The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I just received my new 250GB SATA2 drive, and I installed XP on it when it arrived. I also want to dual-boot with Vista, so I used Partition Magic to split the size of the drive in half. Both partitions use NTFS and are classed as "Primary" by Partition Magic. However, Vista refuses to install on either of these partitions, saying that it could not find any drive suitable for installation, or something along those lines. I downloaded Vista drivers for the onboard SATA controller, but though it will load the driver for my add-on PCI IDE/SATA card (which I'm not using for the SATA drive), it won't pick up on any driver for my on-board chipset. I'd really prefer not to have to put Vista on an old IDE drive, I want to take advantage of the speed offered by the SATA drive.
Can anyone help? My motherboard is the MSI G965M, which uses the (terrible) JMicron IDE/SATA chip.
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
There are incompatibilities with some games in Vista, such as Hitman Blood Money, so I will use XP for these games. However, I've just upgraded my pc and bought a GeForce 8800 GTS card so that I can play DirectX10 games that'll be coming out this year and next, so I need Vista.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
The safest and easiest way to dual-boot a system is just using seperate HDDs.
Is it cost effective for you to buy another hard drive for Vista?
Edit: Wait, can the Vista installer even see the drive in question? From the sound of your post (JMicron issue) it sounds like it can't even see the physical drive.
victor_c26 on
It's been so long since I've posted here, I've removed my signature since most of what I had here were broken links. Shows over, you can carry on to the next post.
Oh, it can see it... it just refuses to use it, saying that it doesn't meet it's criteria or something.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
All i can contribute is that i've used partition magic in the exact same way (to split my xp partition into two for a vista install) and didn't have any problems, so its not partition magics fault
Edit - What the hell, I'll just split my 120GB IDE drive in two, then re-install XP and then Vista, using the SATA drive for storage... which is a damn shame, as I wanted the speed of the SATA drive for Windows.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Edit - What the hell, I'll just split my 120GB IDE drive in two, then re-install XP and then Vista, using the SATA drive for storage... which is a damn shame, as I wanted the speed of the SATA drive for Windows.
yes,SATA seagate 7200.10, and i'm using a motherboard with a jmicron controller, but i dont think my sata drives are actually plugged into the jmicron controller
Posts
Do you *need* an XP dual boot?
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Is it cost effective for you to buy another hard drive for Vista?
Edit: Wait, can the Vista installer even see the drive in question? From the sound of your post (JMicron issue) it sounds like it can't even see the physical drive.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Edit - What the hell, I'll just split my 120GB IDE drive in two, then re-install XP and then Vista, using the SATA drive for storage... which is a damn shame, as I wanted the speed of the SATA drive for Windows.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten