The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.

[Dune]Open Spoilers for movie, closed for books!

localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
edited October 2021 in Debate and/or Discourse
DUNE

6gms175axa8p.jpg

Dune (Part One) is pretty damn good movie, dir. by the excellent Denis Villeneuve (Arrival, Sicario, Blade Runner 2049). The first of atleast two films, this adaptation of the 1965 by Frank Herbert mostly covers the first half of the book. We follow Paul Atreides as he and House Atreides are entrusted with stewarding the desert planet Arrakis. As it is the lone source of the spice Melange, and the only means of interstellar travel in the distant future of 10,191, the planet is coveted by many.

q94evn7yig1c.jpg


Starting Timothée Chalamet, Rebecca Ferguson, Oscar Isaac, Josh Brolin, Stellan Skarsgård, Dave Bautista, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Zendaya, David Dastmalchian, Chang Chen, Sharon Duncan-Brewster, Charlotte Rampling, Jason Momoa, Javier Bardem, and the worms from Beetlejuice

s47fhwvrapfs.jpg

localhjay on
«13456742

Posts

  • McRhynoMcRhyno Registered User regular
    Casting Jamis as a magical negro is a bad fucking look. Yikes.

    PSN: ImRyanBurgundy
  • GONG-00GONG-00 Registered User regular
    https://youtu.be/CnuaXR933mA

    Oh, the new one is fine too.

    “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
    Law and Order ≠ Justice
    xu257gunns6e.png
  • localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
    McRhyno wrote: »
    Casting Jamis as a magical negro is a bad fucking look. Yikes.

    I uh


    Didn't get this reading

  • McRhynoMcRhyno Registered User regular
    Copy pasta from my previous post:

    The Jamis stuff doesn't exactly play well. "Oh, this black guy just has to be my friend and teacher! Wait, no he's not. I have to kill him to realize my power." I know the visions are a metaphor, but... yikes.

    PSN: ImRyanBurgundy
  • localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
    He clearly didn't wanna kill him. Idk I think it's a bit of a stretch. It gave more depth to Jamis I thought

  • swaylowswaylow Registered User regular
    I don't know that I read/saw the visions as a metaphor - Paul sees many possible futures - friendship and his own death included. And I don't really think they presented him killing Jamis as a realization of his power - Paul would preferred another way but ultimately bent to their customs. Later we see him push against their customs where they are harmful - likely as a result of his experience killing Jamis.

    I have my second screening tomorrow so will get a chance to see again and consider if I am missing something.

    Quasi-related: I was really hoping to eventually see it in Regal's "4DX" which is a hilarious attempt at upcharging for an amusement park / cinema experience that involves moving seats, haptic seat feedback (think a lumbar support slamming into your back) atmosphere effects, etc but it stops showing in 4DX after tomorrow so I will miss it.

  • MvrckMvrck Dwarven MountainhomeRegistered User regular
    McRhyno wrote: »
    Copy pasta from my previous post:

    The Jamis stuff doesn't exactly play well. "Oh, this black guy just has to be my friend and teacher! Wait, no he's not. I have to kill him to realize my power." I know the visions are a metaphor, but... yikes.

    Are you like, getting Jamis confused with Stilgar? Jamis was never anything even approaching a friend to Paul.

  • mrondeaumrondeau Montréal, CanadaRegistered User regular
    Mvrck wrote: »
    McRhyno wrote: »
    Copy pasta from my previous post:

    The Jamis stuff doesn't exactly play well. "Oh, this black guy just has to be my friend and teacher! Wait, no he's not. I have to kill him to realize my power." I know the visions are a metaphor, but... yikes.

    Are you like, getting Jamis confused with Stilgar? Jamis was never anything even approaching a friend to Paul.

    There's a short, probably metaphorical, vision of Jamis a bit they met the Fremens where Jamis says something like "I will teach you the ways of Arrakis".
    Which he does, since the ways of Arrakis is to kill people.

  • StraygatsbyStraygatsby Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    My unsolicited Dune actor casting hot takes (Lynch vs. Villeneuve) in no particular order:

    Paul: Upgrade
    Chani: Upgrade
    Jessica: Downgrade
    Leto: Draw
    Duncan: Upgrade!
    Gurney: Downgrade!
    Raban: Upgrade!
    Stilgar: Downgrade
    Baron: Draw

    Straygatsby on
  • This content has been removed.

