The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

That is not brand standards- A Black Thread

Spectral SwallowSpectral Swallow Registered User regular
edited February 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
Today I was fired for using the descriptive word 'black'.

Let me set it up for you. I do(did) security work at Target and once a day I have these huddles where we talk about people we're looking for, that kind of thing. For the past month I'd been describing a lady we were looking for as 'A short black lady, with a shaved head' and then showing pictures.
Now two days ago one of the higher ups decided to take time out of their busy day and attend this huddle with the rest of the lower levels instead of me giving them a one on one. After the huddle she informed me that 'black' is an offensive word and that I should instead be using 'African American'.

Normally I go along with the stupid Target Talk(using Guest instead of customer, team member instead of employee) but on this one I told her it wasn't going to happen. You see my best friend in the whole wide world is black, he's never been to Africa, has no desire to go to Africa. He absolutely hates being called African American. Several other team members in the store(who I consider friends and are also black) feel the exact same way. I will ask them 'Hey who are we looking for' to which they'll respond, 'The black lady with the shaved head'.
So the next day during my huddle another higher up attends and again pulls the 'African American' card, to which I again refuse.
A short time later I was told to either call blacks African Americans or I'd be fired. I told them to do what they felt like they needed to do, because I was not going to bend on this one.

So today I go in do my shift and about 15 minutes til I have to leave I'm called into the HR office, she gives me this song and dance about not appealing to 'brand standards' and that you can't say 'black' in a professional manner. I pointed out that the 'brand standards' were saying 'white' instead of Caucasian, so if I were to say Caucasian I'd be in the exact same position. A point which she twice glossed over.
And so I was relieved. Over a non-offensive descriptive word.

So black is no longer socially accepted? But am I even in the right here? Opinions?

Spectral Swallow on
«1

Posts

  • SamSam Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Huge chains feel the need to control the exact air temperature, muzak, and odor of their stores, standardized across the world.

    I don't think they'd feel any differently about their robots.

    Sam on
  • The CatThe Cat Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    You weren't fired for what you think you were fired for. You were fired for defying several of your superiors and probably for making them look silly in front of their fellow workers and yours, thus undermining their authority. Whether you're right or wrong is pretty much immaterial, they just didn't want to have to deal with your sass.

    The Cat on
    tmsig.jpg
  • ChurchChurch Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Regardless of whether he was fired for saying "black" or for defying his idiotic superiors, the term "African American" is a little silly. Not because I have some hang-up with being politically correct, but because it's making an unfounded assumption, and it's inconsistent.

    Church on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • SamSam Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I really think somewhere at corporate someone decided they wouldn't want their African-American guests to hear something like "Hey John, could you show that black lady over there where the furniture section is?"

    Not that anyone would refer to a customer like that within earshot, or for any other reason than to distinguish the person in a crowd, but suits are overzealous and like to assume their team members are idiots.

    Sam on
  • ChurchChurch Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Of course. Doesn't make the blanket term "African-American" any less stupid.

    And what's with "Caucasian"? Caucasians are from the Caucasus. Most white people trace their ancestry elsewhere.

    Church on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited February 2008
    So, you didn't do something your boss wanted because it was silly? Even after repeated instructions?

    Do you just not know how to pick your fights, or were you looking to quit anyways? I'm leaning toward the latter, right now.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • Spectral SwallowSpectral Swallow Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Elki wrote: »
    So, you didn't do something your boss wanted because it was silly? Even after repeated instructions?

    Do you just not know how to pick your fights, or were you looking to quit anyways? I'm leaning toward the latter, right now.

    Like I briefly touched on before, many of the blacks in the store feel that African American is offensive. So I have to choose who I don't want to offend, the blacks who don't care if black is said, or the whites, who think they know what blacks want.

    No secret though, the way they said it did send me into defensive mode, "You'll either say 'Black' or be fired" kinda thing.

    Spectral Swallow on
  • InvisibleInvisible Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Yikes, you secretly recorded it? Even states with single-party consent laws, you could be in legal hot water. I certainly hope you checked with a lawyer before doing that.

    And no, you're pretty much in the wrong. Target has a very strong policy of crafting a reputable brand and while you may disagree with it, actively going against it and defying your supervisor's attempts to correct the situation, make your firing justifiable to me. A more reasonable approach would have been writing to corporate, documenting that both team members and guests found the term offensive and attempting to correct it that way.

