The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Xbox 360 or PS3 (long term view, help me decide)

GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
edited December 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
I'm considering getting either a 360 or a PS3 (and a hdtv/monitor specifically for it) at some point. (probably not this month, probably)
However, I don't really want to buy both. (money considerations, i'm off to Australia in March for my brothers wedding)

Here's how i've broken it down to myself:

Xbox 360:

Good:

Mass Effect
Online integration is apparently good
XNA Studio harks me back to my days on the Amiga with AMOS and Blitz Basic (this one has me interested big time)

Bad:

Microsoft micro-payment you to death (gold and silver bs)
All the RROD problems and other problems (like this emerging jamming wireless signals thing)
Online gaming is user hosted rather than on dedicated servers (latency issues ahoy!)
It's Microsoft

PS3:

Good:

MGS 4 (MGS2 left a sour taste in my mouth and as such I skipped MGS3.. I should probably get MGS3)
JRPG's
No hardware issues
Final Fantasy 3067 (or whatever one it's currently at, i'm undecided on this.. after 7 I just kind of lost interest)
Online is free
Online gaming uses dedicated servers (at least from what i've been able to discern)

Bad:

Price
It's likely to end up (at least in the west) as the other system to develop for, meaning western developers will probably focus on the 360 and Wii
It's Sony


On the Mass Effect point, this is a big seller to me. But since EA bought them out I reckon it'll probably end up either on the pc or another console (PS3) sooner or later. What with EA's obsession with porting games to every format known to man.

I already own a decent highend pc and a Macbook Pro for my first person shooter and WoW needs. (Sorry, I do not like first person shooters on consoles. With the possible exception of Metroid Prime.)
I also own a Wii for just chilling out, collecting a few stars on Mario Galaxy etc.

So, yeah.. convince me to buy one or the other. There are probably other points etc, but those are the ones that come to my mind.

PSN | Steam
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
GrimReaper on
«1

Posts

  • MichaelLCMichaelLC In what furnace was thy brain? ChicagoRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Well, can't argue with the "It's Sony" part, cause if you hate them and their racial, stupid, insulting ads, don't buy their products.

    I'll say I was immpressed with the XBox Marketplace. Played with it for a few minutes at my sister's house. A lot more than what Sony has in terms on non-game content.

    I'm still amazed at the PS3s abilities, though. The fact that it has Bluetooth and I can use BT keyboards and mice make me think of it as more of a HTPC than a "game console." Don't know if it's the same for the XBox, but I can plug in a thumb drive or ext. HD, and load up pics, video, etc. Pretty cool.

    Game-wise, I went the PS route this time because last-gen it had more exclusinves, but I don't think that's really the case for either this time around. A lot more developers/publishers seem to be pushing out multi-platform titles. If that's good or not, I couldn't say. Obviopusly you won't be playing Halo title on a PS in the near future.

    MichaelLC on
  • RuzanRuzan Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Bah! Blueray is the ship that never set sail and so it sits in the harbor. Its pretty, but its also pretty damn worthless.


    Score one vote on your list for 360.

    Ruzan on
    If you say "plz" because it is shorter than "please" then I'll say "no" because it is shorter than "yes".
  • mugginnsmugginns Jawsome Fresh CoastRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Xbox Live is really pretty cheap. I recently got a 13 month card for 3 bucks a month. RROD isn't really a huge issue anymore, especially if you buy a new box. 3 year warranty ++.

    I'd go with a 360 myself, but I can't really see myself playing anything on PS3 until MGS4 comes out, and I don't even really like the MGS series.

    mugginns on
    E26cO.jpg
  • Cynic JesterCynic Jester Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    The chance of you seeing Mass Effect on PS3? One big fat 0. Microsoft co-funded and published it. Something tells me they have something written like "No fucking way in hell is this getting ported to the PS3" in their agreement. And while it is bound to end up on the PC, I wouldn't hold my breath. Early 2009 maybe.

    And while planning ahead is fine, the difference in the libraries right now is huge. While the PS3 is gaining with games like Ratchet and Uncharted, I'd still pick up a 360 for the larger library.

    The JRPG argument is the only one I'm really torn on, because I loves me some japanese grindfests, but so far the only one for PS3 that I really want is FFXIII and even then, I'm torn, because FFXII wasn't exactly the highlight of the series.