  • BlackDragon480BlackDragon480 Bluster Kerfuffle Master of Windy ImportRegistered User regular
    Stuck at work, but I'd just like to say to all the first time fliers:

    Welcome to Larrytown!

    No matter where you go...there you are.
    ~ Buckaroo Banzai
  • SneaksSneaks Registered User regular
    MorganV wrote: »
    My unsolicited Dune actor casting hot takes (Lynch vs. Villeneuve) in no particular order:

    Paul: Upgrade
    Chani: Upgrade
    Jessica: Downgrade
    Leto: Draw
    Duncan: Upgrade!
    Gurney: Downgrade!
    Raban: Upgrade!
    Stilgar: Downgrade
    Baron: Draw

    I don't disagree with most of what you have (and it's more a case that both casts were fucking stacked with none really being bad). I think Baron was the lesser in the new version (but more style and story than acting), and I'd be more inclined to put Paul on a Draw until we see what happens later. Might just be me not appreciating Chalamet as much as others do.

    You missed Mapes, which just has to go in the Downgrade with two exclamation points. And at least one exclamation point Downgrade from Dourif and Stockwell to the current versions of DeVries and Yeuh. Very servicable in the new version, but the original cast just felt like they were given so much more fleshing out and as a result, gave a stronger showing.

    Conversely, upgrade with a couple of exclamation point to Kynes.

  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator, Administrator admin
    MorganV wrote: »
    You missed Mapes, which just has to go in the Downgrade with two exclamation points.

    I'm wondering exactly what was left on the cutting floor with her.

  • StraygatsbyStraygatsby Registered User regular
    Sneaks wrote: »
    MorganV wrote: »
    My unsolicited Dune actor casting hot takes (Lynch vs. Villeneuve) in no particular order:

    Paul: Upgrade
    Chani: Upgrade
    Jessica: Downgrade
    Leto: Draw
    Duncan: Upgrade!
    Gurney: Downgrade!
    Raban: Upgrade!
    Stilgar: Downgrade
    Baron: Draw

    I don't disagree with most of what you have (and it's more a case that both casts were fucking stacked with none really being bad). I think Baron was the lesser in the new version (but more style and story than acting), and I'd be more inclined to put Paul on a Draw until we see what happens later. Might just be me not appreciating Chalamet as much as others do.

    You missed Mapes, which just has to go in the Downgrade with two exclamation points. And at least one exclamation point Downgrade from Dourif and Stockwell to the current versions of DeVries and Yeuh. Very servicable in the new version, but the original cast just felt like they were given so much more fleshing out and as a result, gave a stronger showing.

    Conversely, upgrade with a couple of exclamation point to Kynes.

    Both good additions! I completely blanked on Kynes. I really liked the updated version, but I have great love for von Sydow in the more limited Lynch version of the character as well.

  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    Von Sydow is a damn legend for good reason, but I really liked the new Kynes a hell of a lot.

  • This content has been removed.

  • SneaksSneaks Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    McRhyno wrote: »
    Copy pasta from my previous post:

    The Jamis stuff doesn't exactly play well. "Oh, this black guy just has to be my friend and teacher! Wait, no he's not. I have to kill him to realize my power." I know the visions are a metaphor, but... yikes.

    I don’t know that “I have to kill potential allies so that I will not, myself, be killed” is particularly close to “I have to kill him to realize my power.” I mean, I guess Paul can’t realize his power if he’s dead, but that’s… really not what Paul’s worrying about in that moment.

    As for Jamis being an exemplar of the magical black man… I just don’t think that’s the case. It’s a little closer to the old (and related) “noble savage” trope, but even that is undermined—pretty throughly undermined, in fact—by the fact that Jamis doesn’t want to help Paul and Jessica learn a lesson. He wants them dead to preserve the safety of his tribe; he has his own motivation contrary to the white interlopers.

    I do wish Jessica had come down a little harder on… basically everyone in that scene, though. I felt the absence of her calculated and intentionally cruel, “How does it feel to be a killer?” from the original book, in particular. Honestly, I think Villeneuve’s film has a way of shortchanging Jessica repeatedly.

