The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

What's up guys

PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
edited April 2008 in Help / Advice Forum
Okay, so let's have a chat about H/A.

I like H/A. I'm kind of really proud of the fact that it really has helped a lot of people who wouldn't otherwise be able to ask some of the questions that get asked in here. I think it's actually helped a lot of forumers out in really legitimate ways, whether you figured out how to get into shape or fix your computer or you realized that hey, just asking girls if they want to go get some coffee actually works sometimes.

I don't think that H/A is perfect though, and we don't often have public venues made available for criticism. We try to respond to PMs, but sometimes that's difficult if we don't get to log in for a few days, or if you're really pissed off at us and you're not making your point so clearly (hint: it's hard to see your side of things sometimes).

So let's have us a talk. No one's going to get carded in this thread unless you're taking advantage of this opportunity to try to get some pointless barbs in. If you'd like to express discontent with a specific instance, it'd probably be best if you still did that via PM, but if you're willing to help us keep things calm, I can promise we'll at least give you our reasons for whatever happened. I can't guarantee that we're going to reverse anything or that you'll see sweeping change in H/A because that's kind of not the point.

The idea is that we can get a better understanding of what you guys want in H/A that you're not getting, to hear out any really good ideas you'd like to see us give a shot, and generally just to clear the air.

IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
Pheezer on
«1345

Posts

  • MegaMan001MegaMan001 CRNA Rochester, MNRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    One thing that really bugs me about this place is that a lot of people shill out a lot of information about medical topics based on either on anecdotal information or even worse "I heard this could happen. . . " It leads to a lot of threads where people will quote Wikipedia / WebMD as how some problem - no matter how small - can technically be life threatening without any real experience.

    Admittedly, to try and combat this I've changed my title to Registered Nurse and explain my background whenever I try to answer a question, but it's something that gets under my skin.

    MegaMan001 on
    I am in the business of saving lives.
  • MarcoND7MarcoND7 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    MegaMan001 wrote: »
    One thing that really bugs me about this place is that a lot of people shill out a lot of information about medical topics based on either on anecdotal information or even worse "I heard this could happen. . . " It leads to a lot of threads where people will quote Wikipedia / WebMD as how some problem - no matter how small - can technically be life threatening without any real experience.

    Admittedly, to try and combat this I've changed my title to Registered Nurse and explain my background whenever I try to answer a question, but it's something that gets under my skin.
    This is my third post, so there's not much I can complain aboot, but I agree with MegaMan001. That COULD get annoying.

    MarcoND7 on
    The author is not responsible for any bad puns, jokes, or other jackassy things. Thank you.
  • Dark MoonDark Moon Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    MegaMan001 wrote: »
    One thing that really bugs me about this place is that a lot of people shill out a lot of information about medical topics based on either on anecdotal information or even worse "I heard this could happen. . . " It leads to a lot of threads where people will quote Wikipedia / WebMD as how some problem - no matter how small - can technically be life threatening without any real experience.

    Admittedly, to try and combat this I've changed my title to Registered Nurse and explain my background whenever I try to answer a question, but it's something that gets under my skin.

    While true to an extent, the general consensus of the thread tends to be reasonable. One or two people will take the alarmist route and declare immediate medical action is required, but there are usually enough other folks around who know something (like yourself or that doctor who posts every now and then with a nice disclaimer before his post saying he's not responsible for the advice he gives) to clear up any particularly ridiculous claims before someone ends up in the ER for a cold. And really, with very, very few people educated enough to recognize some of the strange medical conditions people come here asking about it's probably better to err on the side of caution. An extra trip to the doctor is better than slowly dying while chanting, "The internet told me I'm okay..."

    I'm really happy with H/A these days. There are rarely any off-topic or unhelpful posts, and I've personally learned a great deal just by reading threads and then doing research/pulling papers trying to help the threadmaker out. My only real complaint would be the number of redundant threads recently, but with search disabled that's bound to happen and is an issue that will hopefully clear up once search comes back.

    Dark Moon on
    3072973561_de17a80845_o.jpg
  • falsedeffalsedef Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Not a direct problem with H/A, but the GT and subtech forums get a lot more technical help threads than this one. H/A could use something like subforums for technical/random and relationship/life threads, which would make it more explicit what H/A is for.

    At the moment, it feels like H/A is only for life related questions, and technical questions are misplaced.

    falsedef on
  • VThornheartVThornheart Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    falsedef wrote: »
    Not a direct problem with H/A, but the GT and subtech forums get a lot more technical help threads than this one. H/A could use something like subforums for technical/random and relationship/life threads, which would make it more implicit what H/A is for.