    If you are planning on buying one of them within the next 3 months, I'd go with an XBox. After that though, it'll depend on what games have been announced/released for each and judging based on that.

    Plus, Xbox 360 has Settlers and Carcassone on live. So much fun.

    Cynic Jester on
  • RubickRubick Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'm getting an XBOX 360, so therefore you should as well.

    Just take a look at the library and see which games appeal to you.

    Rubick on
  • Nitsuj82Nitsuj82 Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Ruzan wrote: »
    Bah! Blueray is the ship that never set sail and so it sits in the harbor. Its pretty, but its also pretty damn worthless.


    Score one vote on your list for 360.

    What are you talking about?! I'm totally still rocking my Laserdisks and MiniDisks!!! Sony is the king of instantly unsupported media. (UMD included)

    To the OP though, I've got the 360 and Wii, and do eventually plan to buy a PS3. I stagger the purchase of the consoles and have since the last generation. Why? Well because you can always find compelling reasons to purchase ANY of the consoles.

    Plus, the PS3 is dead to me until GT5 comes out. So I figure I have another couple years at LEAST.

    Nitsuj82 on
    Your sig is too tall. -Thanatos
    Nitsuj82.png
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I've got a 360, and my neighbor has a PS3, so I've had a lot of hands on time with both of them.

    First off, the PS3 is the better system hardware wise. There's just no arguing this. It's much more attractive visually in terms of graphics, menus, etc.

    The 360 is far less complicated. The Blade menu is easy to navigate and has few, if any, glitches. Live is definately worth the investment, and while it might not be free like Sony's online experience, it's very, very cheap (compared to an MMO, or a starbucks coffee) and it's well maintained. The marketplace is great, especially when you don't feel like going to the video store late at night when it's all cold outside and you just want to watch a movie or catch last weeks episode of __________ . The games are a lot of fun.

    Also, the 360 does have some rpg's available, and it's catering to the market more than it used to. Blue Dragon is a great traditional JRPG, and Eternal Sonata is a lot of fun as well.

    I think in a couple of years the PS3 definately has the potential to become a great system, but for the immediate future, and the life of the console itself, I'm with the 360.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Ruzan wrote: »
    Bah! Blueray is the ship that never set sail and so it sits in the harbor. Its pretty, but its also pretty damn worthless.

    I don't see how having a built-in hi-def dvd player is a strike against a console. o_O

    Xbox 360 has a much deeper game library, and the xbox network seems a whole heck of a lot better than the PS3 network (my experience from warhawk and resistance was kinda frustrating).

    I have a PS3, so maybe it's just a "grass is greener" thing.

    Most of the time it's on it's playing media (I don't need a standalone cd or dvd player anymore), most gaming I do on it is single player (GH3, PS2 rpgs and rhythm games) or local multiplayer (Street Fighter). My friends who have 360's are always on xbox live. And FF13 is coming out in what? '09? Plenty of time to save up if that's the title you're waiting for.

    Djeet on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Djeet wrote: »
    Ruzan wrote: »
    Bah! Blueray is the ship that never set sail and so it sits in the harbor. Its pretty, but its also pretty damn worthless.

    I don't see how having a built-in hi-def dvd player is a strike against a console. o_O

    Xbox 360 has a much deeper game library, and the xbox network seems a whole heck of a lot better than the PS3 network (my experience from warhawk and resistance was kinda frustrating).

    I have a PS3, so maybe it's just a "grass is greener" thing.

    Most of the time it's on it's playing media (I don't need a standalone cd or dvd player anymore), most gaming I do on it is single player (GH3, PS2 rpgs and rhythm games) or local multiplayer (Street Fighter). My friends who have 360's are always on xbox live. And FF13 is coming out in what? '09? Plenty of time to save up if that's the title you're waiting for.

    Tell that to your laserdisc collection.

    Honestly, in terms of investment, the 360 is the way to go. You can get a 360 and and the HD player for about the price of a PS3 (depending) if that's what is holding you back. The game library and on-line support clearly goes 360's way.

