The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.

Is the video game industry going to implode?

Bang Bang Miss AmericaBang Bang Miss America Registered User regular
edited January 2008 in Games and Technology
Apart from the success story of Assasins Creed, and Halo 3 doing well (why wouldn't it?) everything else about the industry this year to me, as a gamer, has been a total bomb.

The Wii is selling like hot cakes, though it hardly caters to veteran video gamers. Yes, there are some amazing games like Mario Galaxy, though the fact that games like Catz are selling over a half a million and Zack didn't even hit 40k really depresses me. This just shows that the awful games are going to keep on flooding in, and less and less companies are going to bother with original IPs.

Whilst the Wii is selling like mad, the PS3 whilst doing improving, has nothing on the wii. It has great games...but like Uncharted barely sold anything.......again, less and less companies are going to be willing to make original IPs.

On the xbox 360 side...Assasins Creed is great, though it is not stunning like Orange Box. Assasins Creed is selling amazingly, which I appauld Ubisoft for, though its kind of sad that Orange Box in comparison is barely selling at all and stores like Game have had to reduce the price to 25 pounds to get it off the shelves.

On the PC side......Crysis and Unreal Tournament bombed. So much money went in to these games, and both are great games, though sold nothing at all....due to the fact that people were far too involved in the AAA console games, these games needing monsters of PCs to run, and despite a unified banner for PC games, PC gaming is still confusing to the general public.

Plus, we still don't have video game figures. The world of movies has so many......okay, we all know Major Nelson, Peter Moore, Cliffy B. but do the general public? No. All they see is the publisher. Who hosted the Spike VGAs? Samuel Jackson. A movie star.

Plus theres all the things like 360s RRODing, the Gamespot issue and so much more. Despite so many amazing video games coming out this season, I really think that the video game industry is going to have a crash like it did yonder ago. Original IPs are barely selling, the general public still don't have a clue about video games and HDTVs, video games cost far too much to make, and video games cost far too much. Wonder why the pre-owned industry for video games is so high? Video games are awful prices. 40 quid for a game. Awful. There needs to be serious changes, and here I will list what I think needs to happen:

1. One video game console. DVDs do well because you can just buy any DVD player, and the DVD will work. Mario, Zelda, Halo, Final Fantasy and Gran Turismo on one console would simply be astonishing. It would require so much effort from the big three (Ninty, Microsoft etc.) but the amount of revenue they would make would be sweet for them, and sweet for video gamers in the long term cause that would mean more games.

2. Video game costs reduced. Pac-man only cost 100,000 to make back in the day, whilst games now cost millions upon millions, and thats without advertising. I'd say 10 pounds per game would be a great price, and games would sell so much better that way. Also we need fair priced downloadable content. Paying money for episode 1 and shivering isles is fine with me but what the heck? Money for .jpg avatars and hats in Viva Pinata? NO.

3. More independant video game developers. Nearly all games that come out on the 360 etc. are made by huge powerhorse teams. Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft need to embrace the independant video game developers and we need to see more indie games on consoles.

4. Stamp down on shovel ware. Nintendo seal of quality? My ass. Nintendo need to stomp down on the crap that games to their consoles, so companies will have to make good games if they want to be released.

5. Universal rating system for all games on all systems, all countries, and not just video games, I mean a TOTALLY universal rating system for all media. Movies, games etc. all of them. I find it so weird the american system for rating films (I live in UK) works. It's like such a huge jump between (I think it's called Teen) to R-rated, where as over here it goes, 12+, then 15+, then 18+. There needs to be a simple, fair rating system for all countries, all video games on all consoles, all movies, all DVDs and all CDs.

Sorry if I rambled on a bit. Happy New Years!

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwyxz
Bang Bang Miss America on
«1

Posts

  • Speed RacerSpeed Racer Scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratch scritch scratchRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Every single one of your criticisms is either vague, insignificant in the grand scheme of things, or simply wrong.

