The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

RAID 1 vs mobo upgrade - lose everything anyways?

DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
edited June 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldnt' having a RAID1 (mirror) array with 2 drives sort of get fucked with the upgrade of a motherboard?

Since the particular RAID controller would likely change, and thus the RAID couldnt be migrated over.

And since a new array would have to be created under the new controller, all the data would be lost?



Would it not be better in that case to do "manual" mirroring and just remember to backup all your data to the 2nd drive on some kind of schedule, using someting like Synctoy?

That way your OS drive can be reformatted or whatever on mobo changes, and you still have all your stuff backed up on the 2nd drive?


Yes RAID1 would make things "easier" in that you dont have to remember to do everything but it seems to me to have a fatal flaw.

You'd have to back everything up to a 3rd drive or a pile of dvd's before migrating to the new mobo...

Deusfaux on

Posts

  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'm pretty sure that most proper RAID controllers will actually leave each disk able to operate independently if the controller fails/is replaced.

    devoir on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    yes they do, that's the purpose of RAID1.

    but since he'd have to migrate to a new raid controller on a new motherboard...

    that involves recreating the raid array - ie the new controller couldnt "see" the old raid array.

    and creating a new raid array erases everything on the disks. both disks. so the data would be lost unless it's backed up to a 3rd HDD or optical discs or something

    Deusfaux on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I am fairly certain that this is only a problem for RAID setups more complicated than RAID 1.

    If he had a RAID 5 set up or something, maybe, but RAID 1 is just writing everything to both drives at the same time.

    If I were him I'd just back up important stuff to CDs and then wing it.

    Daedalus on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Onboard raid controllers aren't very good to begin with. If you have to have a raid in your desktop, use a dedicated card instead. You can bring the card with you when you change machines and everything should come along fine. Also keep in mind that raid 1 isn't really there for data protection, only redundancy. If you delete or corrput a file on one drive, the same thing happens on the other.

    stigweard on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    stigweard wrote: »
    Onboard raid controllers aren't very good to begin with. If you have to have a raid in your desktop, use a dedicated card instead. You can bring the card with you when you change machines and everything should come along fine. Also keep in mind that raid 1 isn't really there for data protection, only redundancy. If you delete or corrput a file on one drive, the same thing happens on the other.

    I dunno about you, but I loose a lot more data from a hard drive dying than I do from accidentally deleting stuff.

    Still, I'm sure the reverse is true for plenty of people.

    Daedalus on
Sign In or Register to comment.