The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

crysis: a debacle

jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
edited December 2007 in Games and Technology
ok, i just bought crysis thinking that my machine was not only good enough to display it at max but better (just bought the damn thing, but i cant remember how to check my specs again, i checked them against the reccomended requirements b4 but i was doing it from memory, which is probably why this is happening) how do i check my specs?

jontheshogun on
«13

Posts

  • ZenitramZenitram Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Start > Run > dxdiag

    Zenitram on
  • ScosglenScosglen Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Start -> Run -> dxdiag should give you a general overview of your system hardware. You'll want a program like cpuz or others if you want to check more specific hardware information like memory speeds.

    Scosglen on
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    ok here are my specs versus the reccomended specs.

    My specs
    OS: Vista
    Processor: intel core 2 duo 1.66 ghz
    RAM: 2046 MB DDR
    HD: 24gb free (after installation)
    Video Card: nvidia Geforce 8400m
    VRAM: 880 mb
    Sound: Dx10 Comp.
    DirectX: DirectX 10
    HDDVD-ROM

    reccomended specs
    OS: Windows XP or Windows Vista
    Processor: Core 2 Duo/Athlon X2 or better
    RAM: 1.5 GB RAM
    Hard Drive: 12GB
    Video Card: NVIDIA 7800 Series, ATI Radeon 1800 Series or better
    VRAM: 512MB of Graphics Memory
    Soundcard: DirectX 9.0c compatible
    Direct X: DX9.0c or DX10
    Other: DVD-ROM


    now after reading that HOW THE HELL CANT I RUN THIS DAMN GAME, WITHOUT HAVING ALL OF THE STATS (shaders, shadows, graphics, display, etc.) AT LOW? sry if i sound angry, but i am. this is rather peturbing, thinking that i have the perfect machne until i actually implement it...

    jontheshogun on
  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    EA UK's crysis page has a tool that'll compare your specs against the crysis min requirements

    Gdiguy on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    If you don't know what you're specs are, the odds are that you're not going to be able to max it, since only the highest end systems (quad core, SLI'ed GTX's) are able to run it anywhere near that

    EDIT: yeah, you're graphics card is the problem, and it's not really the game's fault that you didn't check your spec's before buying it

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    well you dont have 880mb of video memory. your graphics card is also as low as it gets before going integrated. it likely doesnt have the power nor the feature support to run crysis.

    Deusfaux on
  • FreddyDFreddyD Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    FreddyD on
  • fogeymanfogeyman Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Spoit wrote: »
    If you don't know what you're specs are, the odds are that you're not going to be able to max it, since only the highest end systems (quad core, SLI'ed GTX's) are able to run it anywhere near that

    EDIT: yeah, you're graphics card is the problem, and it's not really the game's fault that you didn't check your spec's before buying it
    I can run it at near max (everything on high) at 1280x1024. I have a beefy rig (x2 4200+ and 8800gt), but no quad core or SLI stuff. That's only necessary for really high resolutions.


    OP: In addition to your graphics card being an issue, I think your CPU is also fairly slow. Yeah, Core 2 Duos are super efficient and run well with low clock speeds, but 1.66 ghz is exceptionally low (especially for games like Crysis).

    fogeyman on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    By Max, most people mean the maximum in-game settings (read: very high), and usually at higher resolutions like 1080. Heck, I can run it with a few settings on very high, most of high, and only shaders and post-processing on medium on my low-end c2d and 320 GTS at playable (25+) frame rates.

    Maybe it's my low Vmem, but from my experience, crysis is far more GPU bound than CPU bound, and it almost never hits 100% CPU except for the occasional spike in big explosions (even with physics set to Very high)

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • Tw4winTw4win Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    With my new rig I can run it with everything "very high" at 1280x1024 but it slows to a crawl if I turn on any AA.

    Tw4win on
    steam_sig.png
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    You have a really shitty video card. Congratulations.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    jontheshogun on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    /facepalm

    You're wrong. The 8400 is a budget card. You'll need to replace it if you want to play Crysis. A faster processor wouldn't hurt either (as someone pointed out, 1.6 GHZ is really slow for gaming).

