The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I've noticed that depictions of zombie survival scenarios in print and on film tend to gloss over the immediate consequences of an undead takeover, instead opting to recount the experiences of a few individuals over the longer term. (See: 28 Days Later, the George A. Romero "Dead" films, the Walking Dead graphic novels.) While this no doubt makes for better storytelling, it has made me curious as to what such consequences would actually entail.
How would a densely populated urban area such as Toronto, New York, or Chicago deteriorate in the immediate wake of such a zombie apocalypse? What would serve as major vectors of zombifying illness? How would essential services such as water, power, and emergency response services deteriorate, and over what time frames? How would this takeover be portrayed in print and televised media? How would the government respond? Finally, how many days would it take for a complete takeover of the undead within the specified area? Assume the following rules:
Most zombies possess average human strength, below average co-ordination.
No zombie is impeded by darkness.
Anyone who dies of any cause post invasion rises as a zombie within twenty-four hours.
Anyone who dies after direct contact with the undead rises as a zombie immediately.
No zombie requires sustenance to function, but all zombies are instinctively driven to hunt living people by an insatiable hunger for human flesh.
These zombies are in all other respects the slow, decaying shamblers seen in The Walking Dead and the George A. Romero films.
World War Z is a very good exploration of the global consequences of a zombie plague. How it would spread all over the world, how people would try to exploit it, how nations would adapt to combat the hordes of undead, and so on.
Casual Eddy on
0
Bloods EndBlade of TyshallePunch dimensionRegistered Userregular
edited August 2007
Fuck Zombies. Bitches go down like it ain't no thang.
I'm afraid of Vampires. Taking over Salem's Lot style.
The outcome really depends on if it's a contained infection or not. RE Mansion/Racoon City/ Umbrella Bases in CV were all contained and were all blown up, but worldwide outbreak would basically spell the destruction of mankind, with small pockets of survivors living on the run for a while. I know you specified GAR zombies, but if it were 28 Days Later style [will die of hunger], or infection only zombies[bite/scratch etc.], the situation isn't as dire.
Also, after a zombie outbreak, if humanity managed to survive, you can bet on the military using the virus/whatever as a biological weapon [if that wasn't already it's purpose].
EDIT: Zombies wouldn't be the only problem. In the event of a Z-Day, I can see the heavily armed gangs quickly becoming as dangerous as the undead, as they're armed and could easily steal weapons and supplies from other survivors [DotD Biker Gang].
The outcome really depends on if it's a contained infection or not. RE Mansion/Racoon City/ Umbrella Bases in CV were all contained and were all blown up, but worldwide outbreak would basically spell the destruction of mankind, with small pockets of survivors living on the run for a while.
I had a discussion with a couple friends a little while back, and we came to the conclusion that it might be possible to survive as part of a water based hunter-gatherer society. Heck, survival in a fortified city might even be feasible, as long as the settlement is sufficiently defended and appropriate burial rituals are developed. (Though not specified in the OP, GAR zombies can be disabled through decapitation and severe head trauma IIRC. (This is based on what I've heard; I've only actually watched the Dawn of the Dead remake and read The Walking Dead.))
That's actually the reasoning for my OP. I'm writing a d20 Zombie Apocalypse RPG, but I figured that I'd have more success discussing the fluff here than in ODaM.
Fuck Zombies. Bitches go down like it ain't no thang.
I'm afraid of Vampires. Taking over Salem's Lot style.
Vampires can be reasoned wiith, though. And if we have a situation where a vampire can drink from a human without killing them or turning them, it's no problem at all. Some people have 'live-in blood cow' as a career, vampires go legit, everyone lives happily.
Zombies? No way in fuck are you reasoning with a zombie. Maybe a xombie, but not a zombie. And your buddy gets bit? Suddenly your buddy is a zombie too. Mega-problem.
The zombie survival guide is wrong about a few things as far as guns go.
Other than that, its pretty good.
I've glanced at the Zombie Survival Guide, though I've yet to pick up World War Z. I posted this thread with the goal of constructing a timeline for the deterioration of essential services within the context of an urban environment. Are either of those books specific about that kind of thing?
It strikes me that hospitals and nursing homes would both act as initial sources of and major vectors for the zombie outbreak. Following those lines, emergency medical services would probably be the first to go—perhaps even by the end of the first day. It also seems plausible that subway systems would serve as another major vector.