    At the moment, it feels like H/A is only for life related questions, and technical questions are misplaced.


    Agreed, it could use subforums for specific topics (if we want to expand on the concept).

    An added benefit would be that it'd be easy for someone with a specific specialty/knowledge to find the ones they can help out with most.
    Megaman001 wrote:
    One thing that really bugs me about this place is that a lot of people shill out a lot of information about medical topics based on either on anecdotal information or even worse "I heard this could happen. . . " It leads to a lot of threads where people will quote Wikipedia / WebMD as how some problem - no matter how small - can technically be life threatening without any real experience.

    Admittedly, I've given medical advice without having any technical credentials in the field... and I apologize if it's done harm. The two situations I can think of was one where someone had a bad ear infection and another where someone had Strep. Though I'm no expert, I know that these can be bad things if left untreated, and I expressed my non-professional but urgent opinion that they should see a doctor.

    I felt in both cases that it was important for the person to see a doctor, but indeed I'm not a professional. I imagine most people who give advice on personal relationship here aren't relationship therapists either, however.

    But I can see how an unprofessional opinion given would be frustrating to a professional, especially if it differs. We could have an honor system of prefixing advice given without proper credentials with some special tag, like "[Unofficial Advice]" or something like that.

    Part of the usefulness is that, though unofficial advice may be exaggerated or off by a bit at times, we can't know for sure that someone who's absolutely qualified to make an assessment will even show up in the forum. So we do the best we can to give the best advice we can in hopes that it will help, or at least start the discussion.

    I'd be willing to participate in such a program. I feel it's useful to get (and give) advice, even if it's not professional... but indeed, if someone steps in that has an actual qualifications or professional experience, it'd be useful to know who does and who doesn't so that the OP can choose based on that advice. (on a side note, I do try to prefix statements that I make where I'm not qualified with something along the lines of "this is merely anecdotal" or "I'm no expert at this, but from what I've researched/seen/read about...")

    VThornheart on
    3DS Friend Code: 1950-8938-9095
  • MurphyMurphy Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Well, I have to say, that even though I rarely post threads (and the couple that I did post were probably not worded right, and thus didn't get the "right" kind of responses), and even though I don't post advice that often, because I rarely feel qualified to offer it, I do really enjoy this forum, and I learn a lot from it. It and D&D are easily my two most frequented areas on the PA forums.

    While I could see the benefit to a Relationship subforum, and a Tech subforum, I think we do ok as it is. I worry that if things split up too much, that the H&A section as a whole would suffer.

    Murphy on
  • Kate of LokysKate of Lokys Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I would like to see infractions given out to people who ask for advice (almost inevitably on relationships) yet have no fucking intention at all of actually taking it. This is Help / Advice, not Validation / Ego-Boosting, but people keep wandering in and posting trainwrecks like this. I can't even tell if what's going on in there is carefully calculated emotional trolling or just the desperate nonsense of someone so far gone they can't even make sense to themselves anymore, but either way, it is three pages of people telling the OP to get counselling and making helpful suggestions about baby steps towards self-improvement, punctuated by the OP outright rejecting all of their advice and throwing in more curveballs to keep the pity coming.

    That's just one example, but there are a lot of threads like that. And I think that if respondents can be punished - and rightly so - for shitting on someone else's thread by offering useless advice, OPs should be punished if their thread was shit to begin with and violated the spirit of the forums.

    Also, I think it kind of goes without saying that the people who post here are not lawyers or doctors. Even if they were, if they were stupid enough to post saying "I am a doctor, and my professional medical opinion is that you should ignore that swelling growth and wait for it to go away!", they would just be setting themselves up for verbal and/or legal abuse when the growth turns out to be gangrene or something. It is absolutely impossible to give any sort of reasonable diagnosis over the internet. It is difficult enough, sometimes, to do that in real life. I think personal experiences and "doctor now [or at least next week, or before it gets worse, or whatever]" posts are pretty much the only acceptable responses to medical advice threads.

    Kate of Lokys on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    It's unlikely that we'd get any sort of subforum in here. We get more threads than any other forum, but our post density is way lower, i.e. we have tons of threads that get less than one page worth of posts.

    MegaMan001, I share your pain. Usually, if it's exceptionally egregious ("I have a headache" "it could be a brain tumor!") I'll throw a card, but I haven't seen anything that bad lately.

