The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Ukraine] Oh, HIMARS! A Thread on Russia's Illegal and Immoral Invasion

Inquisitor77Inquisitor77 2 x Penny Arcade Fight Club ChampionA fixed point in space and timeRegistered User regular
edited February 2023 in Debate and/or Discourse
Thread Title Meme:
8kb4qdsbfk10.jpg


This thread is for discussion of the illegal and immoral Russian invasion of Ukraine, the latest large-scale action of a broader conflict that started in 2014 with Russia's "annexation" of Crimea.

Here is the previous OP for this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/246157/russian-invasion-of-ukraine-mr-zelenskyy-goes-to-europe/p1

Courtesy of War Mapper, here is the latest map of the conflict as of 13 February 2023:
Currently, the war has seen little progress on either side over the winter. There are now signs that Russia is gearing up (or has already begun) an offensive to try to retake Bakhmut and the surrounding areas in the east.

See below for an interview with a Ukrainian in Kherson after the city's liberation:
Because now we have no electricity in the city, no water, no central supply heating, no mobile connection, no internet connection. But we have no Russians, and I am extremely happy of that! We can survive anything...but we are free!


===============================

Global Thermonuclear War:
Please note that while discussion of nuclear weapons and nuclear proliferation are inevitable, there does exist a G-ddamn Separate Thread for that topic.

Azov Nazis: Previous mod declarations have included not discussing the Azov Regiment in the context of it supposedly being a Neo-Nazi group, and a general call for decorum against personal attacks.

Fuck Putin: Acceptable topics include saying, "Fuck Putin!" and all permutations thereof, including just repeating the phrase "FuckPutinFuckPutinFuckPutinFuckPutinFuckPutinFuckPutinFuckPutin" ad infinitum (no promises you won't get banned for spam being too awesome, though).

Crazy P is Awesome: If you Awesome a post by CrazyP, it is assumed you are Awesome-ing the fact that CrazyP is alive and well, not that you are Awesome-ing the contents of his post. (CrazyP is a Russian forumer who currently resides in a place that is not Russia.)

News & Information: While the fog of war always exists and it is very difficult to verify all reports, there does exist a standard of credibility. Major, established news outlets such as The New York Times or Reuters are generally accepted sources. Independent journalists, open source intelligence analysts, and official government sources should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Blog posts from J. Random Dickbag should be avoided or placed in the correct speculative context. All news should be prefaced with the source and, where appropriate, caveated as unreliable or speculation. Niche or less well-known sources should have corresponding descriptions of their reliability and sourcing.

Please remember that many forumers visit this thread precisely because it typically eschews random internet speculation and propaganda talking points.

Gore and NSFW/NSFL Content: In addition, all content which shows gore, horrific injuries, corpses, mass graves, and similar themes must always be spoilered and tagged appropriately. Failure to do so in the past has resulted in moderator intervention. Inflicting trauma on other forumers is not cool. Please remember that this place is still considered PG-13.

Perun: Videos from Perun have proven to be a very good source of analysis for this war, particularly in the contexts of logistics and procurement. He has received the PA Thread Seal of Approval.

ElJeffe on
«134567100

Posts

  • CornucopiistCornucopiist Registered User regular
    Sorry, this one is for people with Twitter access only. It has to be seen:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1625496891592159232/video/1

    gecwulsr0jqi.jpeg

  • enc0reenc0re Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    The Financial Times (my favorite newspaper) has an article on seemingly everybody but Germany backing out of supplying Leo 2.
    Germany’s defence minister has voiced his frustration with European partners who spent months pressuring Berlin to supply tanks to Ukraine but have so far failed to deliver any of the heavy armour themselves.
    [...]
    Nato officials told the Financial Times that Berlin was waiting for a coalition of Leopard 2 donors to be formed before sending its own contingent, adding that the plan was to send the two battalions in one delivery.
    Germany has already begun training Ukrainian tank crews on the vehicles, raising the possibility that deliveries could be delayed if other countries continued to drag their feet.
    Maybe I'm hopelessly naive, but I am baffled that a slew of countries was seemingly pressuring Germany for export licenses, and now is reneging after Germany is go. I genuinely believed Germany was holding things up and was quite miffed at Scholz insisting on an American commitment. Now I can't help but wonder if he knew only the U.S. could be relied on to follow through on its word.

    enc0re on
  • GilgaronGilgaron Registered User regular
    It has been a little eye opening at how few arms Europe seems to actually have operational to be spared. I guess there's MAD and everything to preclude a Russian invasion and they haven't done the sort of force projection the US does to need large forces but it just feels weird hearing about numbers of equipment that sound like what I assume my state National Guard unit has for screwing around with.