    By the way, we frown upon the GameFAQs style of posting on this forum. You'll notice that everyone at least makes an effort to use correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar. I heartily recommend you give it a try if you'd like to post on this forum regularly. Just a thought.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • AiserouAiserou Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    No, your graphics card is the problem. Its not a tier, its a family, and you have the butt-ugly retarded child of the family.

    Edit: Your processor is probably a problem as well. If you turn the physics stuff up the game gets really cpu intensive.

    Aiserou on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.


    If it didn't have the M behind it, yes. But it does, so, no.

    I can't find a damn thing on the internet that will show you the relative power of that card with its desktop brothers, but I did find someone who said it was getting about 1000 in 3dmark, which is about a third of what you'd get out of its desktop kin.

    I think. Caveat is that information about benchmarks requires a degree to decipher all the cryptic stats and specs people throw online.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • DehumanizedDehumanized Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    Dehumanized on
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    FreddyD wrote: »
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    mines in the 8 series, so why the hell is it not even playable on LOW for mine? and no mine is NOT as low as it goes, mines better than the reccomended graphics card, everything i have is better than the reccomended stuff so any of you who say that my graphics card is a piece of shit you dont know wtf ur talking about. and i did check my specs, i just did it from memory and i remembered that at least all of my stuff was better than the min. so i bought it.

    jontheshogun on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    By the way, we frown upon the GameFAQs style of posting on this forum. You'll notice that everyone at least makes an effort to use correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar. I heartily recommend you give it a try if you'd like to post on this forum regularly. Just a thought.

    Shit. Yeah. What he said.

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • Tw4winTw4win Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    You have a really shitty video card. Congratulations.

    Who me? I hope not... it's a new Geforce 8800 GT.

    Apotheos is going to make me cry...

    Tw4win on
    steam_sig.png
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'm sorry sir but just because 8400 > 7800 does NOT mean your 8400m is greater than a 7800, especially if it's the cheapest of the 8400m series.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • AiserouAiserou Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    FreddyD wrote: »
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    mines in the 8 series, so why the hell is it not even playable on LOW for mine? and no mine is NOT as low as it goes, mines better than the reccomended graphics card, everything i have is better than the reccomended stuff so any of you who say that my graphics card is a piece of shit you dont know wtf ur talking about. and i did check my specs, i just did it from memory and i remembered that at least all of my stuff was better than the min. so i bought it.

    The point is, a 7800 from the rec specs completely kicks the ass of the 8400. Just because it in a higher series, does not mean its more powerful. Your video card is the absolute bottom of the line for the 8 series, whereas the 7800 was mid to high range for the 7 series.

    Aiserou on
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    no, i use a lower graphics card (this is on another computer) for games like gears of war, unreal tournament, bioshock, etc. and it works like a dream, i can max it out for everything.

    jontheshogun on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    You're becoming a pest. What card are you referring to? (lying about)

    Deusfaux on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Then why not play it on that other card:|

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Aiserou wrote: »
    FreddyD wrote: »
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    mines in the 8 series, so why the hell is it not even playable on LOW for mine? and no mine is NOT as low as it goes, mines better than the reccomended graphics card, everything i have is better than the reccomended stuff so any of you who say that my graphics card is a piece of shit you dont know wtf ur talking about. and i did check my specs, i just did it from memory and i remembered that at least all of my stuff was better than the min. so i bought it.

    The point is, a 7800 from the rec specs completely kicks the ass of the 8400. Just because it in a higher series, does not mean its more powerful. Your video card is the absolute bottom of the line for the 8 series, whereas the 7800 was mid to high range for the 7 series.


    wait wait wait, let me get this streight. how is a 7800 better than the 8400? especially considering i built this computer for gaming (this was on the "reccomended for gaming" que).

    jontheshogun on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    FreddyD wrote: »
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    mines in the 8 series, so why the hell is it not even playable on LOW for mine? and no mine is NOT as low as it goes, mines better than the reccomended graphics card, everything i have is better than the reccomended stuff so any of you who say that my graphics card is a piece of shit you dont know wtf ur talking about. and i did check my specs, i just did it from memory and i remembered that at least all of my stuff was better than the min. so i bought it.

    Your card is in the 8 series, but it is about as low-end as you can go, and a mobile version besides. The 7800 mentioned by the Crysis Recommended Specs is the high-end card from the previous generation. A 7800 will outperform your 8400m by leaps and bounds. In addition, your processor is the slowest Core 2 Duo I've seen, so that'll be an issue. I also suspect, given the other stats you're working with, that your RAM is lower-end as well.

