The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Gaia-online banned the word "pedo", what can I do to make them correct this mistake?

AldoAldo Hippo HoorayRegistered User regular
edited October 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
I'm a long time member of Gaia-online (feel free to laugh at me), I'm 20 and I am fairly aware of the inner works of that site.

On Saturday night the management of Gaia-online blocked the word "pedo" from their site, it gets replaced with "*****". The reason for this is that the management is aware that there are paedophiles active on their site and this is their way to deal with it. This is the complete announcement on the issue, this is an amendment posted in a subforum, detailing that circumventing the word filter is a punishable offense.

Naturally, reality does not work like this. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible for individuals to contact the management of gaia-online, so there is no way for me to tell this to them in a clear and civilised way.

I believe the only way to get through to the management, is to get in contact with some sort of organisation protecting children. I understand that there are in fact think-tanks in the USA that state that what gaia-online has done is a good way to fight against paedophiles, so it is important that I get in contact with a decent organisation.

PA, I need your advice! Where do I start?

Aldo on
«1

Posts

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    So their way of fighting back against active paedophiles preying on kids on their site... is to ban the use of the word "pedo"? Am I understanding this right? Because this ranks a perfect 10 on the retard scale.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • evilbobevilbob RADELAIDERegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Richy wrote: »
    So their way of fighting back against active paedophiles preying on kids on their site... is to ban the use of the word "pedo"? Am I understanding this right? Because this ranks a perfect 10 on the retard scale.
    No, they've turned it up to 11.

    evilbob on
    l5sruu1fyatf.jpg

  • TheFishTheFish Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Just spell it 'paedo' and everybody wins.

    TheFish on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    TheFish wrote: »
    Just spell it 'paedo' and everybody wins.
    Also banned.

    t Richy: you're understanding this right.

    Aldo on
  • gneGnegneGne Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Why care though? You don't use the word on a daily basis..

    gneGne on
    pasigcopyox6.jpg
  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I can't think of a context where I'd use the word pedo when not referring to pedophiles.

    I can't even think of words with pedo in it.

    Why is this word-filtering an issue to you? Do you call people pedo a lot?

    Having the world "pedo" banned isn't going to result in more (or less) child predators on the site.

    In fact, it basically affects nobody, except people who call other people pedos.

    So, why is this an issue for you? Is it a free speech thing? Are you opposed to censorship in all its forms? What?

    Pony on
  • HooraydiationHooraydiation Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    "Egad, there's a man or woman who wishes to have sex with children! Be warned, little ones!"

    Hooraydiation on
    Home-1.jpg
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    All this does is encourage pedophiles not to type posts like "Hi, I'm a pedophile, want to chat?".

    If they aren't announcing themselves are children are actually less safe!

    I think you should call To Catch a Predator and get a sting operation set up.

    (Actually, I have to second "what's the big deal?" It's a stupid policy, but doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things)

    Tomanta on
  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I think everyone can agree it's a stupid policy and won't solve any real problems.

    It's like how a certain troublesome word is banned here at PA, while other racial slurs or other discriminatory epithets are not. The policy itself is asinine, but it has also been explained well and is understandable. It doesn't actually solve any problems, but it avoids problems that could come up if people were allowed to freely use that word rampantly.

    I get the feeling maybe the people who run Gaia, given how popular it is, were sick of the word being all over their forums.

    Often the perception of something is more important than the context, especially with say, reporting media.

    For example, a while back there was a fellow who posted something to the effect of "Penny Arcade is a gaybashing site ran by homophobes".

    He posted this in SE++, of all places.

    His evidence? The massive amount of instances of the word "fag" on the forums. Totally ignoring context, usage, anything.

    He just counted numbers.

    I imagine Gaia's admins want to avoid some media dink posting some Newsline report about how it's a farming ground for child predators, and their evidence is "The word "pedo" appears on the site 610,000 times".

    Ignoring the fact that, of course, in all instances the word is being used as an insult. Ignoring that Gaia, as one of the most popular forums on the entire internet has over a million posts a day.

    Ignoring the rest of the facts and the context is what mainstream American media does best!

    Pony on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    It does matter to me.

