Since Ive been like, 11, my hair has been pretty much been buzzed off once it got long enough that it needed to be brushed. Earlier this year I ditched that, and started growing it longer. Still not really sure what I want to do with it, and the last few haircuts have come out subpar.
It needs to be cut again. I've had 4 females suggest a fauxhawk. My concern is 3 fold
1) Not looking like an epic tool, as some fauxhawk wearers do.
2) Being able to do something with it that looks conservative, for say church, or job interviews
3) Having gunk in my hair. The last few times Ive had my hair cut, the cuttererer went on for a few minutes about my hair having 'great texture' or something. I dunno. I dont wanna mess that up though with gunk/gel/whatever that makes the hair feel greasy/stiff/whatever.
Current refernce shots:
H/A, do your bidness!
Posts
If you want it to stick up a LOT then you will have to put product in it. However this product does not need to be greasy, and you won't need very much.
Personally I would go with an understated fauxhawk (just make it longer on the top and shorter on the sides, with maybe a bit of shaping) because you can always use product to play it up into a full blow hawk type thing.
I basically walk int any barber/hair stylist and say "short and rough, leave a little more on top that I can mess up"
You want "Mat(t)-style" product. Greasy is never cool.
2. Your hair seems curly like mine so you may be limited to certain styles or need a ton of gel so experiment. If you wanna save money on gel borrow a friend's to test it out.
I uh
I turn 20 this sunday..
Im not like, 15.
20.
Still go for the fauxhawk?
Try out the faux-hawk and if you like it, keep it. Why should society dictate changes in our hairstyle?