    EDIT:
    Echo wrote: »
    One thing that I didn't like though, from a plot perspective, was the death of Leto. The Lynch movie made it clear it was a short range weapon (and the hallucination causes the misstep). The new version has it that the whole room is wiped out, and the Baron's protected by the shield. Which, given slow moving material can breach the shield, how's it stopping gas from passing through?

    Also, anyone who's read the books (I tried several decades ago, and just couldn't), how's it go down in the books? Which version got it closer, or did they both take liberties?
    The Lynch version is far closer, but the book does mention that the Baron’s shield slowing the passage of air to him contributed to his survival. I think I can see why Villeneuve changed things up; he has no interest in humanizing the Baron, and the Baron’s fear and shock of having only barely escaped death is as human as the character ever gets in the text. Villeneuve’s spin on the events allows him to smoothly skip that material.

    Sneaks on
  • SnicketysnickSnicketysnick The Greatest Hype Man in WesterosRegistered User regular
    I think the baron was more protected by being able to float up to the ceiling pretty quick sharp. If the gas was fairly dense he'd only get a light dose

    7qmGNt5.png
  • redxredx I(x)=2(x)+1 whole numbersRegistered User regular
    Sneaks wrote: »
    McRhyno wrote: »
    Copy pasta from my previous post:

    The Jamis stuff doesn't exactly play well. "Oh, this black guy just has to be my friend and teacher! Wait, no he's not. I have to kill him to realize my power." I know the visions are a metaphor, but... yikes.

    I don’t know that “I have to kill potential allies so that I will not, myself, be killed” is particularly close to “I have to kill him to realize my power.” I mean, I guess Paul can’t realize his power if he’s dead, but that’s… really not what Paul’s worrying about in that moment.

    As for Jamis being an exemplar of the magical black man… I just don’t think that’s the case. It’s a little closer to the old (and related) “noble savage” trope, but even that is undermined—pretty throughly undermined, in fact—by the fact that Jamis doesn’t want to help Paul and Jessica learn a lesson. He wants them dead to preserve the safety of his tribe; he has his own motivation contrary to the white interlopers.

    I do wish Jessica had come down a little harder on… basically everyone in that scene, though. I felt the absence of her calculated and intentionally cruel, “How does it feel to be a killer?” from the original book, in particular. Honestly, I think Villeneuve’s film has a way of shortchanging Jessica repeatedly.

    EDIT:
    Echo wrote: »
    One thing that I didn't like though, from a plot perspective, was the death of Leto. The Lynch movie made it clear it was a short range weapon (and the hallucination causes the misstep). The new version has it that the whole room is wiped out, and the Baron's protected by the shield. Which, given slow moving material can breach the shield, how's it stopping gas from passing through?

    Also, anyone who's read the books (I tried several decades ago, and just couldn't), how's it go down in the books? Which version got it closer, or did they both take liberties?
    The Lynch version is far closer, but the book does mention that the Baron’s shield slowing the passage of air to him contributed to his survival. I think I can see why Villeneuve changed things up; he has no interest in humanizing the Baron, and the Baron’s fear and shock of having only barely escaped death is as human as the character ever gets in the text. Villeneuve’s spin on the events allows him to smoothly skip that material.

    book spoiler
    Almost completely sure the book has several people around the Baron also get killed, most of the other folks in the room, even though it is explicitly stated it is short range.

    But Dune short range?

    They moistly come out at night, moistly.
  • BloodySlothBloodySloth Registered User regular
    Yo everything relating to the sandworms was executed incredibly. Awe-inspiring forces of impossible, humbling nature. Totally inhospitable to human life. I loved that the worms disturbing the sand as they move makes it difficult for people to escape from them. I loved the visual analogy where the wormsign produces shifting resonance patterns that mirror Paul's shifting visions of the future. So great.

    And even though I knew it was coming, the image of one of the fremen riding them at the very end gave me chills.