    Speed Racer on
  • xWonderboyxxWonderboyx Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    I don't have too much time to reply because I'm about to head out with the wife (NEW YEARS WOOO!), but I can agree on some points. While I don't think a crash in the same sense as the one back in the 80's is due, a crash of another kind, which you hinted at is imminent.

    The crash I speak of is the crash in quality. As you said, quality, original IPs are selling like shit, while shovelware is moving like hotcakes. I don't really know who to blame, but I have to go with my wife shopping for DS games because she is the kind of person to buy a game like Catz.

    I don't really know where else to go with this post because I've got to run, but be sure I will be back for a hearty discussion. Tomorrow.

    xWonderboyx on
    shark2.jpg
    XBL - Follow Freeman
  • JCRooksJCRooks Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Oh gawd. There's just so much that's ... wrong in this post. You sound like some of the so-called "analysts" out there that have been predicting doom-and-gloom for the games industry for ages, even despite the obvious evidence otherwise.

    Sadly, I am headed off to a New Year's party so I can't dissect your little essay piece by piece. I'm sure someone else will.

    Or better yet, maybe this thread should just be locked and killed. And instead, you should head to the wonderful video game sales thread, read all 50+ pages there, give it some thought, then try again (and preferably in that thread).

    JCRooks on
    Xbox LIVE, Steam, Twitter, etc. ...
    Gamertag: Rooks
    - Don't add me, I'm at/near the friend limit :)

    Steam: JC_Rooks

    Twitter: http://twitter.com/JiunweiC

    I work on this: http://www.xbox.com
  • notagamenotagame Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Apart from the success story of Assasins Creed, and Halo 3 doing well (why wouldn't it?) everything else about the industry this year to me, as a gamer, has been a total bomb.

    The Wii is selling like hot cakes, though it hardly caters to veteran video gamers. Yes, there are some amazing games like Mario Galaxy, though the fact that games like Catz are selling over a half a million and Zack didn't even hit 40k really depresses me. This just shows that the awful games are going to keep on flooding in, and less and less companies are going to bother with original IPs.

    What? Assassin's Creed, Mass Effect, Bioshock, etc. All original IPs, or at least they are spiritual successors to old awesome IPs. There will always be innovation and new IP, but they may not be your cup of tea.
    Whilst the Wii is selling like mad, the PS3 whilst doing improving, has nothing on the wii. It has great games...but like Uncharted barely sold anything.......again, less and less companies are going to be willing to make original IPs.

    Again, this could be a PS3 problem. Assassin's Creed has no problem selling a shit ton of copies, and Mass Effect broke 1 million copies world wide in less than a month.
    On the xbox 360 side...Assasins Creed is great, though it is not stunning like Orange Box. Assasins Creed is selling amazingly, which I appauld Ubisoft for, though its kind of sad that Orange Box in comparison is barely selling at all and stores like Game have had to reduce the price to 25 pounds to get it off the shelves.

    I got the orange box for my PC, as did many of my friends. Also I don't think there was any major ad campaign for the Orange Box.
    On the PC side......Crysis and Unreal Tournament bombed. So much money went in to these games, and both are great games, though sold nothing at all....due to the fact that people were far too involved in the AAA console games, these games needing monsters of PCs to run, and despite a unified banner for PC games, PC gaming is still confusing to the general public.

    Crysis and UT3 both require monstrous PCs, especially Crysis, it will choke to death even the most expensive PC out there. They shoot themselves in the foot by making the requirement so high. You ever wonder why Blizzard games sold like hot cakes? Besides the fact that they are all fantastic games, it's because they can all be run on a piece of shit 4 year old budget PC. You are not going to get console level success with PC games because except for us nerds, nobody want to deal with all the hassle.
    Plus, we still don't have video game figures. The world of movies has so many......okay, we all know Major Nelson, Peter Moore, Cliffy B. but do the general public? No. All they see is the publisher. Who hosted the Spike VGAs? Samuel Jackson. A movie star.

