The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

HDTV: Is HDMI worth it?

ZimmydoomZimmydoom Accept no substitutesRegistered User regular
edited December 2007 in Games and Technology
I just recently invested in a brand new 42" HDTV (this one) for my father for Christmas, and it's already up in the main living room with my games and the DVD player. I have a Wii and 360, both with component cables, and will probably be getting a PS3 and/or Blu-Ray/HD-DVD player at some point. This is my first experience playing on an HDTV, so I really don't have anything to compare it to. Right now, everything looks absolutely freakin' gorgeous compared to the ten year-old 22" CRT in my bedroom.

My question, basically, is whether or not I'm fine sticking with component cables for my 360, or would I really be better off still if I invested in HDMI cables? I'm one of those people who likes to squeeze every last drop of performance out of his gear, but I don't want to throw my money away if there really isn't any discernible difference in quality since I only get to play on it when I'm home from school anyway. Also, if I do opt for HDMI, is it worth it to invest in Monster Cable, or should I just stick with the plain ol' first party stuff?

Better-than-birthday-sig!
Gim wrote: »
Zimmydoom, Zimmydoom
Flew away in a balloon
Had sex with polar bears
While sitting in a reclining chair
Now there are Zim-Bear hybrids
Running around and clawing eyelids
Watch out, a Zim-Bear is about to have sex with yooooooou!
Zimmydoom on
«13

Posts

  • GadeusGadeus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Yes, HDMI is definitely something you'll want, especially if you're getting a PS3 / HD-DVD player (or if you ever plan on hooking your PC to the TV). Always go for the cheapest possible HDMI cable, by the way, it's a digital cable. Either it works or it doesn't, no in betweens.

    HDMI is always going to give a higher quality picture in comparison to any analogue inputs, like component. For example, I noticed a huge difference in text clarity when I switched from VGA to DVI / HDMI for my PC.

    Gadeus on
    Brawl Code: 2105-8329-7282
  • Dark ShroudDark Shroud Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    First off yes HDMI is worth it. You'll need HDMI if you want your PS3 to upscale DVDs. And since the PS3 doesn't come with an HD cable you might as well get the best for it. And no you do not need Monster cables unless you need a cable longer than 7' feet. You can get a $5 cable from Newegg, Tigerdirect, or Monoprice.

    For the 360, the component cables it came with are accpectable at this point in time.


    This the best cable for the PS3 from Monoprice. Black 6ft, $6.43 (back ordered): http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=102&cp_id=10240&cs_id=1024008&p_id=3992&seq=1&format=2

    Here's one that will do and can later be used for the 360 (360 uses HDMI 1.2 instead 1.3a like the PS3), 7ft black, $6.99: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812189053

    I paid roughly $30 at a Sam's Club for a Pure Digital Belkin HDMI Cable with extra shielding (I get high interference in my area) and I was ripped off about $10. You should never pay more than $25 max for an HDMI cable. And currently Sam's Club seems to have them back at $19.**.

    Dark Shroud on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Zimmydoom wrote: »
    I just recently invested in a brand new 42" HDTV (this one) for my father for Christmas, and it's already up in the main living room with my games and the DVD player.

    Ahahahaha, that was so devious. For your father, yeah, right. ;-)

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • harvestharvest By birthright, a stupendous badass.Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    HDMI is cool cause it's just the one cable.

    As for the Xbox cabling business, you can get a 1080p picture out of component cables but it isn't as good as using VGA or DVI or HDMI (in ascending quality order). Since you have a VGA and HDMI port, might as well use whichever one you can get a cheaper cable for.

    harvest on
    B6yM5w2.gif
  • TheSonicRetardTheSonicRetard Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    with HDMI you probably won't see a dramatic (or really, any) increase in visual quality from component and especially VGA. Rather, HDMI is worth it because, as it's been repeated a few times in this topic, if you want any sort of Hi-def media format to be guaranteed to work, you need it. But as of right now, you don't.

