The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Teen Athlete to America: Stop Stokkeing your Poles

Dread Pirate ArbuthnotDread Pirate Arbuthnot OMG WRIGGLYT O X O P L A S M O S I SRegistered User regular
edited June 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
Allison Stokke, 18, became a celebrity nearly overnight. She's a high school athlete, a pole vaulter, and while she had stirred up a lot of interested in competitive pole vaulting circuits and coaches, outside of that area she was unrecognized - until a few photos of her found their way onto more popular blogs.

Sports blogs began to pick up her pictures, and then blogs that concentrated on 'male interests', such as 'hot women and sports', mostly with locker room talk surrounding it. One article introduced her, and followed up her accomplishments with "Hubba hubba and other grunting sounds.". A fake Facebook was put up. A fansite was hosted, and the forums were promptly filled with sexual fantasies about her as well as pictures. Photographers began to show up at her meets, asking for photo shoots. Some wanted to run legitimate articles, other wanted her to dress scantily and smile for the camera. Even though the pictures and videos were innocent, such as her adjust her hair, think out loud about how to improve her performance, or just smiling as she is about to vault, Stokke has become a sex symbol overnight. Fans from Spain post on her MySpace about how well known she is in their country - not for her athletic career.

Stokke has a 4.0 GPA, a scholarship to the University of California, and many pole vaulting accomplishments, but at the moment she professes herself afraid. In a Washington Post article, she claims that she's afraid to leave her house alone, keeps her doors locked at all times, and talks about the humiliation of having elaborate sexual fantasies put up where anyone - even her parents, who check on such things regularly to prevent stalking - can read them.

This is probably symptomatic though of the obsession in America of how females are portrayed. When Paris Hilton was jailed, her fans tried to appeal because she brings 'beauty and glamour' to their lives. Tabloids obsess over the sex lives of celebrities. Is there any way to protect women from the media spotlight in this fashion? Is it possible to change attitudes over this sort of thing, and if so, how would you suggest changing them?

Dread Pirate Arbuthnot on
«13456721

Posts

  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Is there any way to protect women from the media spotlight in this fashion? Is it possible to change attitudes over this sort of thing, and if so, how would you suggest changing them?

    As long as the country has such backwards, Victorian views on sex itself, I don't think changing attitudes on this sort of thing will be possible.

    ege02 on
  • Al SimmonsAl Simmons Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    So you're saying Paris Hilton has fans?

    WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE PEOPLE?

    Al Simmons on
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Al Simmons wrote: »
    So you're saying Paris Hilton has fans?

    WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE PEOPLE?

    Seriously. I have never in my life actually talked to someone who likes Paris Hilton. Whenever her name comes up in conversation, real-life or interwebs, it's always in the context of everyone hating her and finding her annoying.

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • Not SarastroNot Sarastro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Al Simmons wrote: »
    So you're saying Paris Hilton has fans?

    WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE PEOPLE?

    They're being dealt with.

    Oh, and what ege02 said. Sounds harsh, but in a country with anything approaching rational views on sex, I don't think the girl & family would be having quite the same reaction to this. Conversely, it probably wouldn't have become such an issue in the first place.

    Not Sarastro on
  • Al SimmonsAl Simmons Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Part of me says "suck it up, it'll be over soon enough." But the other part thinks that if this was my daughter I'd be pretty pissed off.

    Al Simmons on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I know this was posted in [chat], but:

    http://feministing.com/archives/007124.html
    OCWeekly wrote:
    The defense niceties vanished immediately. Defense lawyer Al Stokke, who replaced lead trial attorney Joseph G. Cavallo, questioned any link between the rape and the victim's claim of mental anguish. Stokke also mocked the girl's physical injuries, finally conceding she was unconscious but then trying to use that against her. "There's [no pain] that is felt," he said, "because she was unconscious."

    So how is your daughter, ege?

    Glaeal on
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Look up her father and two cases he defended recently to get an idea why the internet is making a big deal about Stokke. As I recall her father is a defense attorney who defended an officer who forced himself on a stripper and blamed the womans "job of sex" for seducing the poor policeman. Previous to that he tried to get 4 men off of a rape charge because the victim was passed out. It sucks in her case that the sins of her father have caused her to be in the spotlight, but what can we do? Censor the internet? Stop adolecent males from finding attractive women attractive?

    It must be horrible for her to be objectified, I just don't see what anyone can do about it.

    Preacher on
    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    So being in high school puts you in the public light now?

    Glaeal on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Preacher wrote: »
    Look up her father and two cases he defended recently to get an idea why the internet is making a big deal about Stokke. As I recall her father is a defense attorney who defended an officer who forced himself on a stripper and blamed the womans "job of sex" for seducing the poor policeman. Previous to that he tried to get 4 men off of a rape charge because the victim was passed out. It sucks in her case that the sins of her father have caused her to be in the spotlight, but what can we do? Censor the internet? Stop adolecent males from finding attractive women attractive?

    It must be horrible for her to be objectified, I just don't see what anyone can do about it.
    Or we could see the girl and her father as two individuals. I sure as hell would not want to be held accountable for the bullshit my father does at his work.