Would the zombie-disease itself be non-fatal, near-instantly fatal, or somewhere in between?
Meaning, how quickly do you become a zombie once infected?
Let's go with fatal. Those who are bitten by zombies but survive immediate encounters rapidly become weaker, dying and rising as a zombie within the course of a day.
I think that if there was to be a real zombie outbreak, it would be more along the lines of 28 Day/Weeks Later. The Rage virus was an engineered strain of rabies, and that scenario actually wouldnt be at all far from reality. I wouldnt be surprized in the least bit if it hasnt already been created. In any case, we must remember that in a real world situation zombies wouldnt be the only threat. Scared and desperate humans are the most destructive force on Earth.
The most likely cause of such an event would be viral. The Dead series tends to rely on an unknown cause where anyone who dies revives, which sounds more mystical then logical. Could be some contagion that everyone has and only activates on death though I guess.
And depends on teh incubation period to. DOTD remake, they can come back in a few seconds, thus somewhere like NYC would be toast in a few days, the living wouldnt have the chane to accomodate to killing what they think are humans and the majority aren't exactly survivalists either. They'd be consumed incredibly fast and increase the zombie horde.
What about cremating those who die before they rise again? if that worked id guess few dead people would be simply left in the streets to rot. Perhaps it could be one solution to contain a outbreak? Unless you somehow end up spreading it even more then or something offcourse..
What about cremating those who die before they rise again? if that worked id guess few dead people would be simply left in the streets to rot. Perhaps it could be one solution to contain a outbreak? Unless you somehow end up spreading it even more then or something offcourse..
Again depends on hte movie. The living dead series involves the poison that creates zombies spreading whenever a zombie is incinerated, which is also btw, the only way to kill htem.
I can't imagine a Zombie Apocolypse event being very likely. I'm not saying this based on the fact that zombies don't exist; I just don't belive the way zombies propogate is all that effective. I think that any sort of zombie apocolypse would suffer from a sort of zombie hawking radiation before it could become a major epidemic.
Consider this: Every zombie outbreak has to start with a zombie-zero, or Z-0 if you will, the first person who died and turned into a zombie. Now, I'd barely give Z-0 even odds on infecting one other person depending on how zombified he is before he comes into contact with others. Z-0, being a zombie and all, isn't really the brightest of fellows so I really doubt he could really be trusted to maul and shamble off. Chances are, he'll probably be partway through eating someone's medulla when police or bystanders spot him and go, "Hey, it's a nascent zombie apocolypse." In the best of conditions, assuming Z-0 got the good fortune of getting locked in a hospital, old folk's home, or orphanage overnight we're looking at 200 people infected at most.
Now 200 people is decent, but once you're that far the cat is prettmuch out of the bag and the populace is bound to be reacting. Anyone who's got a weapon (which averages to more guns than people in America) is going to be walking about armed and itching to re-kill some animated corpses. Zombie shamble? Bullet. Crypt walking? Bullet. Listening to Kernkraft 2000? Bullet. Anything that so much as limps will be shot on sight. Under these conditions, I can't imagine zombies being able to get more than a 1:1 kill:death ratio. Without 1:1, more zombies are going out of comission than are being enlightened to the Braaaaaaaiiiiiiiins philosophy, and it's just a matter of time until they get eliminated.
Good point; the zombie plague will either need to be air or water transferable, or be nascent for a long enough period of time to spread.
Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
0
amateurhourOne day I'll be professionalhourThe woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered Userregular
edited August 2007
The only problem with that is that most people, regardless of all the movies made, still wouldn't have their brains wired to realize just what is going on. If the zombie did come up on a group of people, and had some kind of enhanced strength, chances are he'd be able to bite two or three before he was killed, and even then he might just be shot and left for dead. That's how they spread, through panic and stealth. If he lives, he'll slink down an alley, and before long he's bitten three or four hobos. I agree that if people could kill them well then all would be fine, but as much as everyone wants to look at america as this gun loving party town, we can't just walk around firing weapons, even in the event of a national crisis. The army would shoot anyone on sight carrying a firearm and firing it twoards the general public. I'm not saying people wouldn't have guns, but it would mostly be the army doing all of the work, not the general public. ANd even though most people here do own a gun, their ammo is limited, so if they've got four zombies coming at them, and only one clip, unless they're a trained marksman they're fucked. Personally, I'd get a few rifles, a handgun or two, a sword, and I'd make my way out to the woods, or the ocean, try to find an island somewhere. Maybe a castle in europe..... : )
Well, then, the outbreak epicenters would be wherever people congregate. Malls, downtown areas, public recreation sites, etc.
