so we all know that the first requirement of a Toy is that it's something that is Made, the making is what pours the soul in and makes something like forky or sporky or whatevva da fuk his name was
so we all know that the first requirement of a Toy is that it's something that is Made, the making is what pours the soul in and makes something like forky or sporky or whatevva da fuk his name was
but how little making is required
is a ball and stick a Toy
I think it's some combination of making and anthropomorphizing on behalf of the child/children
If an object is "brought" to life through play then it really comes to life. For instance, Bopeep ISN'T a toy, she's a lamp, but she was played with like a toy and that gave her life
If you're just playing with a ball and stick then they're just a ball and stick. If you are imagining that the ball and stick have personalities, they become toys
so we all know that the first requirement of a Toy is that it's something that is Made, the making is what pours the soul in and makes something like forky or sporky or whatevva da fuk his name was
but how little making is required
is a ball and stick a Toy
I think it's some combination of making and anthropomorphizing on behalf of the child/children
If an object is "brought" to life through play then it really comes to life. For instance, Bopeep ISN'T a toy, she's a lamp, but she was played with like a toy and that gave her life
If you're just playing with a ball and stick then they're just a ball and stick. If you are imagining that the ball and stick have personalities, they become toys
We do see toys that are still in-packaging as having Toyness before they have the opportunity to be physically handled by children though
So now we're entering into territory where we have to ask if it requires a Child to imagine them as having play, or if the adults making them being conscious of them being toys also provides the spark
so we all know that the first requirement of a Toy is that it's something that is Made, the making is what pours the soul in and makes something like forky or sporky or whatevva da fuk his name was
but how little making is required
is a ball and stick a Toy
I think it's some combination of making and anthropomorphizing on behalf of the child/children
If an object is "brought" to life through play then it really comes to life. For instance, Bopeep ISN'T a toy, she's a lamp, but she was played with like a toy and that gave her life
If you're just playing with a ball and stick then they're just a ball and stick. If you are imagining that the ball and stick have personalities, they become toys
Well, I'd argue the hockey puck has neither when humans are around, but I have no evidence.
There appears to be a toy car with limbs instead of wheels in Sid's room, which might imply normal toy cars with wheels and no limbs or eyes are Toys.
so we all know that the first requirement of a Toy is that it's something that is Made, the making is what pours the soul in and makes something like forky or sporky or whatevva da fuk his name was
but how little making is required
is a ball and stick a Toy
I think it's some combination of making and anthropomorphizing on behalf of the child/children
If an object is "brought" to life through play then it really comes to life. For instance, Bopeep ISN'T a toy, she's a lamp, but she was played with like a toy and that gave her life
If you're just playing with a ball and stick then they're just a ball and stick. If you are imagining that the ball and stick have personalities, they become toys
We do see toys that are still in-packaging as having Toyness before they have the opportunity to be physically handled by children though
So now we're entering into territory where we have to ask if it requires a Child to imagine them as having play, or if the adults making them being conscious of them being toys also provides the spark
I think in the case of say a buzz light-year the packaged toys are brought to life not by an individual child but by the collective imagination of all children, as influenced through buzz light-year advertising
A similar thing could likely be said of Stinky Pete, though it is noteworthy that he's retained his sentience decades after he was forgotten by popular culture. This implies that the process is one-way, and once an object gains toy-life it can never lose it
Yes once made, a toy lives as long as its mortal vessel remains intact. Potentially for hundreds of years. Perhaps thousands.
Should this vessel be destroyed entirely where, then, does the soul go? Does it know paradise? Or, being not of the flesh, is it apart from God, and so damned there to Gehenna?
Yes once made, a toy lives as long as its normal vessel remains intact.
Should this vessel be destroyed entirely where, then, does the soul go? Does it know paradise? Or, being not of the flesh, is it apart from God, and so damned there to Gehenna?
Ask Sid
0
PaperLuigi44My amazement is at maximum capacity.Registered Userregular
Posts
but how little making is required
is a ball and stick a Toy
I think it's some combination of making and anthropomorphizing on behalf of the child/children
If an object is "brought" to life through play then it really comes to life. For instance, Bopeep ISN'T a toy, she's a lamp, but she was played with like a toy and that gave her life
If you're just playing with a ball and stick then they're just a ball and stick. If you are imagining that the ball and stick have personalities, they become toys
http://www.audioentropy.com/
We do see toys that are still in-packaging as having Toyness before they have the opportunity to be physically handled by children though
So now we're entering into territory where we have to ask if it requires a Child to imagine them as having play, or if the adults making them being conscious of them being toys also provides the spark
So a bat or at least the ball is a Toy.
Steam ID - VeldrinD | SS Post | Wishlist
There appears to be a toy car with limbs instead of wheels in Sid's room, which might imply normal toy cars with wheels and no limbs or eyes are Toys.
the etch a sketch
vestigial evolutionary trait that just isn't selected out
Why do they have locks on their doors
Like an appendix? Do they ever get them removed? You'd figure a high performance race car like lightning would benefit from less weight.
Existence is suffering. They all want to die.
I think in the case of say a buzz light-year the packaged toys are brought to life not by an individual child but by the collective imagination of all children, as influenced through buzz light-year advertising
A similar thing could likely be said of Stinky Pete, though it is noteworthy that he's retained his sentience decades after he was forgotten by popular culture. This implies that the process is one-way, and once an object gains toy-life it can never lose it
http://www.audioentropy.com/
well ultimately a car is not well suited to performing optional surgery on someone
But wasn't that part of the premise of one of the sequels?
Should this vessel be destroyed entirely where, then, does the soul go? Does it know paradise? Or, being not of the flesh, is it apart from God, and so damned there to Gehenna?
Ask Sid
Are most funko pops condemned to speechless agony
The RC car?
Pretty sure it had headlight eyes.
I immediately thought of Etch but maybe the knobs would be thought of as limbs of some kind
Also Mike and Mr Spell and that’s only from the first act of the first movie!
Is existence a never ending Matryoshka doll of toys hiding from toys hiding from toys?