    Others are better with words, so I'll just copy/paste a friend on this

    Like I said, the word isn't slanderous, it's a clinical term, and the idea that it would make sexual predators leave because a word is filtered is simply preposterous. I'm sorry, but your average pedal-file isn't going to run a topic search on the forbidden word in question and think that they are going to score, the ban is if anything, damaging. Aldo brought up a very good point, knowledge is power, and if you cant be knowledgeable, you're pretty much doomed to make dumb mistakes. By making the subject taboo, essentially the occurrence of that kind of predatory behavior could go up, not down, because somebody might have been able to be forewarned, but with this censorship in place, is now more vulnerable.

    Please, don't treat this whole subject with a cynical "lol who cares? internet serious business!" victims of paedophiles, are real people, this can be your little sister, this can be your daughter. The issue is a serious one and I want gaia-online to do something about it.

    This is why I made this topic, I am aware that I, as an individual, cannot change anything, that is why I'm looking for an official organisation to help me, I can't do this all alone or with the help of a few other kids on an internet site. I need a serious organisation to make gaia-online do something for children.

    Aldo on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I think you're all looking at this the wrong way. This isn't a retarded solution; it's a great solution. Gaia-Online can now say that they're "doing something to combat pedophilia" without actually doing anything to combat pedophilia. It's a feel-good measure designed to let them to point at something that is cheap and easy to implement without really affecting the experience of the game.

    And the whole "the internet is full of pedophiles" thing is basically just a scare tactic by the media to make you watch their shows. The best solution is to just ignore it, and I'm totally dumping this in D&D.

    Thanatos on
  • SoonerManSoonerMan Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I still fail to see what you're trying to do. You want to stop pedophiles on ONE MMO? Why not try for all of them?

    SoonerMan on
    Rah, Oklahoma! Rah, Oklahoma! Rah, Oklahoma~! O-K-U!
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Pony wrote: »
    It's like how a certain troublesome word is banned here at PA, while other racial slurs or other discriminatory epithets are not. The policy itself is asinine, but it has also been explained well and is understandable. It doesn't actually solve any problems, but it avoids problems that could come up if people were allowed to freely use that word rampantly.
    It has? I missed that explanation completely. Why is that one racial slur so problematic it had to be banned, while others are still acceptable to use?

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    It does matter to me.

    Others are better with words, so I'll just copy/paste a friend on this

    Like I said, the word isn't slanderous, it's a clinical term, and the idea that it would make sexual predators leave because a word is filtered is simply preposterous. I'm sorry, but your average pedal-file isn't going to run a topic search on the forbidden word in question and think that they are going to score, the ban is if anything, damaging. Aldo brought up a very good point, knowledge is power, and if you cant be knowledgeable, you're pretty much doomed to make dumb mistakes. By making the subject taboo, essentially the occurrence of that kind of predatory behavior could go up, not down, because somebody might have been able to be forewarned, but with this censorship in place, is now more vulnerable.

    Please, don't treat this whole subject with a cynical "lol who cares? internet serious business!" victims of paedophiles, are real people, this can be your little sister, this can be your daughter. The issue is a serious one and I want gaia-online to do something about it.

    This is why I made this topic, I am aware that I, as an individual, cannot change anything, that is why I'm looking for an official organisation to help me, I can't do this all alone or with the help of a few other kids on an internet site. I need a serious organisation to make gaia-online do something for children.

    They banned the word because there were probably a lot of people going around using it to describe others, based on the nature of the game. I don't see a problem with a filter. A lot of forums have them. If a kid doesn't know what a pedo is I would sure as hell hope they're not learning about them from Gaia online. You're talking about filtering out bad words vs parents not watching their kids on the internet. If you want to get a group started to petition that gaia online does more to prevent pedos from joining, then that's great.... But forming a group to raise awareness of the word in genral and bitch because they don't want it spoken on their site, which they allow you to become a member of, is kind of pointless.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Richy wrote: »
    Pony wrote: »
    It's like how a certain troublesome word is banned here at PA, while other racial slurs or other discriminatory epithets are not. The policy itself is asinine, but it has also been explained well and is understandable. It doesn't actually solve any problems, but it avoids problems that could come up if people were allowed to freely use that word rampantly.
    It has? I missed that explanation completely. Why is that one racial slur so problematic it had to be banned, while others are still acceptable to use?