    As for long term... who knows. The fact is, developers for Sony exclusively are more likely to port to the 360 then vice versa, simply because so many developers are losing money on the 360. Long term prospects don't look that great, honestly... there's still time, but it really seems Sony lost this round.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Sentry wrote: »
    Tell that to your laserdisc collection.

    Ahh the format war thing. Has anyone given a cogent reason as to why there must be a winner; given that Microsoft (maybe Toshiba too?) and Sony are both willing to pour money into the formats, and netflix will rent you either, where is there the pressure for there to be a clear "winner"?

    Djeet on
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    So, i've noticed that you can change the output resolution of the 360. Does it actually run the games at the resolution you set or does it simply resize the rendered output video?

    I remember reading about Halo 3 running at some funky resolution regardless of what setting you used or something. (note, I don't care for console FPS', this is merely something I read a bit ago)

    So, if I buy some widescreen or normal aspect ratio monitor and connect the 360 via a hdmi->dvi adapter will it run the games actually at say 1280x1024 (for example) rather than (for arguments sake) 640x512 then resize to 1280x1024.

    Also, same questions for the PS3.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • RocketSauceRocketSauce Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    The RRoD isn't really an issue in the newest 360s. They run more quietly (still kinda annoying), and have HDMI. So you shouldn't worry about the hardware.

    You really should look at the games. Take a look at all of the titles you would be interested in getting with each system, and look at some of the ones coming out in the future.

    I had an Xbox, so I stuck with it and got the 360, and am glad I did. It's got some great games on it, and Live is the king of the hill in online console gaming right now.

    RocketSauce on
  • SteveSSteveS Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I had 2 360's that had to be returned, which soured me to that system for the time being. I picked up a PS3 and have been happy with it. The prices around here are pretty close, so that wasn't an issue. Take a look at what is out and what is on the horizon. All the stuff that I am reading says that it is way to early to tell if there is a clear winner and there are plenty of people that are saying _____ will be the winner, so it is hard to make a long term decision.

    SteveS on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Djeet wrote: »
    Sentry wrote: »
    Tell that to your laserdisc collection.

    Ahh the format war thing. Has anyone given a cogent reason as to why there must be a winner; given that Microsoft (maybe Toshiba too?) and Sony are both willing to pour money into the formats, and netflix will rent you either, where is there the pressure for there to be a clear "winner"?

    The pressure is coming from the consumer. You can tell because no one is buying either format.

    Sony has a long history of losing these things, but you never know....

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    SteveS wrote: »
    I had 2 360's that had to be returned, which soured me to that system for the time being. I picked up a PS3 and have been happy with it. The prices around here are pretty close, so that wasn't an issue. Take a look at what is out and what is on the horizon. All the stuff that I am reading says that it is way to early to tell if there is a clear winner and there are plenty of people that are saying _____ will be the winner, so it is hard to make a long term decision.

    Well, everyone knows the Wii is the clear winner. I'm after a 360 or PS3 for the kind of games that simply won't appear on the Wii. I guess you could say i'm after the runner-up. :P

    It's still a tough decision though, everytime I think "oh yeah.. the 360 has this over the PS3" then I think "oh yeah, but all the JRPG's you like will be on the PS3 next year", I don't know.. I suppose for a lot of the JRPG's they're probably gonna be switching from the PS3 to the Wii as their platform of choice. But I don't know that for certain, it's not like some big JRPG house has been announcing all their big titles will be on the Wii from now on, that's mostly (il)logical deduction.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    SteveS wrote: »
    I had 2 360's that had to be returned, which soured me to that system for the time being. I picked up a PS3 and have been happy with it. The prices around here are pretty close, so that wasn't an issue. Take a look at what is out and what is on the horizon. All the stuff that I am reading says that it is way to early to tell if there is a clear winner and there are plenty of people that are saying _____ will be the winner, so it is hard to make a long term decision.

    Well, everyone knows the Wii is the clear winner. I'm after a 360 or PS3 for the kind of games that simply won't appear on the Wii. I guess you could say i'm after the runner-up. :P

    It's still a tough decision though, everytime I think "oh yeah.. the 360 has this over the PS3" then I think "oh yeah, but all the JRPG's you like will be on the PS3 next year", I don't know.. I suppose for a lot of the JRPG's they're probably gonna be switching from the PS3 to the Wii as their platform of choice. But I don't know that for certain, it's not like some big JRPG house has been announcing all their big titles will be on the Wii from now on, that's mostly (il)logical deduction.