  • knitdanknitdan Registered User regular
    I didn’t realize Piter de Vries was even in the movie until I saw people talking about him and thought back to the Harkonnen scenes

    I thought that guy was just some random Harkonnen functionary

    Also I thought Javier Bardem was terrific as Larry Stilgar

    “I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
    -Indiana Solo, runner of blades
  • SyngyneSyngyne Registered User regular
    Is it terrible that I kept giggling they showed the Sardaukar planet because the priest kept making me think of this?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0s0czlJ4xA

    5gsowHm.png
  • BloodySlothBloodySloth Registered User regular
    knitdan wrote: »
    I didn’t realize Piter de Vries was even in the movie until I saw people talking about him and thought back to the Harkonnen scenes

    I thought that guy was just some random Harkonnen functionary

    Also I thought Javier Bardem was terrific as Larry Stilgar

    I mentioned this in the movies thread, but Piter really felt like a waste of a great casting decision. I hope that, if we ever get some obscenely long Jackson-style special edition, that we get to see more of what makes that character special.

    I dunno why I was hesitant over Bardem before I saw the movie, but his Stilgar was fucking great. Loved him.

  • chrisnlchrisnl Registered User regular
    I'm not sure why they had the mentats have just the center of their bottom lip marked instead of the discoloring being from drinking whatever drug it is that they consume to overdrive their brains. I suppose since they didn't really have much focus on the mentats, with Thufir Hawat at least having a role unlike Piter de Vries who just kind of died like a chump and didn't really contribute anything else, then there wasn't really a need to explain much about them or even show what it was they did exactly. Like Thufir did one calculation about how much it cost to send the Emperor's Herald for a ceremony and was otherwise just a normal guy, and that calculation wasn't anything super impressive and seemed to be just multiplying a known number by 3. The Baron didn't even make a comment about how much it would cost to replace Piter after the poisoning, so it's really easy to miss that Piter was there and died.

    In fact I don't recall them mentioning anything at all about forbidding thinking machines. There might have been something alluded to when they talked about the Spacing Guild navigators, but if so it was easy to lose in the flow of things because I certainly don't remember it. It's not super important to Paul's story, so I'm not like angry or anything, but it's a weird thing to leave out when it is quite a foundational aspect of the setting.

    steam_sig.png
  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    0QA9p1Y.png

  • KrieghundKrieghund Registered User regular
    My sister has my copy so I can't look it up, but does the book have any instances of Mentats doing Mentat things? I don't really remember anything like that. Although, without some serious exposition, I don't know how anyone is supposed to know what the social mores of the universe are. Nobody even mentions Kanly, which is what is going on between Atreides and Harkonnen. You see Gurney reading his OCB, but nobody tells you what it is.

    I didn't particularly have a problem with Jamis being different in the visions than in actuality. Paul was pretty happy to be able to call himself Paul Muad'Dib, instead of just Muad'Dib. Plus it was a nice bit of misdirection.

  • edited October 2021
    This content has been removed.

  • FleebFleeb has all of the fleeb juice Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    Just saw it on a giant imax screen and I'm absolutely blown away. I loved loved the aesthetics and the sense of scale. A book like Dune is pretty much impossible to bring over to film properly, being like 90% internal monologue, but I think they did a pretty good job. My wife's never read the book and knew nothing about the story and she still got most of what was going on. I think a couple scenes absolutely could have been explained better and might have benefited from some Lynch type voice overs maybe... the hunter-seeker scene in particular. Take the crysknife scene with Mapes and Jessica, I knew from reading the book what was going on, but to the wife that was a really weird scene that didn't add much to the movie.

    I'm REALLY glad I saw it on imax... just incredible. I am 100% in on the worldbuilding and aesthetics going on here. Can't wait for the second part.

    I really did want to hand Paul a tissue a few times though :D but I gotta hand it to Chalmet, he did a great job. Can you imagine the direction on some of those scenes? "Ok, your mind is being put through a hallucinogenic wringer and you're seeing past, present, and possible futures spread out in a kaleidoscopic tableaux... and... ACTION" :D:D

    Fleeb on
  • This content has been removed.

