Fallout online - Can I hear a "Hell Yeah!"

12357

Posts

  • NATIKNATIK DenmarkRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Well it does say "which is your favorite Interplay Fallout" not just Fallout.

    NATIK on
    steam_sig.png
  • TIFunkaliciousTIFunkalicious Kicking back in NebraskaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I still would have clicked the first one. hurrah for the vault dweller

    TIFunkalicious on
  • GaddezGaddez Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    NATIK wrote: »
    Well it does say "which is your favorite Interplay Fallout" not just Fallout.

    That's the Joke; They're doing there best to ignore bethesda made an excellent game in there setting.

    That having been said, thank god they didn't include FO:BOS as an option.

    Gaddez on
  • NATIKNATIK DenmarkRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    It should be on the list though, if Microprose's Tactics is on there then Brotherhood of Steel counts too :P.

    I own it myself though and god its a terrible fallout game, but it is a decent mindless hack'n'slash though.

    NATIK on
    steam_sig.png
  • KlykaKlyka DO you have any SPARE BATTERIES?Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    signed up!

    Klyka on
    SC2 EU ID Klyka.110
    lTDyp.jpg
  • farbekriegfarbekrieg Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    holy thread necromancy batman! I thought interplay went tits up back in 2005-6 but according to wikipedia they still kind of exist... it still seems like a smoke and mirrors campaign to look like a publishinghouse tho.

    But arent the original guys from fallout interplay days basically obisdian entertainment today? Even if this isnt a vapor ware scheme to steal investor money what kind of guarantees do we have that it will do better than say... fallen earth?

    Either way im signed up

    farbekrieg on
  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Gaddez wrote: »
    NATIK wrote: »
    Well it does say "which is your favorite Interplay Fallout" not just Fallout.

    That's the Joke; They're doing there best to ignore bethesda made an excellent game in there setting.

    In most ways FO3 was a better game than FO 1 or 2

    Rent on
  • Xenogear_0001Xenogear_0001 Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Signed up, and I don't even like MMO's generally.

    Xenogear_0001 on
    steam_sig.png
  • GraviijaGraviija Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I signed up, and I actively dislike MMOs. Also, since I've never played any Fallout before FO3, I just lied and said FO1 was my favorite.

    Graviija on
  • BahamutZEROBahamutZERO Registered User, Moderator mod
    edited October 2010
    holy shit
    Signed up, I'm amazed this has made it to beta. I hope it's wonderful.

    BahamutZERO on
    BahamutZERO.gif
  • DarmakDarmak RAGE vympyvvhyc vyctyvyRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Waka Laka wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    I WILL EAT MY OWN COCK IF IT COMES OUT! SIG THAT!

    Oh... dear.

    I swear to god, if someone hasn't told him about this yet I'm going to give him so much shit when I get home. :rotate:

    Darmak on
    JtgVX0H.png
  • korodullinkorodullin What. SCRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Wait, this beta signup thing? This is old news. Like, several months old. Nothing else has been heard about it since this went up in June.

    Damn all of you for making me think there's been an update.

    korodullin on
    ZvOMJnu.png
    - The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (2017, colorized)
  • Xenogear_0001Xenogear_0001 Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Ah, well, fiddlesticks.

    Xenogear_0001 on
    steam_sig.png
  • MorninglordMorninglord I'm tired of being Batman, so today I'll be Owl.Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Huh. I thought I'd be the lone voice of dissent for feeling pessimistic about the success of this venture.

    Guess I'm not as big an outlier as I thought.

    Morninglord on
    (PSN: Morninglord) (Steam: Morninglord) (WiiU: Morninglord22) I like to record and toss up a lot of random gaming videos here.
  • CherrnCherrn Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Huh. I thought I'd be the lone voice of dissent for feeling pessimistic about the success of this venture.

    Guess I'm not as big an outlier as I thought.

    Yeah, I have no interest in this entire project. Zero. As far as I'm concerned, MMOs have repeatedly and consistently raped their own potential. We're at a point where I'm just going to assume any new MMO is complete shit until proven otherwise.

    Cherrn on
    All creature will die and all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai.
  • ArchonexArchonex No hard feelings, right? Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Anyone else notice the little details on that website?
    THE MASTER LIVES is scrawled onto the desk. Along with HAROLD with an X etched into the desk next to his name. D:

    Archonex on
  • DraperDraper __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2010
    hambone wrote: »
    there's no way this is going to be anything but Interplay trying to make a quick buck by riding Bethesda's FO3 coattails. And it's not that I'm pessimistic about Interplay's ability to make a good game as much as I'm pessimistic about playing Fallout with other people.

