The state of PC gaming

da newbda newb New York, New YorkRegistered User regular
edited November 2007 in Games and Technology
First off: I am new to PC gaming. Granted, I played a little Starcraft and WoW, but now I have taken the plunge. And I really like it. PC games seem to have a lot more depth to them, not to mention mod-ability. But on to my main point.

PC gaming had been decreasing in sales since 2000 which was around when the PS2 came out. It was just easier for people to play games on consoles (the setup was the problem). But it increased for the first time last year (granted, a lot of this was due to WoW). But it seems to me that it isn't just about that one game. It seems easier to get into PC gaming and now Microsoft has developed Games for Windows there is a system to work by. I think PC gaming is coming back.

But since I am new to the PC genre, my view could be jaded. Up until a little while ago I didn't really pay attention to PC games. This year it appears that there are a great number of AAA titles coming out; more than in a long time. But this could likely be because of my previous ignorance. What do you guys think? Is PC gaming making a comeback?

P.S. Sorry for starting a new one. I guess I didn't enter in the right search words.

da newb on
«13456

Posts

  • Flippy_DFlippy_D Digital Conquistador LondonRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    ITT: Sweeping statements and no empirical data.

    Flippy_D on
    p8fnsZD.png
  • DreadedNodroGDreadedNodroG Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I think the Orange Box helped increase sales for the PC. Perhaps because of the included TF2?

    DreadedNodroG on
  • VeritasVRVeritasVR Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Every time this thread pops up (once or twice a month) I laugh to myself and think of Crysis, Starcraft 2, Company of Heroes, etc.

    It's never been "low", and thus does not need a "comeback".

    VeritasVR on
    CoH_infantry.jpg
    Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
  • KVWKVW Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I'd wager Blizzard games are the exception that proves the rule in regards to sagging PC sales. In the old days it was unheard of for a console game to get a PC port. It was always the other way around with the console getting the inferior port of some popular PC game.

    A lot of the 'big' PC games lately have been 360 ports or cross platform releases with consoles that cost $500-1000 less than the equivilent PC required to play them. Bioshock, Gears of War, Halo 2, Call of Duty 4, GRAW2, Rainbow Six: Vegas. All would have been huge PC hits in the old days, but are now smash hit console games with some niche hardcore PC fans.

    Do I think PC gaming is dying? No, but it's definitely taking a back seat to console gaming and being relegated to the MMORPG, RTS and hardcore FPS 'system'. When FPS shooters sell 4 million console versions compared to the couple 100k PC version when released at the same time, there's definitely something wrong.

    KVW on
  • da newbda newb New York, New YorkRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    VeritasVR wrote: »
    Every time this thread pops up (once or twice a month) I laugh to myself and think of Crysis, Starcraft 2, Company of Heroes, etc.

    It's never been "low", and thus does not need a "comeback".


    I suppose. But there are some games that seem to be on both the PC and console but are geared more towards console gaming, which is a tad annoying. Not that bad though.

    da newb on
  • SoaLSoaL fantastic Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    PC games needed a comeback? From what?

    SoaL on
    DKFA7.gif
  • VeritasVRVeritasVR Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    da newb wrote: »
    VeritasVR wrote: »
    Every time this thread pops up (once or twice a month) I laugh to myself and think of Crysis, Starcraft 2, Company of Heroes, etc.

    It's never been "low", and thus does not need a "comeback".


    I suppose. But there are some games that seem to be on both the PC and console but are geared more towards console gaming, which is a tad annoying. Not that bad though.

    In my opinion, all shooters are best played with a mouse. Lots of shooters come out for the PC and console. Therefore, all shooters that come out for the PC and console are better played by the PC.

    That's my argument, if you want to play the conjecture game.

    VeritasVR on
    CoH_infantry.jpg
    Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
  • ImpersonatorImpersonator Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    fuck pc games, oh look at this new engine, these particles, oh the shiny shadows!, oh look at this new pc you're going to have to buy to play any goddamn new game!

    Impersonator on
  • HtR-LaserHtR-Laser Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    The first mistake is calling it the "PC genre."

    HtR-Laser on
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited November 2007
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Aroduc on
  • StoverStover Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    KVW wrote: »
    I'd wager Blizzard games are the exception that proves the rule in regards to sagging PC sales.