A mall infestation would be manageable as long as you had a good supply of sports equipment and giant Lego heads.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
Well, then, the outbreak epicenters would be wherever people congregate. Malls, downtown areas, public recreation sites, etc.
A mall infestation would be manageable as long as you had a good supply of sports equipment and giant Lego heads.
You're expecting humans to react and fight back that quickly which wouldn't happen. For a start, half the people they'd be killing initially could possibly be their friends/family/loved ones. Secondly they aren't default murderers and it'd be hard to do. Also girls are wusses. It aint happening for them.
You're looking at at least a few hours before theres any kind of mass retalliation after all the panic and fear settles down and people start going nuts.
Unfortunately, and as much as I want to use a sword to lay waste to the zombie horde, it was discussed in an earlier thread that after about 3 skulls the blade would be dull as hell and worthless and thats if it doesn't get stuck in the bone, leaving you defenseless as the rest chomp down on you. A knife is better for a quick jab into the brain.
Well, then, the outbreak epicenters would be wherever people congregate. Malls, downtown areas, public recreation sites, etc.
A mall infestation would be manageable as long as you had a good supply of sports equipment and giant Lego heads.
You're expecting humans to react and fight back that quickly which wouldn't happen. For a start, half the people they'd be killing initially could possibly be their friends/family/loved ones. Secondly they aren't default murderers and it'd be hard to do. Also girls are wusses. It aint happening for them.
You're looking at at least a few hours before theres any kind of mass retalliation after all the panic and fear settles down and people start going nuts.
Yes, but all it takes is one particularly driven war photographer and a brainy-yet-sexy government agent to drive back the hordes. No sweat.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
That's actually the reasoning for my OP. I'm writing a d20 Zombie Apocalypse RPG, but I figured that I'd have more success discussing the fluff here than in ODaM.
I actually played a few sessions of a game like this. Basically took the old-school (give me ALL the D6's) Star Wars rules.
Source material seems kind of easy, same as the world now except zombies.
Unfortunately, and as much as I want to use a sword to lay waste to the zombie horde, it was discussed in an earlier thread that after about 3 skulls the blade would be dull as hell and worthless and thats if it doesn't get stuck in the bone, leaving you defenseless as the rest chomp down on you. A knife is better for a quick jab into the brain.
Definitely depends on the sword. "The Zombie Survival Guide" shows that in trained hands a foil or other ranged piercing weapon would be excellent. A lightweight spear would be amazing. I could also see a heavy "Dao" type sword working, where sharpness isn't a major concern. Just the momentum can shatter and sever an arm. Katanas, especially those display kind, would be useless, as chestwounds aren't going to stop a zed.
(sharpened tip for eye-stabbing)
But again, skill of the wielder is the most important aspect.
A very heavy sword that could act more as a bludgeon than a slicer would be good. Though you'd either need to be strong or train with it to gain more speed or you're gonna get overwhelmed anwyay. But at least in that case, sharpness isn't as important as power.
The zombie survival guide is wrong about a few things as far as guns go.
Other than that, its pretty good.
I've glanced at the Zombie Survival Guide, though I've yet to pick up World War Z. I posted this thread with the goal of constructing a timeline for the deterioration of essential services within the context of an urban environment. Are either of those books specific about that kind of thing?
It strikes me that hospitals and nursing homes would both act as initial sources of and major vectors for the zombie outbreak. Following those lines, emergency medical services would probably be the first to go—perhaps even by the end of the first day. It also seems plausible that subway systems would serve as another major vector.