    A basic rundown of why you need it (with techno-jargin removed for easy reading):

    HD-DVD and Blu Ray include a non-utilized feature in order to prevent copying or ripping of video. Basically hi-def movie makers don't want you to be able to hook up your Hi-def video player to some sort of box and record a perfect copy of the movie (which is stupid because no one in their right mind would rip a hi-def movie this way). So, in order to make sure this never happens, hi-def video formats include a method of copy protection. All HDTVs produced after a certain date (don't worry, unless you're a damn early adopter you're good) must be able to verify that the hi-def player is connected directly to the television. They do this using a digital signal. The hi-def player will send a signal, digitally, through the cable connecting it to the television, which the television must decode, figure out a reply with, and then send back to the hi-def player. The only way they can send it is with a digital connection.

    Now, what happens if the verification cannot be detected? Well, like I said, it's unused now, but the planned purpose is to force the hi-def player to downscale. So, instead of outputting at, say, 1080p, it'll output at 480p. again, this is done in order to prevent people from recording hi-def streams. If they can't be sure it's not hooked up to some crazy box that'll record the stream, they'll drop you back down to 480p.

    So VGA or component? Those are analog connections - they won't verify to the hi-def player that there is a direct connection. HDMI and DVI can both verify the connection. As I said before, this feature is unused, and the general consensus is that it won't be used for now. Will it be used? Who knows. But it's scary enough to convince some that unless you have an HDMI connection, hi-def formats are worthless. To clarify, right now you can connect a HD-DVD drive to a 360 which is connected to an HDTV using VGA and still output in HD. But there's a possibility that one day, it might not, and you'll be required to have an HDMI enabled 360.

    TheSonicRetard on
  • DaemonionDaemonion Mountain Man USARegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    [EDIT]

    I was misinformed

    [/EDIT]


    I suggest the following website for cables: www.monoprice.com

    Daemonion on
  • mastmanmastman Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    The fact that it's one small cable sells me by itself. Sick of there being 400000 cables behind my home entertainment area. Plus, it does 1080p

    also, don't buy the $70 ones. There are hdmi cables that sell for like $6

    mastman on
    ByalIX8.png
    B.net: Kusanku
  • HypertimeHypertime Arlington, VARegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    mastman wrote: »
    The fact that it's one small cable sells me by itself.

    Yes. Yes. Oh god, yes.
    also, don't buy the $70 ones. There are hdmi cables that sell for like $6

    I have Penny Arcade to thank for pointing me to Monoprice. DVI-to-HDMI cable for my laptop? $50 at a brick and mortar ... $4 online.

    Hypertime on
    Your mom.
  • FaceballMcDougalFaceballMcDougal Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false, his tv may not accept 1080p over component though

    FaceballMcDougal on
    xbl/psn/steam: jabbertrack
  • mntorankusumntorankusu I'm not sure how to use this thing.... Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    mntorankusu on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    And no you do not need Monster cables unless you need a cable longer than 7' feet. You can get a $5 cable from Newegg, Tigerdirect, or Monoprice.

    Change that to 50 feet. Monoprice's 50-footer has been tested against Monster's. Same quality, of course. I'd dig up the URL but I've got no time right now.

    Daedalus on
  • Dr_KeenbeanDr_Keenbean Dumb as a butt Planet Express ShipRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    Yeah. It's only like 1070p. You need HDMI to get the extra 10 pixels. I am joking.

    You will not notice the difference. Unless you're some manner of machine with the sole purpose of determining that sort of shit. Which, if you are, I apologize.

    Dr_Keenbean on
    PSN/NNID/Steam: Dr_Keenbean
    3DS: 1650-8480-6786
    Switch: SW-0653-8208-4705
  • FaceballMcDougalFaceballMcDougal Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    Don't say that sort of thing over at AVS...

    You guys have to remember that HDMI has a company behind it that wants people to think there is a higher visual quality to their product. The marketing has certainly worked... but when you start testing things it doesn't add up.

