The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent
vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums
here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules
document is now in effect.
What to learn to learn "everything."
Posts
Lots of different angles, which is great - some specific and some very general. For my own purposes, while I enjoy knowing a crap-ton of seemingly random stuff that lets me have interesting conversations with college professors across many disciplines and also help my students with a variety of work, not just their English classes, I was considering a different approach to start making the best use of what I've got so far - for instance, I don't have an eidetic memory but I've heard that a close approximation can actually be learned. That might be neat, but then I wonder if there's not something else I could learn that would make learning THAT easier/more interesting. etc.
But the tangents that came out here are also interesting and well worth continuing to talk about, so don't let the limits of my OP put a stop to any.
That and a lot of free time and patience.
that's what I was thinking.
Kind of a given :P. Guess I should add nutrition/fitness in as well, for throroughness' sake. And what I posted wasn't a hard and fast guide - best to tailor it to individual strengths, like. I mean, I completely forgot to include music in the list, because I'm basically crap at it. But there's at least a plan there, in which one picks a specialty, and plugs in a bunch of slightly-tangential-but-useful stuff to be studied slightly less in-depth, and then plugs in the holes with stuff one considers less vital but still fun/interesting, to be pursued when time allows.
Also, budgeting your time in formal education wisely is pretty crucial. For me, that meant enrolling in lots of math and engineering classes, but it also means I'm going to miss out on a lot of law, philosophy, econ, etcetera because they may or may not be feasible self-education topics for me. We shall see.
Oh, certainly. In retrospect, I definitely erred there.
I agree that a degree of versatility is important to society and individuals. I suppose I disliked what I perceived as an attempt to specify this. And the last sentence, because it implied "at the expense of deep understanding of a specific topic" to me.
Well, Heinlein is obsessed with war. Ever read Starship Troopers? Might as well be a "I want you!" poster. The whole, "plan an invasion, die gallantly" schpiel isn't a coincidence.
But that's off-topic. Carry on.
But why can't everything be interesting?
Then more power to ya, I say. I'm all for the modern day daVinci. I just don't think it's safe to assume that any arbitrary person can become him merely by educating themselves.
When someone finds EVERYTHING interesting they have ADD.
Seriously though, people aren't even aware of the majority of topics, due to the sheer number of them (How many years would YOU devote to studying Peruvian albino stink bug mating habits?), so it's hard to claim universal interest when there's nearly universal ignorance.
EDIT: I should say that I agree with Incenjucar above in that there are just way too many topics that you will never even hear about, and it sucks but you will never ever get to know about them. Speaking for myself, I can say that when I DO find out about a topic, I usually find at least one thing about it that interests me, and that will lead me down a road of discovery about that topic that dead ends when the effort required to learn more outweighs my interest level.