World War Z pretty much covers this, it even looks at what would happen to astronaughts on the space station. It doesnt really go into super pedantic detail about a specific city, but its the most chronological and detailed account of a zombie outbreak you can really find. It goes from initial outbreak, how it would spread across continents, the panic, zombie anatomy (even why their eyes look fucked up, due to having no water glazing them they grow dry and scratched, cut with black lines), to relocation of society behind 'safe zones' then reclamation or the 'zombie war', the training of soldiers specifically to fight large numbers of zombies, he basically covers everything. He also cites hospitals as major outbreak centres in one chapter im pretty sure, and theres a section where the underground tunnels of Paris act as an initial haven for refugees, but quickly become outbreak centres with high densities of infestation. Every zombie related phenomenom you could think of he covers, and theres even a samurai sword wielding nerd. I dont wanna hype it too much, but it was quite a good read.
Its not the perfect book, but it satisfys that detail-lust I often get when watching most zombie movies. If they were to ever make a tv series based on a zombie apocalypse, it would have to be based on World War Z.
That said I havent read the survival guide, but its by the same dude.
The outcome of a zombie apocalypse depends entirely on the speed of the zombies.
If they're slow ones we'll see people in a more offensive role, actively trying to erradicate the zombie hordes. If they're speedy ones we'll see people huddled in bunkers/fortresses taking a more defensive approach.
Either way I'll be driving around in a lifted 4X4 pickup truck with spikes on both bumpers laughing at all you people who don't own firearms.
Edit - I think it's pretty safe to say that something like a zombie outbreak would spread like wildfire. As previously stated hospitals and nursing homes would be the sources of outbreak (if we're talking about the voodoo type "you die and become a zombie", and not virus type"you get infected and become a zombie") and would surge through pedestrian areas. Subways, streets in major cities, shopping malls, stores, etc. Anything where people are congregated together. Which basically means everywhere. In my opinion the most important thing in a zombie survival scenario is to stay mobile. Holding up in a location for more than some sleep/food/water is a bad idea. In any case, I would imagine all emergency/public services to collapse within a few days and we'd be dealing with a Mad Max meets Dawn of the Dead scenario within a few weeks.
also you've got a worse problem if symptons dont develop instantly, because people sneaking out of quarentine zones, then you've got multiple outbreak centres, traditional hazmat and quarantine procedures are simply inadequate when the virus turns people into weapons. I think it is possible that it could be quarantined successfully, but luck would factor in, say a small town with an 'epi-centre'.
This is discounted voodoo zombies, im kinda going with the World War Z-esque zombie.
also you've got a worse problem if symptons dont develop instantly, because people sneaking out of quarentine zones, then you've got multiple outbreak centres, traditional hazmat and quarantine procedures are simply inadequate when the virus turns people into weapons. I think it is possible that it could be quarantined successfully, but luck would factor in, say a small town with an 'epi-centre'.
This is discounted voodoo zombies, im kinda going with the World War Z-esque zombie.
Well look at teh DOTD remake. The black guy kept his russian wife away from the others for weeks even though she'd been attacked by the zombies, he managed to disguise the fact she'd been bitten. It was discrete and to those who don't know it can be transmitted or at least sped up that way, they'd let them into a safe haven without any question. Which is where the fuckeduppery begins.
DarkWarrior on
0
DynagripBreak me a million heartsHoustonRegistered User, ClubPAregular
This weirds me the fuck out because last night I had a damn zombie nightmare. Not only was there tons of zombie dogs on the train I was on - I was eventually bit (and got so pissed I started bitting them back) but after I was bitten they dropped me off at an abandoned(so they thought) barn for fear that I was going to become one - I was met with more dogs then two young zombie kids (like.. 10 year old boy and 5 year old girl) after killing their zombie puppy.. It was the weirdest dream I ever fucking had.
Shit freaks me out. I hate any disease/drug that destroys my mind and takes away or changes my humanity.
Edit - I think it's pretty safe to say that something like a zombie outbreak would spread like wildfire. As previously stated hospitals and nursing homes would be the sources of outbreak (if we're talking about the voodoo type "you die and become a zombie", and not virus type"you get infected and become a zombie") and would surge through pedestrian areas. Subways, streets in major cities, shopping malls, stores, etc. Anything where people are congregated together. Which basically means everywhere. In my opinion the most important thing in a zombie survival scenario is to stay mobile. Holding up in a location for more than some sleep/food/water is a bad idea. In any case, I would imagine all emergency/public services to collapse within a few days and we'd be dealing with a Mad Max meets Dawn of the Dead scenario within a few weeks.