  • CelestialBadgerCelestialBadger Registered User regular
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

  • CornucopiistCornucopiist Registered User regular
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

  • honoverehonovere Registered User regular
    enc0re wrote: »
    The Financial Times (my favorite newspaper) has an article on seemingly everybody but Germany backing out of supplying Leo 2.
    Germany’s defence minister has voiced his frustration with European partners who spent months pressuring Berlin to supply tanks to Ukraine but have so far failed to deliver any of the heavy armour themselves.
    [...]
    Nato officials told the Financial Times that Berlin was waiting for a coalition of Leopard 2 donors to be formed before sending its own contingent, adding that the plan was to send the two battalions in one delivery.
    Germany has already begun training Ukrainian tank crews on the vehicles, raising the possibility that deliveries could be delayed if other countries continued to drag their feet.
    Maybe I'm hopelessly naive, but I am baffled that a slew of countries was seemingly pressuring Germany for export licenses, and now is reneging after Germany is go. I genuinely believed Germany was holding things up and was quite miffed at Scholz insisting on an American commitment. Now I can't help but wonder if he knew only the U.S. could be relied on to follow through on its word.

    Especially that now Poland of all the countries seems to be a bit wobbly with their leopard commitment is “hilarious“

    Germany: 14 2a6
    Portugal: 3 2a6
    Canada: 4 2a4
    Spain: training and "some" 2a4
    Poland: 14 2a4, probably, maybe less
    Finland: 0
    Denmark: 0
    Norway: 8 2a4
    Netherlands: 0, but mostly because they don't actually own any.
    Greece: 0, partially thanks to Turkey dicking around in the Mediterranean


  • CelestialBadgerCelestialBadger Registered User regular
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

    Trump phrased it in a way designed to annoy European countries, who are all independent sovereign powers. He made it sound like Europe owed tribute to the USA. He knows how to talk to American conservatives, but his communication style inspires instant loathing in absolutely everyone else.

  • This content has been removed.

  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

    Trump phrased it in a way designed to annoy European countries, who are all independent sovereign powers. He made it sound like Europe owed tribute to the USA. He knows how to talk to American conservatives, but his communication style inspires instant loathing in absolutely everyone else.

    Who knows if that was even his intention. It's equal odds he actually thought it meant Europe would hand over hundreds of billions of dollars/euros to the US (and maybe by extension him personally?). He really did not seem to have the first idea how any of this stuff actually works beyond his instinctive and pathological need to hustle money out of people.

  • ZibblsnrtZibblsnrt Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited February 2023
    Casual wrote: »
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

    Trump phrased it in a way designed to annoy European countries, who are all independent sovereign powers. He made it sound like Europe owed tribute to the USA. He knows how to talk to American conservatives, but his communication style inspires instant loathing in absolutely everyone else.

    Who knows if that was even his intention. It's equal odds he actually thought it meant Europe would hand over hundreds of billions of dollars/euros to the US (and maybe by extension him personally?).

    That was asbsolutely his intention. He literally handed Merkel a physical bill at one point.

    Zibblsnrt on
  • CelestialBadgerCelestialBadger Registered User regular
    Casual wrote: »
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

    Trump phrased it in a way designed to annoy European countries, who are all independent sovereign powers. He made it sound like Europe owed tribute to the USA. He knows how to talk to American conservatives, but his communication style inspires instant loathing in absolutely everyone else.

    Who knows if that was even his intention. It's equal odds he actually thought it meant Europe would hand over hundreds of billions of dollars/euros to the US (and maybe by extension him personally?). He really did not seem to have the first idea how any of this stuff actually works beyond his instinctive and pathological need to hustle money out of people.

