The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Metal Gear Solid and the Aquisition of Snakes to Eat

apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
edited August 2007 in Games and Technology
I recently went out of my way to get on to playing the Metal Gear Solid series as I found the trailers for Guns of the Patriots to be quite intriguing. I'd played MGS on the Playstation back in the day, but had a copy of Twin Snakes on the shelf for some time so started there.

The first game was as fun as I remembered, and while the game play on the second game was just as good it is perhaps the stupidest narrative of any game I've ever played. However, I've been soundly encouraged to get to Snake Eater as quickly as possible. However, I've also been told to go after the Subsistence version of the game as it is supposed to be by some measures vastly superior.

The problem is I can't find the fucking thing anywhere, while I can find many copies of Snake Eater in the bargain bin for $15.

So do I just get that, or do I keep searching?



猿も木から落ちる
apotheos on
«13456712

Posts

  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    The biggest changes in Subsistence are a controllable camera, a Boss Rush mode, and the ability to watch the cutscenes whenever you want.

    If those don't matter to you, then just buy the original.

    Renzo on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    UnbreakableVow on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Oh yeah, the camera thing. I didn't like the new camera, so I just kinda forgot they added it in. You can use either with the right analog stick.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • VeganVegan Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I waited for Subsistence and I only used the new camera. I don't think I would like a fixed camera.

    Basically, I have no input, except that it's by far the best MGS game.

    Vegan on
    steam_sig.png
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    The game is perfectly fine with the old-style camera. It was designed for the old-style camera, for fuck's sake.

    MGS3 is awesome. I own the original Snake Eater, and I can't imagine how any newfangled camera could make it any better. I don't think there's any point in killing yourself over trying to find Subsistence.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I don't blame you for disliking MGS2's story. I thought it was fucking retarded too, back when I first played it. I disliked it so much that I immediately sold off MGS1 and 2.

    But a few years later I was convinced to play MGS3. Then I replayed MGS2, and knowing what I learned from 3, 2 actually made some goddamn sense.

    Then I read a few articles on 2 that really cleared up some stuff:
    This: http://junkerhq.net/MGS2/index.html
    And this: http://www.deltaheadtranslation.com/MGS2/DOTM_TOC.htm

    So yeah, 2 actually works. But only after really digging deep into it. For me, anyway.

    Renzo on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    The game is perfectly fine with the old-style camera. It was designed for the old-style camera, for fuck's sake.

    MGS3 is awesome. I own the original Snake Eater, and I can't imagine how any newfangled camera could make it any better. I don't think there's any point in killing yourself over trying to find Subsistence.

    This is exactly right. With the old camera, you can, you know...see where you are. I guess the new camera gives you that sensation of really "being lost in the jungle", but if you're the type of person who enjoys that, you should probably not be playing video games.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    The game is perfectly fine with the old-style camera. It was designed for the old-style camera, for fuck's sake.

    MGS3 is awesome. I own the original Snake Eater, and I can't imagine how any newfangled camera could make it any better. I don't think there's any point in killing yourself over trying to find Subsistence.

    This is exactly right. With the old camera, you can, you know...see where you are. I guess the new camera gives you that sensation of really "being lost in the jungle", but if you're the type of person who enjoys that, you should probably not be playing video games.

    You can click the right stick and switch between the two camera styles.

    Some people like being able to see where they're going.

    Renzo on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Oh yeah, the camera thing. I didn't like the new camera, so I just kinda forgot they added it in. You can use either with the right analog stick.

    Yeah, I kinda figured.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • PureauthorPureauthor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If I've never completed a MGS game in my life, can I play MGS3 and know what is going on?

    Pureauthor on
    SS FC: 1334 0950 5927
    Platinum FC: 2880 3245 5111
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Pureauthor wrote: »
    If I've never completed a MGS game in my life, can I play MGS3 and know what is going on?

    The main story, yeah. You won't catch all the in-jokes, but they aren't critical. It plays the best out of all of them, too.

    Renzo on
  • hoodie13hoodie13 punch bro Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Renzo wrote: »
    The game is perfectly fine with the old-style camera. It was designed for the old-style camera, for fuck's sake.

    MGS3 is awesome. I own the original Snake Eater, and I can't imagine how any newfangled camera could make it any better. I don't think there's any point in killing yourself over trying to find Subsistence.