    Invisible on
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    The Cat wrote: »
    You weren't fired for what you think you were fired for. You were fired for defying several of your superiors and probably for making them look silly in front of their fellow workers and yours, thus undermining their authority. Whether you're right or wrong is pretty much immaterial, they just didn't want to have to deal with your sass.

    The Cat hit it dead on.

    African American may be a stupid term (I generally use Black and it's what I hear used 99.9% of the time around here), but this is a job. You shut your mouth and do what they say, or they fire you.

    shryke on
  • VariableVariable Mouth Congress Stroke Me Lady FameRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I think we'll all agree that you were wrong as far as Target is concerned, but as far as whether or not the term is acceptable, which actually seems to be what you want to discuss, I'd say no not at all... and I think mostly everyone would agree on that point as well.

    Variable on
    BNet-Vari#1998 | Switch-SW 6960 6688 8388 | Steam | Twitch
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited February 2008
    I don't think there are many people who care about being called black or African American. Both terms are equally acceptable among 99% of African Blacks.

    I find it hard to be outraged at anyone here. Corporations just work like that. They try to cover as much ass as possible.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    If requiring you to use the words "African American" instead of "black" is the stupidest thing Target did on that day, it would be an astonishingly good day for Target.

    I don't see why you would take a stand over something so stupid and unimportant, but whatever. Also, you may very well have committed a crime by recording the conversation, which would really compound the stupid on your end. Good work.

    Thanatos on
  • Spectral SwallowSpectral Swallow Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I'm not worried about the job, at all. I have two others to fall back on(working three jobs was kinda gettin' to me).
    My thing is more on the double standard of getting in trouble for saying black instead of African American, but not white.

    It's just a general description that helps cut who you're looking for by half.

    Spectral Swallow on
  • archonwarparchonwarp Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Since the thread seems to have shifted away from whether or not you were in the wrong, I'm throwing in my agreement with you on your choice of terms. Obviously, we don't know the whole story here, but it's possible she could have been Haitian or Cuban or any number of non-African races, isn't it? Wouldn't using a less-specific statement, such as 'dark-complexion', be a better choice? I guess it depends on your area, too. I live in an area that's about 90% white. When I was doing some work in Cleveland, which is about 40% white, I heard a guy point someone out as "the black guy over there" and someone else as "the white girl".

    archonwarp on
    873342-1.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I'm not worried about the job, at all. I have two others to fall back on(working three jobs was kinda gettin' to me).
    My thing is more on the double standard of getting in trouble for saying black instead of African American, but not white.

    It's just a general description that helps cut who you're looking for by half.
    If you can't find ten policies in Target's employee handbook far stupider than that one, then you probably can't read. It was just a really dumb place to draw a line in the sand.

    Thanatos on
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    The Cat wrote: »
    You weren't fired for what you think you were fired for. You were fired for defying several of your superiors and probably for making them look silly in front of their fellow workers and yours, thus undermining their authority. Whether you're right or wrong is pretty much immaterial, they just didn't want to have to deal with your sass.

    Shinto on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    As an aside I'd be careful what you do with that recording and where you admit to secretly recording things. State laws vary but you may expose yourself to a huge legal hassle.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • JohnDoeJohnDoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Normally I go along with the stupid Target Talk(using Guest instead of customer, team member instead of employee) but on this one I told her it wasn't going to happen.

    Why make a stand over such a pointless issue when you've already rolled over on similar stuff?

    JohnDoe on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited February 2008
    Corporate PR types don't like it because there are a lot of incidents involving some white guy saying "black [guy/girl/people], and then going on a very unfortunate rant. Of course the rant would be just as bad if he had said African Americans, but African Americans isn't as tainted as black and nobody ever faulted PR and business school types for being too smart, and that's why African American is the standard for corporate-speak.

    You think it's dumb? That's fine. But realize that's how all corporations operate.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • juice for jesusjuice for jesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Both of my roommates are black and never, ever, refer to themselves, or blacks in general, as "African-American." They use "black", same as every other black person I've ever known. I'm pretty sure they both come from Caribbean families, anyway.

    Sounds like losing that job's not going to put you on the streets, so I say good for you for standing up against stupidity, even if it's a Sisyphean endeavor.

    juice for jesus on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Shinto wrote: »
    The Cat wrote: »
    You weren't fired for what you think you were fired for. You were fired for defying several of your superiors and probably for making them look silly in front of their fellow workers and yours, thus undermining their authority. Whether you're right or wrong is pretty much immaterial, they just didn't want to have to deal with your sass.

    ege02 on
  • juice for jesusjuice for jesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    He actually is aware of that fact, you don't need to quote the same thing over and over.

    juice for jesus on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    So what are we arguing about, then?