    Thanatos on
  • LewishamLewisham Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    The number of girl-threads is off the charts. Can we have a megathread for "I want to ask this girl/boy out" stuff? I mean, not the "my girlfriend is going psycho" or whatever, just the ones where the answer is always "just ask her out already, seriously, suck it up"

    Lewisham on
  • Seattle ThreadSeattle Thread Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Kate's got a point, but those seeking advice shouldn't be made to feel like they need to accept said advice at face value or suffer the consequences. It would discourage junk threads, sure, but it might also discourage those who have a genuine need.

    Besides, I can only think of two instances off the top of my head where the authors obviously didn't want to take any advice presented to them. And one was yonks ago.

    Seattle Thread on
    kofz2amsvqm3.png
  • MurphyMurphy Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Posters seeking advice definitely shouldn't feel that they are obligated to take what is offered, but I would like to see more...I'm not sure what I want to say here...consequences, I guess for those who so obviously weren't really interested in getting advice in the first place. (Ego posting, I guess).

    Murphy on
  • hoodie13hoodie13 punch bro Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Personally, I think a megathread for relationship stuff would be a bad idea. You'd have a bunch of people posting problems, and one or two may get overlooked. Besides, I've personally experienced just having my computer problem overlooked in the current computer megathread. Megathreads are fine for chatting and general discussion about stuff, but when multiple people need help with separate problems, separate threads are best.

    hoodie13 on
    PSN: HoodieThirteen
    XBL: Torn Hoodie
    @hoodiethirteen
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    falsedef wrote: »
    Not a direct problem with H/A, but the GT and subtech forums get a lot more technical help threads than this one. H/A could use something like subforums for technical/random and relationship/life threads, which would make it more explicit what H/A is for.

    At the moment, it feels like H/A is only for life related questions, and technical questions are misplaced.

    No. We're not pidgeon-holing H/A into Girl or Computer questions and there's no good reason to segment things that way. Sorry, but your idea is a bad one. If Thanatos sounds like he might be agreeing with you it's because he sucks.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • Seattle ThreadSeattle Thread Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    There's always the Dating thread in AFK...

    Seattle Thread on
    kofz2amsvqm3.png
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    I would like to see infractions given out to people who ask for advice (almost inevitably on relationships) yet have no fucking intention at all of actually taking it. This is Help / Advice, not Validation / Ego-Boosting, but people keep wandering in and posting trainwrecks like

    Nope. Never going to happen. Everyone gets to ask. If the rest of us realize they're not interested in help, they get their topic closed and they don't get to make a repeat of the same thread. No other punishments because a lot of the time, people don't realize that they're part of that category and it would be pointless to punish it anyhow because it would only deter thoughtful and considerate people who are very unlikely to fall into that category.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • MurphyMurphy Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Pheezer wrote: »
    I would like to see infractions given out to people who ask for advice (almost inevitably on relationships) yet have no fucking intention at all of actually taking it. This is Help / Advice, not Validation / Ego-Boosting, but people keep wandering in and posting trainwrecks like

    Nope. Never going to happen. Everyone gets to ask. If the rest of us realize they're not interested in help, they get their topic closed and they don't get to make a repeat of the same thread. No other punishments because a lot of the time, people don't realize that they're part of that category and it would be pointless to punish it anyhow because it would only deter thoughtful and considerate people who are very unlikely to fall into that category.

    Good point. I hadn't considered that. The threads do get closed with regularity if they aren't going anywhere, and that should be enough. If people consistently post threads that aren't really seeking advice, they don't get responded to.

    Murphy on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Lewisham wrote: »
    The number of girl-threads is off the charts. Can we have a megathread for "I want to ask this girl/boy out" stuff? I mean, not the "my girlfriend is going psycho" or whatever, just the ones where the answer is always "just ask her out already, seriously, suck it up"

    Also no. It wouldn't accomplish anything because everyone feels that their situation is special anyhow, and besides, I'm willing to be sympathetic on this topic. A lot of those threads come from dudes who have their very first girlfriend or whatever and I don't think they deserve to have what is to them a very big deal lost in the shuffle of a megathread or brushed off as "oh you're another one of those".