    Some general probably gave him a talk about inadequate European military funding and he heard it as “we should charge the Europeans protection money.”

  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    Yeah Trump is an idiot and his understanding extended no further than mob-style extortion.

    He thought Europe owed the US tribute and our military presence there was some zero-sum benefit or gift to Europe.

  • V1mV1m Registered User regular
    Europe is a bit like an alcoholic in recovery with war. Keeping booze/arms around is a temptation.

    That and the Us wants to be the superpower in whose sphere of influence the EU resides, at least in terms of the Military-Industrial power and up to a point the joint foreign policy.
    The EU lets it as long as Germany can be the economic heavyweight in its sphere of influence (and France gets the captaincy of whatever hierarchy and administration that creates).
    And most people in the western EU feel that’s a fine division of powers where everyone gets things the others don’t care for.
    It was rather weird when Trump insisted we weapon up.

    Yeah I remember thinking "you know, you might not like getting what you're asking for..." at the time.

  • This content has been removed.

  • honoverehonovere Registered User regular
    The US also found something they say they can't spare. Longer ranged missiles (ATACMS)
    From the guardian
    The US has told Ukraine it will not send long-range missiles because it has too few to spare, according to a report.

    US officials have said transferring Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to the battlefield in Ukraine would risk a shortage of its own stockpiles and damage its own readiness for any fight in the future, sources have told Politico.

    One senior official said:

    With any package, we always consider our readiness and our own stocks while providing Ukraine what it needs on the battlefield.

    That concern, combined with the Biden administration’s worry that Ukraine would use the 190-mile range missiles to attack deep inside Russian territory, is why the US will not be shopping the ATACMS to the frontline any time soon, the news site writes.

    One potential workaround would be for Kyiv to ask for Washington’s approval to buy ATACMS from an allied country that operates the weapon, using financing from the US, according to one person.

    The list of ATACMS users includes South Korea, Poland, Romania, Greece, Turkey, Qatar and Bahrain.

  • Inquisitor77Inquisitor77 2 x Penny Arcade Fight Club Champion A fixed point in space and timeRegistered User regular
    honovere wrote: »
    The US also found something they say they can't spare. Longer ranged missiles (ATACMS)
    From the guardian
    The US has told Ukraine it will not send long-range missiles because it has too few to spare, according to a report.

    US officials have said transferring Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to the battlefield in Ukraine would risk a shortage of its own stockpiles and damage its own readiness for any fight in the future, sources have told Politico.

    One senior official said:

    With any package, we always consider our readiness and our own stocks while providing Ukraine what it needs on the battlefield.

    That concern, combined with the Biden administration’s worry that Ukraine would use the 190-mile range missiles to attack deep inside Russian territory, is why the US will not be shopping the ATACMS to the frontline any time soon, the news site writes.

    One potential workaround would be for Kyiv to ask for Washington’s approval to buy ATACMS from an allied country that operates the weapon, using financing from the US, according to one person.

    The list of ATACMS users includes South Korea, Poland, Romania, Greece, Turkey, Qatar and Bahrain.

    THEN YOU SHOULD'VE STARTED MAKING MORE LAST YEAR.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    it's a completely bullshit excuse, with the dissolution of the long range missile treaty the ATACMS is obsolete, we're only making more so we can sell them and to fulfill pre-existing contracts, the PRSM is replacing it and should be the standard by 2025 (it is at least 4 times the range)

    it's a good thing the media never even bothers to google search any of this shit before just regurgitating it


    It really does feel to me like the west wants Ukraine to just barely be able to win this thing, and since Russia's offensive is looking pretty anemic they're getting hesitant about continuing the up-arming

    My position is that the least life would have been lost if we announced last march that by august Ukraine would have F-16/F-15e, M1A2 SEPv3, ATACMS, Bradley, and Patriot and started training immediately. Like given how bad Russia's defense seems to be when Ukraine can punch through, giving them overwhelming force via lend lease would have been the best option.

    I will lay out money now: if Putin offers peace but he keeps Crimea, Europe will fall over themselves to demand Ukraine take it

    override367 on
  • This content has been removed.

  • DixonDixon Screwed...possibly doomed CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited February 2023
    We can't spare the missiles, but we also love to make the missiles.

