The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
So its getting around Christmas time and there are a lot of new cameras and such and I think its about time for me to get a new one.
The two brands I'm looking into are Canon and Sony.
I don't know a lot about all the technical stuff I should, so I come to my very reliable Gaians to help me out. Spam More spam
The things I'll be using my camera for is just taking some good shoots outsides or inside. And my budget is around $400.
So yeah, that's what I have and hopefully someone can give me a few guidelines on what to buy and maybe the link to my dream camera?~!
Thanks a bunch~!
Don't bother with the Sony superzoom. If you want a superzoom, you buy a Panasonic Lumix, but even then it's huge and bulky. Besides, if you truly need that kind of capability in a camera you should be buying a DSLR body and a decent telephoto lens.
The second camera you linked is a more expensive and slightly smaller version of the camera I'm about to suggest, but lacking in the manual features that you'll really appreciate if you develop more than a passing interest in taking snapshots. I love my little Canon A570 IS. It was cheap (~$200) and has a wide variety of scene options while still boasting full manual controls (focus/exposure). Image quality is excellent, ISO is useable up to about 200 ISO/possibly 400, and the battery life is phenomenal (a couple hundred shots on a pair of rechargeable AAs).
By going under budget on the camera, you can afford a decent tripod to put it on! If you really do want to take landscapes/etc, you're going to need a tripod - ideally one that will still be useable once you upgrade to a DSLR (if you decide to go that route) and last you ages (so it's still a good investment even if you don't move up). I would advise Manfrotto or Velbon legs with a Manfrotto ball head. Do not get a pan'n'tilt head - those are for video cameras and are not useful with a still camera. Look to spend at least $100 on the legs and another $50 on the head - unless you're absolutely sure you will never upgrade from a point and shoot, in which case you can get a smaller and cheaper head ($30)ish.
Of course, having given this advice, if you're truly into photography you will eventually want a DSLR. I just got my Pentax K10d, and it is so many leaps and bounds above my P+S it's actually funny.
Posts
The second camera you linked is a more expensive and slightly smaller version of the camera I'm about to suggest, but lacking in the manual features that you'll really appreciate if you develop more than a passing interest in taking snapshots. I love my little Canon A570 IS. It was cheap (~$200) and has a wide variety of scene options while still boasting full manual controls (focus/exposure). Image quality is excellent, ISO is useable up to about 200 ISO/possibly 400, and the battery life is phenomenal (a couple hundred shots on a pair of rechargeable AAs).
By going under budget on the camera, you can afford a decent tripod to put it on! If you really do want to take landscapes/etc, you're going to need a tripod - ideally one that will still be useable once you upgrade to a DSLR (if you decide to go that route) and last you ages (so it's still a good investment even if you don't move up). I would advise Manfrotto or Velbon legs with a Manfrotto ball head. Do not get a pan'n'tilt head - those are for video cameras and are not useful with a still camera. Look to spend at least $100 on the legs and another $50 on the head - unless you're absolutely sure you will never upgrade from a point and shoot, in which case you can get a smaller and cheaper head ($30)ish.
Of course, having given this advice, if you're truly into photography you will eventually want a DSLR. I just got my Pentax K10d, and it is so many leaps and bounds above my P+S it's actually funny.