    We do now, Jade Raymond.
    Plus theres all the things like 360s RRODing, the Gamespot issue and so much more. Despite so many amazing video games coming out this season, I really think that the video game industry is going to have a crash like it did yonder ago. Original IPs are barely selling, the general public still don't have a clue about video games and HDTVs, video games cost far too much to make, and video games cost far too much. Wonder why the pre-owned industry for video games is so high? Video games are awful prices. 40 quid for a game. Awful. There needs to be serious changes, and here I will list what I think needs to happen:

    Did you read the news a couple of weeks ago? More than 60% of Americans play video games, and the video game industry had surpassed the movie industry years ago. There is not going to be a crash.
    1. One video game console. DVDs do well because you can just buy any DVD player, and the DVD will work. Mario, Zelda, Halo, Final Fantasy and Gran Turismo on one console would simply be astonishing. It would require so much effort from the big three (Ninty, Microsoft etc.) but the amount of revenue they would make would be sweet for them, and sweet for video gamers in the long term cause that would mean more games.

    No. You want a console monopoly, you can have it over my cold dead body.
    2. Video game costs reduced. Pac-man only cost 100,000 to make back in the day, whilst games now cost millions upon millions, and thats without advertising. I'd say 10 pounds per game would be a great price, and games would sell so much better that way. Also we need fair priced downloadable content. Paying money for episode 1 and shivering isles is fine with me but what the heck? Money for .jpg avatars and hats in Viva Pinata? NO.

    Not going to happen. Halo 3 cost $30 million to make, at 10 pounds per game they will need to sell tens of millions of copies to make money.

    How old are you by the way? Maybe you are not old enough to remember that back in the day, a single SNES game could cost more than $100.
    3. More independant video game developers. Nearly all games that come out on the 360 etc. are made by huge powerhorse teams. Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft need to embrace the independant video game developers and we need to see more indie games on consoles.

    This I agree with. But with big companies like EA buying everybody up, it's not going to happen.

    5. Universal rating system for all games on all systems, all countries, and not just video games, I mean a TOTALLY universal rating system for all media. Movies, games etc. all of them. I find it so weird the american system for rating films (I live in UK) works. It's like such a huge jump between (I think it's called Teen) to R-rated, where as over here it goes, 12+, then 15+, then 18+. There needs to be a simple, fair rating system for all countries, all video games on all consoles, all movies, all DVDs and all CDs.

    Sure thing, maybe after you conquer the world and force everyone to go by a single standard. Other wise how will anybody make the the world's governments/companies agree to one single standard?

    notagame on
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    How did everything else bomb?
    Just over the games I've bought this year, Crackdown? skate? BioShock? Forza? Mass Effect? There's others, but I'm too lazy to think.
    Those games did not bomb. Not even slightly.

    darleysam on
    forumsig.png
  • SlicerSlicer Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    1. One video game console. DVDs do well because you can just buy any DVD player, and the DVD will work. Mario, Zelda, Halo, Final Fantasy and Gran Turismo on one console would simply be astonishing. It would require so much effort from the big three (Ninty, Microsoft etc.) but the amount of revenue they would make would be sweet for them, and sweet for video gamers in the long term cause that would mean more games.

    2. Video game costs reduced. Pac-man only cost 100,000 to make back in the day, whilst games now cost millions upon millions, and thats without advertising. I'd say 10 pounds per game would be a great price, and games would sell so much better that way. Also we need fair priced downloadable content. Paying money for episode 1 and shivering isles is fine with me but what the heck? Money for .jpg avatars and hats in Viva Pinata? NO.

    3. More independant video game developers. Nearly all games that come out on the 360 etc. are made by huge powerhorse teams. Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft need to embrace the independant video game developers and we need to see more indie games on consoles.

    4. Stamp down on shovel ware. Nintendo seal of quality? My ass. Nintendo need to stomp down on the crap that games to their consoles, so companies will have to make good games if they want to be released.

    5. Universal rating system for all games on all systems, all countries, and not just video games, I mean a TOTALLY universal rating system for all media. Movies, games etc. all of them. I find it so weird the american system for rating films (I live in UK) works. It's like such a huge jump between (I think it's called Teen) to R-rated, where as over here it goes, 12+, then 15+, then 18+. There needs to be a simple, fair rating system for all countries, all video games on all consoles, all movies, all DVDs and all CDs.