    I don't think others are acceptable either. A few in particular though are probably more likely to pop up on a mods radar, but I'll bet if they see any racial slur used against someone they're going to lock it down.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Gaia-online is a 13+ site, if kids aren't aware what a pedo is at that age they have horrible parents.

    I am aware that to get my point across I have to keep repeating it, so I'll do just that.

    Is there an organisation in the United States of America that is looking after victims of paedophiles that can explain to Gaia-online that what they are doing is morally wrong and is not solving any problems on their site?

    Aldo on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'm going to set aside the fact that people in 4chan, the very rectum of the Internet, look down on Gaia, and I'm also going to set aside the point that internet pedos convincing kids to sneak over to their houses is not nearly as prevalent as NBC would have you believe and instead focus on your last couple points here: that 1) some forum banning the word "pedo" makes children unsafe, and b) that, given point 1, Gaia has some kind of moral responsibility (let alone the ability) to save the childrens.

    Both of these points are quite obviously untrue.

    First of all, with or without the word being banned, the site's moderators are going to ban people who try to solcit sex from kids over the internet, only now it'll go through proper channels. Kinda like how G&T used to get clogged up with people shitting in bad threads (keeping them at the top) rather than having moderators quietly delete them.

    Second, even if your first point wasn't completely ridiculous, it is not Gaia's job to keep children safe on the 'tubes. The Internet is a scary, grown-up place and it's a parent's job to parent their kids.

    Daedalus on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Richy wrote: »
    Pony wrote: »
    It's like how a certain troublesome word is banned here at PA, while other racial slurs or other discriminatory epithets are not. The policy itself is asinine, but it has also been explained well and is understandable. It doesn't actually solve any problems, but it avoids problems that could come up if people were allowed to freely use that word rampantly.
    It has? I missed that explanation completely. Why is that one racial slur so problematic it had to be banned, while others are still acceptable to use?
    It got to the point where everyone in SE++ was using n***** in a completely harmless, obviously joking-around kind of way, of course, and Khoo didn't want the site coming up on a Google search for n****** or something. Understandable.

    Daedalus on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    I'm going to set aside the fact that people in 4chan, the very rectum of the Internet, look down on Gaia, and I'm also going to set aside the point that internet pedos convincing kids to sneak over to their houses is not nearly as prevalent as NBC would have you believe and instead focus on your last couple points here: that 1) some forum banning the word "pedo" makes children unsafe, and b) that, given point 1, Gaia has some kind of moral responsibility (let alone the ability) to save the childrens.

    Both of these points are quite obviously untrue.

    First of all, with or without the word being banned, the site's moderators are going to ban people who try to solcit sex from kids over the internet, only now it'll go through proper channels. Kinda like how G&T used to get clogged up with people shitting in bad threads (keeping them at the top) rather than having moderators quietly delete them.

    Second, even if your first point wasn't completely ridiculous, it is not Gaia's job to keep children safe on the 'tubes. The Internet is a scary, grown-up place and it's a parent's job to parent their kids.
    Gaia can not save children, Gaia CAN make children aware of predators. That is the moral responsibility of Gaia-online.

    Aldo on
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Gaia-online is a 13+ site, if kids aren't aware what a pedo is at that age they have horrible parents.

    I am aware that to get my point across I have to keep repeating it, so I'll do just that.

    Is there an organisation in the United States of America that is looking after victims of paedophiles that can explain to Gaia-online that what they are doing is morally wrong and is not solving any problems on their site?

    They're not doing anything morally wrong or illegal... You don't seem to be comprehending this. It's like saying that if PA forums banned swear words then kids wouldn't learn that swear words are bad. It makes no sense.

    Now if gaia has no warning whatsoever about not soliciting or giving information to strangers, then yeah, they should do that.

    To answer your question... Yes, there probably is a group somewhere in america that would petition this. They're called lawyers, but since no laws are being broken there is nothing you can do to MAKE this company abide by your wishes.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited October 2007
    So I understand that it's stupid, but what's the actual problem with it?

    Doc on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    I'm going to set aside the fact that people in 4chan, the very rectum of the Internet, look down on Gaia, and I'm also going to set aside the point that internet pedos convincing kids to sneak over to their houses is not nearly as prevalent as NBC would have you believe and instead focus on your last couple points here: that 1) some forum banning the word "pedo" makes children unsafe, and b) that, given point 1, Gaia has some kind of moral responsibility (let alone the ability) to save the childrens.