    The problem is, you shouldn't be buying a console for what might come out down the road. If you want one now, buy it for whats out now... if you don't want one now, then just wait on it. Buying for the future will just lead to disappointment and sadness.

    That, and I think square-enix is going to be releasing something on 360... that's what I heard anyway.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Sentry wrote: »
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    SteveS wrote: »
    I had 2 360's that had to be returned, which soured me to that system for the time being. I picked up a PS3 and have been happy with it. The prices around here are pretty close, so that wasn't an issue. Take a look at what is out and what is on the horizon. All the stuff that I am reading says that it is way to early to tell if there is a clear winner and there are plenty of people that are saying _____ will be the winner, so it is hard to make a long term decision.

    Well, everyone knows the Wii is the clear winner. I'm after a 360 or PS3 for the kind of games that simply won't appear on the Wii. I guess you could say i'm after the runner-up. :P

    It's still a tough decision though, everytime I think "oh yeah.. the 360 has this over the PS3" then I think "oh yeah, but all the JRPG's you like will be on the PS3 next year", I don't know.. I suppose for a lot of the JRPG's they're probably gonna be switching from the PS3 to the Wii as their platform of choice. But I don't know that for certain, it's not like some big JRPG house has been announcing all their big titles will be on the Wii from now on, that's mostly (il)logical deduction.

    The problem is, you shouldn't be buying a console for what might come out down the road. If you want one now, buy it for whats out now... if you don't want one now, then just wait on it. Buying for the future will just lead to disappointment and sadness.

    That, and I think square-enix is going to be releasing something on 360... that's what I heard anyway.


    The already released project sylpheed. It might not be a jrpg, but it sure as hell brought back the wing commander style shooter from days of yore.... complete with final fantasy quality cutscenes between the missions.

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    -You aren't interested in shooters or MMO's
    -You don't want to pay for Live (although this is not really a big deal, it's still roughly a game a year)
    -You like JRPG's

    Those 3 point towards PS3. It looks like you only have one real reason listed for 360. (That being Mass Effect obviously)

    I have a PS3. While there is a list of games that I really want to play on 360, I have enough for my PS3 that I already don't have enough time to do them all.

    If we only look at exclusives:
    -Warhawk (Not an FPS, plays kinda like Battlefield, and it is really good)
    -Uncharted
    -Heavenly Sword
    -Ratchet & Clank (seriously, fuckawesome good)
    -Folklore
    -Motorstorm

    Will keep you busy for a while. Add in the multiplatform games (Assassin's Creed, Guitar Hero/Rock Band, etc etc) and you have more than enough games to play.

    Is Mass Effect really the only game that you want for 360? Because seriously the software list is what you should be looking at. (Dead Rising, Crackdown, XBLA games maybe?)

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I am interested in MMO's if they're good. (for example I play World of Warcraft on the pc. well MMORPG)

    I have heard of good things about R&C.

    So, from my understanding you can use usb/bluetooth keyboards and mice with the PS3 and also external usb hard drives? (I have a couple of spare IDE drives kicking around, I could buy a external enclosure usb thing to use them) I think I heard you can replace the internal hard drive or something as well?

    Can you use the external drive for game saves etc?

    Also, same for the 360. From what I can tell it does not have bluetooth. If I were to buy the arcade or something could I then use one of my 120GB IDE drives in an external usb enclosure to store my saves/act as the normal hard drive?

    For example, say I buy the arcade and connect an external hard drive.. would games like say Mass Effect cache their game data to avoid certain problems?

    EDIT: If you can use an external hard drive to store your saves and cache game data on the 360 then i'll probably buy a 360 arcade, external drive enclosure and a monitor.

    Talking of which should I be aiming for a specific monitor resolution? Should I aim for the 1280x720 resolution? I'm still not sure about the whole resolution thing, does setting the resolution on the 360 set it to actually render the video at that resolution or does it simply scale the output video to your desired resolution?