    FaceballMcDougal on
    xbl/psn/steam: jabbertrack
  • mntorankusumntorankusu I'm not sure how to use this thing.... Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    Don't say that sort of thing over at AVS...

    You guys have to remember that HDMI has a company behind it that wants people to think there is a higher visual quality to their product. The marketing has certainly worked... but when you start testing things it doesn't add up.

    Too bad it actually does look better, or you might have a point.

    I have seen it with my own eyes.

    mntorankusu on
  • FaceballMcDougalFaceballMcDougal Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    Don't say that sort of thing over at AVS...

    You guys have to remember that HDMI has a company behind it that wants people to think there is a higher visual quality to their product. The marketing has certainly worked... but when you start testing things it doesn't add up.

    Too bad it actually does look better, or you might have a point.

    I have seen it with my own eyes.

    ok then

    info is out there if you want to look beyond a single anecdotal experience that could have additional factors

    FaceballMcDougal on
    xbl/psn/steam: jabbertrack
  • mntorankusumntorankusu I'm not sure how to use this thing.... Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Even picture quality being equal HDMI is way worth it.

    Edit: And sure, there are additional factors. There could be interference affecting the analog Component signal, or the television in question could just be kind of bad at handling the analog Component signal. Neither of these affect (or are as likely to affect, in any case) an HDMI signal.

    mntorankusu on
  • NickTheNewbieNickTheNewbie Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Here's an important thing to figure out: Does your tv actually accept 1080p inputs, or does it just have the capability to display 1080p? I know it sounds crazy, but my brother in law got screwed on something like that.

    NickTheNewbie on
  • mntorankusumntorankusu I'm not sure how to use this thing.... Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Here's an important thing to figure out: Does your tv actually accept 1080p inputs, or does it just have the capability to display 1080p? I know it sounds crazy, but my brother in law got screwed on something like that.

    Do you mean it was a TV with a resolution lower than 1920x1080, but it was advertised as 1080p because it could display 1080p signals? Or that it had a 1920x1080 resolution but was incapable of accepting a 1080p signal?

    Anyway, his TV is both full 1920x1080 and can accept 1080p signals.

    mntorankusu on
  • NickTheNewbieNickTheNewbie Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Here's an important thing to figure out: Does your tv actually accept 1080p inputs, or does it just have the capability to display 1080p? I know it sounds crazy, but my brother in law got screwed on something like that.

    Do you mean it was a TV with a resolution lower than 1920x1080, but it was advertised as 1080p because it could display 1080p signals? Or that it had a 1920x1080 resolution but was incapable of accepting a 1080p signal?

    Anyway, his TV is both full 1920x1080 and can accept 1080p signals.

    The tv was full 1920x1080, but could not take in 1080p signal. Well since his tv can take in 1080p through the component, the other question is, what devices support 1080p output through component?

    NickTheNewbie on
  • wwtMaskwwtMask Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Yes, it's worth it, if for nothing else than to reduce clutter. Hell, I just bought a couple of cheapo HDMI cables for the sole purpose of clearing up stuff behind my TV and because I'd run out of component slots in the back. $20 was a small price to pay for that.

    wwtMask on
    When he dies, I hope they write "Worst Affirmative Action Hire, EVER" on his grave. His corpse should be trolled.
    Twitter - @liberaltruths | Google+ - http://gplus.to/wwtMask | Occupy Tallahassee
  • Dr_KeenbeanDr_Keenbean Dumb as a butt Planet Express ShipRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Here's an important thing to figure out: Does your tv actually accept 1080p inputs, or does it just have the capability to display 1080p? I know it sounds crazy, but my brother in law got screwed on something like that.

    Do you mean it was a TV with a resolution lower than 1920x1080, but it was advertised as 1080p because it could display 1080p signals? Or that it had a 1920x1080 resolution but was incapable of accepting a 1080p signal?