    Just so you know KVW that that's not what the "exception proves the rule" argument means at all.

    Stover on
    outoftheloop.jpg
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Aroduc wrote: »
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Seriously, Bioshock was the very first game I flat out couldn't play, and I bought my PC almost 5 years ago.

    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    shryke on
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    shryke wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Seriously, Bioshock was the very first game I flat out couldn't play, and I bought my PC almost 5 years ago.

    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    The glory of PC gaming is that idiots are weened out by default. Maybe we are "elitists" but seriously, we know more than you. All of you!

    Smashism on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Smashism wrote: »
    The glory of PC gaming is that idiots are weened out by default. Maybe we are "elitists" but seriously, we know more than you. All of you!

    WHAT?!?!!?

    Excuse me? So apparently one must assume that the average Counter-Strike player is the pinnacle of intelligence, tolerance, and sportsmanship?

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • Flippy_DFlippy_D Digital Conquistador LondonRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    *makes whistling noise, miming an airship crashing

    Flippy_D on
    p8fnsZD.png
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Smashism wrote: »
    The glory of PC gaming is that idiots are weened out by default. Maybe we are "elitists" but seriously, we know more than you. All of you!

    WHAT?!?!!?

    Excuse me? So apparently one must assume that the average Counter-Strike player is the pinnacle of intelligence, tolerance, and sportsmanship?

    Excuse me, but since when did CS represent the PC community as a whole?

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post. Don't get too offended now.

    Smashism on
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Smashism wrote: »
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Smashism wrote: »
    The glory of PC gaming is that idiots are weened out by default. Maybe we are "elitists" but seriously, we know more than you. All of you!

    WHAT?!?!!?

    Excuse me? So apparently one must assume that the average Counter-Strike player is the pinnacle of intelligence, tolerance, and sportsmanship?

    Excuse me, but since when did CS represent the PC community as a whole?

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post. Don't get too offended now.

    Plus, I think the Halo community showed us up. Their like "You call that a pack of gibbering racist assholes? Let us show you how it's done!".

    shryke on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Smashism wrote: »

    Excuse me, but since when did CS represent the PC community as a whole?

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post. Don't get too offended now.

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post.

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • Hotlead JunkieHotlead Junkie Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Well one thing that;s probably worth pointing out is that a lot of the most popular PC games are meant to be played, and are played for much, much longer than most console games. For example, I could of gone through about 3 or so avarage length console games in the same amount of time I'v played Team Fortress 2 online. Same goes for City of Heroes or Diablo 2. I may not play as many PC games as I do console games but when I do play a PC game it's usually for a lot, lot longer than a console game. See MMORPGS and such. Instead of paying for a few games on a console, you pay the same amount of money to play the one game. PC games may not sell as many but they definatey makes as much money as console games

    Hotlead Junkie on
    tf2_sig.png
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Smashism wrote: »

    Excuse me, but since when did CS represent the PC community as a whole?

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post. Don't get too offended now.

    ...maybe you couldn't read the sarcasm in my post.

    i can requote things too.

    Smashism on
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited November 2007
    Well one thing that;s probably worth pointing out is that a lot of the most popular PC games are meant to be played, and are played for much, much longer than most console games. For example, I could of gone through about 3 or so avarage length console games in the same amount of time I'v played Team Fortress 2 online. Same goes for City of Heroes or Diablo 2. I may not play as many PC games as I do console games but when I do play a PC game it's usually for a lot, lot longer than a console game. See MMORPGS and such. Instead of paying for a few games on a console, you pay the same amount of money to play the one game. PC games may not sell as many but they definatey makes as much money as console games

    And if you bother to include flash based games or the like... then PC games are far FAR FAR more profitable.

    Aroduc on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Man, the point was that I was doubly playing off of your sarcasm.

    Sorry D:

    Well, regardless, us elitist bastards better return to sipping tea+playing pc games. :P

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • Fig-DFig-D Tustin, CA, USRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I was about to type out this big, long smart sounding post where I sound like I jackass on top of a mountain telling everyone what they all already know, but lemme try this again: Smashism, I didn't pick up on the sarcasm element until you said something. Such is the internet.

    Fig-D on
    SteamID - Fig-D :: PSN - Fig-D
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Man, the point was that I was doubly playing off of your sarcasm.