I've said it before, but I think heading to a seaport would be the best bet. A ship waiting to leave if things go bad, rail lines to move to other places in case you need provisions from far away, containers which can serve as weapons and living quarters, and line of sight for miles using the cranes.
Posts
I'm afraid of Vampires. Taking over Salem's Lot style.
Also, after a zombie outbreak, if humanity managed to survive, you can bet on the military using the virus/whatever as a biological weapon [if that wasn't already it's purpose].
EDIT: Zombies wouldn't be the only problem. In the event of a Z-Day, I can see the heavily armed gangs quickly becoming as dangerous as the undead, as they're armed and could easily steal weapons and supplies from other survivors [DotD Biker Gang].
I had a discussion with a couple friends a little while back, and we came to the conclusion that it might be possible to survive as part of a water based hunter-gatherer society. Heck, survival in a fortified city might even be feasible, as long as the settlement is sufficiently defended and appropriate burial rituals are developed. (Though not specified in the OP, GAR zombies can be disabled through decapitation and severe head trauma IIRC. (This is based on what I've heard; I've only actually watched the Dawn of the Dead remake and read The Walking Dead.))
EDIT:
That's actually the reasoning for my OP. I'm writing a d20 Zombie Apocalypse RPG, but I figured that I'd have more success discussing the fluff here than in ODaM.
And World War Z
The zombie survival guide is wrong about a few things as far as guns go.
Other than that, its pretty good.
Vampires can be reasoned wiith, though. And if we have a situation where a vampire can drink from a human without killing them or turning them, it's no problem at all. Some people have 'live-in blood cow' as a career, vampires go legit, everyone lives happily.
Zombies? No way in fuck are you reasoning with a zombie. Maybe a xombie, but not a zombie. And your buddy gets bit? Suddenly your buddy is a zombie too. Mega-problem.
I've glanced at the Zombie Survival Guide, though I've yet to pick up World War Z. I posted this thread with the goal of constructing a timeline for the deterioration of essential services within the context of an urban environment. Are either of those books specific about that kind of thing?
It strikes me that hospitals and nursing homes would both act as initial sources of and major vectors for the zombie outbreak. Following those lines, emergency medical services would probably be the first to go—perhaps even by the end of the first day. It also seems plausible that subway systems would serve as another major vector.
Meaning, how quickly do you become a zombie once infected?
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
Zombie survival guide goes over this
Let's go with fatal. Those who are bitten by zombies but survive immediate encounters rapidly become weaker, dying and rising as a zombie within the course of a day.
Destroy them
I would actually expect hospitals to be not that bad, since there are so many measures to prevent the spread of disease already in place there.
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
And depends on teh incubation period to. DOTD remake, they can come back in a few seconds, thus somewhere like NYC would be toast in a few days, the living wouldnt have the chane to accomodate to killing what they think are humans and the majority aren't exactly survivalists either. They'd be consumed incredibly fast and increase the zombie horde.
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam
Again depends on hte movie. The living dead series involves the poison that creates zombies spreading whenever a zombie is incinerated, which is also btw, the only way to kill htem.
Consider this: Every zombie outbreak has to start with a zombie-zero, or Z-0 if you will, the first person who died and turned into a zombie. Now, I'd barely give Z-0 even odds on infecting one other person depending on how zombified he is before he comes into contact with others. Z-0, being a zombie and all, isn't really the brightest of fellows so I really doubt he could really be trusted to maul and shamble off. Chances are, he'll probably be partway through eating someone's medulla when police or bystanders spot him and go, "Hey, it's a nascent zombie apocolypse." In the best of conditions, assuming Z-0 got the good fortune of getting locked in a hospital, old folk's home, or orphanage overnight we're looking at 200 people infected at most.
Now 200 people is decent, but once you're that far the cat is prettmuch out of the bag and the populace is bound to be reacting. Anyone who's got a weapon (which averages to more guns than people in America) is going to be walking about armed and itching to re-kill some animated corpses. Zombie shamble? Bullet. Crypt walking? Bullet. Listening to Kernkraft 2000? Bullet. Anything that so much as limps will be shot on sight. Under these conditions, I can't imagine zombies being able to get more than a 1:1 kill:death ratio. Without 1:1, more zombies are going out of comission than are being enlightened to the Braaaaaaaiiiiiiiins philosophy, and it's just a matter of time until they get eliminated.