    Yes the threads very frequently go the exact same way, repeatedly, but you know, I've been here long enough that I'm OK with that. It's not hurting anything and if you don't like those threads, you can ignore them. They're not so frequent that they're pushing other threads off the front page before they're answered, and they aren't prevent other types of threads from being made. So they get to stay.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Murphy wrote: »
    Pheezer wrote: »
    I would like to see infractions given out to people who ask for advice (almost inevitably on relationships) yet have no fucking intention at all of actually taking it. This is Help / Advice, not Validation / Ego-Boosting, but people keep wandering in and posting trainwrecks like

    Nope. Never going to happen. Everyone gets to ask. If the rest of us realize they're not interested in help, they get their topic closed and they don't get to make a repeat of the same thread. No other punishments because a lot of the time, people don't realize that they're part of that category and it would be pointless to punish it anyhow because it would only deter thoughtful and considerate people who are very unlikely to fall into that category.

    Good point. I hadn't considered that. The threads do get closed with regularity if they aren't going anywhere, and that should be enough. If people consistently post threads that aren't really seeking advice, they don't get responded to.

    It's also quite uncommon. Of all of the worst things that happen here, bad threads happen far less than bad replies. So even if we were looking to "solve" it, there would still be bigger fish to fry. But there's nothing to solve so we're just not gonna worry about it.


    Also guys this is a pretty good mix of the sort of thing I wanted to see and the sort of thing I expected to see and you're all being very nice about it. So thanks, let's keep the ball rolling (despite me saying no to everything).

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    oh, and the doctor thing, I think I pretty much completely agree with what Dark Moon was saying. I don't really see what's going to be done about that situation, but I'm open to suggestions and if they're not too insane (let's remember this isn't a huge deal) we'll look at what the results might be.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    In my opinion, though it may not be adding much to the actual topic, I think that the H/A Forum runs pretty damn well. The mods here run a tight ship, and I appreciate each and every one of them.

    Though I may not respond in many H/A threads, I try to help out where I can. I'm sure there are many people here that appreciate everything that H/A has to offer, and I don't think anything really needs to change.

    But this is one man's opinion (Oh and a girlfriend mega-thread is a bad idea).

    urahonky on
  • MurphyMurphy Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    A girlfriend (or relationships in general) megathread would be a bad thing. If people want to chat about relationships in general, we have D&D. But people seeking specific advice should be able to command center stage (as it were) when asking a question.

    Murphy on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I pretty much love H/A the way it is. The infractions seem a bit inconsistent, but I guess you guys can't catch every fake-post made here.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • VThornheartVThornheart Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Pheezer wrote: »
    Lewisham wrote: »
    The number of girl-threads is off the charts. Can we have a megathread for "I want to ask this girl/boy out" stuff? I mean, not the "my girlfriend is going psycho" or whatever, just the ones where the answer is always "just ask her out already, seriously, suck it up"

    Also no. It wouldn't accomplish anything because everyone feels that their situation is special anyhow, and besides, I'm willing to be sympathetic on this topic. A lot of those threads come from dudes who have their very first girlfriend or whatever and I don't think they deserve to have what is to them a very big deal lost in the shuffle of a megathread or brushed off as "oh you're another one of those".

    Yes the threads very frequently go the exact same way, repeatedly, but you know, I've been here long enough that I'm OK with that. It's not hurting anything and if you don't like those threads, you can ignore them. They're not so frequent that they're pushing other threads off the front page before they're answered, and they aren't prevent other types of threads from being made. So they get to stay.

    Also, if we had a single mega-thread for it, we'd miss those gems like that one a few weeks ago where the girl was OBVIOUSLY hot and bothered for the guy, and we got to cheer him on.

    They're few and far between, but it makes me happy to cheer someone on rather than break it to him that it's just not as good as it looks. =)

    VThornheart on
    3DS Friend Code: 1950-8938-9095
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    I've not really come across anything in here that isn't just the usual price of doing business in an internet forum, tbh. There are some terrible posts, there's the occasional troll (Cardboard Tube eg. :P ), there are repeat threads that you get tired reading, there are threads where people consistently ignore posts and keep repeating the same shit, there's an occasional inconsistent moderation and so on. But like I say, these are just the expected minor annoyances of internet forums, is there really air that needs cleared? Maybe I missed I herd of drama lamas somewhere.

    All in all, I'd say on balance this is a good resource. Sure, you get dumb advice occasionally, but that's the trade off from being able to poll a massive group of people for counsel. I think anecdotal advice is often just as valid in here as professional advice and it'd be impractical and at odds with the purpose of the forum to have a panel of learned professionals who were the only people allowed to answer questions anyway.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • Dread Pirate ArbuthnotDread Pirate Arbuthnot OMG WRIGGLY T O X O P L A S M O S I SRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    This may sound crazy, but I kind of like it when little mini-debates start over advice -- as long as it's nothing like "WoW will kill your social life and you'll die alone surrounded by emptied coke bottles surrounded by your own urine" "No it wont I play 16 hours a day and I'm totally fine!!" I think it could be beneficial to the OP to read a little back and forth and I don't think it should be cracked down on as much as it is.