    Is this going to turn into one of those racism threads?

    ege02 on
  • juice for jesusjuice for jesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    He's probably just looking for affirmation, I guess. Of course that's not how it works in D&D.

    juice for jesus on
  • Spectral SwallowSpectral Swallow Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.

    Spectral Swallow on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    Newsflash: Whites were not systematically oppressed with the word white (or really ever in this country.)

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    In most circumstances, "black" is pretty goddamned "P.C." However, in most circumstances, you're okay wearing jeans and a T-shirt. You're not okay wearing jeans and a T-shirt to work, just like you're not okay calling black people "black."

    Thanatos on
  • juice for jesusjuice for jesus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    Newsflash: Whites were not systematically oppressed with the word white (or really ever in this country.)

    I don't think that has anything to do with this situation. And if you are talking about Jim Crow laws, the term used was "colored."

    juice for jesus on
  • JamesKeenanJamesKeenan Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Thanatos wrote: »
    If requiring you to use the words "African American" instead of "black" is the stupidest thing Target did on that day, it would be an astonishingly good day for Target.

    I don't see why you would take a stand over something so stupid and unimportant, but whatever. Also, you may very well have committed a crime by recording the conversation, which would really compound the stupid on your end. Good work.

    Wait... what's wrong with Target? That's an honest question. I've mostly only ever heard bad things about Wal-Mart, so I'm missing the misdoings of the other large chain stores.

    And I think the problem here is their adamant reinforcement of a policy with shitty priorities, choosing PC over pragmatism, for one.

    JamesKeenan on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    Newsflash: Whites were not systematically oppressed with the word white (or really ever in this country.)

    I don't think that has anything to do with this situation. And if you are talking about Jim Crow laws, the term used was "colored."

    No, I'm actually talking about the pervasive cultural overtones that influence all relations between white and black in America. While I find nothing wrong with the word 'Black' not understanding how the corporate overlords might object displays a profound lack of awareness of American society.

    Essentially while there is a double standard the why of it is not nonsensical and is obvious to anybody who pays the least amount of attention.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.

    Why would any of the higher-ups worry about it? Corporations with boards dominated with whites don't normally run into any trouble with policies, practices, or PR slips having to do with whites.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    ege02 wrote: »
    Shinto wrote: »
    The Cat wrote: »
    You weren't fired for what you think you were fired for. You were fired for defying several of your superiors and probably for making them look silly in front of their fellow workers and yours, thus undermining their authority. Whether you're right or wrong is pretty much immaterial, they just didn't want to have to deal with your sass.

    Good measure, etc.

    Anyways, it seems like what you wanted to do was seem all "uncompromising" and "consistent." Well, good for you, you lost your job over something silly.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • GungHoGungHo Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    If my bosses wanted me to call my laptop a notebook and they told me I was being insubortinate for calling it a laptop and not a notebook and I persisted in calling it a laptop even after being directly warned, then you think maybe I am actually being insubordinate even while I'm pointing out someone can alternately call the coffee maker a coffee maker or a coffee brewer as if that somehow puts me on higher moral ground? Welcome to the real world kid, where people have rules that you gotta follow, and they don't make sense, but you still gotta do it anyway. Don't try to rationalize it... it only makes you look worse in the end. Like right about now.

    GungHo on
  • OctoparrotOctoparrot Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    Newsflash: Whites were not systematically oppressed with the word white (or really ever in this country.)

    Blacks were not systematically oppressed with the word black, they're oppressed by much less tasteful words (one of which juice for jesus has named). Dark-skinned or dark-complexioned would definitely be the more PC term, since "black people" aren't black at all, and could come from anywhere.

    But since we're more concerned with Today than The Olden Days, white, black, asian, are all used alone without inherent bias. However, conjunctively with derogatory words and intent they acquire that tone. I can't count the number of times I've had to call someone a "dumb fucking wasp".

