The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Judges and courts and tickets oh my!

AndorienAndorien Registered User regular
edited June 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
So I got a traffic ticket. By rear-ending some poor bastard. Yeah, go me.

Anyway, I got a court date set for next month on the 13th. I've never been to traffic court before, other than "alright class, Judge Bob is gonna talk to you about justice . . . and YOU!" Any tips, things I should be aware of, what to wear, etc etc?

Also, I noticed on the ticket that it says my car is red. My car is, in fact, green. Does this make any difference to me whatsoever?

Andorien on

Posts

  • evanismynameevanismyname Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Don't count on the color discrepancy to get you out of the ticket.

    evanismyname on
  • BronzeDuckBronzeDuck Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Are you planning on fighting the ticket or not? ( I would guess not, since you rearending someone else is pretty hard to fuck up).

    If you're not going to fight: I've heard pleading no contest is good, and what I have done in both of my tickets. Its basically "yeah I fucked up, and Im here because I have to be, Im not fighting the ticket". In my experience this means that the judge says "ok, here is how much you owe go pay and dont do it again"

    If you're going to try and fight it for whatever reason, talk to a lawyer, at least for advice even if you dont hire them for the case.

    BronzeDuck on
  • TexiKenTexiKen Dammit! That fish really got me!Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I rear-ended someone last year, but I fought it because the guy stopped short on top of it being a slick road.
    I got an attorney, went to court for a jury trial, and it got dismissed because the cop and the other person didn't show up (the guy in turn tried to get $1,000 of repairs for something the insurance adjuster stated was only $200 max for new paint, so fuck him).

    Since it's a moving violation, it stays with you longer and your insurance will go up (mine was going to go up by $300 a year until I was 25, and I was 21 when it happened, so it made financial sense to get a lawyer for $100 and fight it).

    I recommend getting a traffic lawyer, and have him push the date back some more to increase the likelihood of the cop and other driver not showing up.

    TexiKen on
  • LavaKnightLavaKnight Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Traffic Court itself is remarkably easy. You go there, sit down in the courtroom with a ton of other people, and a judge calls you up to the stand one by one. Just showing up will usually get the judge to reduce the fine by a little, but this is obviously something that varies from judge to judge. Plead either no contest of guilty (innocent is only if you're dumb and want to go to court over a traffic ticket), and then explain what happened in your own words. They do hold some value, even if you were in the wrong. If you don't have something to say about it and were entirely in the wrong, you might as well just pay the ticket and avoid court entirely.

    If you want to fight it, well, good luck with that. Like TexiKen said, you can get out of it, but if you were unequivocally at fault you're relying on somebody else (the cop, other person) to get you out of it, which is not a winning strategy in my book.

    If the insurance is taken care of and it's manageable to pay for it, I'd just pay it and not deal with court at all.

    LavaKnight on
  • FristleFristle Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Get to the courthouse like 30 minutes earlier than you think you have to, because if it's anything like the one in Fairfax County VA, you'll be held up 20 minutes in their stupid metal detector security line. I say "stupid" because it used to run smoothly, pre-shoe-bomber crap. Now they want to x-ray everyone's cell phone and have you take off your belt. I mean seriously...

    As for what to wear, you can't overdress. I've heard people say not to put on a suit because the Judge might think you're pretentious, but, how do they know you don't just have a job where a suit is required? I say dress like you would for a job interview, unless you would feel ridiculous. Being dressed well makes you more confident too, which is important when you're under the harsh stare of the judicial system.

    Fristle on
    Fristle.jpg
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...

    Shadowfire on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.

    Thanatos on
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.

    Right, but usually it's because you rear-ended someone while speeding, or were doing some other dumb thing. I know it happens that you can just get the ticket for the accident, but there's usually other things going on...

    Shadowfire on
  • AndorienAndorien Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I don't particularly plan the fight the ticket, as I was pretty much 100% at fault.

    For those wishing to know the details of the ticket, it had a generic "Following too closely", which I guess is what the cop figured was a good ticket in the event of running into someone. It's not really true, since what basically happened was I was going to work, was pretty sleepy, and noticed too late that a small truck with a small cart attached had stopped to make a left turn. Yeah, I told them this, but that's what they gave me. I'm not overly concerned about the actual clause, since it seems to me that "Ran the fuck into someone" would warrant a higher price than "Tailgating".

    Insurance seems to be taken care of, they're sending a $700 check to pay for the damages to my vehicle (which were pretty minor. some turn signals got knocked out of place, and they still work even).