    These are all issues that will negatively impact your ability to run Crysis.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • fogeymanfogeyman Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    no, i use a lower graphics card (this is on another computer) for games like gears of war, unreal tournament, bioshock, etc. and it works like a dream, i can max it out for everything.
    You're still wrong, but try running Crysis in DX9. That should improve your performance.

    fogeyman on
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I am hoping this is just a troll and not an honest gamer who is so computer illiterate that he probably bought this laptop for somewhere over $2000 with it's wimpy card.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Spoit wrote: »
    Then why not play it on that other card:|

    im at college, the one i use normally is a laptop (thats this one), the one with the lower graphics card a desktop, thats at home like 9 states away.

    jontheshogun on
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    You're still wrong, but try running Crysis in DX9. That should improve your performance.

    ok. one, yeah i am pretty computer illiterate. how do i run a program in DX9? i dont really know what im doing?

    jontheshogun on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    wait wait wait, let me get this streight. how is a 7800 better than the 8400? especially considering i built this computer for gaming (this was on the "reccomended for gaming" que).

    Because the mathematical value of the model number (eg 8400 > 7800) has shit all to do with relative performance.

    You have a cheap mobile GPU from the 8th generation of nVidia. The 7800 was fairly high in the 7th generation of nVidia. Vis a vid the 7800 is a better card than yours.

    And, if you were trying to build a gaming rig, and then put in a MOBILE graphics processor, well, I call that "Epic Fail".

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • AiserouAiserou Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Aiserou wrote: »
    FreddyD wrote: »
    On a side note, they put Crysis up on the gaming computer they have at Fry's Electronics and it looked and ran like garbage. I don't think that engine has been optimized as well as it could have been. It's even more glaring next to games like World in Conflict and Unreal Engine 3 games, which look and run well on terrible hardware.

    Crysis is playable on my Geforce 6800 / P4 work machine, but it looks thoroughly unimpressive.

    mines in the 8 series, so why the hell is it not even playable on LOW for mine? and no mine is NOT as low as it goes, mines better than the reccomended graphics card, everything i have is better than the reccomended stuff so any of you who say that my graphics card is a piece of shit you dont know wtf ur talking about. and i did check my specs, i just did it from memory and i remembered that at least all of my stuff was better than the min. so i bought it.

    The point is, a 7800 from the rec specs completely kicks the ass of the 8400. Just because it in a higher series, does not mean its more powerful. Your video card is the absolute bottom of the line for the 8 series, whereas the 7800 was mid to high range for the 7 series.


    wait wait wait, let me get this streight. how is a 7800 better than the 8400? especially considering i built this computer for gaming (this was on the "reccomended for gaming" que).

    The 7 series has a certain feature set, the 8 series has more modern feature set. The 7800 is still a more powerful card than the 8400, but the 8400 has a few features the 7800 does not. That being said, the 8400 is not going to do much in DirectX 10 mode anyways, because DirectX 10 games are typically more cpu intensive, so the 7800 is still the better card.

    As for why is was in the ""reccomended for gaming" que", well, thats advertising for you.

    Aiserou on
  • Tw4winTw4win Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Aiserou wrote: »

    The point is, a 7800 from the rec specs completely kicks the ass of the 8400. Just because it in a higher series, does not mean its more powerful. Your video card is the absolute bottom of the line for the 8 series, whereas the 7800 was mid to high range for the 7 series.

    For the money, I don't think you can beat the 7800, especially if you need a card that uses AGP instead of PCI express. I picked one up a couple of months ago for my (now) old system and it rocked. I saw an immediate performance increase from my ATI 9800. Although, I'd be surprised if I didn't see an increase from that.

    Tw4win on
    steam_sig.png
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    *500, *400, etc are all budget cards. *600, *700 are mid-range/performance cards. *800, *900 are enthusiast/high end cards.

    you have a mobile version (always worse than the desktop equivalent) of the bottom ass end budget card of the most recent generation of nvidia gpus. (8*00's)

    sure its better than budget cards from the last generation (7400, 7300, etc) . But likely mid range and especially high end cards from the last gen (7600, 7800, 7900, etc) will smack it all over the place. Let alone mid and high end parts from the CURRENT generation (8600, 8800, etc).... which is what crysis REALLY wants.