    Anyway, his TV is both full 1920x1080 and can accept 1080p signals.

    The tv was full 1920x1080, but could not take in 1080p signal. Well since his tv can take in 1080p through the component, the other question is, what devices support 1080p output through component?

    360.

    To my knowledge that is all.

    Dr_Keenbean on
    PSN/NNID/Steam: Dr_Keenbean
    3DS: 1650-8480-6786
    Switch: SW-0653-8208-4705
  • bombardierbombardier Moderator Mod Emeritus
    edited December 2007
    Here's an important thing to figure out: Does your tv actually accept 1080p inputs, or does it just have the capability to display 1080p? I know it sounds crazy, but my brother in law got screwed on something like that.

    Do you mean it was a TV with a resolution lower than 1920x1080, but it was advertised as 1080p because it could display 1080p signals? Or that it had a 1920x1080 resolution but was incapable of accepting a 1080p signal?

    Anyway, his TV is both full 1920x1080 and can accept 1080p signals.

    The tv was full 1920x1080, but could not take in 1080p signal. Well since his tv can take in 1080p through the component, the other question is, what devices support 1080p output through component?

    360.

    To my knowledge that is all.
    It sure does. HD-DVD output will only be 720p over component, however.

    bombardier on
  • taliosfalcontaliosfalcon Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    with HDMI you probably won't see a dramatic (or really, any) increase in visual quality from component and especially VGA. Rather, HDMI is worth it because, as it's been repeated a few times in this topic, if you want any sort of Hi-def media format to be guaranteed to work, you need it. But as of right now, you don't.

    A basic rundown of why you need it (with techno-jargin removed for easy reading):

    HD-DVD and Blu Ray include a non-utilized feature in order to prevent copying or ripping of video. Basically hi-def movie makers don't want you to be able to hook up your Hi-def video player to some sort of box and record a perfect copy of the movie (which is stupid because no one in their right mind would rip a hi-def movie this way). So, in order to make sure this never happens, hi-def video formats include a method of copy protection. All HDTVs produced after a certain date (don't worry, unless you're a damn early adopter you're good) must be able to verify that the hi-def player is connected directly to the television. They do this using a digital signal. The hi-def player will send a signal, digitally, through the cable connecting it to the television, which the television must decode, figure out a reply with, and then send back to the hi-def player. The only way they can send it is with a digital connection.

    Now, what happens if the verification cannot be detected? Well, like I said, it's unused now, but the planned purpose is to force the hi-def player to downscale. So, instead of outputting at, say, 1080p, it'll output at 480p. again, this is done in order to prevent people from recording hi-def streams. If they can't be sure it's not hooked up to some crazy box that'll record the stream, they'll drop you back down to 480p.

    So VGA or component? Those are analog connections - they won't verify to the hi-def player that there is a direct connection. HDMI and DVI can both verify the connection. As I said before, this feature is unused, and the general consensus is that it won't be used for now. Will it be used? Who knows. But it's scary enough to convince some that unless you have an HDMI connection, hi-def formats are worthless. To clarify, right now you can connect a HD-DVD drive to a 360 which is connected to an HDTV using VGA and still output in HD. But there's a possibility that one day, it might not, and you'll be required to have an HDMI enabled 360.
    afaik that is..well..wrong. Even if you have an hdmi enabled 360 hooked up via hdmi, if they implement that drm the usb connection connecting the hd-dvd drive to the 360 is already a non qualified connection, and thus the movie would get downscaled because of that regardless of how the 360s hooked up to the tv

    taliosfalcon on
    steam xbox - adeptpenguin
  • TheSonicRetardTheSonicRetard Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    with HDMI you probably won't see a dramatic (or really, any) increase in visual quality from component and especially VGA. Rather, HDMI is worth it because, as it's been repeated a few times in this topic, if you want any sort of Hi-def media format to be guaranteed to work, you need it. But as of right now, you don't.