    Sorry D:

    Well, regardless, us elitist bastards better return to sipping tea+playing pc games. :P

    Oh and tweaking our machines. Overclocking. Modding.
    pssstt......pirating

    PC gaming has nothing to worry about, its the poor sods who can't figure out a few things:
    1. Alienwares cost a fortune. Saying that a new computer costs 1800+ dollars is just ridiculous. Do better shopping, stop buying from dell and voodoo and crap.
    2. Seriously, just learn to build and tweak your own computer. It's not like us power users are genius' made of uber IQ's. This shits not rocket science.

    I'm not out to piss off any console gamers, I play consoles myself. Just saying don't whine that PC gaming costs you mad grands of cash. Right now theres a transition from old hardware to this next gen of hardware. Its like crying that your ps2 won't play motorstorm.

    As far as the state of software goes, its obvious PC gamers are getting a gold mine of stuff soon.

    Smashism on
  • LudiousLudious I just wanted a sandwich A temporally dislocated QuiznosRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    It's really not. There are LEGO kits that are more difficult than building a PC.

    Ludious on
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Ludious wrote: »
    It's really not. There are LEGO kits that are more difficult than building a PC.

    Those old Lego Technic sets are what used to get me. Damn you space shuttle, I'll never finish.

    Smashism on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    shryke wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Seriously, Bioshock was the very first game I flat out couldn't play, and I bought my PC almost 5 years ago.

    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    I got nostaligic the other day and went back and read an old PC Gamer from 1996, and they had an article about how 3Dfx was in hot water because the Rage pushed only 28FPS at 800x600 as opposed to the VooDoo's 35 FPS in Quake.

    35 FPS at 800x600 was absolutely godly a mere ten years ago. Now think about whether or not having 140fps in 16:9 on a 28" screen is really necessary to enjoy games.

    Salvation122 on
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I'd love some source on the sales of PC games lagging since 2000.

    Because it is a flat out lie.

    The_Scarab on
  • Fig-DFig-D Tustin, CA, USRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Sales... eh. I got nothing, but it sure seems like attention as been more focused towards the console market (vs say the Tie Fighter era). Of course, this is obvious and not really arguable so I'll go back to doing whatever it is I do now...

    Fig-D on
    SteamID - Fig-D :: PSN - Fig-D
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited November 2007
    shryke wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Seriously, Bioshock was the very first game I flat out couldn't play, and I bought my PC almost 5 years ago.

    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    I got nostaligic the other day and went back and read an old PC Gamer from 1996, and they had an article about how 3Dfx was in hot water because the Rage pushed only 28FPS at 800x600 as opposed to the VooDoo's 35 FPS in Quake.

    35 FPS at 800x600 was absolutely godly a mere ten years ago. Now think about whether or not having 140fps in 16:9 on a 28" screen is really necessary to enjoy games.

    No?

    Aroduc on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    shryke wrote: »
    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    Gross! I like to play games at their maximum potential of the developer's vision.

    But then I don't complain about purchasing new hardware all the time to do so.

    Deusfaux on
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    shryke wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    I love how when people start bitching about "zomg, PCs require new hardwares" they conveniently totally ignore games like Civ4 or Medieval 2 or Half Life 2 or any number which are still running perfectly fine on my 2001 desktop. Oh no, I see less reflective water than other people! How ever will I survive?

    Seriously, Bioshock was the very first game I flat out couldn't play, and I bought my PC almost 5 years ago.

    Then again, some of the complaints I've seen are funny. "OMG, I ad to turn my resolution down to 1024x768 to play this game smoothly. OMG constant upgrade". And I'm sitting there thinking "O_o? I play at the resolution all the time".

    I got nostaligic the other day and went back and read an old PC Gamer from 1996, and they had an article about how 3Dfx was in hot water because the Rage pushed only 28FPS at 800x600 as opposed to the VooDoo's 35 FPS in Quake.

    35 FPS at 800x600 was absolutely godly a mere ten years ago. Now think about whether or not having 140fps in 16:9 on a 28" screen is really necessary to enjoy games.
    The answer is yes, if it is possible. Cmon I know you guys spend forever tweaking for perfect graphic to fps ratio. If it is possible, it must be done.

