Options

[Phalla] Through The Greatwood - Finale: A Hero's Return (Good Guys Win!)

191012141549

Posts

  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    [size=+1]WE MAEK A TIE![/size]

    O_o WTF? O_o

    Whatever happened to the general consensus that having a tie was bad for the village?

    Note: No randomization in this Phalla; per OP.

    Squashua on
  • Options
    LocusLocus Trust Me The seaRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Clarification Request: What happens in the event of a tie?
    Request denied.

    Locus on
  • Options
    ArdorArdor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Ardor wrote: »
    [size=+1]WE MAEK A TIE![/size]

    O_o WTF? O_o

    Whatever happened to the general consensus that having a tie was bad for the village?

    Note: No randomization in this Phalla; per OP.

    I don't recall the last time a seer and a bad guy both came out in a game where we don't know anything at all about roles or numbers of bad guys etc.

    Breaking down vote records have always helped the village, instead of looking at records of a single bandwagon, let's look at the records of a tie or attempted tie, it gives us more to work with IMO.

    Ardor on
  • Options
    Jester313Jester313 Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    Jester313 on
  • Options
    Jester313Jester313 Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Locus wrote: »
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Clarification Request: What happens in the event of a tie?
    Request denied.

    Boo.

    Jester313 on
  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    Not in my opinion; my vote has been cast.

    Vigilante should take down the claimed bad guy (visiblehowl) and we leave the seer till tomorrow.

    Squashua on
  • Options
    ArdorArdor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    I think it would be easier to pick two targets and go with it, whether or not we use a current vote leader is up to you guys.

    Let Xevo have a few days to help prove to us he's a good guy seer before we consider killing him.

    Ardor on
  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    I think it would be easier to pick two targets and go with it,

    :mrgreen: Ardor and precisionk :mrgreen:

    Squashua on
  • Options
    PlutoniumPlutonium Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Do we know yet what seering results any seers will recieve?

    Good or Evil? the role's name?

    I'm looking for stuff that would help confirm a seer.

    Plutonium on
  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Plutonium wrote: »
    Do we know yet what seering results any seers will recieve?

    Good or Evil? the role's name?

    I'm looking for stuff that would help confirm a seer.

    Seers should just tell whomever their target is what that target's role is via PM and be done with it.

    Squashua on
  • Options
    ArdorArdor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Ardor wrote: »
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    I think it would be easier to pick two targets and go with it,

    :mrgreen: Ardor and precisionk :mrgreen:

    That's fine by me. I have as much chance of being a bad guy as anyone else, so if you want me to test my own theory I will do so.

    For now, I'll leave a vote on myself since I'll be gone for a few hours.

    Hopefully when I'm back, we have two targets picked out so we can work with our voting records tomorrow in combination with the narration, which may help give us a lot of information we need.

    I vote for Ardor because he's a jerk.

    Ardor on
  • Options
    Jester313Jester313 Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I'm heading off for supper my Children. I think Ardor's plan has some merit, and as such I will not change my vote for now. If, upon my return, we have two clear targets, I will adjust accordingly.

    Jester313 on
  • Options
    XevoXevo Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Plutonium wrote: »
    Do we know yet what seering results any seers will recieve?

    Good or Evil? the role's name?

    I'm looking for stuff that would help confirm a seer.

    According to my PM, I will know their role, which in this game can be verrry specific.

    Xevo on
  • Options
    Niceguy MyeyeNiceguy Myeye Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    I vote for Ardor because he's a jerk.

    This guy's just trying to be trendy like me. Don't trust him, he doesn't wear it right. But, it's a good start, now ardor and pk have 2 votes. And I didn't even have to change mine!

    Maybe this tie thing can work. I was just waiting until someone started it up.