    Sorry if I rambled on a bit. Happy New Years!

    1. No competition can be a very bad thing, and I'll leave it at that.

    2. Not sure how it's going in the UK, but in the US the price jump from $50 to $60 more or less matches inflation rates (and quite frankly it's surprising that new games were $50 for so long). And while it's true that games would sell more at a greatly reduced price, I'd be willing to bet quite a bit that cutting prices in half would not give an equal return (what I mean by that is a price cut in half would probably not double the demand for games in general, which could lead to less profit). Not to mention that with the costs of high profile games nowadays, it would be very difficult to break even if they sold at a budget price.

    3. I don't own a 360, but there seems to be a fair amount of games by small developers available to purchase on Live Marketplace or whatever it's called, is there not? Steam is also good for indie developers.

    4. I agree that shovelware is annoying, but it happens on all consoles (just look at how much crap the PS2 got, for instance). The Wii is just getting an abundance of shovelware because it's been selling like hotcakes. Just gotta grin and bear with it.

    5. This is an entirely different beast compared to the rest of your points, so I think this would be better for a different thread.

    Slicer on
  • RainbowDespairRainbowDespair Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    1) If you add up all the sales from the 360 version, the PS3 version, the PC store version, and the PC download version, I daresay you'll find that The Orange Box did quite well for itself.

    2) Expecting blockbuster sales out of Zac & Wiki: Quest for Barbaros' Treasure, a game in a niche genre that had no marketing behind it and has a name and box art that screams shovelware is insane. It's not an indicator that the gaming industry is doomed, it's just an indicator that the higher ups in Capcom didn't have a lot of faith in it otherwise they would have given it the marketing push it needed to do better.

    3) We have another thread going on right now that is debating whether or not 2007 was the strongest year in gaming history. Regardless of whether or not you agree, a year that could elicit those kinds of positive opinions out of people is unlikely to result in the gaming industry imploding.

    RainbowDespair on
  • DehumanizedDehumanized Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Standardizing ratings systems sounds like a horrible, horrible idea. It's completely insensitive to differences in cultural acceptance of differing types of content.

    Dehumanized on
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    For instance, the US loves violence, hates boobs. Europe, the inverse.

    darleysam on
    forumsig.png
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    darleysam wrote: »
    For instance, the US loves violence, hates boobs. Europe, the inverse.

    Japan loves them together but not separately.

    Couscous on
  • YaYaYaYa Decent. Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Are people still pushing for a console monopoly?

    No. It's not going to happen.

    Anyway, yeah, this guy needs to check his fucking figures. This may have been the best year for gaming, not the worst, sales and quality wise. We're not in danger of anything.

    And as for personalities...Why? Why does it really matter? The only people who would really care are the hardcore like us, and we already know plenty of personalities. Shiggy, Reggie, Kaz Hirai, Peter Moore...

    YaYa on
  • nopoastingnopoasting __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    Video games are pop culture now.

    Nothing can save them.

    nopoasting on
  • BakerIsBoredBakerIsBored Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    CNN:Video game industry capitalizing on writers' strike

    As long as the writers stay on strike, the better video games gonna do :) No one wants to watch reruns :P

    BakerIsBored on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    What the hell is this?

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • FreddyDFreddyD Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    darleysam wrote: »
    For instance, the US loves violence, hates boobs. Europe, the inverse.
    But this is changing as video games get more photo realistic. Realistic boobs are a lot easier to stomach than realistic violence.

    The only immediate danger I see for the video gaming industry right now is fallout from the collapse of the Wii bubble. I'm afraid that the casual gamers brought in by the Wii are going to tire of the novelty and move on to the next new thing in electronics, making video games in general seem unfashionable and outdated.

    FreddyD on
  • DichotomyDichotomy Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Hilarious fakepost.

    ...right?