    Smashism on
  • Inglorious CoyoteInglorious Coyote Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I really don't think the PC side has declined so much as the console side has expanded, so it's getting more attention than the PC side is.

    Inglorious Coyote on
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Funny thing is with all the people talking about doom and gloom for the PC is, I can't remember the last time I heard a developer or a publisher say the same thing.

    http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=85531

    "People have been saying for years that the PC market is declining; yet we've seen massive growth and success in our niched PC segment instead."

    http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7559&Itemid=2

    "PCs are the most-used gaming platform for kids of all age groups, according to a new report from NPD Group"

    http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7839&Itemid=2

    "He also said that the PC is a “growing” market, and Ubisoft will be delivering Far Cry 2 on PC first, as well as launching casual MMOs at the end of next year and in 2009. “We are looking at [PC] to create more brands that will also be on console, but we’ll also create specific brands just for PC.”"





    And there's a glut of people pushing out console titles onto PC.

    Call of Duty 4 on PC. Assassin's Creed on PC. Devil May Cry 4 on PC. Even Turok is coming to PC


    The only thing I think that's really hurting PC at the moment is Xbox Live Arcade! and PSNetwork. Both groups are taking what are fairly low spec/high concept titles and using them in the console war. These are the sort of titles that would make great PC releases and we are missing out on (although there are plenty of freeware games... lets hope that Indie PC developers can start monetising their developments.)

    Rook on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    whoa whoa whoa

    CoD 4 is not a console game on the PC

    It is a PC game on consoles

    CoD 3 was the shittier console game that was not IW developed

    Deusfaux on
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Man, if I hear one more jackass talk about his 15 year old Cray Supercomputer that he got for $30 and a piece of pocket lint and it runs just fine now I will kill everything.

    Of course it's not constant upgrading but goddammit you are not playing Crysis on your 3 year old $400 computer.

    durandal4532 on
    Do what you can to elect Harris/Walz and downticket Dem candidates in your area by doorknocking, phonebanking, or postcarding: https://www.mobilize.us/
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Development for Call of Duty 4 was focussed much more on the consoles.

    Hence why it demoed at e3 on consoles, all previews have been of the console version as well as the bulk of the marketing.

    Infinity Ward certainly are PC devs and I have the PC version of COD4 and it is awesome.

    But to say it is a PC game on consoles is a little misleading, in that it has little to no distinguishing features which would imply this, whereas it does have a lot of parts about it that indicate it is designed around consoles.

    The_Scarab on
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    CoD 4 is definitely a console game on the PC as much that Quake Wars is a PC game on Consoles.

    Rook on
  • AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I wish we could stop having this conversation because it's been going for 10 YEARS .

    Aridhol on
  • VoodooVVoodooV Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I really don't think the PC side has declined so much as the console side has expanded, so it's getting more attention than the PC side is.

    The focus has definitely shifted. Games for Windows isn't helping shit at all either. Can anyone truly deny that most if not all these dual release games that have come out lately have clearly been meant for the consoles first and PC second? No one wants to make complex space sims that pretty much require joysticks anymore.

    I mean I'm as shocked as anyone. I absolutely could not stand shooters on consoles one bit, but games like GoW have changed my mind and made me turn my nose up at the PC version.

    Smashism is exactly right, PC gaming is not exactly rocket science, but I think we're seeing the transition of gaming going from some obscure geek hobby to something a lot more mainstream. I'm going to be real insensitive and pull out some stereotypes, but the average Walmart junkie doesn't want to learn the finer points of how to troubleshoot Windows and your driver versions and etc.

    But shit, the problem is this perception by the neophytes that you HAVE to have the 800 dollar quad SLI uber card just even be considered a gamer. Fuck that noise! So you have these lay people who only have computers for internet/email and maybe some digital photograhy, something even the most basic, super cheap computer can do. Then little Billy comes along and says, "But Moooooooom! I won't be cool at school unless I have some overpriced Alienware rig, and thats where the shit breaks down and people get fed up and buy the convenience of a 350 dollar Xbox360, despite how even now thats considered high end for a console.

    But also, going back to the original point. Yes consoles have expanded, they've become more PC-like too. So depending on how you look at it, PC gaming isn't really dying, its just becoming way more streamlined.

    VoodooV on
Sign In or Register to comment.