    Niceguy Myeye on
  • Options
    zalzal Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Frankly I think it's more improtant we don't give the role of the investigator to someone that won't use it to benefit us, but my suggestion apparently has fallen on deaf ears. Oh well...

    zal on
  • Options
    precisionkprecisionk Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Ardor wrote: »
    Jester313 wrote: »
    Wait. So should the bad guy and the seer be our targets?

    I think it would be easier to pick two targets and go with it,

    :mrgreen: Ardor and precisionk :mrgreen:

    MOER LIKE SQUASHUA AND PLUTONIUM, M I RITE?

    precisionk on
  • Options
    Gorilla SaladGorilla Salad Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    !Senior Fish for investigator.

    Gorilla Salad on
  • Options
    telcustelcus Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I'll !retract Zerinan and !vote for Visiblehowl for 3 reasons.

    1) Zerinan seems to be AWOL at the moment, so my grudge vote doesn't seem to be doing much
    2) Visible said he was a bad guy, I'm cool with killing people that say such things
    3) Just to generally piss off Locus by doing stacks of retracts and revotes :P.

    telcus on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    PsychoCucumberPsychoCucumber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I think it'd be a bad idea to take out two of our most active players. It would be better by far to pick two people who don't really contribute.


    Edit: I DO ,however, agree with Telcus. Not about pig fucking, but about Voting Visiblehowl . Retract DethKok

    PsychoCucumber on
  • Options
    WhiteZinfandelWhiteZinfandel Your insides Let me show you themRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Hang on just a minute. I thought we were bandwagoning Dethkok because he mentioned something about selling rat meat and the narration said we should root out the "hunters". Isn't that a correlation? Also, !retract Hakkekage and !vote Squashua.

    WhiteZinfandel on
  • Options
    FrosteeyFrosteey Elaise 1521-2945-8940Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    Squashua wrote: »
    Ardor wrote: »
    [size=+1]WE MAEK A TIE![/size]

    O_o WTF? O_o

    Whatever happened to the general consensus that having a tie was bad for the village?

    Note: No randomization in this Phalla; per OP.

    I don't recall the last time a seer and a bad guy both came out in a game where we don't know anything at all about roles or numbers of bad guys etc.

    Breaking down vote records have always helped the village, instead of looking at records of a single bandwagon, let's look at the records of a tie or attempted tie, it gives us more to work with IMO.

    It kind've loses the point when the tie is engineered...

    Frosteey on
  • Options
    WhiteZinfandelWhiteZinfandel Your insides Let me show you themRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    For Sale - Rat on Stick
    Delicious meat; Portable
    No meal is finer

    That'd be it.

    WhiteZinfandel on
  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    zal wrote: »
    Frankly I think it's more improtant we don't give the role of the investigator to someone that won't use it to benefit us, but my suggestion apparently has fallen on deaf ears. Oh well...

    All an investigator does is ask a question; depends on how good the question is.

    So, are there any question suggestions?

    No haiku there. :-)

    Squashua on
  • Options
    zalzal Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Hang on just a minute. I thought we were bandwagoning Dethkok because he mentioned something about selling rat meat and the narration said we should root out the "hunters". Isn't that a correlation? Also, !retract Hakkekage and !vote Squashua.

    Telcus has been going on and on about pork so should he be put on notice too? :P

    zal on
  • Options
    ZerinanZerinan Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I hate Phalla first days like this. I've got stuff to do and I don't really care enough to read through 500 posts of nonsense anyway. So I shall vote for that handsome stud Zerinan to be our inquisitor type person and I vote Zerinan to die a horrible horrible death. That cunning villain!

    Zerinan on
    6394_970621.png
  • Options
    TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Guys, DA is more suited for a role in office.

    Vote DA!

    Also, I did not realize Fembot was playing.