    It's quite the conundrum US of A...

    Dixon on
  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    it's a completely bullshit excuse, with the dissolution of the long range missile treaty the ATACMS is obsolete, we're only making more so we can sell them and to fulfill pre-existing contracts, the PRSM is replacing it and should be the standard by 2025 (it is at least 4 times the range)

    it's a good thing the media never even bothers to google search any of this shit before just regurgitating it


    It really does feel to me like the west wants Ukraine to just barely be able to win this thing, and since Russia's offensive is looking pretty anemic they're getting hesitant about continuing the up-arming

    My position is that the least life would have been lost if we announced last march that by august Ukraine would have F-16/F-15e, M1A2 SEPv3, ATACMS, Bradley, and Patriot and started training immediately. Like given how bad Russia's defense seems to be when Ukraine can punch through, giving them overwhelming force via lend lease would have been the best option.

    I will lay out money now: if Putin offers peace but he keeps Crimea, Europe will fall over themselves to demand Ukraine take it
    There are minimum equipment levels required. They are set by the pentagon, and it’s very much a if we went to war with 2 major powers tomorrow, how much shit would we need to win?

    That’s the minimum. So yeah. That’s probably a legitimate reason. They haven’t started fielding PrSM missiles yet. It’s still in testing. Low rate initial production maybe. Full rate production won’t be until April 2025 assuming no schedule issues.

    Here’s a paper on it
    https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2021_SARS/22-F-0762_PrSM_SAR_2021.pdf

    zepherin on
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    I know that's what their reason is but I am unconvinced, we need them if the US engages in two peer ground wars (who's the other peer than China?) and for some reason the air force is unavailable and the navy is unavailable

  • VishNubVishNub Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    honovere wrote: »
    The US also found something they say they can't spare. Longer ranged missiles (ATACMS)
    From the guardian
    The US has told Ukraine it will not send long-range missiles because it has too few to spare, according to a report.

    US officials have said transferring Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to the battlefield in Ukraine would risk a shortage of its own stockpiles and damage its own readiness for any fight in the future, sources have told Politico.

    Attack’ems

    Jfc

    VishNub on
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    Yeah, someone definitely backronymed that one into being.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    I know that's what their reason is but I am unconvinced, we need them if the US engages in two peer ground wars (who's the other peer than China?) and for some reason the air force is unavailable and the navy is unavailable
    Here is a probable scenario for you. North Korea fires a test ballistic missile, and the guidance chip fucks up and as opposed to landing in the Sea of Japan it hits Misawa AFB. As opposed to saying “our bad.” NK doubles down and says they meant to do it to teach the US a lesson. Such an event could kill US-AF members and Japan SDF members. That would be mean the US goes to war with NK and because there is a defense alliance between NK and China possibly China too. And so we’d need to be able to fight a land war in NK and maintain air superiority over both NK China and probably part of Russia while maintaining our stance in Ukraine.

    It would take the president issuing an EO or maybe even congress passing a law to change our mummy equipment levels.

    zepherin on
  • Inquisitor77Inquisitor77 2 x Penny Arcade Fight Club Champion A fixed point in space and timeRegistered User regular
    I seriously doubt the U.S. would ever go to war with North Korea unless it was something serious, like hundreds of American civilians killed. And even then, it's doubtful that the United States would declare war on North Korea without South Korea's consent. And there's pretty much no chance South Korea would ever agree to war with North Korea unless it was a defensive one on their end.

    The standing U.S. policy with North Korea has always been that we are there to protect South Korea, and it is South Korea that gets first say in whether or not we go to war with North Korea because they are the ones who will bear the brunt of such fighting. Not even Japan has the same moral standing when it comes to North Korea because they don't face the same existential threat. Seoul could literally be leveled if a war were to break out, and that's a consequence which we have absolutely no business deciding on our own.

  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    I seriously doubt the U.S. would ever go to war with North Korea unless it was something serious, like hundreds of American civilians killed. And even then, it's doubtful that the United States would declare war on North Korea without South Korea's consent. And there's pretty much no chance South Korea would ever agree to war with North Korea unless it was a defensive one on their end.