    This is exactly right. With the old camera, you can, you know...see where you are. I guess the new camera gives you that sensation of really "being lost in the jungle", but if you're the type of person who enjoys that, you should probably not be playing video games.

    You can click the right stick and switch between the two camera styles.

    Some people like being able to see where they're going.
    Yeah.

    Here, lemme draw it out for you: Because you don't have the soliton radar like you did in MGS1 and 2, you have to rely on the equipment you DO have, which is a dinky little sonar, a motion detector, and a heartbeat sensor. That's fine, but the 2/3rds camera of MGS1 and 2 WAS 2/3rds because if you were watching your radar, you knew what was coming as you ran back toward the screen.

    In MGS3 this is not the case. You are in a gigantic jungle, and you cannot see the enemy's position or direction they are facing if the camera is not facing them. You can and will RUN INTO the enemy often and by accident. The "Third-Person Camera" alleviates these problems. I find that when running south at any time, I use the TPC, and for the rest of the game used the regular 2/3rds camera.

    Also, the added content of Subsistence is totally excellent and worth the money you pay to get it. And you can get it for maybe 20-30 bucks.

    hoodie13 on
    PSN: HoodieThirteen
    XBL: Torn Hoodie
    @hoodiethirteen
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I've had an itch to play MGS3, MGS1, MGS2 in that order. Maybe when MGS4 is closer to release.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2007
    Isn't Subsistence the only actual north american version of MG2?

    How do MG1 and MG2 play in it, I read they are "updated" but ...uh..what does that mean?

    The story to MGS2 had its quirks, but I can appreciate cheesy Japanese high drama. I cannot appreciate terrible writing and direction, though. This game went into being deeply stupid far to many times.

    And Raiden just sucks. A lot.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • DirtchamberDirtchamber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    Magenta'd for dirty lies.

    Seriously, 3 shits all over 2 in pretty much every department.

    Dirtchamber on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2007
    hoodie13 wrote: »
    Also, the added content of Subsistence is totally excellent and worth the money you pay to get it. And you can get it for maybe 20-30 bucks.

    IF I could find it I would get it. But I can't.

    Note I'm in Canada, so that makes it worse.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    Magenta'd for dirty lies.

    Seriously, 3 shits all over 2 in pretty much every department.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2007
    MGS2 plot question
    So in MGS2, are the Colonel and Rose always "fakes", because a real Rose shows up at the end and honestly it just doesn't make any sense at all. It made stupid sense before the bitch showed her face, but at least that was some sense.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • DehumanizedDehumanized Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    Isn't Subsistence the only actual north american version of MG2?

    How do MG1 and MG2 play in it, I read they are "updated" but ...uh..what does that mean?

    The story to MGS2 had its quirks, but I can appreciate cheesy Japanese high drama. I cannot appreciate terrible writing and direction, though. This game went into being deeply stupid far to many times.

    And Raiden just sucks. A lot.

    I put in a rental of Subsistence a few weeks ago to see how it was different from standard Snake Eater. I played a little bit of MG1 and MG2... both appeared to be near direct ports of the MSX versions (from comparing screenshots and stuff...) with accommodation made for the PS2 where appropriate (saving style, control schemes). MG1 will be significantly different if you are familiar with the NES version, however.

    And yeah, the Subsistence version of MG2 is the only official north american release.

    Dehumanized on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    Magenta'd for dirty lies.

    Seriously, 3 shits all over 2 in pretty much every department.

    Like that awesome injury/food system? Or the wonderful story with absolutely no development for anyone outside of The Boss? Or the fact that it was presented in such a dumbed-down manner after the amazing MGS2, and
    anyone who paid an inkling of attention to the goddamn 15-minute radio sequence with The Boss in the Virtuous Mission knows damn well what she's up to?

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    Isn't Subsistence the only actual north american version of MG2?

    How do MG1 and MG2 play in it, I read they are "updated" but ...uh..what does that mean?

    The story to MGS2 had its quirks, but I can appreciate cheesy Japanese high drama. I cannot appreciate terrible writing and direction, though. This game went into being deeply stupid far to many times.

    And Raiden just sucks. A lot.

    Yeah Raiden still kinda grates on me, but Rose is the real killer.