    A basic rundown of why you need it (with techno-jargin removed for easy reading):

    HD-DVD and Blu Ray include a non-utilized feature in order to prevent copying or ripping of video. Basically hi-def movie makers don't want you to be able to hook up your Hi-def video player to some sort of box and record a perfect copy of the movie (which is stupid because no one in their right mind would rip a hi-def movie this way). So, in order to make sure this never happens, hi-def video formats include a method of copy protection. All HDTVs produced after a certain date (don't worry, unless you're a damn early adopter you're good) must be able to verify that the hi-def player is connected directly to the television. They do this using a digital signal. The hi-def player will send a signal, digitally, through the cable connecting it to the television, which the television must decode, figure out a reply with, and then send back to the hi-def player. The only way they can send it is with a digital connection.

    Now, what happens if the verification cannot be detected? Well, like I said, it's unused now, but the planned purpose is to force the hi-def player to downscale. So, instead of outputting at, say, 1080p, it'll output at 480p. again, this is done in order to prevent people from recording hi-def streams. If they can't be sure it's not hooked up to some crazy box that'll record the stream, they'll drop you back down to 480p.

    So VGA or component? Those are analog connections - they won't verify to the hi-def player that there is a direct connection. HDMI and DVI can both verify the connection. As I said before, this feature is unused, and the general consensus is that it won't be used for now. Will it be used? Who knows. But it's scary enough to convince some that unless you have an HDMI connection, hi-def formats are worthless. To clarify, right now you can connect a HD-DVD drive to a 360 which is connected to an HDTV using VGA and still output in HD. But there's a possibility that one day, it might not, and you'll be required to have an HDMI enabled 360.
    afaik that is..well..wrong. Even if you have an hdmi enabled 360 hooked up via hdmi, if they implement that drm the usb connection connecting the hd-dvd drive to the 360 is already a non qualified connection, and thus the movie would get downscaled because of that regardless of how the 360s hooked up to the tv

    uh, considering microsoft specifically created HDMI 360's to make their HD-DVD attachment qualified, and that they're a major proponent of the HD-DVD format, and that everything I've read states the opposite of what you said, I'm going to need a source.

    TheSonicRetard on
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Shadowfire on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    Daedalus on
  • ZenitramZenitram Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daemonion wrote: »
    You have a 1080P HDTV.

    Component cables (the green, blue, and red ones) only go up to 720p/1080i.

    false

    1080p over Component doesn't look great, though.

    Don't say that sort of thing over at AVS...

    You guys have to remember that HDMI has a company behind it that wants people to think there is a higher visual quality to their product. The marketing has certainly worked... but when you start testing things it doesn't add up.

    Just like when people think they need component cables when they can really use composite if they wanted to (yes it works).

    To contribute to the discussion: Although I love me some video, I can't really tell the difference between HDMI and component for quality. Having said that, it's nice to have digital audio and video in what is essentially a giant USB connector.

    Zenitram on
  • Dr_KeenbeanDr_Keenbean Dumb as a butt Planet Express ShipRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Zenitram wrote: »
    Having said that, it's nice to have digital audio and video in what is essentially a giant USB connector.

    This should be how they are marketing HDMI to the masses. Not 'zomgz more rezomolutionisms', instead it should be '1 fucking cable. Seriously.'

    Dr_Keenbean on
    PSN/NNID/Steam: Dr_Keenbean
    3DS: 1650-8480-6786
    Switch: SW-0653-8208-4705
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    I assume a 1.2 device connected to a 1.2 tv would still work fine over 1.3?

    Bionic Monkey on
    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    I assume a 1.2 device connected to a 1.2 tv would still work fine over 1.3?

    What do you mean "over 1.3"? It's the same cable. You plug a 1.2 device into a 1.2 reciever, you have a 1.2 connection.