    Also, I don't necessarily hate shooters. I just get annoyed by having to play fps shooters with joypads. (if you can play say resistance fall of man with a bluetooth/usb keyboard+mouse that'd be pretty cool)

    EDIT2: A google search says no, external drives can only be used to store music etc. Which sucks. I'd have to get something like the premium which puts the 360 back onto an equal footing with the PS3.

    EDIT3: A quick google indicates the core/arcade has the ability to add the hard drive unit thing to it.. so in theory I could use one of my spare 3.5" sata drives with this. Not only would it work out much cheaper but the 360 would use a much faster hard drive instead of a slower laptop 2.5" drive.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    For example, say I buy the arcade and connect an external hard drive.. would games like say Mass Effect cache their game data to avoid certain problems?
    No, sadly. MS has established a policy stating that 360 games cannot rely on the presence of the hard drive, because they are selling versions of the console that have no hard drive. I don't think game developers even have the option of creating a cache file on the hard drive when one is present, which is really unfortunate. I will say this however: Mass Effect is so good, I find myself completely willing to overlook the texture pops you see now and then. YMMV.

    Also, if you're just buying the 360 now, there's two years' worth of games to explore. I'm not a fan of console shooters either, and yet I've played and finished GRAW, RB6 Vegas, and Gears of War. The single player campaigns for all three are quite good, but they really shine in co-op play. I still can't stand to play competitively with the gamepad, which is why I play TF2 on my PC, but I'd say those games are still worth a look for their single player and co-op modes. I still play co-op RB6 Vegas with friends from time to time.

    Something else you might want to consider. The 360 has sold over 13 million units thus far. The PS3 has sold less than half that number. The latest NPD data has that gap growing, not shrinking. The PS3 is selling well overseas, but in the US market (which is the largest by far), it's being outsold heavily. While there's still a chance that this can be turned around, as time goes on it becomes more and more likely that "must have" 3rd-party PS3 exclusives will start turning into multiplatform titles, or even 360 exclusives, because no publisher wants to cut themselves off from the majority of the high def market if they can help it.

    For example, at one point Assassin's Creed was on track to become a PS3 exclusive, but that changed when Ubisoft saw the console sales numbers. If the PS3 doesn't get an absolutely ginormous title to turn the tide on sales, it's on track to become this generation's GameCube in terms of 3rd party support. I don't mean that to be disparaging towards the PS3, it's obviously not the same situation on the technology side, and the PS3 will probably be the place to find JRPGs (though Square-Enix's Last Remnant is going to be multiplatform). But you cannot deny that as the 3rd-place system in terms of units sold, the PS3 is seriously behind the eight-ball in terms of 3rd-party support. Personally, I wouldn't consider buying a PS3 until I saw it consistently outselling the 360 for several consecutive months.

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    For example, say I buy the arcade and connect an external hard drive.. would games like say Mass Effect cache their game data to avoid certain problems?
    No, sadly. MS has established a policy stating that 360 games cannot rely on the presence of the hard drive, because they are selling versions of the console that have no hard drive. I don't think game developers even have the option of creating a cache file on the hard drive when one is present, which is really unfortunate. I will say this however: Mass Effect is so good, I find myself completely willing to overlook the texture pops you see now and then. YMMV.

    Hold on, so what you're essentially saying is that the hard drive isn't actually used for any real effect?

    That's insane, are you sure on this? I mean games like Oblivion must have some awful problems if that's the case. Constantly loading textures etc from a medium significantly slower than a hard drive would I doubt help. Data caching to the hard drive would help boost loading textures etc massively.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    Also, I don't necessarily hate shooters. I just get annoyed by having to play fps shooters with joypads. (if you can play say resistance fall of man with a bluetooth/usb keyboard+mouse that'd be pretty cool)

    You cannot do this with RFOM, though you might could get the fragFX which is a PS peripheral which maps the right thumbstick to a mouse-plus-pad-type controller, and the left thumbstick is turned into a kinda nunchuk thing (http://www.splitfish.com/). It's kinda a hack really. I think the onus is on the game developer to support keyboard and mouse (not sony) so games may or may not support.

    Supposedly UT3 supports keyboard and mouse but I haven't picked it up yet so don't know for sure.

    Also hard drive upgrades are supported on PS3 (sony has a tutorial on how to do it). I think you can only store media on external hard drives connected to the PS3 (not game saves).