    Octoparrot on
  • ChurchChurch Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    If my bosses wanted me to call my laptop a notebook and they told me I was being insubortinate for calling it a laptop and not a notebook and I persisted in calling it a laptop even after being directly warned, then you think maybe I am actually being insubordinate even while I'm pointing out someone can alternately call the coffee maker a coffee maker or a coffee brewer as if that somehow puts me on higher moral ground? Welcome to the real world kid, where people have rules that you gotta follow, and they don't make sense, but you still gotta do it anyway. Don't try to rationalize it... it only makes you look worse in the end. Like right about now.

    Somehow I don't think the laptop is going to be offended by you calling it a notebook, nor is the coffee maker going to consider "brewer" to be offensive.

    Church on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Hey, Spectral, here's what you do next time:

    When some doof in corporate tells you to use a term you think is retarded, you use it whenever he and his ilk are around. When he and his ilk aren't around, use whatever term you want. Everyone wins. Occasionally maybe you'll slip and use the wrong term in front of the corporate doofs, in which case you say, "Shoot, I'm sorry, I slipped. Won't happen again."

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Church wrote: »
    GungHo wrote: »
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    If my bosses wanted me to call my laptop a notebook and they told me I was being insubortinate for calling it a laptop and not a notebook and I persisted in calling it a laptop even after being directly warned, then you think maybe I am actually being insubordinate even while I'm pointing out someone can alternately call the coffee maker a coffee maker or a coffee brewer as if that somehow puts me on higher moral ground? Welcome to the real world kid, where people have rules that you gotta follow, and they don't make sense, but you still gotta do it anyway. Don't try to rationalize it... it only makes you look worse in the end. Like right about now.

    Somehow I don't think the laptop is going to be offended by you calling it a notebook, nor is the coffee maker going to consider "brewer" to be offensive.

    ATTENTION:

    Due to heightened sensitivities, use of the word "brewer" is now forbidden on the PA forums. You must refer to that word as "the b-word" or "b*****". Note that such pejoratives as "mud maker" and "counter monkey" are still acceptable.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • GungHoGungHo Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Church wrote: »
    GungHo wrote: »
    Theres no racism involved here, it's not like I was like, "We're looking for this n*****, she has a shaved head."
    It's more about how black is no longer P.C. and the double standard of getting in trouble for saying 'black', but not for saying 'white'.
    If my bosses wanted me to call my laptop a notebook and they told me I was being insubortinate for calling it a laptop and not a notebook and I persisted in calling it a laptop even after being directly warned, then you think maybe I am actually being insubordinate even while I'm pointing out someone can alternately call the coffee maker a coffee maker or a coffee brewer as if that somehow puts me on higher moral ground? Welcome to the real world kid, where people have rules that you gotta follow, and they don't make sense, but you still gotta do it anyway. Don't try to rationalize it... it only makes you look worse in the end. Like right about now.

    Somehow I don't think the laptop is going to be offended by you calling it a notebook, nor is the coffee maker going to consider "brewer" to be offensive.
    Depends on how far along Skynet is.

    And, this whole story really has nothing to do with the actual person being referred to being offended. This has everything to do with the people you're around being offended, perhaps on the behalf of others, perhaps needlessly, but offended anyway, just cause they can be. Shoving your head in your ass and saying "it's ridiculous" doesn't mean you get to keep your job or make them any less empowered to enforce their idea of morality on you.
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    ATTENTION:



    Due to heightened sensitivities, use of the word "brewer" is now forbidden on the PA forums. You must refer to that word as "the b-word" or "b*****". Note that such pejoratives as "mud maker" and "counter monkey" are still acceptable.
    SEE?!? Now you get to follow this one cause "they said so." Want to know why? They said so. You know why they get to say so? It's their board.

    GungHo on
  • thanimationsthanimations Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I guess one way to look at it is, when you're talking to your friends that don't mind/prefer the descriptive "black," there isn't a problem because you know them. When you're talking to/about people you don't know, it's easier and generally more polite to try and find the most neutral term.

    I work with a girl who is Apache; some people prefer the term Native American, and some prefer Indian. Now if I didn't know her preference, I probably would use Native American since that's considered more neutral.

    PC terms become ridiculous but it's always easier to fall back on these for people you don't know . If I were to take anything out of this situation, it would be that.

    thanimations on
  • OctoparrotOctoparrot Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    PC terms become ridiculous but it's always easier to fall back on these for people you don't know . If I were to take anything out of this situation, it would be that.

    The OP's problem is that to himself and his circle of acquaintances, the supposedly PC term African American is ignorant and mildly racist.

    Octoparrot on
Sign In or Register to comment.