    The standing U.S. policy with North Korea has always been that we are there to protect South Korea, and it is South Korea that gets first say in whether or not we go to war with North Korea because they are the ones who will bear the brunt of such fighting. Not even Japan has the same moral standing when it comes to North Korea because they don't face the same existential threat. Seoul could literally be leveled if a war were to break out, and that's a consequence which we have absolutely no business deciding on our own.

    It would figuratively be unavoidable. From a big picture standpoint, we could not have another nation attack our military bases without substantial reprisal. From a foreign policy standpoint you have to treat a missile strike that the head of the nation said was intentional as intentional.

    If you don’t have a disproportionate response, and encourages other nations to do the same. And the media would be labeling any president that didn’t attack as a coward. There would be the political and domestic outrage to do it. So unfortunately if we were directly attacked we would have to treat it as such.

    But that’s neither here nor there. Pentagon has to be able to fight that war, or multiple African nations as part of a peacekeeping mission.

    zepherin on
  • StarZapperStarZapper Vermont, Bizzaro world.Registered User regular
    Technically speaking there was never a peace treaty for the Korean War, we're still "at war" with N. Korea it's just been a standoff for the past 70 some odd years. But regardless, outside of China there is no credible threat to the US. All the next largest militaries are our NATO allies. Who else is there, India, Brazil? None of which are hostile to the US. Closest hostile nation would likely be Iran, but we could flatten them easily if we wanted. I say give em all the ammunition we got (not like we have to share that information publicly, either.)

  • Mr RayMr Ray Sarcasm sphereRegistered User regular
    edited February 2023
    I'm skeptical that the lack of one very specific type of rocket would prevent the U.S military from taking apart North Korea's WW2 era military, even blindfolded and with one hand behind their back.

    I'm also skeptical that the U.S would put actual boots on the ground unless it was absolutely unavoidable, more likely they would simply bomb the country's military infrastructure flat from the air with their 10,000,072 other types of long range bombs and missiles.

    I'm surprised the U.S isn't simply shipping HIMARS rockets directly from the factory to Ukraine given how effective they've proved to be.

    Mr Ray on
  • Stabbity StyleStabbity Style He/Him | Warning: Mothership Reporting Kennewick, WARegistered User regular
    North Korea's big thing is the damage it will cause at the start of the war. They've got a ton of artillery set to blow the shit out of Seoul if things pop off. Like, I have confidence that if things started, we could end things fairly quickly, but the initial structural damage and civilian deaths/injuries would be pretty terrible.

    Stabbity_Style.png
  • GiantGeek2020GiantGeek2020 Registered User regular
    The ISW report for 2/13/23

    Russia and Iran continue to work together. Russia gets technical support and military supplies.
    UK outlet The Guardian relatedly reported on February 13 that Iran has smuggled at least 18 long-range drones to Russia using boats and Iranian state-owned aircraft.[3] The Guardian found that these shipments include six Mohajer-6 drones and 12 Shahed-121 and 129 drones, which have air-to-ground strike capabilities and are designed to deliver a payload to the target and return to base, unlike the Shahed-131 and 136 loitering munition-type drones that Russian forces have widely used in Ukraine thus far.[4] Russian milbloggers noted on February 13 that IRGC-affiliated Il-76 cargo aircraft routinely fly to Russia, suggesting that Tehran consistently provides Moscow with a variety of material using IRGC-affiliated planes.[5] These data points, taken in tandem, suggest that Russia continues to rely on Iran for military and technological support in Ukraine and that some Iranian personnel are likely in Ukraine directly supporting Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, as ISW has previously reported.[6]

    What is Iran getting out of this is my question? I doubt they have any particular beef with Ukraine, so Russia must be paying for all of this. In what or with what?

    Russia is increasing censorship of news or alternative points of view. I expect a statement that "We have always been at war with Ukraine." to be said, without irony, any day now.
    The Kremlin’s collective skin appears to be thinning as the war protracts at a rate that can be measured by the number of phrases and words Russians are forbidden to say.