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
A mall infestation would be manageable as long as you had a good supply of sports equipment and giant Lego heads.
You're expecting humans to react and fight back that quickly which wouldn't happen. For a start, half the people they'd be killing initially could possibly be their friends/family/loved ones. Secondly they aren't default murderers and it'd be hard to do. Also girls are wusses. It aint happening for them.
You're looking at at least a few hours before theres any kind of mass retalliation after all the panic and fear settles down and people start going nuts.
Unfortunately, and as much as I want to use a sword to lay waste to the zombie horde, it was discussed in an earlier thread that after about 3 skulls the blade would be dull as hell and worthless and thats if it doesn't get stuck in the bone, leaving you defenseless as the rest chomp down on you. A knife is better for a quick jab into the brain.
Yes, but all it takes is one particularly driven war photographer and a brainy-yet-sexy government agent to drive back the hordes. No sweat.
I actually played a few sessions of a game like this. Basically took the old-school (give me ALL the D6's) Star Wars rules.
Source material seems kind of easy, same as the world now except zombies.
Definitely depends on the sword. "The Zombie Survival Guide" shows that in trained hands a foil or other ranged piercing weapon would be excellent. A lightweight spear would be amazing. I could also see a heavy "Dao" type sword working, where sharpness isn't a major concern. Just the momentum can shatter and sever an arm. Katanas, especially those display kind, would be useless, as chestwounds aren't going to stop a zed.
(sharpened tip for eye-stabbing)
But again, skill of the wielder is the most important aspect.
Zombies are already slow, they'd freeze up north.
World War Z pretty much covers this, it even looks at what would happen to astronaughts on the space station. It doesnt really go into super pedantic detail about a specific city, but its the most chronological and detailed account of a zombie outbreak you can really find. It goes from initial outbreak, how it would spread across continents, the panic, zombie anatomy (even why their eyes look fucked up, due to having no water glazing them they grow dry and scratched, cut with black lines), to relocation of society behind 'safe zones' then reclamation or the 'zombie war', the training of soldiers specifically to fight large numbers of zombies, he basically covers everything. He also cites hospitals as major outbreak centres in one chapter im pretty sure, and theres a section where the underground tunnels of Paris act as an initial haven for refugees, but quickly become outbreak centres with high densities of infestation. Every zombie related phenomenom you could think of he covers, and theres even a samurai sword wielding nerd. I dont wanna hype it too much, but it was quite a good read.
Its not the perfect book, but it satisfys that detail-lust I often get when watching most zombie movies. If they were to ever make a tv series based on a zombie apocalypse, it would have to be based on World War Z.
That said I havent read the survival guide, but its by the same dude.
If they're slow ones we'll see people in a more offensive role, actively trying to erradicate the zombie hordes. If they're speedy ones we'll see people huddled in bunkers/fortresses taking a more defensive approach.
Either way I'll be driving around in a lifted 4X4 pickup truck with spikes on both bumpers laughing at all you people who don't own firearms.
http://www.sothisisacomic.com/Zombie/zomb3.html is fun to play with.
Edit - I think it's pretty safe to say that something like a zombie outbreak would spread like wildfire. As previously stated hospitals and nursing homes would be the sources of outbreak (if we're talking about the voodoo type "you die and become a zombie", and not virus type"you get infected and become a zombie") and would surge through pedestrian areas. Subways, streets in major cities, shopping malls, stores, etc. Anything where people are congregated together. Which basically means everywhere. In my opinion the most important thing in a zombie survival scenario is to stay mobile. Holding up in a location for more than some sleep/food/water is a bad idea. In any case, I would imagine all emergency/public services to collapse within a few days and we'd be dealing with a Mad Max meets Dawn of the Dead scenario within a few weeks.
This is discounted voodoo zombies, im kinda going with the World War Z-esque zombie.
Well look at teh DOTD remake. The black guy kept his russian wife away from the others for weeks even though she'd been attacked by the zombies, he managed to disguise the fact she'd been bitten. It was discrete and to those who don't know it can be transmitted or at least sped up that way, they'd let them into a safe haven without any question. Which is where the fuckeduppery begins.
Shit freaks me out. I hate any disease/drug that destroys my mind and takes away or changes my humanity.
Man you don't like anything
Who do you think you are, Target Practice?