    Dread Pirate Arbuthnot on
  • TaGuelleTaGuelle Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Where applicable, it'd be nice to have a rule where people have to give pertinent details off the bat. Like, how old, where you live, gender, so on and forth. For instance, I remember a thread where someone asked for advice on how to deal with a speeding ticket. To me, it would reason, to list your age, WHERE YOU LIVE, what speed you were going/what was the speed limit, and if you have any previous violations. This person had only listed the speed they were going at, which did not suffice for proper advice.

    TaGuelle on
  • AldoAldo Hippo Hooray Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Sometimes people get infracted for, what seems to the untrained eye, ordinary posts. I'm sure the poster on the receiving end gets a message detailing what he did wrong and why that is wrong, but the rest of us have to second guess. This gives H/A the image of a subforum you'd better not post in unless you want to get a angry VC yelling at you and a lot of people like to make jokes about the uptight nature of the place. I think it would help this subforum if you'd post some of the "weird" infractions in the thread over in Tube's Circus as examples of what people aren't allowed to do. I'm sure there's clear logic behind everything, but sometimes it's completely lost to me.

    Aldo on
  • XaquinXaquin Right behind you!Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    This may sound crazy, but I kind of like it when little mini-debates start over advice -- as long as it's nothing like "WoW will kill your social life and you'll die alone surrounded by emptied coke bottles surrounded by your own urine" "No it wont I play 16 hours a day and I'm totally fine!!" I think it could be beneficial to the OP to read a little back and forth and I don't think it should be cracked down on as much as it is.

    this right here is what I was going to type, only this sounds better.

    Xaquin on
  • romanqwertyromanqwerty Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Id also like to see mods make a post afterwards explaining why a user was infracted for this post. Sometimes it is obvious but often it is quite confusing to me.

    PS: 3rding the thing about mini-debates

    romanqwerty on
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Allowing relevant mini-debates isn't a bad idea, but there would absolutely have to be ironclad rules on civility, name-calling, and staying on topic.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Allowing relevant mini-debates isn't a bad idea, but there would absolutely have to be ironclad rules on civility, name-calling, and staying on topic.

    There all ready is. Like, over the entire forum pretty much.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • LewieP's MummyLewieP's Mummy Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I love this forum, it amazes me how helpful people are, how you genuinely try to help each other.

    The environment is so positive - if I need help on something, I'm definitely posting here, cos you guys are fab! And you give useful advice.

    I love the mini-debates.

    LewieP's Mummy on
    For all the top UK Gaming Bargains, check out SavyGamer

    For paintings in progress, check out canvas and paints

    "The power of the weirdness compels me."
  • VThornheartVThornheart Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Aye, this forum does paint humanity in an encouraging light. I mean, where elsewhere on the internet people given anonymity end up defaming and insulting each other, we're genuinely trying to help.

    Admittedly, it's a bit addicting. This board and the PAX board are the only ones I check here now... not that the other boards are bad, but this one feels rewarding to contribute to.

    I'm definitely also a fan of mini-debates on the subject. Not many things are completely clear-cut and obvious... and sometimes it helps to educate not only the OP on the many options, but even the people in the debate.

    For example, I didn't realize just how UNDER-educated I was in the realm of finance until I got into a mini-debate about investments. That was pretty soon after I started watching the H&A forum... and the information and debate that ensued (I think it was between me and Thinatos) made me realize that I didn't know as much about finances as I thought I did. I've been reading the finance-related posts since then, along with doing my own research, in an attempt to correct the misinformation I have picked up over the years.

    Two people educated for the price of one! Not bad.

    VThornheart on
    3DS Friend Code: 1950-8938-9095
  • EggyToastEggyToast Jersey CityRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    It's already a rule, but I really don't like piggybackers. Especially necroposting piggybackers. It's hard to justify an infraction for people being humble about their problem, but I'd much prefer those to be split out and given a title of their own (even if it's something like "Piggyback from [thread]").

    The only other thing I sometimes wonder about is how people who make the threads feel about the mods responding in their threads. If pheezer says "you're an idiot," does that person freak out? If VC says a response is "just wrong" does he mean that from an infraction viewpoint, or just an opinion? A forum I visited a looong time ago used to have mods start posts with [mod hat] or similar (not an actual tag) so people knew that the person was being serious from a mod point of view. VC, Than, and pheez often have good advice, but I think sometimes people don't know when they're simply responding or when they're serious about telling people to knock it off.