    Dichotomy on
    0BnD8l3.gif
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    The only immediate danger I see for the video gaming industry right now is fallout from the collapse of the Wii bubble. I'm afraid that the casual gamers brought in by the Wii are going to tire of the novelty and move on to the next new thing in electronics, making video games in general seem unfashionable and outdated.
    It didn't collapse for the Gameboy, DS, Playstation, etc.

    Couscous on
  • ZekZek Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    hahahahahahhahahaha

    wait, you're serious?

    Zek on
  • YaYaYaYa Decent. Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Zek wrote: »
    hahahahahahhahahaha

    wait, you're serious?

    Before I made my reply I thought for a long time if this guy was serious.

    Now I'm afraid I misjudged him.

    YaYa on
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    YodaTuna on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    Did you read the fucking press release from Blizzard? Blizzard specifically said this is NOT going to happen.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • TeeManTeeMan BrainSpoon Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Is this man living in some alternate reality? In the reality I live in, the gaming market has never been stronger. In the previous finaicial year, Australias' gaming industry cracked the AU$1b mark for the first time; up 15%.
    The Wii is the breaking records left and right in terms of hardware and software sales.
    Bioshock, Uncharted, Mass Effect are in my top 5 games of 2007; all of which are new franchises. Couple these with amazing sequels in the worlds of Call of Duty, Forza, Mario, RE4 (Wii-remake), Metroid, Halo and dozens of others, its completely out of my comphrension when looking at facts that the levels of money, and thus success, are going to turn down any time soon.

    I do not agree with any of your points.

    TeeMan on
    steam_sig.png
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    Did you read the fucking press release from Blizzard? Blizzard specifically said this is NOT going to happen.

    You think that means jack shit? They are not going to come out and say "We're going to milk our franchises to the point where you'll be playing Starcraft 2009." Activision is in charge of Blizzard now.

    YodaTuna on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Another thing Yoda. Rock Band is agreed by many to be more true to the spirit of Guitar Hero than Guitar Hero 3 is. Rock Band is also made by Harmonix and published by EA. They're not owned by Activision anymore.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • Mei HikariMei Hikari Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Well, if this isn't the cutest troll thread I've seen.

    Mei Hikari on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    Did you read the fucking press release from Blizzard? Blizzard specifically said this is NOT going to happen.

    You think that means jack shit? They are not going to come out and say "We're going to milk our franchises to the point where you'll be playing Starcraft 2009." Activision is in charge of Blizzard now.

    No, no Activision is not in charge of Blizzard now.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Pharezon wrote: »
    Another thing Yoda. Rock Band is agreed by many to be more true to the spirit of Guitar Hero than Guitar Hero 3 is. Rock Band is also made by Harmonix and published by EA. They're not owned by Activision anymore.

    That was pretty much my point. Harmonix was the soul of Guitar Hero. They took it with them to Rock Band. Then Activision gave GH3 to Neversoft, who as far as I know, has no previous music-game experience. They also added all those goofy ass bosses or whatever.

    The same thing is applied to Call of Duty. Infinity Ward is the soul of Call of Duty. They know they expect, they know what the fans expect.

    Activision could let any one of their mediocre development teams now make a game based on a Blizzard franchise. And then we'll have the same situation as CoD. Mediocre/Awful games in between awesome ones.

    YodaTuna on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    Another thing Yoda. Rock Band is agreed by many to be more true to the spirit of Guitar Hero than Guitar Hero 3 is. Rock Band is also made by Harmonix and published by EA. They're not owned by Activision anymore.

    That was pretty much my point. Harmonix was the soul of Guitar Hero. They took it with them to Rock Band. Then Activision gave GH3 to Neversoft, who as far as I know, has no previous music-game experience. They also added all those goofy ass bosses or whatever.

    The same thing is applied to Call of Duty. Infinity Ward is the soul of Call of Duty. They know they expect, they know what the fans expect.

    Activision could let any one of their mediocre development teams now make a game based on a Blizzard franchise. And then we'll have the same situation as CoD. Mediocre/Awful games in between awesome ones.