    I !retract Dethkok and !vote Fembot.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • Options
    PsychoCucumberPsychoCucumber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    What about "how many traitors are there?"
    Or " How many good specials are there?"
    Or " Is Xevo the seer? "

    PsychoCucumber on
  • Options
    TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Can't ask that last one I believe.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • Options
    WhiteZinfandelWhiteZinfandel Your insides Let me show you themRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    zal wrote: »
    Hang on just a minute. I thought we were bandwagoning Dethkok because he mentioned something about selling rat meat and the narration said we should root out the "hunters". Isn't that a correlation? Also, !retract Hakkekage and !vote Squashua.

    Telcus has been going on and on about pork so should he be put on notice too? :P

    He's going on about pork for clear reasons though. DK just randomly offered rat meat.

    WhiteZinfandel on
  • Options
    GrundlterrorGrundlterror Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    Feel free to come forward if you think I'm sniffing glue and this plan sucks. I just think having 2 targets instead of 1 makes vote records more useful in the longer run, that's it.

    Man, what?

    This doesn't make sense Ardor. If we choose two targets and tie them both up, then thats that and the bad guys aren't going to risk voting outside of those two targets (especially on day 1). Hell even looking at who voted for target X as opposed to target Y... if they were going to be tied anyway does it really matter who voted for who?

    If I was a bad guy I would just vote for my own guy, since it was decided that they need to be tied and anyone breaking the tie or voting outside of our guidelines would be suspect.

    This, ladies and gentlemen, is what Ardor acts like when he is evil.

    Grundlterror on
    steam_sig.png
  • Options
    PsychoCucumberPsychoCucumber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    It would be in the bad guy's best interest for us to vote out two innocents on day one. And since everything is basically random on day 1, it probably wouldn't be that hard to manipulate the mob away from the people you didn't want to have voted off.

    PsychoCucumber on
  • Options
    SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    So that begs the question... who did Ardor sway the vote from?

    Squashua on
  • Options
    ElendilElendil Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    Feel free to come forward if you think I'm sniffing glue and this plan sucks. I just think having 2 targets instead of 1 makes vote records more useful in the longer run, that's it.

    Man, what?

    This doesn't make sense Ardor. If we choose two targets and tie them both up, then thats that and the bad guys aren't going to risk voting outside of those two targets (especially on day 1). Hell even looking at who voted for target X as opposed to target Y... if they were going to be tied anyway does it really matter who voted for who?

    If I was a bad guy I would just vote for my own guy, since it was decided that they need to be tied and anyone breaking the tie or voting outside of our guidelines would be suspect.

    This, ladies and gentlemen, is what Ardor acts like when he is evil.
    Yeah, I've had some misgivings about him the past few hours.

    Elendil on
  • Options
    P10P10 An Idiot With Low IQ Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Alright, I just got back. here's the spreadsheet
    summary!
    Execution:
    DETHKOK - 8
    Xevo - 4
    Visiblehowl - 3
    The Wook, DevoutlyApathetic, Ardor and PrecisionK - 2 each

    Election:
    Squashua - 12
    DevoutlyApathetic - 5
    Ardor - 4

    P10 on
    Shameful pursuits and utterly stupid opinions
  • Options
    FembotFembot Registered User regular
    edited August 2007

    This, ladies and gentlemen, is what Ardor acts like when he is evil.

    I don't know if he's evil, but his "hay Bale is probably evil because he said something silly and that's probably a slip-up" thing was really kinda odd.

    Fembot on
  • Options
    PsychoCucumberPsychoCucumber Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I guess that would be Xevo. Since he's claimed to be seer, though, it's perfectly reasonable to stop voting for him, at least until we know for sure, one way or the other.

    PsychoCucumber on
  • Options
    TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Guys, I think Fembot is evil.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • Options
    FembotFembot Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I think TehSpectre is a good guy special, because he thinks I'm evil.

    Fembot on
  • Options
    ElendilElendil Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    !retract DA
    !vote Ardor

    Elendil on
  • Options
    TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Fembot wrote: »
    I think TehSpectre is a good guy special, because he thinks I'm evil.
    I always think you're evil.

    You and DA.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.