  • Romantic UndeadRomantic Undead Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    Saw this last night, haven't read the thread, but here are my initial impressions:

    - I thought the acting in general was great, but they did make a few alterations to characterization that I'm still a bit on the fence about
    - I feel they leaned a bit too far toward turning Leto a the virtuous tragic father figure. If I recall correctly Leto in the book absolutely engages in some far more sketchy behavior than what is implied in the movie. I get they wanted to make Leto more palatable to the audience to crank up the tragedy around his demise, but still, I feel that taking away some of the more nuanced aspects of his life and rule do an overall disservice to the narrative.
    - Similar with Jessica, downplaying her role as a Bene Gesserit a bit, framing her more as an unwitting victim rather than a manipulator in her own right, though they did do that scene with her and Paul in the tent when he lashes out at her that at least somewhat shows the audience that what she and the Bene Gesserit did was pretty fucked up, and her role in escaping her kidnapping did show off how scary she can be, so that at least helps address some of my concerns in that vein.
    - Maybe it's because I'm an old, but I think the Gom Jabbar scene was better in the 1984 original (cheezy though it was). The burning hand was far more gruesome than the sanitized "ash" hand we got here, making the scene more visceral, and Chalumet going stoic compared to McLanahan's over-emoting didn't feel as affecting to me
    - Everything about the technology in Dune was amazing. The Ornithoptors - 10/10. Seeing the Spice collectors and even the freakin' silos made me nostalgic for Dune 2 on the PC
    - Pitor was under-utilized; and where was Feyd?
    - I'm not sold on the Harkonnen aesthetic. Feels too cruel and alien and breaks my suspension of disbelief somewhat. Again, this might just be 80s nostalgia talking here, but the old cast, as ridiculous and gross as they were, still somehow felt more relatable that these weird unsettling monsters that we got
    - Bardem's Stilgar was absolutely great. Look forward to more from him in the next movie
    - Action scenes in general were tense and exciting. The shields are a neat special effect and also provide a good shorthand to what and who is getting damaged and how.
    - This includes the kidnapping into the sandstorm scene - great tension, great execution!
    - I think they could have cut down on the prophetic visions a bit. They felt like they interrupted the flow of the movie sometimes. I knew what I was looking at because I was familiar with the story, but I could see uninformed viewers finding them jarring and confusing. I felt a good number of them could have been implied rather than made explicit, but then someone might accuse me of wanting to violate the "show, don't tell" rule, so what do I know?
    - The duel at the end was clichéd but I did enjoy Stilgar on the verge of annoyance and disgust going: "is he toying with him?". I just love the thought of someone's inner monologue going "What kind of asshole shows mercy to their opponent? Ugh! DISGUSTING!"

    Overall, I did enjoy it, but I am worried that aspects of it will make it tough for a general audience to buy in. They've already announced part 2 though, so it's good to know that it was at least successful enough to warrant that much. Also, I now feel the urge to re-watch the mini-series with James McAvoy to compare and contrast to, as I barely remember anything from that one.

    Romantic Undead on
    3DS FC: 1547-5210-6531
  • mrondeaumrondeau Montréal, CanadaRegistered User regular
    - The duel at the end was clichéd but I did enjoy Stilgar on the verge of annoyance and disgust going: "is he toying with him?". I just love the thought of someone's inner monologue going "What kind of asshole shows mercy to their opponent? Ugh! DISGUSTING!"
    I think you are misreading the scene a bit. Stilgar, and the Fremens are not opposed to mercy. It's just that this is a kind of duel where mercy is not on the table (can't have an ongoing grunge messing with the tribe of one of the grudgers is dead).
    So once Paul is informed of that fact, he is supposed to go for the jugular. Which the movie shows, multiple times. Without Paul actually cutting it.

    That's the part that worries Stilgar and when the tribe starts being outraged . Being Fremens, they have trouble with the whole concept of "remorse for killing someone" and, until Jessica explains, interpret those hesitations as actual sadism.
    Killing someone is not something that cause problems for Fremens (it's part of life for them), but torture, that's something else.

  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    Fun fact: Alec Newman, who played Paul in the miniseries version (and of course the follow-up Children of Dune miniseries), is now 46.

    He's got a small role in the new season of the BBC's Shetland, which is currently showing, and he's only just barely recognisable. Still a fine actor though, I thought he portrayed Paul's growth through both miniseries very well.

