The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
my friend had the best idea: a reverse drinking game where the candidate has to take a shot every time he says one of his too-frequent phrases
e.g. john edwards has to take a shot whenever he mentions his father, or uses the word "mill" or any variation thereof
and then by the end of the debate all of the candidates are either totally sloshed or have been forced to diversify their rhetoric, and wither outcome would be hilarious
Randall_Flagg on
0
GoslingLooking Up Soccer In Mongolia Right Now, ProbablyWatertown, WIRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
I think I might actually skip this one and head over to Pros Vs. Joes instead.
Gosling on
I have a new soccer blog The Minnow Tank. Reading it psychically kicks Sepp Blatter in the bean bag.
I'm planning to watch atleast one debate on t.v. instead of youtubing it later.
I look forward to Ron Paul saying sensible things and the other idiots responding with the regular Republican rhetoric.
I may or may not get drunk playing a drinking game to it. I haven't decided yet.
The only slightly sensible things Ron Paul says are regarding foreign policy.
I'm thinking this debate will center more on the economy.
Paul is nothing approaching sensible regarding the economy.
Eh, you know they're going to talk about balancing the budget and cutting spending while spending trillions ramping up the war.
I put forward Paul will still probably be the most rational debater.
Derrick on
Steam and CFN: Enexemander
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
I'll play the drinking game. What should the rules be? 911, terrorist, dog piling on ron paul, cutting off ron paul mid sentence, cut taxes, hillary sniping, what else?
Anyone planning on watching this tonight? I'm tempted if for no other reason than it's the Rudy 9iu11ani death watch.
I am.
I suppose I am too. I can't say I particularly care, but it's probably worth watching the development of the McCain rhetoric if he's the winner, or the self destruction if he ends up losing.
werehippy on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
Yeah man, cutting taxes on the rich makes less sense than abolishing taxes altogether. You're so right about this.
Well the popular GOP battlecry is that Democrats are tax and spend. They blow the money on "pork" which is stupid crap for their own gain. So instead of finding a way to cut out the pork, the GOP believe the best way is to cut government funding for special programs all together....so they can give tax cuts to rich people (themselves). They're literally selling poverty to working class stiffs who don't understand that they're being fleeced. The last 8 years have empirically proven Reagonomics to be a lie.
(Sinking money into Iraq hasn't helped, but considering the only way the GOP can stay in power is to play the same "be afraid of t3h turi'rists!" they can't throttle back now, which is and will be their undoing.)
Yeah man, cutting taxes on the rich makes less sense than abolishing taxes altogether. You're so right about this.
Well the popular GOP battlecry is that Democrats are tax and spend. They blow the money on "pork" which is stupid crap for their own gain. So instead of finding a way to cut out the pork, the GOP believe the best way is to cut government funding for special programs all together....so they can give tax cuts to rich people (themselves). They're literally selling poverty to working class stiffs who don't understand that they're being fleeced. The last 8 years have empirically proven Reagonomics to be a lie.
(Sinking money into Iraq hasn't helped, but considering the only way the GOP can stay in power is to play the same "be afraid of t3h turi'rists!" they can't throttle back now, which is and will be their undoing.)
Still a better situation than no taxes and a completely limited government.
Ron Paul is taking Reaganomics to it's logical extremity. If it's not working now, how does what he's doing make more sense?
Duki on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
It doesn't. Paul's problem is he sees the problems, but then he offers ridiculous solutions. You have a thorn in your palm, time to break your foot!
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
90 minutes?
Fencingsax on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
Oh man I can't wait to see what RP will ask and to whom.
No-Quarter on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
I don't know shit about Bush's plan. I just assume it won't work because well...it's a Bush plan. Can anyone explain?
No-Quarter on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
1st question: How much of Bush's ass can you kiss Mr. Romney?
Fencingsax on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
Jobs my ass, you can't get full time work in this country, you go part time until they fire you right before they are FORCED to hire you fulltime. Why? the health insurance FUCKS THEM.
"We are cursed," said Iyad Sarraj, a Gaza psychiatrist and a human rights activist. "Our leaders are either Israeli collaborators, asses, or mentally unstable."
Sounds vaguely familiar...
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
God forbid our taxes go up to fix the fucking economy.
No-Quarter on
0
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
LOL restrain spending. The trillion dollar war debt disagrees with you.
Jobs my ass, you can't get full time work in this country, you go part time until they fire you right before they are FORCED to hire you fulltime. Why? the health insurance FUCKS THEM.
You are aware that Romney was in charge of the first and only state in the country to implement a form of universal healthcare, yeah?
I don't know shit about Bush's plan. I just assume it won't work because well...it's a Bush plan. Can anyone explain?
The same plan that's been floating around (pretty close to Obama's).
$300+ to anyone that earned at least $3000 last year. $300 per child, up to $1200 per household. Expanded (temporarily) unemployment benefits and food stamps. The last was trade in exchange for some business boondoggles, bsically tax write offs for equipment and some other stuff. Price tag of about 150 billion.
werehippy on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited January 2008
We may have high corporate taxes (I disagree), but we have lots of loopholes.
Posts
Link to noise?
I look forward to Ron Paul saying sensible things and the other idiots responding with the regular Republican rhetoric.
I may or may not get drunk playing a drinking game to it. I haven't decided yet.
The only slightly sensible things Ron Paul says are regarding foreign policy.
I'm thinking this debate will center more on the economy.
Paul is nothing approaching sensible regarding the economy.
I am.
e.g. john edwards has to take a shot whenever he mentions his father, or uses the word "mill" or any variation thereof
and then by the end of the debate all of the candidates are either totally sloshed or have been forced to diversify their rhetoric, and wither outcome would be hilarious
Eh, you know they're going to talk about balancing the budget and cutting spending while spending trillions ramping up the war.
I put forward Paul will still probably be the most rational debater.
I suppose I am too. I can't say I particularly care, but it's probably worth watching the development of the McCain rhetoric if he's the winner, or the self destruction if he ends up losing.
Don't forget cutting taxes for the rich and big time corporations.
Paul IS the most rational one of them, which is hysterical/depressing at the same time.
Well the popular GOP battlecry is that Democrats are tax and spend. They blow the money on "pork" which is stupid crap for their own gain. So instead of finding a way to cut out the pork, the GOP believe the best way is to cut government funding for special programs all together....so they can give tax cuts to rich people (themselves). They're literally selling poverty to working class stiffs who don't understand that they're being fleeced. The last 8 years have empirically proven Reagonomics to be a lie.
(Sinking money into Iraq hasn't helped, but considering the only way the GOP can stay in power is to play the same "be afraid of t3h turi'rists!" they can't throttle back now, which is and will be their undoing.)
Still a better situation than no taxes and a completely limited government.
Ron Paul is taking Reaganomics to it's logical extremity. If it's not working now, how does what he's doing make more sense?
McCain is such a maverick.
The same plan that's been floating around (pretty close to Obama's).
$300+ to anyone that earned at least $3000 last year. $300 per child, up to $1200 per household. Expanded (temporarily) unemployment benefits and food stamps. The last was trade in exchange for some business boondoggles, bsically tax write offs for equipment and some other stuff. Price tag of about 150 billion.