    Are you that dense? Activision does not own Blizzard.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • Spacehog85Spacehog85 Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    4. Stamp down on shovel ware. Nintendo seal of quality? My ass. Nintendo need to stomp down on the crap that games to their consoles, so companies will have to make good games if they want to be released.

    This is like the fourth post today that the OP take a shit on Nintendo. Although he does a good job of building Nintendo up whit how well its selling and lolsony, ultimately he bashes Nintendo.

    Are the guys from the sony defense force bored or something today?

    Spacehog85 on
  • Der Waffle MousDer Waffle Mous Blame this on the misfortune of your birth. New Yark, New Yark.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    This is similar to the Ubisoft Montreal/Shanghai thing with the Splinter Cell series.

    Der Waffle Mous on
    Steam PSN: DerWaffleMous Origin: DerWaffleMous Bnet: DerWaffle#1682
  • SlicerSlicer Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Spacehog85 wrote: »
    4. Stamp down on shovel ware. Nintendo seal of quality? My ass. Nintendo need to stomp down on the crap that games to their consoles, so companies will have to make good games if they want to be released.

    This is like the fourth post today that the OP take a shit on Nintendo. Although he does a good job of building Nintendo up whit how well its selling and lolsony, ultimately he bashes Nintendo.

    Are the guys from the sony defense force bored or something today?

    Uh, it's a valid complaint.

    Have you seen the sheer amount of crappy low budget games for the Wii?

    Not a pretty sight.

    Slicer on
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    Another thing Yoda. Rock Band is agreed by many to be more true to the spirit of Guitar Hero than Guitar Hero 3 is. Rock Band is also made by Harmonix and published by EA. They're not owned by Activision anymore.

    That was pretty much my point. Harmonix was the soul of Guitar Hero. They took it with them to Rock Band. Then Activision gave GH3 to Neversoft, who as far as I know, has no previous music-game experience. They also added all those goofy ass bosses or whatever.

    The same thing is applied to Call of Duty. Infinity Ward is the soul of Call of Duty. They know they expect, they know what the fans expect.

    Activision could let any one of their mediocre development teams now make a game based on a Blizzard franchise. And then we'll have the same situation as CoD. Mediocre/Awful games in between awesome ones.

    Are you that dense? Activision does not own Blizzard.

    Ok, well here's a different way of putting it. Blizzard and Activision are one company now, but they are headed up by the CEO from Activision. Ta-da.

    YodaTuna on
  • AngryAngry The glory I had witnessed was just a sleight of handRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    Did you read the fucking press release from Blizzard? Blizzard specifically said this is NOT going to happen.

    You think that means jack shit? They are not going to come out and say "We're going to milk our franchises to the point where you'll be playing Starcraft 2009." Activision is in charge of Blizzard now.

    apparently you don't know what the fuck is up. Vivendi bought activision, activision did not buy blizzard.

    Angry on
  • PharezonPharezon Struggle is an illusion. Victory is in the Qun.Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    It's useless Angry. He can't accept that Blizzard will still be able to do their own thing.

    Pharezon on
    jkZziGc.png
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Slicer wrote: »
    Spacehog85 wrote: »
    4. Stamp down on shovel ware. Nintendo seal of quality? My ass. Nintendo need to stomp down on the crap that games to their consoles, so companies will have to make good games if they want to be released.

    This is like the fourth post today that the OP take a shit on Nintendo. Although he does a good job of building Nintendo up whit how well its selling and lolsony, ultimately he bashes Nintendo.

    Are the guys from the sony defense force bored or something today?

    Uh, it's a valid complaint.

    Have you seen the sheer amount of crappy low budget games for the Wii?

    Not a pretty sight.

    I hate shovelware because I have to constantly remind people not to buy it. "Hey this game is only 20 bucks new! Sweet deal!" NOOO... However shovelware is a sign of a healthy system. Look at the PS1 and the PS2. Also by having more games you have more shelf space which means a lot to slightly less than educated people when picking out a video game system.