    Djeet on
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    Hold on, so what you're essentially saying is that the hard drive isn't actually used for any real effect?

    That's insane, are you sure on this? I mean games like Oblivion must have some awful problems if that's the case. Constantly loading textures etc from a medium significantly slower than a hard drive would I doubt help. Data caching to the hard drive would help boost loading textures etc massively.
    I didn't say it's not used for anything, I said it's not used for texture caching. The hard drive is used for save games, console settings, and downloads. For example, if I download the 1GB demo for a game, it goes on the hard drive. However, as far as I'm aware, no disc-based game is currently able to create a cache file on the hard drive to store textures. I'm hoping MS will change this policy, given the memory limitations of the system. I know they have already made exceptions to some of their policies. MMOs are allowed to require a hard drive now, for example, and the XBLA size limitation has been raised now that larger memory cards are available. It would really make sense to allow games to optionally create a texture cache on an HD when one is present, but right now they don't seem to allow it. I haven't played Oblivion on the 360, so I don't know if it has loading or texture pop issues, but you can definitely notice it in Mass Effect from time to time. Like I said, it doesn't detract from my enjoyment of the game, but it's there.

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    MGS 4 (MGS2 left a sour taste in my mouth and as such I skipped MGS3.. I should probably get MGS3)

    You really should play MGS3, it's an amazing game. Especially if you are planning to play MGS4.

    Right now the 360 is kicking the crap out of the PS3. A year or two from now? It's really hard to say. With games getting delayed or canceled, with new games coming out of nowhere and with everyone's porting zeal it's rather hard to say.

    Inquisitor on
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Djeet wrote: »
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    Also, I don't necessarily hate shooters. I just get annoyed by having to play fps shooters with joypads. (if you can play say resistance fall of man with a bluetooth/usb keyboard+mouse that'd be pretty cool)

    You cannot do this with RFOM, though you might could get the fragFX which is a PS peripheral which maps the right thumbstick to a mouse-plus-pad-type controller, and the left thumbstick is turned into a kinda nunchuk thing (http://www.splitfish.com/). It's kinda a hack really. I think the onus is on the game developer to support keyboard and mouse (not sony) so games may or may not support.

    I got one of the beta test versions, and it sucks. If the sensitivity is high enough to be usable as a mouse (i.e. what you would have it on if you were playing a PC game) it stutters like a motherfucker.

    Haven't finished reading the rest of the thread but I wanted to throw this in there.

    As far as PS3 hard drives: The stock unit is very easy to replace, exactly the same as changing the drive on a laptop. Uses a standard 2.5" laptop drive. You can use an external HDD for any sort of media, as well as backing up any save/game data (with a few restrictions, for instance Rock Band saves can't be copied). In addition if you want to go crazy you can do this.

    I have a 60gb launch model, have downloaded everything except the sports titles, and have 13gb left, FYI.

    (Oh and you simply cannot say enough good things about R&C)

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    Djeet wrote: »
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    Also, I don't necessarily hate shooters. I just get annoyed by having to play fps shooters with joypads. (if you can play say resistance fall of man with a bluetooth/usb keyboard+mouse that'd be pretty cool)

    You cannot do this with RFOM, though you might could get the fragFX which is a PS peripheral which maps the right thumbstick to a mouse-plus-pad-type controller, and the left thumbstick is turned into a kinda nunchuk thing (http://www.splitfish.com/). It's kinda a hack really. I think the onus is on the game developer to support keyboard and mouse (not sony) so games may or may not support.

    I got one of the beta test versions, and it sucks. If the sensitivity is high enough to be usable as a mouse (i.e. what you would have it on if you were playing a PC game) it stutters like a motherfucker.

    Haven't finished reading the rest of the thread but I wanted to throw this in there.

    As far as PS3 hard drives: The stock unit is very easy to replace, exactly the same as changing the drive on a laptop. Uses a standard 2.5" laptop drive. You can use an external HDD for any sort of media, as well as backing up any save/game data (with a few restrictions, for instance Rock Band saves can't be copied). In addition if you want to go crazy you can do this.

    I have a 60gb launch model, have downloaded everything except the sports titles, and have 13gb left, FYI.