    Both of these points are quite obviously untrue.

    First of all, with or without the word being banned, the site's moderators are going to ban people who try to solcit sex from kids over the internet, only now it'll go through proper channels. Kinda like how G&T used to get clogged up with people shitting in bad threads (keeping them at the top) rather than having moderators quietly delete them.

    Second, even if your first point wasn't completely ridiculous, it is not Gaia's job to keep children safe on the 'tubes. The Internet is a scary, grown-up place and it's a parent's job to parent their kids.
    Gaia can not save children, Gaia CAN make children aware of predators. That is the moral responsibility of Gaia-online.

    No, no it fucking isn't. It's a parent's job to parent. Look, you're quite obsessed with making Gaia change what they're doing here when it's obviously just an effort to clean up forum spam.

    Man, what the hell do you think some forum administrators give a shit about your opinion? You can't make anybody do anything; if you disagree you're free to leave that awful place, end of thread.

    Daedalus on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Gaia-online is a 13+ site, if kids aren't aware what a pedo is at that age they have horrible parents.

    I am aware that to get my point across I have to keep repeating it, so I'll do just that.

    Is there an organisation in the United States of America that is looking after victims of paedophiles that can explain to Gaia-online that what they are doing is morally wrong and is not solving any problems on their site?

    They're not doing anything morally wrong or illegal... You don't seem to be comprehending this. It's like saying that if PA forums banned swear words then kids wouldn't learn that swear words are bad. It makes no sense.

    Now if gaia has no warning whatsoever about not soliciting or giving information to strangers, then yeah, they should do that.

    To answer your question... Yes, there probably is a group somewhere in america that would petition this. They're called lawyers, but since no laws are being broken there is nothing you can do to MAKE this company abide by your wishes.

    sdfsddfd

    What they are doing is telling "hey there are paedophiles on this website and to solve that problem we have banned the word "paedophile" have a nice day!" That is stupid, that is retarded, that is not helping anyone, that is making the subject of paedophiles a taboo.

    I'm not looking for a lawyer, I don't want to sue Gaia-online, I want to get through to their management and make them understand that what they are doing is stupid, retarded, not helping and potentially dangerous.

    Aldo on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    No, no it fucking isn't. It's a parent's job to parent. Look, you're quite obsessed with making Gaia change what they're doing here when it's obviously just an effort to clean up forum spam.

    Man, what the hell do you think some forum administrators give a shit about your opinion? You can't make anybody do anything; if you disagree you're free to leave that awful place, end of thread.
    Considering most parents don't even know the difference between a mouse and keyboard, it is kind of naive of you to say that parents should explain all this to their kids.

    Aldo on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    sdfsddfd

    What they are doing is telling "hey there are paedophiles on this website and to solve that problem we have banned the word "paedophile" have a nice day!" That is stupid, that is retarded, that is not helping anyone, that is making the subject of paedophiles a taboo.

    I'm not looking for a lawyer, I don't want to sue Gaia-online, I want to get through to their management and make them understand that what they are doing is stupid, retarded, not helping and potentially dangerous.

    Well, it's a fucking forum, right? You could, I dunno, make a post about it? If (as seems likely) they don't give a shit what you think, then there is nothing you can do so for god's sake don't spread Gaiadrama to another forum!

    Daedalus on
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Gaia-online is a 13+ site, if kids aren't aware what a pedo is at that age they have horrible parents.

    I am aware that to get my point across I have to keep repeating it, so I'll do just that.

    Is there an organisation in the United States of America that is looking after victims of paedophiles that can explain to Gaia-online that what they are doing is morally wrong and is not solving any problems on their site?

    They're not doing anything morally wrong or illegal... You don't seem to be comprehending this. It's like saying that if PA forums banned swear words then kids wouldn't learn that swear words are bad. It makes no sense.

    Now if gaia has no warning whatsoever about not soliciting or giving information to strangers, then yeah, they should do that.

    To answer your question... Yes, there probably is a group somewhere in america that would petition this. They're called lawyers, but since no laws are being broken there is nothing you can do to MAKE this company abide by your wishes.

    sdfsddfd

    What they are doing is telling "hey there are paedophiles on this website and to solve that problem we have banned the word "paedophile" have a nice day!" That is stupid, that is retarded, that is not helping anyone, that is making the subject of paedophiles a taboo.