    If you're at all interested in dissecting MGS2, flip through the 2nd link I posted earlier and just look at the screenshots. It was enough to pique my interest.

    Renzo on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I honestly couldn't tell you. Someone was eating lightbulbs while they were writing that script.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • hoodie13hoodie13 punch bro Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    Isn't Subsistence the only actual north american version of MG2?

    How do MG1 and MG2 play in it, I read they are "updated" but ...uh..what does that mean?

    The story to MGS2 had its quirks, but I can appreciate cheesy Japanese high drama. I cannot appreciate terrible writing and direction, though. This game went into being deeply stupid far to many times.

    And Raiden just sucks. A lot.

    1) Far as I know, yes.

    2) Just cleaned up the dialogue a bit, I think.

    3) In my most recent play through, I simply ignored whenever Rose started talking. Do that, and you should be golden. Seriously, it does get better with age. Playing the other games more makes you appreciate the little bits of MGS2 more (not to mention making much more sense out of the insane plot).

    hoodie13 on
    PSN: HoodieThirteen
    XBL: Torn Hoodie
    @hoodiethirteen
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    MGS2 plot question
    So in MGS2, are the Colonel and Rose always "fakes", because a real Rose shows up at the end and honestly it just doesn't make any sense at all. It made stupid sense before the bitch showed her face, but at least that was some sense.
    The Colonel is part of Arsenal's AI, a construction of Raiden's imaginations after his expectations and descriptions based on the Shadow Moses mission. Think of the "residual self image" idea from The Matrix, and that pretty much describes why he looks just like Colonel Campbell. Rose is real, up until toward the ending sections of the game. Then it's an AI. Raiden meets up with the real Rose in the ending sequence.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    Magenta'd for dirty lies.

    Seriously, 3 shits all over 2 in pretty much every department.

    Like that awesome injury/food system?
    Yeah, the same one that is super easy to manage if you aren't braindead and don't get shot all the time.
    Or the wonderful story with absolutely no development for anyone outside of The Boss?
    I see you missed all the character development for Snake and more specifically the fact that
    The Cobras are symbols for Jack instead of just characters.
    Or the fact that it was presented in such a dumbed-down manner after the amazing MGS2,
    Elaborate.
    and
    anyone who paid an inkling of attention to the goddamn 15-minute radio sequence with The Boss in the Virtuous Mission knows damn well what she's up to?
    Yeah, but the kicker is WHY.

    Renzo on
  • DirtchamberDirtchamber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you want the original Metal Gear titles, get Subsistence. I'm pretty sure Metal Gear Online is...well, offline, now.

    Just get the original Snake Eater.

    Oh, and MGS2 > MGS1 and MGS3

    Magenta'd for dirty lies.

    Seriously, 3 shits all over 2 in pretty much every department.

    Like that awesome injury/food system? Or the wonderful story with absolutely no development for anyone outside of The Boss? Or the fact that it was presented in such a dumbed-down manner after the amazing MGS2, and
    anyone who paid an inkling of attention to the goddamn 15-minute radio sequence with The Boss in the Virtuous Mission knows damn well what she's up to?

    Well, I mean, I'm not going to argue with you about it, what with this being a matter of taste and so on. But if you honestly think that The Boss is the only developed character in MGS3, then I'd suggest that you need to play it again - and pay some fucking attention this time.

    EDIT: Ha ha ha! Read that spoiler you posted for MGS2 and tell me again how it's got a better plot than MGS3. Ha ha ha! Oh, wow.

    Dirtchamber on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    As for the injury/food system: It never presented a problem. What it presented was an annoyance. There was just no need for it, other than the cool cutscene which introduces the injury system.

    You can't tell me that MGS3's story wasn't told in a much more straightforward manner. You weren't guessing at all. And if you were, you should snuggle up with a nice copy of The Transporter or something.
    And the reason for Boss's actions are all given in that damn 15-minute-radio sequence. She's loyal to her end. Were you seriously thinking she wasn't working for the US the whole time?

    I don't care if the Cobras were "symbols". They could have presented that, just as well as they could have given then some development of their own. MGS1 and 2 did it, it's not a foreign concept.

    Snake's development goes as far as they ordered his mentor to death, so now he doesn't trust the US anymore. DIDN'T SEE THAT ONE COMING!