    Deusfaux on
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    apotheos wrote: »
    wait wait wait, let me get this streight. how is a 7800 better than the 8400? especially considering i built this computer for gaming (this was on the "reccomended for gaming" que).

    Because the mathematical value of the model number (eg 8400 > 7800) has shit all to do with relative performance.

    You have a cheap mobile GPU from the 8th generation of nVidia. The 7800 was fairly high in the 7th generation of nVidia. Vis a vid the 7800 is a better card than yours.

    And, if you were trying to build a gaming rig, and then put in a MOBILE graphics processor, well, I call that "Epic Fail".


    oh ok i see now. aright, thx, you were a little bit mean towards the end, but i deserve it cuz i was taking out my anger at the wrong person. im gonna go kill the salesperson who gave me the wrong information.

    jontheshogun on
  • RomanPublicSpongeBathRomanPublicSpongeBath Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    no, i use a lower graphics card (this is on another computer) for games like gears of war, unreal tournament, bioshock, etc. and it works like a dream, i can max it out for everything.

    What card is in the other computer? It's possible that it could run Crysis if it does well with those other games.

    Edit: Abridged due to being too slow.

    RomanPublicSpongeBath on
  • apotheosapotheos Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007

    oh ok i see now. aright, thx, you were a little bit mean towards the end, but i deserve it cuz i was taking out my anger at the wrong person. im gonna go kill the salesperson who gave me the wrong information.

    You probably sensed a lot of kickback from everyone because we were trying to show you how you were mistaken and you seemed reluctant to catch up at first. I don't blame you. Sounds like a sucky situation.

    I am a little out of touch with this scene as while I used to be the sort to drop $650 on a video card (pristine first run of GeForce 4 Ti4600! Oh the days!) nowadays I run on a iMac and just don't give a damn about hardware.

    Now, I googled and found what looks like tips on how to get the best performance out of Crysis on that rig:

    http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=16034

    apotheos on


    猿も木から落ちる
  • jontheshogunjontheshogun Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    no, i use a lower graphics card (this is on another computer) for games like gears of war, unreal tournament, bioshock, etc. and it works like a dream, i can max it out for everything.

    Steadfastly denying that your graphics card is the problem will not change the fact that your graphics card is the problem. Dehumanized and the others are right, the 8400, especially the mobile edition, is just not a card designed for intensive gaming. What card is in the other computer? It's possible that it could run Crysis if it does well with those other games.

    ok, yes, i get it now, if i wanted to get a superior graphics card in the 8 series it would have had to have been 600+, i understand this now.

    now, can any1 here help me by telling me how to run crysis in DX9? or are you gonna constantly bombard me with reminders of how i was wrong, i know i was. now plz oh knowlegable ones (probably spelled that wrong) how do i do this?

    jontheshogun on
  • Tw4winTw4win Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    Cheap mobile graphics card is your problem.


    my graphics card is not the problem, its in the tier above the reccomended graphics card so that has nothing to do with it.

    The number on the card, unfortunately, has very little to do with its actual preformance quality. Unfortunately, nvidia cards that are lower than *600 are generally pretty poorly suited to gaming purposes.

    no, i use a lower graphics card (this is on another computer) for games like gears of war, unreal tournament, bioshock, etc. and it works like a dream, i can max it out for everything.

    Steadfastly denying that your graphics card is the problem will not change the fact that your graphics card is the problem. Dehumanized and the others are right, the 8400, especially the mobile edition, is just not a card designed for intensive gaming. What card is in the other computer? It's possible that it could run Crysis if it does well with those other games.

    ok, yes, i get it now, if i wanted to get a superior graphics card in the 8 series it would have had to have been 600+, i understand this now.

    now, can any1 here help me by telling me how to run crysis in DX9? or are you gonna constantly bombard me with reminders of how i was wrong, i know i was. now plz oh knowlegable ones (probably spelled that wrong) how do i do this?

    AFIK, if you are running the game under Vista with a DX10 compatible card it's going to force you to run it in DX10. YOu might need to switch to Windows XP. Someone else can probably answer the question better than I can.

    Tw4win on
    steam_sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.