    Aldo on
  • stiliststilist Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?
    This creepiness is her fault for being attractive?

    stilist on
    I poop things on my site and twitter
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited June 2007
    I saw her picture on a sports blog a while back, and had the same thought I would've if I saw a fit male athlete (or was looking in the mirror). "Damn, that's a nice body."

    Didn't know who it was, though, and the background story makes it much creepier.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Glaeal wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    So being in high school puts you in the public light now?


    EDIT: Wrong info, ignore. High school, no. Sports, maybe.

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • DiscGraceDiscGrace Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    Yes, heaven forfend that we should expect guys not to turn into creepy stalkers when they see a picture of a pretty girl! That girl should have known better than to be so attractive. She should definitely hurt her athletic career by wearing baggy-ass clothes to keep from being a temptation to them. :|

    DiscGrace on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?
    Free burkhas for everyone!

    Aldo on
  • SkyGheNeSkyGheNe Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    stilist wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?
    This creepiness is her fault for being attractive?

    Um, he didn't even come close to saying that. His line of thought was more or less "what else do you expect" and "there's little you're going to do about it."

    *edit*

    Also, her father's a cunt. I hope he suffers.

    SkyGheNe on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    This is stupid; it resembles the fundamentalist Muslim views on the issue; i.e. the woman should not dress or act in ways that will invoke sexual urges in the man.

    ege02 on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?
    Blame the victim much?

    Hacksaw on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    O_o

    I knew/know plenty of female athletes in high school and college who don't "wear more" and don't get stalked.

    There's no reason to assume you'll get stalked just because you're hawt.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    ege02 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    This is stupid; it resembles the fundamentalist Muslim views on the issue; i.e. the woman should not dress or act in ways that will invoke sexual urges in the man.

    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards. (And since she's now a legal adult, there's not much you can do about it)

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • Not SarastroNot Sarastro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    Weeeeeeeeeeeell, generally I'd expect you to not be a total moron, but clearly I'm going to be disappointed.

    Father thing is interesting, didn't know that. Of course, while it puts a spin on his proclamations to the press re: his daughter, it has fuck all to do with the fact that the girl is the one being targeted.

    Not Sarastro on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Who are these people whose standards say "athlete should not dress for performance"?

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • SkyGheNeSkyGheNe Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    This is stupid; it resembles the fundamentalist Muslim views on the issue; i.e. the woman should not dress or act in ways that will invoke sexual urges in the man.

    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    It's kinda hard though when the sport requires slim clothing. Ever see a long distance runner? Now this comment is a little ridiculous...

    SkyGheNe on
  • Not SarastroNot Sarastro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    Not Sarastro on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    This is stupid; it resembles the fundamentalist Muslim views on the issue; i.e. the woman should not dress or act in ways that will invoke sexual urges in the man.

    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards. (And since she's now a legal adult, there's not much you can do about it)
    She didn't ask to be a sex symbol. She shouldn't have to monitor how she dresses because some creep took her picture and plastered it all over the internets.

    Hacksaw on
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.
    News flash: we are not obligated to dress ourselves according to other people's comfort levels. Kindly fuck off.

    Hacksaw on
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.
    News flash: we are not obligated to dress ourselves according to other people's comfort levels. Kindly fuck off.

    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • The Green Eyed MonsterThe Green Eyed Monster i blame hip hop Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Preacher wrote: »
    Look up her father and two cases he defended recently to get an idea why the internet is making a big deal about Stokke. As I recall her father is a defense attorney who defended an officer who forced himself on a stripper and blamed the womans "job of sex" for seducing the poor policeman. Previous to that he tried to get 4 men off of a rape charge because the victim was passed out. It sucks in her case that the sins of her father have caused her to be in the spotlight, but what can we do? Censor the internet? Stop adolecent males from finding attractive women attractive?
    Her father adds an interesting twist to what exactly type of culture propagates these types of attitudes, but it by no means suddenly excuses the attitudes which create this unfortunate situation for Allison.

    The Green Eyed Monster on
  • Dread Pirate ArbuthnotDread Pirate Arbuthnot OMG WRIGGLY T O X O P L A S M O S I SRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.
    News flash: we are not obligated to dress ourselves according to other people's comfort levels. Kindly fuck off.

    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.

    So you're saying she deserves all of this because she dresses in clothes appropriate for her athletic activity?

    Dread Pirate Arbuthnot on
  • Not SarastroNot Sarastro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.

    Methinks that if you keep talking for long enough your head will eventually deflate and disappear completely.

    Not Sarastro on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Weeeeeeeeeeell, if you're in the public light, you wear clothing that is to any degree revealing, and you happen to be very good looking, presume SOMEBODY is going to stalk you. The easiest way to avoid it, wear more clothing even if it's detrimental to pole vaulting. What else do you expect?

    This is stupid; it resembles the fundamentalist Muslim views on the issue; i.e. the woman should not dress or act in ways that will invoke sexual urges in the man.

