
    Considering how the very existence of the worldwide pandemic has been politicized and is being used for partisan purposes, it's hard to say what's paranoia and what's incompetence exacerbated by malevolence.

  • quovadis13quovadis13 Registered User regular
    Michigan has it now too. One case at the hospital my wife works at. Fun!!

  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    daveNYC wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    This is such insane thinking. Like, part of me can at least understand how you might be obsessed with elections and want to look good. That makes sense. It's terrible, but I get it.

    But the way to make the numbers look good is to take actions to avoid a case fatality rate approaching 10% because you ran out of hospitals. Keep the number of dead below the many thousands, if you can. The election isn't tomorrow, it's half a year away. You're fucked if you try to make the numbers look good now, vs looking good then.

    Also now is a great opportunity, politically. Take strong measures, talk about being a strong man, keeping the people safe. Most everyone will eat that shit up. What an incredibly pathetic, weak response. What an incredibly weak leader. This doesn't look good, this makes him look weak, and I'm surprised he hasn't cottoned on.

  • Knight_Knight_ Dead Dead Dead Registered User regular
    I did not know the cfr in regions of Italy was beginning to push 10% that is extremely scary.

    I wish we would do something as a country while we still can to prevent everyone from getting this thing, I feel tremendously helpless and scared for myself and my almost 70 y/o parents.

    aeNqQM9.jpg
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    This is such insane thinking. Like, part of me can at least understand how you might be obsessed with elections and want to look good. That makes sense. It's terrible, but I get it.

    But the way to make the numbers look good is to take actions to avoid a case fatality rate approaching 10% because you ran out of hospitals. Keep the number of dead below the many thousands, if you can. The election isn't tomorrow, it's half a year away. You're fucked if you try to make the numbers look good now, vs looking good then.

    Also now is a great opportunity, politically. Take strong measures, talk about being a strong man, keeping the people safe. Most everyone will eat that shit up. What an incredibly pathetic, weak response. What an incredibly weak leader. This doesn't look good, this makes him look weak, and I'm surprised he hasn't cottoned on.

    Nah, from a purely political self interest perspective this is basically a no win scenario. Taking full quarantine measures like Italy or South Korea or China are doing would be a fatal blow to reelection. Either it works and people end up resenting it as unnecessary, or it doesn't and now you own failing the crisis.

    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • Dark Raven XDark Raven X Laugh hard, run fast, be kindRegistered User regular
    My assisted living workplace is approaching this with an extremely laissez faire attitude, in a way that's frustrating. Like even if ya don't believe the hype, believe that other people do and are gonna be panic buying the shit we need on a daily basis! :I

    Oh brilliant
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    This is such insane thinking. Like, part of me can at least understand how you might be obsessed with elections and want to look good. That makes sense. It's terrible, but I get it.

    But the way to make the numbers look good is to take actions to avoid a case fatality rate approaching 10% because you ran out of hospitals. Keep the number of dead below the many thousands, if you can. The election isn't tomorrow, it's half a year away. You're fucked if you try to make the numbers look good now, vs looking good then.

    Also now is a great opportunity, politically. Take strong measures, talk about being a strong man, keeping the people safe. Most everyone will eat that shit up. What an incredibly pathetic, weak response. What an incredibly weak leader. This doesn't look good, this makes him look weak, and I'm surprised he hasn't cottoned on.

    Trump doesn't think past tomorrow. His efforts to downplay this will look awful in a few months because he is both incredibly short sighted and self-absorbed.

  • OrganichuOrganichu poops peesRegistered User regular
    edited March 2020
    My company’s sick pay policy is that you need to be out three days running, and upon the third day you can start filing to use your sick time. I’ve been employed here for over 5 years and despite a few 24 hour bugs I’ve never missed 3 days in a row and thus I’ve never been able to use any of my sick pay.

    So, now I am on day 2. If I miss tomorrow also I’ll need to get a doctor’s note. I’m rage-laughing at the idea that a visit (to my pcp or urgent care) might cost more than my sick pay compensation so I will still lose money in the exchange 🧠


    edit: errr note I’ve no reason to think I’m infected, my symptoms don’t match up very closely. Just describing my situation as someone in America who has to make hard financial decisions about whether I will work when sick, given I handle food and often serve the elderly and other immunocompromised people

    Organichu on
  • klemmingklemming Registered User regular
    Tomanta wrote: »
    Trump doesn't think past tomorrow. His efforts to downplay this will look awful in a few months because he is both incredibly short sighted and self-absorbed.
    But by then he'll be saying how he was totally on top of this from the beginning and didn't downplay anything, everyone said he was the best responder to the coronaflu they'd ever seen. And the people he's trying to sell it to will buy it, because their memories are as selective as his.

    Moving it away from Trump, I'm in the UK and my sister is planning a holiday to Spain at the end of the month. I'm a little concerned about it, but she says she's still planning to go unless she's actually barred from doing so. She's not an idiot (she's a pharmacist, so she arguably knows this sort of thing far better than me, a man who reads stuff on the internet), but I can't help feeling that if our situations were reversed, she'd give me her patented 'really? That's really what you're going to do?' looks that get me to reconsider when I'm thinking about doing something risky or irresponsible.

    Nobody remembers the singer. The song remains.
  • SleepSleep Registered User regular
    Eh you'd be surprised how much people will put on blinders to do that thing they've been wanting to do for weeks or months.

  • RaijuRaiju Shoganai JapanRegistered User regular
    edited March 2020
    Tomanta wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    This is such insane thinking. Like, part of me can at least understand how you might be obsessed with elections and want to look good. That makes sense. It's terrible, but I get it.