    EggyToast on
    || Flickr — || PSN: EggyToast
  • RiemannLivesRiemannLives Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    My only suggestion would be a version of the rule in D&D were mods don't infract people in threads where they have been arguing. VC has handed out a few points that were completely bogus simply because people were disagreeing with him. He also is very quick to post an opinion then immediately throw out the "I will start handing out infractions if you keep talking about this" post.

    Last I checked the rules do not forbid, and in fact encourage, disagreeing / debate on the advice given in H/A. Which is the way it should be.

    Edit: Not worth further mucking up the thread with this aside after the response but no it was not ladder theory (which is, of course, absurd) nor have I ever been infracted by VC.

    RiemannLives on
    Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Allowing relevant mini-debates isn't a bad idea, but there would absolutely have to be ironclad rules on civility, name-calling, and staying on topic.

    There all ready is. Like, over the entire forum pretty much.

    True, but if the rules on debating are relaxed it becomes critical to emphasize that the other rules are still in force, so that things don't turn nasty or become personal.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    My only suggestion would be a version of the rule in D&D were mods don't infract people in threads where they have been arguing. VC has handed out a few points that were completely bogus simply because people were disagreeing with him. He also is very quick to post an opinion then immediately throw out the "I will start handing out infractions if you keep talking about this" post.

    Last I checked the rules do not forbid, and in fact encourage, disagreeing / debate on the advice given in H/A. Which is the way it should be.

    Ladder theory is explicitly disallowed in the rules, there is no cause to debate it. That's the most common circumstance in which I've done that if you don't have something particular in mind.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I think the risk of an arbitrary smackdown from on high kinda makes posting more interesting.

    Djeet on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    My only suggestion would be a version of the rule in D&D were mods don't infract people in threads where they have been arguing. VC has handed out a few points that were completely bogus simply because people were disagreeing with him. He also is very quick to post an opinion then immediately throw out the "I will start handing out infractions if you keep talking about this" post.

    When it happens you can report it and all of the mods will see your report. We're pretty good at ragging on each other (if you guys think you have it rough...) and it'll get the review it deserves. There's also the chance that you just have a handful of completely invalid opinions ("ladder theory", for instance).
    EggyToast wrote: »
    It's already a rule, but I really don't like piggybackers. Especially necroposting piggybackers. It's hard to justify an infraction for people being humble about their problem, but I'd much prefer those to be split out and given a title of their own (even if it's something like "Piggyback from [thread]").

    I do this every time I catch it because I can't stand it either. It also doesn't make it any easier for people trying to search for previous problems. If you search in thread view mode, you can go read the OP of each different problem to see if any are similar to yours. Searching through 12 pages of each of 3 different threads to find all of the different questions asked is just not something anyone will ever do.
    The only other thing I sometimes wonder about is how people who make the threads feel about the mods responding in their threads. If pheezer says "you're an idiot," does that person freak out?

    Pretty much all the time.
    If VC says a response is "just wrong" does he mean that from an infraction viewpoint, or just an opinion?

    You'd have to ask him and you'll probably need to give him a link because none of us have perfect memories. If you disagree with his reply you can ask another H/A mod. It's why there are three of us (let's face it we could probably get by with fewer if we really had to).
    A forum I visited a looong time ago used to have mods start posts with [mod hat] or similar (not an actual tag) so people knew that the person was being serious from a mod point of view. VC, Than, and pheez often have good advice, but I think sometimes people don't know when they're simply responding or when they're serious about telling people to knock it off.

    I actually remember asking Ramius once like a million years ago if we could have a restricted mod-only font colour to use this way. Like only mods can ever post in PA orange. Then you'd know when we meant it and when we were arguing. In fact, I'm going to bring this up with him again, that can't be too hard on this version of the forums.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Oh, also, I think we probably have a pretty healthy amount of debate in threads around here. Debates tend to become emotional and ego based very rapidly online so we tend to end them quickly once people have made their entrenched positions clear. If no one appears to be particularly entrenched I tend to let them go, it's just once two people have made up their minds and do not agree that we're probably just going to re-tread the same points in a more and more offensive manner until someone crosses a line they really shouldn't have.

    And to be perfectly honest, nobody likes it when someone gets banned. There are like 7 or 8 clicks to make to do that.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
This discussion has been closed.