    Jazz on
  • Romantic UndeadRomantic Undead Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    mrondeau wrote: »
    - The duel at the end was clichéd but I did enjoy Stilgar on the verge of annoyance and disgust going: "is he toying with him?". I just love the thought of someone's inner monologue going "What kind of asshole shows mercy to their opponent? Ugh! DISGUSTING!"
    I think you are misreading the scene a bit. Stilgar, and the Fremens are not opposed to mercy. It's just that this is a kind of duel where mercy is not on the table (can't have an ongoing grunge messing with the tribe of one of the grudgers is dead).
    So once Paul is informed of that fact, he is supposed to go for the jugular. Which the movie shows, multiple times. Without Paul actually cutting it.

    That's the part that worries Stilgar and when the tribe starts being outraged . Being Fremens, they have trouble with the whole concept of "remorse for killing someone" and, until Jessica explains, interpret those hesitations as actual sadism.
    Killing someone is not something that cause problems for Fremens (it's part of life for them), but torture, that's something else.

    No no, I got that just fine, I just felt the way they chose to show it via Stilgar's frustration was amusing, it made for a clever way to short hand the contrast between audience expectations (good guys offer mercy) and the Fremen's (only assholes insult their opponents like this in a battle to the death).

    Romantic Undead on
    3DS FC: 1547-5210-6531
  • Romantic UndeadRomantic Undead Registered User regular
    By the by, I found a version of the Dune miniseries on YouTube and *woof* I did NOT remember it being this bad. I even forgot that McAvoy doesn't even play Paul, but his son in the latter half. The guys who does play Paul is... not good.

    3DS FC: 1547-5210-6531
  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    edited October 2021
    By the by, I found a version of the Dune miniseries on YouTube and *woof* I did NOT remember it being this bad. I even forgot that McAvoy doesn't even play Paul, but his son in the latter half. The guys who does play Paul is... not good.

    He seems bad to begin with but I think it makes sense later. Young Paul is often impatient or petulant but it makes his growth as a character quite palpable as it goes on, which I think he plays well. Actor and character really hit their stride from episode 2 onwards.

    Some of the casting is poor (Gurney in particular), and the CGI hasn't aged well at all. But on the whole I still like it, its pluses outweigh its minuses by orders of magnitude for me.

    Jazz on
  • This content has been removed.

  • WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    - Everything about the technology in Dune was amazing. The Ornithoptors - 10/10. Seeing the Spice collectors and even the freakin' silos made me nostalgic for Dune 2 on the PC

    Actually I'll have you know the ornithopters are 0/2

  • localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
    MorganV wrote: »
    Jazz wrote: »
    By the by, I found a version of the Dune miniseries on YouTube and *woof* I did NOT remember it being this bad. I even forgot that McAvoy doesn't even play Paul, but his son in the latter half. The guys who does play Paul is... not good.

    He seems bad to begin with but I think it makes sense later. Young Paul is often impatient or petulant but it makes his growth as a character quite palpable as it goes on, which I think he plays well. Actor and character really hit their stride from episode 2 onwards.

    Some of the casting is poor (Gurney in particular), and the CGI hasn't aged well at all. But on the whole I still like it, its pluses outweigh its minuses by orders of magnitude for me.

    I didn't think it was terrible, but it's a clear third place behind the other two versions. The main upside for it, is that it covers a lot more of the storyline (ie, Children of Dune, which as someone who hasn't read the books, something new) than the Lynch did, and we'll see how far the new series takes us. We likely get a clear ending of nuDune with Part 2, but it's undetermined whether they'll go beyond that.

    I have a feeling that if Denis wants to do a third movie, they'll let him. Even though Warner Bros was trying to play coy they really want a new Lord of the Rings style franchise. And another indicator that they were trying to set this up is the series for HBO Max about the Bene Gesserit. The writer for the movie stepped away from the series to start work on the sequel but I have a feeling WB is firing up the franchise machine for this one.