    Um. No. I'm saying is if being raped bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards. (And since she's now a legal adult, there's not much you can do about it)

    Fixed. See any resemblance to fundy Islamic views now? They say exactly the same thing; if the woman is a sex symbol, it is her mistake. Which is bullshit.

    But then it sort of emphasizes what I said earlier in the thread:
    As long as the country has such backwards, Victorian views on sex itself, I don't think changing attitudes on this sort of thing will be possible.

    ege02 on
  • The Green Eyed MonsterThe Green Eyed Monster i blame hip hop Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.
    There's a difference between "finding her sexy" and plastering her image all over the internet, suddenly showing up at her meets, and making all kinds of unsolicited advances for attention in general.

    The Green Eyed Monster on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Kinda hard to be anonymous when you're on THE FRONT FUCKING PAGE.

    Fencingsax on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Sarastro wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    Um. No. I'm saying is if being a sex symbol bothers you, you don't dress revealingly. If you don't care, knock yourself out, but different people have different standards.

    Erm, so you are saying that one person should censure their dress code because another person considers it sexual? The girl is a fucking athlete you tard. She wears clothing made for efficiency, not sex.

    If it bothers them, then yes! Sheeeesh.
    News flash: we are not obligated to dress ourselves according to other people's comfort levels. Kindly fuck off.

    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.
    I don't think she was complaining about people finding her attractive. Rather, she was complaining about some fuckstick taking her picture without her permission, then plastering it all over the internet, resulting in some heavy duty e-stalkage (and some rl-stalkage, as well).

    Hacksaw on
  • imbalancedimbalanced Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    celery77 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.
    There's a difference between "finding her sexy" and plastering her image all over the internet, suddenly showing up at her meets, and making all kinds of unsolicited advances for attention in general.

    Yes, that's creepy. Those people can deal with the law on an individual basis.

    I find it more interesting that in order to make the problem go away, it's being televised on ESPN, CBS, newspapers nationwide.... It doesn't make any sense. "Oh that poor girl! Let's make her MORE famous, you know, to protect her."

    EDIT: This whole thing reminds me of something I was told when working in the House of Representatives: "Don't email anything you wouldn't want on the front page of the Washington Post." It's just a rule of thumb, if you're in a public space, presume that someone somewhere will want to exploit you in some way. It's sad, but the way the world works now.

    imbalanced on
    idc-sig.png
    Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Is it possible to change attitudes over this sort of thing, and if so, how would you suggest changing them?

    Counter-stalking. Follow the papparazzi around and post pictures of them on your blog with "erotic-fiction" about butt-fucking them with a broom-handle. Ditto to any of the fratboy-bloggers propogating the shit that you can find. I don't mean just her or even her at all, either. I mean there should be some kind of organized dissent going on here and I want to know why there isn't.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • stiliststilist Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Is it possible to change attitudes over this sort of thing, and if so, how would you suggest changing them?
    Counter-stalking. Follow the papparazzi around and post pictures of them on your blog with "erotic-fiction" about butt-fucking them with a broom-handle. Ditto to any of the fratboy-bloggers propogating the shit that you can find. I don't mean just her or even her at all, either. I mean there should be some kind of organized dissent going on here and I want to know why there isn't.
    Seriously, sousveillance.

    stilist on
    I poop things on my site and twitter
  • The Green Eyed MonsterThe Green Eyed Monster i blame hip hop Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    celery77 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.
    There's a difference between "finding her sexy" and plastering her image all over the internet, suddenly showing up at her meets, and making all kinds of unsolicited advances for attention in general.

    Yes, that's creepy. Those people can deal with the law on an individual basis.

    I find it more interesting that in order to make the problem go away, it's being televised on ESPN, CBS, newspapers nationwide.... It doesn't make any sense. "Oh that poor girl! Let's make her MORE famous, you know, to protect her."
    But there is plenty of room within the law to still be creepy and act inappropriately. Just because it's legal doesn't make this sort of attention okay.

    I think the reason it is talked about so much is because it needs to be addressed. Simply shrugging your shoulders and saying "it happens" just doesn't cut it any more. Someone needs to tell these people -- legal or not -- they're fucking creeps and need to knock it off.

    The Green Eyed Monster on
  • Dread Pirate ArbuthnotDread Pirate Arbuthnot OMG WRIGGLY T O X O P L A S M O S I SRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    imbalanced wrote: »
    celery77 wrote: »
    imbalanced wrote: »
    THEN DON'T COMPLAIN WHEN OTHER PEOPLE FIND IT SEXY. I don't know what's so difficult to wrap around this.
    There's a difference between "finding her sexy" and plastering her image all over the internet, suddenly showing up at her meets, and making all kinds of unsolicited advances for attention in general.

    Yes, that's creepy. Those people can deal with the law on an individual basis.

    I find it more interesting that in order to make the problem go away, it's being televised on ESPN, CBS, newspapers nationwide.... It doesn't make any sense. "Oh that poor girl! Let's make her MORE famous, you know, to protect her."

    Right. The law will deal with every single person who joined her MySpace to solicit her for sex, right?

    Dread Pirate Arbuthnot on
This discussion has been closed.