    Putin is saying that everything in Vuhledar is going fine. The ISW expects this to mean that more units are going to be sent into the meat grinder.
    Putin’s comment, however, may also signal an intent to reinforce the assault on Vuhledar with more mobilized forces or by recommitting remaining Northern Fleet elements to the area.[22] ISW recently observed Ukrainian forces destroying Russian surface-to-air missile systems—reportedly belonging to the 80th Separate Arctic Motorized Rifle Brigade of the Northern Fleet—in occupied Kherson Oblast.[23] Ukrainian officials have also previously reported that the Russian military had been accumulating some forces in Mariupol, just 75km southeast of Vuhledar.[24] These indicators suggest that Russian forces, including elements of the Northern Fleet, may be preparing for commitment to Vuhledar. Putin may have been signaling his continued support for Russian forces there to offset news of significant defeats to conventional Russian units on critical sectors of the front.

    And the mobilized troops are not doing particularly well. They haven't had enough teaching or time to season properly
    A Russian serviceman from the 155th Naval Infantry Brigade who participated in an assault on Vuhledar told a Russian opposition outlet that the brigade was 80% to 90% staffed with mobilized men because the Russian military command consistently reinforces Russian units with mobilized servicemen.[26] Russia’s continued reliance on mobilized men who were unable to perform military tasks such as identifying and detecting minefields or knowing what to do having blundered into them during the assault indicates that these mobilized elements do not have the necessary combat experience necessary to stage a successful mechanized offensive. These mobilized men have likely received limited individual training and lack the unit cohesion and professional training or experience necessary for large-scale mechanized offensives. Russia may deploy additional mobilized elements that may be able to conduct sound defensive operations or attrition-based offensive operations to the Vuhledar frontline, but these mobilized soldiers are unlikely to become effective mechanized elements capable of mounting successful offensive operations in any short period of months.

    Now for the detailed stuff.

    Svatove and Kreminna continue to be a hot front and the Russians keep pushing. The Ukrainians keep holding the line as best they can, then they fall back to the next line. There's progress for the Russians on this front, but the Ukrainians never route, never even full scale retreat. The just fall back to the next defensive line and keep up the fight.

    Bakhmut continues to be a meat grinder.
    Ukrainian Eastern Group of Forces spokesperson Colonel Serhii Cherevaty stated on February 12 that Russian and Ukrainian forces engaged in 19 combat clashes over the course of the day and that fighting occurred near Fedorivka, Chasiv Yar, and Ivanivske.[39]

    Vuhledar is seeing some action too. Also some of the Russian commanders got HIMARS'd but the Russian response was literally "We have backups."
    Commander of the DNR "Vostok" battalion Alexander Khodakovsky claimed on February 13 that a Ukrainian HIMARS strike on Vostok headquarters killed the headquarters commander but that Russian command and control in the Vuhledar area will not be impacted by the strike because of duplicated communication channels.

    The Russians are building more mobilization training centers, so there will probably be further call ups.

    Russian unit integration is just going swimmingly.
    The Russian military command is facing challenges integrating irregular armed formations into conventional force structures. The Ukrainian General Staff reported on February 13 that Russian mobilized personnel integrated into the units of the former Donetsk People’s Republic’s (DNR) 1st Army Corps (now part of the Russian Southern Military District) are increasingly refusing to participate in the offensive.[73] DNR commanders and servicemen are likely trying to throw inexperienced Russian mobilized men onto the frontlines due to frustrations with the lack of rotations of their own men or as retribution for unequal treatment of proxy forces in the past. Igor Girkin, a prominent milblogger and former Russian officer who commanded militants in Donbas in 2014, complained that Russian officials have removed several mobilized Russian units from the frontlines following their appeals to local governors but did not offer the same treatment to units from illegally annexed territories.[74] A Russian milblogger also claimed that members of the Russian 51st Guards Airborne Regiment (of the 106th Guards Airborne Division) are purposefully injuring themselves in order to not fight alongside Wagner units. The post also claims Wagner forces threatened to shoot members of members of the 51st Airborne Regiment if they did not save wounded Wagner fighters.[75]