    (Oh and you simply cannot say enough good things about R&C)

    That's one of the things I like about the PS3, the tweakbility aspects.. like how you can run linux on it. (plus I hear work has begun on XBMC being ported to linux to run on PS3 Linux)

    Decisions, decisions.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    That's one of the things I like about the PS3, the tweakbility aspects.. like how you can run linux on it. (plus I hear work has begun on XBMC being ported to linux to run on PS3 Linux)

    Decisions, decisions.

    I had a thread in the old stupid tech board asking if there was anything useful to do with PS3 Linux... and nobody could come up with anything. Although this XBMC thing sounds like a neat acronym, what is that?

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    That's one of the things I like about the PS3, the tweakbility aspects.. like how you can run linux on it. (plus I hear work has begun on XBMC being ported to linux to run on PS3 Linux)

    Decisions, decisions.

    I had a thread in the old stupid tech board asking if there was anything useful to do with PS3 Linux... and nobody could come up with anything. Although this XBMC thing sounds like a neat acronym, what is that?

    http://www.xboxmediacenter.com/

    The best homebrew software there is, it puts all other media center software to shame.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    Djeet wrote: »
    You cannot do this with RFOM, though you might could get the fragFX which is a PS peripheral which maps the right thumbstick to a mouse-plus-pad-type controller, and the left thumbstick is turned into a kinda nunchuk thing (http://www.splitfish.com/). It's kinda a hack really. I think the onus is on the game developer to support keyboard and mouse (not sony) so games may or may not support.

    I got one of the beta test versions, and it sucks. If the sensitivity is high enough to be usable as a mouse (i.e. what you would have it on if you were playing a PC game) it stutters like a motherfucker.

    Sorry to hear that, I wanted to pick one up. Sounds like how the EdgeFX (PS2 version) plus the PS2/PS3 adapter worked in RFOM. It kinda worked, but only well enough for you to spastically run around before you got owned.

    Djeet on
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    There were other issues with it as well. Really it was a fantastic idea, and it felt to me like it was a problem with the control inputs rather than the controller itself. (Although ergonomically speaking it wasn't up to par there either)

    @Grimm: Neat. Might be a reason for Linux then.

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    For the foreseeable future (everything that's even been announced), there's really no question that a 360 is the console to own. The exclusives are more plentiful and are of higher quality, and the multi-platforms routinely get shafted when it comes to putting them on the PS3. My roommate owns a PS3, and we both own CoD4, and the free servers on PS3 drop him one out of every four games. Yeah, it sucks to pay for online, but the cheapest plan is like $4 a month. So my recommendation is 360.

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    For the foreseeable future (everything that's even been announced), there's really no question that a 360 is the console to own. The exclusives are more plentiful and are of higher quality

    MGS4
    FFXIII/VSXIII
    Little Big Planet
    Killzone 2
    Dark Sector
    The Agency
    Home
    GT5/Prologue
    Unnamed Rockstar exclusive

    Just off the top of my head.
    (BTW I'm not trying to be a fanboy troll here - I've been considering a 360, and if you could name a similar list of exclusives I'd appreciate it)

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    MGS4
    FFXIII/VSXIII
    Little Big Planet
    Killzone 2
    Dark Sector
    The Agency
    Home
    GT5/Prologue
    Unnamed Rockstar exclusive

    Just off the top of my head.
    (BTW I'm not trying to be a fanboy troll here - I've been considering a 360, and if you could name a similar list of exclusives I'd appreciate it)
    This site has a pretty big list, though offhand I couldn't say how accurate it is. It's at least up to date, and bonus points to them for including links to the historical versions, so you can track the changes over time. According to their list, the 360 has 100 exclusives to the PS3's 52, although their definition of "exclusive" means "exclusive to consoles". 39 of the 100 360 titles are also on PC, so if you've got a gaming PC, then the PS3 and 360 aren't too far apart. Other interesting tidbits: only 7 released PS3 games on Metacritic with a score of 75 or higher vs. 28 for the 360. That's the overall "quality" factor Boman was referring to. Sony hasn't had much luck with their first-year crop of 3rd-party titles, basically, though that's pretty common in any console's first year.