    Also, the guy I hit's being a really good sport about the whole thing, even though I kinda bent his bumper inward under the vehicle about 2 feet. Hitting trailer at about 35 MPH + force concentrated a single point right on the trailer hitch = interesting results. He kept trying to convince the cops who eventually showed up not to give me a ticket.

    Andorien on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.

    Right, but usually it's because you rear-ended someone while speeding, or were doing some other dumb thing. I know it happens that you can just get the ticket for the accident, but there's usually other things going on...

    It's almost entirely impossible to rear-end somebody without doing something dumb. If somebody "stops short" and you rear-end them, it means you either were driving too fast for conditions or following too close. The law in California and many other states reflects this.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • lunchbox12682lunchbox12682 MinnesotaRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I second getting the lawyer, it will usually be cheaper over the long haul.
    Worked for my speeding ticket.

    lunchbox12682 on
  • AndorienAndorien Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'm not entirely sure a lawyer's worth it. The ticket's only for $94.

    Andorien on
  • lunchbox12682lunchbox12682 MinnesotaRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    For me at least, it was about the insurance effect not the ticket itself.

    lunchbox12682 on
  • LavaKnightLavaKnight Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Andorien wrote: »
    I'm not entirely sure a lawyer's worth it. The ticket's only for $94.

    Like I said earlier, if the insurance is taken care of and you're pretty assuredly at fault, just pay the damn thing. That's a smaller ticket than I got for having broken high-beams, and you wouldn't even have to go in to court, thereby saving valuable and precious time.

    LavaKnight on
  • GrimmGrimm Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Feral wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.

    Right, but usually it's because you rear-ended someone while speeding, or were doing some other dumb thing. I know it happens that you can just get the ticket for the accident, but there's usually other things going on...

    It's almost entirely impossible to rear-end somebody without doing something dumb. If somebody "stops short" and you rear-end them, it means you either were driving too fast for conditions or following too close. The law in California and many other states reflects this.

    Thats how it is here in PA too. I think theres a term for it but i cant think of it right now.

    Grimm on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Grimm wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.
    Right, but usually it's because you rear-ended someone while speeding, or were doing some other dumb thing. I know it happens that you can just get the ticket for the accident, but there's usually other things going on...
    It's almost entirely impossible to rear-end somebody without doing something dumb. If somebody "stops short" and you rear-end them, it means you either were driving too fast for conditions or following too close. The law in California and many other states reflects this.
    Thats how it is here in PA too. I think theres a term for it but i cant think of it right now.
    "Basic speed law violation" and "tailgating," respectively.

    Thanatos on
  • GrimmGrimm Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Grimm wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    What are the other circumstances involved? I mean, I've rear-ended people before, but I've never gotten a ticket for it...
    If you break the law (which, if you rear-end someone, you almost certainly are), you can be given a ticket, at the cop's discretion.
    Right, but usually it's because you rear-ended someone while speeding, or were doing some other dumb thing. I know it happens that you can just get the ticket for the accident, but there's usually other things going on...
    It's almost entirely impossible to rear-end somebody without doing something dumb. If somebody "stops short" and you rear-end them, it means you either were driving too fast for conditions or following too close. The law in California and many other states reflects this.
    Thats how it is here in PA too. I think theres a term for it but i cant think of it right now.
    "Basic speed law violation" and "tailgating," respectively.


    I swear it was something else. All i can think of is "no fault" but thats not right. *shrug* Maybe im thinking of something else.

    Grimm on
  • ShmoepongShmoepong Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I had to go to traffic court years ago for going 35 mph in a 35 mph zone. Go figure. If you want to lend more credibility to your word show up showered, shaved, well-dressed (slacks, collared shirt and tie) and early. Make sure you always address the judge as 'your honor' or at least 'sir' (dunno what you might say outside the US). And never exaggerate the facts when speaking to the judge, it's refreshing for them to not hear b.s.

    I'm not sure following too close warrants a witness, but I had one come in for my case. After the judge heard both the officer's and my testimony, he ruled in my favor (I also took an oath swearing everything I said was true). I firmly believe I added integrity to my story because every other schmuck in the courtroom looked and acted like they didn't care.
    Winning means you don't pay the court costs. That's $35 more in the Fairfax County, VA system. =]

    Shmoepong on
    I don't think I could take a class without sparring. That would be like a class without techniques. Sparring has value not only as an important (necessary) step in applying your techniques to fighting, but also because it provides a rush and feeling of elation, confidence, and joyful exhaustion that can only be matched by ... oh shit, I am describing sex again. Sorry everyone. - Epicurus
Sign In or Register to comment.