    I'm not looking for a lawyer, I don't want to sue Gaia-online, I want to get through to their management and make them understand that what they are doing is stupid, retarded, not helping and potentially dangerous.

    where's your source on that. What statement has been released in site press or third party press where someone has claimed this or gaia online has claimed responsibility?

    because otherwise it just looks like gaia doesn't want their google hits associated with pedo related words so they're putting a stop to it.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    No, no it fucking isn't. It's a parent's job to parent. Look, you're quite obsessed with making Gaia change what they're doing here when it's obviously just an effort to clean up forum spam.

    Man, what the hell do you think some forum administrators give a shit about your opinion? You can't make anybody do anything; if you disagree you're free to leave that awful place, end of thread.
    Considering most parents don't even know the difference between a mouse and keyboard, it is kind of naive of you to say that parents should explain all this to their kids.
    Wait, you think that every Internet forum should be responsible for the safety of those posting on it and I'm naive?

    Everybody who owns a fucking computer knows what the difference between a mouse and a keyboard is. Hyperbole is not effective debate. And anyone who's seen one of those retarded Dateline specials (that you seem to have been taken by) knows there's bad people on the Internet. Stop being stupid.

    Daedalus on
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Aldo wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    No, no it fucking isn't. It's a parent's job to parent. Look, you're quite obsessed with making Gaia change what they're doing here when it's obviously just an effort to clean up forum spam.

    Man, what the hell do you think some forum administrators give a shit about your opinion? You can't make anybody do anything; if you disagree you're free to leave that awful place, end of thread.
    Considering most parents don't even know the difference between a mouse and keyboard, it is kind of naive of you to say that parents should explain all this to their kids.
    Wait, you think that every Internet forum should be responsible for the safety of those posting on it and I'm naive?

    Everybody who owns a fucking computer knows what the difference between a mouse and a keyboard is. Hyperbole is not effective debate. And anyone who's seen one of those retarded Dateline specials (that you seem to have been taken by) knows there's bad people on the Internet. Stop being stupid.


    also, what do knowing the difference between a mouse and keyboard and telling your kids not to talk to strangers have in common? You're talking about computer maintenance and online safety.....

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Well, it's a fucking forum, right? You could, I dunno, make a post about it? If (as seems likely) they don't give a shit what you think, then there is nothing you can do so for god's sake don't spread Gaiadrama to another forum!
    Gaia has a few million members, I'm not going to make a difference. Which is why I made this fucking thread. Go read the OP some time and remember that this topic started in H/A because I was looking for advice.

    Aldo on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    where's your source on that. What statement has been released in site press or third party press where someone has claimed this or gaia online has claimed responsibility?

    because otherwise it just looks like gaia doesn't want their google hits associated with pedo related words so they're putting a stop to it.
    See link in OP.

    Aldo on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Well, it's a fucking forum, right? You could, I dunno, make a post about it? If (as seems likely) they don't give a shit what you think, then there is nothing you can do so for god's sake don't spread Gaiadrama to another forum!
    Gaia has a few million members, I'm not going to make a difference. Which is why I made this fucking thread. Go read the OP some time and remember that this topic started in H/A because I was looking for advice.

    I did read the OP.

    Look, if Gaia doesn't care about you making a post on Gaia, who do you think is going to care about it here? There ain't shit you can do. Get over it. There's your help and/or advice.

    Daedalus on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    If the site is 13+, they are predators at best, not pedophiles. Pedophiles prefer pre-pubescant children, not teens.

    /pedantry

    The site can filter whatever content they want. If they want a clean site with no swearing, and they consider people calling other people pedos offensive, it is their perogative to filter it. Having the word available doesn't have any effect that will help the community. Language is a funny thing, you can warn people about potential perdators wihtout ever calling them by name. Having it banned most likely prevents more problems for them than it can cause.

    stigweard on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    stigweard wrote: »
    If the site is 13+, they are predators at best, not pedophiles. Pedophiles prefer pre-pubescant children, not teens.