  • WinkyWinky rRegistered User regular
    chrisnl wrote: »
    I'm not sure why they had the mentats have just the center of their bottom lip marked instead of the discoloring being from drinking whatever drug it is that they consume to overdrive their brains. I suppose since they didn't really have much focus on the mentats, with Thufir Hawat at least having a role unlike Piter de Vries who just kind of died like a chump and didn't really contribute anything else, then there wasn't really a need to explain much about them or even show what it was they did exactly. Like Thufir did one calculation about how much it cost to send the Emperor's Herald for a ceremony and was otherwise just a normal guy, and that calculation wasn't anything super impressive and seemed to be just multiplying a known number by 3. The Baron didn't even make a comment about how much it would cost to replace Piter after the poisoning, so it's really easy to miss that Piter was there and died.

    In fact I don't recall them mentioning anything at all about forbidding thinking machines. There might have been something alluded to when they talked about the Spacing Guild navigators, but if so it was easy to lose in the flow of things because I certainly don't remember it. It's not super important to Paul's story, so I'm not like angry or anything, but it's a weird thing to leave out when it is quite a foundational aspect of the setting.

    It feels like a lot of the important background got left on the cutting room floor, perhaps explicitly because they figure enough of the audience has the general background of Dune already and the rest of the audience won't care? A lot of aspects of the world were either left to be totally implicit or only covered by a line or two.

    I mirror the sentiment that I really want to see the extended edition. There were a lot of things that could've been fleshed out that weren't. Piter getting such short shrift really hurt, especially given how iconic his role is in the original movie, though honestly I wonder if it was really just an unfortunate case of him not being as visually distinct among the style of the Harkonnens as well as the choice for a more understated performance.

    I think it was an interesting choice to make Jessica more clearly sympathetic and more of an emotional center, but it did remove a lot of her sense of agency. You don't get a lot of her as the Bene Gesserit in this movie, but what little you get of it is certainly frightening and maybe that's something that will come out more in the next film. I suppose her being less stoic of a character sells her decisions to go against her order for the sake of Leto and Paul better.

    I felt like a lot of the actors managed to do a great job giving their character presence with only a few scenes. Doctor Yueh managed to make a strong impression, as did Stilgar and Kynes.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the whole part with Kynes and Duncan in-between the escape from the kidnapping and wandering into Stilgar in the desert was added for the movie, right? I think it was a smart move on their part to expand the focus on Duncan in this movie if only for how that will pay off if they end up getting in the later books, though I felt like that segment really broke up the flow of the story.

    That all said, overall I think that visually this film was everything I could've wanted, and I'll be honest and say that's the part of Dune that is more important to me personally; simply the aesthetics of it. Just spectacular.

  • BloodySlothBloodySloth Registered User regular
    MorganV wrote: »
    Jazz wrote: »
    By the by, I found a version of the Dune miniseries on YouTube and *woof* I did NOT remember it being this bad. I even forgot that McAvoy doesn't even play Paul, but his son in the latter half. The guys who does play Paul is... not good.

    He seems bad to begin with but I think it makes sense later. Young Paul is often impatient or petulant but it makes his growth as a character quite palpable as it goes on, which I think he plays well. Actor and character really hit their stride from episode 2 onwards.

    Some of the casting is poor (Gurney in particular), and the CGI hasn't aged well at all. But on the whole I still like it, its pluses outweigh its minuses by orders of magnitude for me.

    I didn't think it was terrible, but it's a clear third place behind the other two versions. The main upside for it, is that it covers a lot more of the storyline (ie, Children of Dune, which as someone who hasn't read the books, something new) than the Lynch did, and we'll see how far the new series takes us. We likely get a clear ending of nuDune with Part 2, but it's undetermined whether they'll go beyond that.

    I have a feeling that if Denis wants to do a third movie, they'll let him. Even though Warner Bros was trying to play coy they really want a new Lord of the Rings style franchise. And another indicator that they were trying to set this up is the series for HBO Max about the Bene Gesserit. The writer for the movie stepped away from the series to start work on the sequel but I have a feeling WB is firing up the franchise machine for this one.

    I remember reading that Villeneuve really wants to do Dune Messiah as the end of a potential trilogy. It's a really interesting idea to me, partly because while I have mixed feelings on the book, the good shit in there is really good. It'd also really cement the idea that Dune is critical, and not celebratory, of white savior and "great man" narratives.

    The book is also very much a bridge between book 1 and book 3, so I'm curious to see how he plans to make it a definitive ending to a trilogy.

Sign In or Register to comment.