    Now, plug a 1.3 device into a 1.2 TV, which you might have meant, well yes it will work fine but you won't have Dolby Super Fucking Digital EX4 Turbo Hyper Fighting Edition 9-and-a-half-point-1 Super Surround Sound (which you almost certainly don't have the speakers for anyway) and 40-bit color (not that the human eye can tell the difference between 40-bit and 32-bit anyway).

    Daedalus on
  • SmashismSmashism Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    I assume a 1.2 device connected to a 1.2 tv would still work fine over 1.3?

    Ughhhh, theres a 1.2 and 1.3? Now I am even more confused. I can build my own computers just fine but figuring out all this TV A/V stuff is a nightmare to me.

    Smashism on
  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    if i have a 720p tv, will hdmi still look better then component for a 360?

    DiannaoChong on
    steam_sig.png
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    if i have a 720p tv, will hdmi still look better then component for a 360?

    Probably not. In theory, it shouldn't, but some TVs apply different filters to component signals than to HDMI and such, so in reality it varies by TV. If you have a spare cable lying around, go ahead and compare; if not it's probably not worth the bother.

    Daedalus on
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    I assume a 1.2 device connected to a 1.2 tv would still work fine over 1.3?

    What do you mean "over 1.3"? It's the same cable. You plug a 1.2 device into a 1.2 reciever, you have a 1.2 connection.

    Now, plug a 1.3 device into a 1.2 TV, which you might have meant, well yes it will work fine but you won't have Dolby Super Fucking Digital EX4 Turbo Hyper Fighting Edition 9-and-a-half-point-1 Super Surround Sound (which you almost certainly don't have the speakers for anyway) and 40-bit color (not that the human eye can tell the difference between 40-bit and 32-bit anyway).

    My mistake. I assumed it was a different cable standard as well, like USB 1.1 and 2.0.

    Bionic Monkey on
    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • ImprovoloneImprovolone Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Smashism wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    HDMI cables... 1.2 and 1.3... what is the difference, exactly?

    Same cable; don't let anyone tell you differently. Some devices support features from the 1.3 standard and some only from 1.2. The difference is minimal (some sound format shit, 40-bit color that nobody is ever going to actually use, etc.) and of course the device at both ends of the cable must support the 1.3 standard to get it to work.

    I assume a 1.2 device connected to a 1.2 tv would still work fine over 1.3?

    Ughhhh, theres a 1.2 and 1.3? Now I am even more confused. I can build my own computers just fine but figuring out all this TV A/V stuff is a nightmare to me.

    Honestly, ignore it. You don't need to worry about it. I can't stress enough how little you need to worry about this. It's like needing a new USB cable because your printer upgraded it's firmware, or some stupid crap like that.
    Buy the cable you need from monoprice. They are a real honest and well priced company.

    Improvolone on
    Voice actor for hire. My time is free if your project is!
  • MistaCreepyMistaCreepy Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    HDMI is just one simple cable that takes care of just about everything. I cant wait until everything uses the cable. The eternal struggle with cord mess will finally be over.

    MistaCreepy on
    PS3: MistaCreepy::Steam: MistaCreepy::360: Dead and I don't feel like paying to fix it.
  • mastmanmastman Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    HDMI is just one simple cable that takes care of just about everything. I cant wait until everything uses the cable. The eternal struggle with cord mess will finally be over.

    It'll be gloriously clean and dust free. So pumped.

    mastman on
    ByalIX8.png
    B.net: Kusanku
  • mntorankusumntorankusu I'm not sure how to use this thing.... Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    When we have a cable standard that carries power from one device to another, then we can talk about ending cord clutter.

    mntorankusu on
  • mastmanmastman Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    you had to ruin it didn't you

    mastman on
    ByalIX8.png
    B.net: Kusanku
  • MistaCreepyMistaCreepy Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    mastman wrote: »
    you had to ruin it didn't you

    I was thinking the same thing. :lol:

    MistaCreepy on
    PS3: MistaCreepy::Steam: MistaCreepy::360: Dead and I don't feel like paying to fix it.
Sign In or Register to comment.