    The most interesting thing to me is the number of Wii exclusives, though. The Wii went from trailing the 360 to leading by a significant margin between June and now. That's publishers shifting their development focus in the wake of the Wii's strong sales. Next year should be a bumper crop for Wii titles, though how many of them are worthwhile really depends on how well 3rd-party developers make use of the motion controls, I'm guessing.

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    So, I have my old CRT (VGA obviously) kicking around doing nothing. If I connected it up to a 360 or PS3 would the 360/PS3 automatically find the correct refresh rate or would it use the "safe" headache inducing 60Hz?

    EDIT: If I buy the 360 Arcade will I be missing out on anything in-particular? Down the line I can always buy the 20GB/120GB addon anyway if it's needed.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    So, I have my old CRT (VGA obviously) kicking around doing nothing. If I connected it up to a 360 or PS3 would the 360/PS3 automatically find the correct refresh rate or would it use the "safe" headache inducing 60Hz?
    I'm not 100% certain, but I think the official VGA adapter only does 60Hz, which is kind of unfortunate.
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    EDIT: If I buy the 360 Arcade will I be missing out on anything in-particular? Down the line I can always buy the 20GB/120GB addon anyway if it's needed.
    Well, you'd effectively be missing out on most of the downloadable stuff on Live. There's a lot of good stuff on there, movies, demos, Live Arcade games, downloadable content (Bioshock has a free content addon out now, for example), etc. With just a memory card, some of the movies and most of the demos would be unavailable to you. Actually, I'm not even sure if the memory card would have enough bandwidth to play movies that do fit on it. If you end up deciding to get a hard drive down the road, I think you end up paying more in total. My recommendation would be to avoid the Arcade version and just get one with the HD from the get-go.

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    So, I have my old CRT (VGA obviously) kicking around doing nothing. If I connected it up to a 360 or PS3 would the 360/PS3 automatically find the correct refresh rate or would it use the "safe" headache inducing 60Hz?
    I'm not 100% certain, but I think the official VGA adapter only does 60Hz, which is kind of unfortunate.
    GrimReaper wrote: »
    EDIT: If I buy the 360 Arcade will I be missing out on anything in-particular? Down the line I can always buy the 20GB/120GB addon anyway if it's needed.
    Well, you'd effectively be missing out on most of the downloadable stuff on Live. There's a lot of good stuff on there, movies, demos, Live Arcade games, downloadable content (Bioshock has a free content addon out now, for example), etc. With just a memory card, some of the movies and most of the demos would be unavailable to you. Actually, I'm not even sure if the memory card would have enough bandwidth to play movies that do fit on it. If you end up deciding to get a hard drive down the road, I think you end up paying more in total. My recommendation would be to avoid the Arcade version and just get one with the HD from the get-go.

    Can't I just put one of my spare hard drives in a usb external caddy and use that to store any movies/music on?

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I thought 360's would only accept the special HDD attachment?

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    I thought 360's would only accept the special HDD attachment?
    This says otherwise. Can anyone who owns a 360 and has an external USB hard drive confirm?

    EDIT: The link had possible dodgy stuff on there, so i've removed the link.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
  • vonPoonBurGervonPoonBurGer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Lord Yod wrote: »
    I thought 360's would only accept the special HDD attachment?
    As far as I'm aware, only specifically branded HDs will work in the HD slot on the side of the console, and only HDs plugged into the side of the console can be used for Live content (to prevent someone from pirating that content, I suppose). You can connect a separate HD via the USB ports, but you won't be able to download any Live content on to it, and it cannot be used for backwards compatibility software, system updates, etc. What you can do with it is store things like MP3s or WMVs for playback on the 360, but it seems to me that using the Windows Media Center Extender would be easier and cheaper.

    Here's something interesting I found while googling on this subject. According to this MS KnowledgeBase article, the "official" hard drives include 4GB allocated for "game title caching," which was news to me. If that's the case, it really begs the question... Is Mass Effect using that cache poorly, or just not using it at all??

    vonPoonBurGer on
    Xbox Live:vonPoon | PSN: vonPoon | Steam: vonPoonBurGer
  • GrimReaperGrimReaper Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    According to here Bioware don't use the hard drive for any caching with Mass Effect.

    GrimReaper on
    PSN | Steam
    ---
    I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
Sign In or Register to comment.