    I dreamed about a Fallout MMO for a long time. Since then I've played many MMO's, and every single one of them has ended up being so tedious that the life of the world is sucked right out. When I play Fallout games, I get immersed in another world, and I'm not interested in sharing that world with some greasy powergaming shut-ins.


    There is not enough lime in the world.

    Yeah, absolutely.

    Draper on
    lifefinal3.jpg
  • DraperDraper __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2010
    Rent wrote: »
    Gaddez wrote: »
    NATIK wrote: »
    Well it does say "which is your favorite Interplay Fallout" not just Fallout.

    That's the Joke; They're doing there best to ignore bethesda made an excellent game in there setting.

    In most ways FO3 was a better game than FO 1 or 2

    I don't know about FO3, but I'd probably say New Vegas is better in practically every way.

    Draper on
    lifefinal3.jpg
  • TanolenTanolen Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    NATIK wrote: »
    fallout has a very angry fanbase generally

    Is true though, DAC, NMA and the other holdouts from way back when have all become insular hateful places whom you could probably never ever please.

    The old Fallout active fanbase is horrid.

    They actually for the most part seem to like new vegas. But still fallout is hands down the worst fanbase for a single player game series.

    Tanolen on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Hm. Oh dear.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • undeinPiratundeinPirat Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    even though i feel a multiplayer fallout will be bad just because of the setting and how previous games have been

    signed up

    just interested

    undeinPirat on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] steam: undeinpirat
  • MrVyngaardMrVyngaard Live From New Etoile Straight Outta SosariaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Signed up.

    Because retro nuked future America is worth fighting for, every step of the way!

    MrVyngaard on
    "now I've got this mental image of caucuses as cafeteria tables in prison, and new congressmen having to beat someone up on inauguration day." - Raiden333
    camo_sig2.png
  • L|amaL|ama Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    this is the same thing I signed up for around PAX right? With the newsletters and stuff?

    L|ama on
  • FiarynFiaryn Omnicidal Madman Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Well there goes the hope of further single player Fallouts.

    Fiaryn on
    Soul Silver FC: 1935 3141 6240
    White FC: 0819 3350 1787
  • NATIKNATIK DenmarkRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Fiaryn wrote: »
    Well there goes the hope of further single player Fallouts.

    Well even if FOO is succesful I doubt it will keep us from getting SP Fallouts.

    Remember FOO is Interplay, SP FO is Bethesda.

    Also Interplay had to fight very hard to make Fallout Online, Bethesda tried a few times to close it down on the way.

    NATIK on
    steam_sig.png
  • KlashKlash Lost... ... in the rainRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I have to wonder how this makes sense to canon. I mean, an MMO is, by its nature, a big thing. So, how do they hand wave whatever place of the world it takes place in, having possibly thousands and thousands of Vault Dwelling, Lone Wandering, Package-carrying, Chosen Ones?

    This is why I kind of hate MMOs based on single player titles as a general rule. They usually bork the canon, no matter how silly that canon might already be, irreparably. There is nothing worse than "some guys in totally wicked rad gear killed the biggest bad the series has ever known" becoming canon.

    When I heard about this years ago, I was interested, but after having played most of the Fallouts, I am definitely against the very premise of a multiplayer Fallout, a series utterly dedicated to telling me how special I am and that only I can change or destroy entire sections of the retro-future-post-apocalyptic America.

    Klash on
    We don't even care... whether we care or not...
  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    NATIK wrote: »
    Fiaryn wrote: »
    Well there goes the hope of further single player Fallouts.

    Well even if FOO is succesful I doubt it will keep us from getting SP Fallouts.

    Remember FOO is Interplay, SP FO is Bethesda.

    Also Interplay had to fight very hard to make Fallout Online, Bethesda tried a few times to close it down on the way.

    Yeah because Interplay has done shit with the license forever

    Interplay in all honesty has been complete assholes about the whole thing, they're basically doing the dev version of internet domain squatting and it's completely douchey of them

    On top of that I like how they're not even classy enough to acknowledge FO: NV's existence

    IT'S FUCKING OBSIDIAN, BASICALLY ALL OLD INTERPLAY GUYS

    WHAT THE FUCK

    Rent on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Rent wrote: »
    NATIK wrote: »
    Fiaryn wrote: »
    Well there goes the hope of further single player Fallouts.

    Well even if FOO is succesful I doubt it will keep us from getting SP Fallouts.

    Remember FOO is Interplay, SP FO is Bethesda.

    Also Interplay had to fight very hard to make Fallout Online, Bethesda tried a few times to close it down on the way.

