The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I want to donate some money to a Katrina relief organization. Does anyone know of some reputed ones that don't guzzle money or shave some of it off, as I've heard about? Is the Red Cross a better organization to donate to instead? I have between $100-200, and I want to know that every penny is getting to someone that needs it.
Which is to say, don't worry about it. Think about the logistical and administrative expenses of not only getting aid to places but even just processing donations from a wide variety of sources from collection boxes to online credit card donations to large one-off donations from big companies.
The administrative costs are generally necessary and worth it, because they allow the organisations to process and supply much more aid than they would otherwise.
Might I ask why Katrina? I am sure there are some local organizations that could use the money more effieciently and maybe you could donate your time as well, to actually see your money at work.
I suspect any money donated to Katrina would be money thrown away...
Might I ask why Katrina? I am sure there are some local organizations that could use the money more effieciently and maybe you could donate your time as well, to actually see your money at work.
I suspect any money donated to Katrina would be money thrown away...
And why would that be?
OP: stick with the big names, there's plenty of stories around about people who've set up small charities in the wake of a number of large disasters and just kept the monies. Plus, the big ones have better logistics networks so they're actually more likely to be efficient when working inside a developed country.
The Cat on
0
kaliyamaLeft to find less-moderated foraRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
OK. Even if all organizations have overhead- which they do, there are certainly comparative advantages to be had. Google-fu provides: http://www.charitynavigator.org/
Might I ask why Katrina? I am sure there are some local organizations that could use the money more effieciently and maybe you could donate your time as well, to actually see your money at work.
I do volunteer my time locally. I hear that organizations appreciate volunteer work more than donations. However, I mention Katrina because I feel that someone without a home needs money more than someone having trouble paying the electric bill for their home.
Habitat for Humanity is quite active in New Orleans, though there's no guarantee your funds would go directly there.
Edit: Actually, you can donate directly to the Gulf recovery effort.
I think I might choose the latter. But, I'm not familiar with the organization; as The Cat said, maybe I should just stick to some big name organizations. I'm sure the organization is legitimate but it would pester me to no end to donate a substantial amount of money for it to be lost in the donation process or something petty like that.
Might I ask why Katrina? I am sure there are some local organizations that could use the money more effieciently and maybe you could donate your time as well, to actually see your money at work.
I suspect any money donated to Katrina would be money thrown away...
And why would that be?
Because of the complete clusterfuck and corruption that have plagued NO since Katrina. And most big organizations will be more than ready to take your money, but will seldom allow you to direct how it is handled.
However, I mention Katrina because I feel that someone without a home needs money more than someone having trouble paying the electric bill for their home.
And I am sure there are plenty of people locally who are homeless as well.
While I agree with meeker on avoiding donating to Katrina for the exact same reasons - if you do decide to go that route, I agree with habitat for humanity. At least that way you know the money is going directly into building supplies to make homes. They are one of the only large charities I would trust with my $$.
Posts
The administrative costs are generally necessary and worth it, because they allow the organisations to process and supply much more aid than they would otherwise.
I suspect any money donated to Katrina would be money thrown away...
Edit: Actually, you can donate directly to the Gulf recovery effort.
And why would that be?
OP: stick with the big names, there's plenty of stories around about people who've set up small charities in the wake of a number of large disasters and just kept the monies. Plus, the big ones have better logistics networks so they're actually more likely to be efficient when working inside a developed country.
I do volunteer my time locally. I hear that organizations appreciate volunteer work more than donations. However, I mention Katrina because I feel that someone without a home needs money more than someone having trouble paying the electric bill for their home.
I think I might choose the latter. But, I'm not familiar with the organization; as The Cat said, maybe I should just stick to some big name organizations. I'm sure the organization is legitimate but it would pester me to no end to donate a substantial amount of money for it to be lost in the donation process or something petty like that.
http://www.CharityNavigator.org
Because of the complete clusterfuck and corruption that have plagued NO since Katrina. And most big organizations will be more than ready to take your money, but will seldom allow you to direct how it is handled.
And I am sure there are plenty of people locally who are homeless as well.