    But the way to make the numbers look good is to take actions to avoid a case fatality rate approaching 10% because you ran out of hospitals. Keep the number of dead below the many thousands, if you can. The election isn't tomorrow, it's half a year away. You're fucked if you try to make the numbers look good now, vs looking good then.

    Also now is a great opportunity, politically. Take strong measures, talk about being a strong man, keeping the people safe. Most everyone will eat that shit up. What an incredibly pathetic, weak response. What an incredibly weak leader. This doesn't look good, this makes him look weak, and I'm surprised he hasn't cottoned on.

    Trump doesn't think past tomorrow. His efforts to downplay this will look awful in a few months because he is both incredibly short sighted and self-absorbed.

    Trump doesn't think past Nov 2020. It's actually all he thinks about until then.
    HamHamJ wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    daveNYC wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I don't think there's much reason that they'd manipulate the results in order to impact the Democratic primary, but Trump has made it obvious that he 'wants the numbers to look good', so there will be shenanigans incoming.

    This is such insane thinking. Like, part of me can at least understand how you might be obsessed with elections and want to look good. That makes sense. It's terrible, but I get it.

    But the way to make the numbers look good is to take actions to avoid a case fatality rate approaching 10% because you ran out of hospitals. Keep the number of dead below the many thousands, if you can. The election isn't tomorrow, it's half a year away. You're fucked if you try to make the numbers look good now, vs looking good then.

    Also now is a great opportunity, politically. Take strong measures, talk about being a strong man, keeping the people safe. Most everyone will eat that shit up. What an incredibly pathetic, weak response. What an incredibly weak leader. This doesn't look good, this makes him look weak, and I'm surprised he hasn't cottoned on.

    Nah, from a purely political self interest perspective this is basically a no win scenario. Taking full quarantine measures like Italy or South Korea or China are doing would be a fatal blow to reelection. Either it works and people end up resenting it as unnecessary, or it doesn't and now you own failing the crisis.

    We all know he won't own it though, that's the thing.

    Raiju on
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    My office building just announced someone was there Monday who later tested positive for COVID-19, so now we're closed on a day-to-day basis, which is stupid and annoying.

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • SleepSleep Registered User regular
    JFC can the owner class stop fuckin thinking this is just gonna blow over please. It's not gonna magically be not bad tomorrow. It's gonna be bad for months, fuckin deal with it and stop endangering the whole of humanity because you don't want it to affect your bottom line.

  • Giggles_FunsworthGiggles_Funsworth Blight on Discourse Bay Area SprawlRegistered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    Probably just you. Tests have been trickling out to states over the course of this week and I don’t think there is any kind of political angle where the CDC and medical community would sit on results for partisan gain

    I mean, one of the main issues of the primary and our inability to deal with this pandemic is our lack of universal healthcare and labor rights. One candidate stands for those things, and the other has the GOP champing at the bit to run against him because he appears to mentally declining. It's not the most absurd thing I've heard but it is speculation.

  • FoolOnTheHillFoolOnTheHill PhiladelphiaRegistered User regular
    At my job, we have been on heavy travel restrictions for about a week, but still no directives to work from home for the (majority) of the office that can. Since I'm in Pennsylvania and working right next to the two counties with most of the state's confirmed cases (and I'm living in the county with the most so far), I'm wondering what kind of close call or issue it'll take for us to do so.

  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
  • thatassemblyguythatassemblyguy Janitor of Technical Debt .Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    At my job, we have been on heavy travel restrictions for about a week, but still no directives to work from home for the (majority) of the office that can. Since I'm in Pennsylvania and working right next to the two counties with most of the state's confirmed cases (and I'm living in the county with the most so far), I'm wondering what kind of close call or issue it'll take for us to do so.

    Judging by the response so far, it’s going to get Italy bad before serious action is taken by some of the companies that are holding out on doing the right thing.

    e: and even then it’s going to be closing the barn door after the animals have gotten out, the barn has burnt to the ground and the ashes of the structure have washed away by flood waters.

    thatassemblyguy on
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    the poltics are simple

    Trump said it isn't a big deal

    he will never admit it is a big deal. This is the man who redraw a hurricane map with a sharpie to avoid admitting he heard the wrong weather report. He will Baghdad bob this to the bitter bitter end

  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    edited March 2020
    the poltics are simple

    Trump said it isn't a big deal

    he will never admit it is a big deal. This is the man who redraw a hurricane map with a sharpie to avoid admitting he heard the wrong weather report. He will Baghdad bob this to the bitter bitter end

    In November it will be "sure, hundreds died but it's no flu! Totally overblown!"

    Tomanta on
  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    At my job, we have been on heavy travel restrictions for about a week, but still no directives to work from home for the (majority) of the office that can. Since I'm in Pennsylvania and working right next to the two counties with most of the state's confirmed cases (and I'm living in the county with the most so far), I'm wondering what kind of close call or issue it'll take for us to do so.

    Judging by the response so far, it’s going to get Italy bad before serious action is taken by some of the companies that are holding out on doing the right thing.

    e: and even then it’s going to be closing the barn door after the animals have gotten out, the barn has burnt to the ground and the ashes of the structure have washed away by flood waters.

    The narrative that we just need to "push through this" and infect everyone is already being floated in conservative corners. I fully expect a lot of businesses to try to retain the status quo for as long as possible, while their owners issue orders from their safe rooms and bunkers.

This discussion has been closed.