    Yeah because Interplay has done shit with the license forever

    Interplay in all honesty has been complete assholes about the whole thing, they're basically doing the dev version of internet domain squatting and it's completely douchey of them

    On top of that I like how they're not even classy enough to acknowledge FO: NV's existence

    IT'S FUCKING OBSIDIAN, BASICALLY ALL OLD INTERPLAY GUYS

    WHAT THE FUCK

    Squatting? The FO MMO was part of the agreement to sell the IP in the first place!

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Spoit wrote: »
    Rent wrote: »
    NATIK wrote: »
    Fiaryn wrote: »
    Well there goes the hope of further single player Fallouts.

    Well even if FOO is succesful I doubt it will keep us from getting SP Fallouts.

    Remember FOO is Interplay, SP FO is Bethesda.

    Also Interplay had to fight very hard to make Fallout Online, Bethesda tried a few times to close it down on the way.

    Yeah because Interplay has done shit with the license forever

    Interplay in all honesty has been complete assholes about the whole thing, they're basically doing the dev version of internet domain squatting and it's completely douchey of them

    On top of that I like how they're not even classy enough to acknowledge FO: NV's existence

    IT'S FUCKING OBSIDIAN, BASICALLY ALL OLD INTERPLAY GUYS

    WHAT THE FUCK

    Squatting? The FO MMO was part of the agreement to sell the IP in the first place!

    Yes but if they didn't show 'due effort' then rights revert to Bethesda

    so basically they'll release like one screenshot every couple of months

    they've been doing this for years and years and years now

    Rent on
  • freakish lightfreakish light butterdick jones and his heavenly asshole machineRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I didn't look to see if this was posted before. Frankly I'm disappointed in you guys that it wasn't in the last three pages.

    215504262_cSCGQ-L-2.jpg

    this is from 2004

    freakish light on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Signed up.

    And holy shit reading my post from back in 07... It's like going back in time. Look at my hair!

    urahonky on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    This looks like the exact same sign up that was posted, perhaps in this very thread, like a year ago

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • TanolenTanolen Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    So, is this going to be a more traditional mmo and not FPS, since that other FPS post-apoc wasteland game already exists.

    Tanolen on
  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Fallout online would be to Fallout what Star trek online (and the new "alternate-prequel" movie too I guess) was to Star Trek.



    In other words, I hope you liked your time with Fallout, cause the entire storyline is about to go to total shit!

    Astale on
  • RentRent I'm always right Fuckin' deal with itRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Star Trek the alternate prequel movie was the best thing to happen to Star Trek pretty much ever

    So your comparison doesn't make much sesnse

    Rent on
  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    It was a good movie, but it literally wrecked every piece of star trek before it (by writing it out of existence in a, what, one minute long viginette?), and then STO took what was left and basically turned it into a parody.

    So movie was awsome, but it was responsible for the destruction of Star Trek as a franchise nontheless.

    Astale on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    The Star Trek franchise had picked up way too much baggage by that point. It needed to be burned to the ground so it could be rebuilt.

    Couscous on
  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I don't disagree with any of that.

    I'm just saying if this goes through, having two competing companies working with the same license, and with obviouslly no desire to cooperate, it's going to muddle up the lore so bad you might as well start over fresh. And fallout has some good lore.

    Perhaps I should have left out the analogy and just said that.

    CAUSE YOU'RE ALL STAR TREK NERDS. NEEEEEERDS.

    Astale on
  • FiarynFiaryn Omnicidal Madman Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Astale wrote: »
    It was a good movie, but it literally wrecked every piece of star trek before it (by writing it out of existence in a, what, one minute long viginette?), and then STO took what was left and basically turned it into a parody.

    So movie was awsome, but it was responsible for the destruction of Star Trek as a franchise nontheless.

    The only people who view it as a destruction are the hardcore old fans. For literally everyone else, especially the people counting the money the Star Trek franchise makes, the movie was a resounding reinvigorating success.

    To suggest STO has anything vaguely approaching relevance to future outings is ridiculous. It will be ignored. Because it is a mumoperger and no one cares.

    Fiaryn on
    Soul Silver FC: 1935 3141 6240
    White FC: 0819 3350 1787
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Fiaryn wrote: »
    Astale wrote: »
    It was a good movie, but it literally wrecked every piece of star trek before it (by writing it out of existence in a, what, one minute long viginette?), and then STO took what was left and basically turned it into a parody.

    So movie was awsome, but it was responsible for the destruction of Star Trek as a franchise nontheless.

    The only people who view it as a destruction are the hardcore old fans. For literally everyone else, especially the people counting the money the Star Trek franchise makes, the movie was a resounding reinvigorating success.

    To suggest STO has anything vaguely approaching relevance to future outings is ridiculous. It will be ignored. Because it is a mumoperger and no one cares.

    So, kinda like FO3 then.
    :x

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.