    Russia is also building corrupt patronage networks in the areas they captured. Quelle Fucking Surprise.
    Russian officials and regime-linked actors continue to exploit assets from captured Ukrainian cities for economic and military benefit. BBC Russia reported on February 13 that Chechen businessman and close friend of Chechen Head Ramzan Kadyrov, Valid Korchagin, became a co-owner of the Mariupol metallurgical combine (Ilyich Iron and Steel Works in Mariupol) and a Russian chain of restaurants and cafes in Mariupol.[76] BBC Russia reported that Korchagin is likely related to Chechen Senator Suleyman Geremeyev and Deputy Head of the Chechen Ministry of Construction Vakhit Geremeyev, both of whom are reportedly related to close Kadyrov ally and State Duma parliamentarian Adam Delimhanov.[77] The head of Transparency International—Russia, Ilya Shumanov, suggested that the Kremlin is rewarding members of the Geremeyev family who have fought in Ukraine.[78] Russian officials will likely continue to exploit economic assets in occupied areas to build out corrupt patronage networks for personal gain.

    We really need to get Ukraine more tanks and more jets. More everything really.

  • CelestialBadgerCelestialBadger Registered User regular
    It’s obvious what Russia is trading for Iranian weapons: nuclear scientists.

  • Mr RayMr Ray Sarcasm sphereRegistered User regular
    What do you mean the mobiks need more training? They've had three months of training, they should all be elite Spetsnaz by now!

  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    Edit - not asia thread

    zagdrob on
  • SpectrumSpectrum Archer of Inferno Chaldea Rec RoomRegistered User regular
    Y'all poo-pooing North Korea is hilarious, we definitely need all the equipment around in case shit actually goes hot there.

    Like, they could credibly counterinvade the continental US or seize the White House if they really, really wanted.

    XNnw6Gk.jpg
  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    NK has definitely become the favored stand-in for Totally Not China in games and media (that we would like to sell and/or show in China).

  • V1mV1m Registered User regular
    It really does feel to me like the west wants Ukraine to just barely be able to win this thing, and since Russia's offensive is looking pretty anemic they're getting hesitant about continuing the up-arming

    As always, I think it's a mistake to treat such a heterogenous body as ever thinking or operating as "The", but yes I've been saying for a while that there's certainly a faction within NATO countries that is very content for this war to drag on for at least another year or two on the basis that (1) while it's happening, Russia is absolutely unable to indulge in any other adventurism and (2) the longer it lasts, the longer it's going to take Russia to recover from and be any kind of threat to anyone else.

    In an imaginary scenario where Putin goes on TV and says "ooops, sorry, terrible mistake with the map co-ordinates, training exercise went wrong, so sorry, everyone come home by the weekend" and Russia pulls out by COB Friday, they still have some pretty significant (if mostly rather outdated) military assets. They still have a 4-digit number of tanks, loads of artillery, IFVs, the majority of their aviation, etc etc. In an imaginary scenario where this dripfeed keeps Ukraine and the UAF's effective strength juuuuust below the threshold where Russia thinks they might still win something out of this for a second year, then Russia comes out of this with far less of everything.

    And (3) it's an absolutely inarguable justification to increase defence spending.

  • daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    Nuclear weapon technology is the obvious one for Iran. Cold hard cash works. Additional help to bypass sanctions is probably useful too.

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • ProhassProhass Registered User regular
    edited February 2023
    I know separatists likely had complex cultural and economic reasons for wanting to be closer to Russia, but I can’t help but feel a bit of jerkish schadenfreude at separatist leaders complaining about being poorly treated by Russian superiors

    Prohass on
  • [Expletive deleted][Expletive deleted] The mediocre doctor NorwayRegistered User regular
    Prohass wrote: »
    I know separatists likely had complex cultural and economic reasons for wanting to be closer to Russia, but I can’t help but feel a bit of jerkish schadenfreude at separatist leaders complaining about being poorly treated by Russian superiors

    Too late do they find out that there's a difference between Russians and real Russians.

    Sic transit gloria mundi.
  • GrudgeGrudge blessed is the mind too small for doubtRegistered User regular
    Welcome to the Russian Empire. If you're not in Moscow or St Petersburg you're just a fucking pleb, who cares about you? Just shut up and grab that shovel. If you're lucky you get to die for Mother Russia, that's basically the best you'll ever get.

Sign In or Register to comment.