    /pedantry

    The site can filter whatever content they want. If they want a clean site with no swearing, and they consider people calling other people pedos offensive, it is their perogative to filter it. Having the word available doesn't have any effect that will help the community. Language is a funny thing, you can warn people about potential perdators wihtout ever calling them by name. Having it banned most likely prevents more problems for them than it can cause.
    This is the only word they have banned. And you're not allowed to call people names on gaia, just like here.

    Aldo on
  • TubeTube Registered User admin
    edited October 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    It got to the point where everyone in SE++ was using n***** in a completely harmless, obviously joking-around kind of way, of course, and Khoo didn't want the site coming up on a Google search for n****** or something. Understandable.

    No, it got to the point where people were simply coming into a thread and posting "the word" and nothing else, and there was a deluge of "ironic" racist humour. It was basically all that was happening for a while, so I made a rule against racial epithets. After it calmed down, and a lot of the idiots left in protest at the loss of their right to call people dirty chinks, the rule was relaxed somewhat. Later, someone used "the word" in a thread title, there was some discussion as to whether that was ok, and Robert said he didn't want the word used in any context. I don't necessarily agree, but it did solve a problem.

    Re: other racial epithets, there's no racial epithet that is "ok" on this board. You are also not allowed to call someone a faggot in anger. The difference with "the word" is that there's no context based wiggle room.

    Tube on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Write a letter. You can't really do anything else.

    Quid on
  • TachTach Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'm still unclear as to why Aldo is so adamant that Gaia reverse this action. While the motivations to get rid of it are suspect, the end result is that there'd be a lot less Gaia users calling each other "pedo".

    Aldo, why is this so important to you? Is it a freedom of speech issue? Or something that you feel is just inequitable- why this word and no others? Was it that you were abused as a child, and now, you feel that any curtailing of the issue is an affront to those who have been abused?

    Or do you like calling others "pedo"?

    C'mon- I'm really curious as to where your outrage is coming from.

    Tach on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aldo wrote: »
    stigweard wrote: »
    If the site is 13+, they are predators at best, not pedophiles. Pedophiles prefer pre-pubescant children, not teens.

    /pedantry

    The site can filter whatever content they want. If they want a clean site with no swearing, and they consider people calling other people pedos offensive, it is their perogative to filter it. Having the word available doesn't have any effect that will help the community. Language is a funny thing, you can warn people about potential perdators wihtout ever calling them by name. Having it banned most likely prevents more problems for them than it can cause.
    This is the only word they have banned. And you're not allowed to call people names on gaia, just like here.

    Don't you find your rightous indignation over not being able to use the word to be just as outlandish as their refusal to allow it to be said?

    You really think that kids not seeing the word 'pedo' some how puts them in more danger? Frankly, it sounds like you and Gaia should form some sort of overreaction PAC...

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    "paedophile" is a clinical word, I don't use it as a cuss-word, I use it when I am talking about paedophiles, something that can happen when you're on a website where most other users are very young. Gaia-online is sending out the message that it is taboo to talk about older people trying to have (cyber/webcam)sex with minors.

    I care about this because I care about others. This is a serious issue that fucks up children. I haven't been sexually abused, nor any of my friends or family, this does not mean I can not care about the issue.

    *edit: I don't think that "pedo" is being used as much as, say, "n*****" or "gay" or "chink" or "noob" or "retard" on gaia-online. Me for me, I have never seen it used as a way to call people names.

    Aldo on
  • captainkcaptaink TexasRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    You have failed to provide any reasonable argument that banning the word pedo is somehow harmful to Gaia's userbase. I imagine it got to be used as slander way too much, and they banned it before it got out of hand.

    If you're really concerned about child predators, call them that. That's much more descriptive than pedophile anyways.

    captaink on
  • TachTach Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Caring about an issue is one thing, but you're taking this caring a bit farther than most people would.

    Is Gaia an open forum to discuss serious issues like paedophilia? It doesn't seem like it. It doesn't seem that it's a proper subject for an MMO. Most of these games are specifically geared towards kids, and specifically state that adult matters are not allowed. Not only that- but Gaia Online has a specific section of its website dedicated to Saftey Tips that go over the type of information you would probably want to see. They apparently take the issue as seriously as you do- only they do it outside the game.

    All they're saying is that this kind of language isn't appropriate, and they've removed it. It doesn't mean they don't care about preadatory behavior.

    Tach on
This discussion has been closed.