    UnbreakableVow on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    EDIT: Ha ha ha! Read that spoiler you posted for MGS2 and tell me again how it's got a better plot than MGS3. Ha ha ha! Oh, wow.

    Yeah, AI is such a far-out concept. Definitely never heard of anything along those lines at all.

    OH WAIT

    MATRIX.jpg

    Sorry...in my haste to detract MGS3's bad points, I forgot to mention its best part, and a character who does have a bit of development (and a lot of badassness): Ocelot. Even if he does meow. Still, every scene with him was pure joy.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Seriously guys: http://www.deltaheadtranslation.com/MGS2/DOTM_TOC.htm

    It's not just pointing out visual similarities, it's about why. And it's not just post modernism for post modernism's sake.

    Renzo on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    could you imageshack those, blocked here.

    LewieP on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Unbreakable: Make your arguments all day, but at least spoiler them for the guy who made the thread.

    Renzo on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    And guys, I want to say, I in no way at all hate MGS3. It's story is more straightforward, sure, but it's still entertaining, if more in a James Bond kind of fashion. It cleared up the only part of MGS2 that confused me initially. CQC was fucking awesome, as was the ability to FINALLY slit throats. And a shotgun? Yes please. It's definitely the longest game of the bunch, and though the bosses themselves aren't much, the actual battles are (particularly The End and The Boss). Plus, I loved the Cold War setting, the ties to the Cuban Missile Crisis, just...a lot of really good stuff going for this game.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    LewieP wrote: »
    could you imageshack those, blocked here.

    eh, they're on the website that's linked at the top of the post. they're also huge images. so, no.

    Renzo on
  • DirtchamberDirtchamber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    EDIT: Ha ha ha! Read that spoiler you posted for MGS2 and tell me again how it's got a better plot than MGS3. Ha ha ha! Oh, wow.

    Yeah, AI is such a far-out concept.

    Please. The plot in MGS2 is utter fucking nonsense. In fact, it's such nonsense that I'm inclined to think the whole thing is a practical joke - and that people like you are the ones who fell for it.

    EDIT: Wait - did you just point to the THE MATRIX as proof that MGS2's plot isn't garbage? THE MATRIX? Please tell me you're not serious.

    Dirtchamber on
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    EDIT: Ha ha ha! Read that spoiler you posted for MGS2 and tell me again how it's got a better plot than MGS3. Ha ha ha! Oh, wow.

    Yeah, AI is such a far-out concept.

    Please. The plot in MGS2 is utter fucking nonsense. In fact, it's such nonsense that I'm inclined to think the whole thing is a practical joke - and that people like you are the ones who fell for it.

    Would you please explain to me how, in the grand scheme of things, the plot of EVERY Metal Gear Solid isn't utter fucking nonsense?

    Hell, look at MGS1. Pure fucking nonsense. But still enjoyable.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    EDIT: Ha ha ha! Read that spoiler you posted for MGS2 and tell me again how it's got a better plot than MGS3. Ha ha ha! Oh, wow.

    Yeah, AI is such a far-out concept.

    Please. The plot in MGS2 is utter fucking nonsense. In fact, it's such nonsense that I'm inclined to think the whole thing is a practical joke - and that people like you are the ones who fell for it.

    Am I talking to myself here? Seriously, this explains a lot of stuff. It's not a perfect argument. I have issues with it, but it's pretty good.

    http://www.deltaheadtranslation.com/MGS2/DOTM_TOC.htm

    Renzo on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2007
    I wouldn't call the plot especially nonsense. I liked certain parts of it a lot. But it was very badly done, very poorly told, and needlessy stupid to a degree than is unacceptable.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Good work guys. Now apo will know whether or not to get MGS2.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • MerovingiMerovingi regular
    edited August 2007
    Call me crazy but I very much prefer MGS2 over MGS3.

    The camo mechanic was nothing short of annoying, and the setting wasn't as interesting. I didn't mind playing as Raiden like most people did, but my biggest gripe with either of the two is the shitty ass controls. Having to hold three shoulder buttons while holding the square button (just enough to not fire) to peek around a corner was like an Olympic event for my hands and fingers.

    Merovingi on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • switzky21switzky21 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    MGS3 is one of two games I have cried over.

    That ending was ice cold.

    switzky21 on
Sign In or Register to comment.