    YodaTuna on
  • PureauthorPureauthor Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    Another thing Yoda. Rock Band is agreed by many to be more true to the spirit of Guitar Hero than Guitar Hero 3 is. Rock Band is also made by Harmonix and published by EA. They're not owned by Activision anymore.

    That was pretty much my point. Harmonix was the soul of Guitar Hero. They took it with them to Rock Band. Then Activision gave GH3 to Neversoft, who as far as I know, has no previous music-game experience. They also added all those goofy ass bosses or whatever.

    The same thing is applied to Call of Duty. Infinity Ward is the soul of Call of Duty. They know they expect, they know what the fans expect.

    Activision could let any one of their mediocre development teams now make a game based on a Blizzard franchise. And then we'll have the same situation as CoD. Mediocre/Awful games in between awesome ones.

    Are you that dense? Activision does not own Blizzard.

    Ok, well here's a different way of putting it. Blizzard and Activision are one company now, but they are headed up by the CEO from Activision. Ta-da.

    Vivendi acquired Activision, not the other way around.

    Pureauthor on
    SS FC: 1334 0950 5927
    Platinum FC: 2880 3245 5111
  • YodaTunaYodaTuna Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Angry wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    Pharezon wrote: »
    YodaTuna wrote: »
    The only really bad thing that happened this year that I think it going to hurt the industry in the long run was the massive amount of acquisitions that happened this year. How many formerly independent studios got gobbled up this year?

    I think Activision is going to be the first company that feels the pain that this will cause. Now that they own Blizzard, I believe they will milk it for all it's worth and completely distill Blizzard's games due to frequent releases.

    Don't believe me? Look what they did to the Call of Duty franchise. They two great games made by Infinity Ward that were a decent space apart. But then they wanted to milk it. They got greedy. They gave Call of Duty 3 to Treyarch, who really isn't good at anything. It was mediocre. But the execs at Activision are going to feel vindicated by the success of CoD4. It's already old news that CoD5 is going to Treyarch again for some god forsaken reason. AND it's going back to World War 2. The whole thing should be appalling to gamers. Maybe Treyarch will get to make StarCraft 3 and release it one year after 2.

    I feel they have already taken the soul out of Guitar Hero, as anyone who has played GH3 and Rock Band can attest to.

    While I don't think the industry is going to crash, I think there will definitely be repercussions for hardcore gamers in the years to come. Quality over quantity needs to become the industry standard.

    Did you read the fucking press release from Blizzard? Blizzard specifically said this is NOT going to happen.

    You think that means jack shit? They are not going to come out and say "We're going to milk our franchises to the point where you'll be playing Starcraft 2009." Activision is in charge of Blizzard now.

    apparently you don't know what the fuck is up. Vivendi bought activision, activision did not buy blizzard.

    Yes, but Activision Blizzard, which is a division of Vivendi is headed up by the people who ran Activision, the same people who made the decisions regarding Tony Hawk, Call of Duty and Guitar Hero. While I think those decisions are detrimental to the games they release, it has made them the largest publisher in the world. Which is what Vivendi wants. They want they head guys at Activision to make them the money they way they have been.

    YodaTuna on
  • AngryAngry The glory I had witnessed was just a sleight of handRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Activision Blizzard is not blizzard. it's a consolidated name for the purposes of selling stocks. no product that blizzard releases will ever bare the name Activision Blizzard. activision has zero control over any blizzard development team or ip.

    Angry on
  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Instead of arguing about signs about an implosion, we can turn this thread into something interesting by arguing about the aftermath of a pretend implosion. Games are no longer showcased in stores. Shovelware fills landfills near to bursting. Miyamoto was drawn and quartered by order of the Japanese government. That sort of stuff.

    What are people doing now that interactive entertainment was ruined by sequels and clones? If the home market is destroyed, do arcades make a comeback?

    emnmnme on
  • AngryAngry The glory I had witnessed was just a sleight of handRegistered User regular
    edited January 2008
    we all watch survivor: new jersey.

    Angry on
Sign In or Register to comment.