The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Movie Release Awareness for March '08

2

Posts

  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Elki wrote: »
    The Bank Job was an OK movie.

    Gim on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    So, Pettigrew lives for a day was pretty good. Amy Adams in the first half was amazing. It felt very much like it was a play adapted for the screen.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • thanimationsthanimations Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Septus wrote: »
    So, Pettigrew lives for a day was pretty good. Amy Adams in the first half was amazing. It felt very much like it was a play adapted for the screen.

    I really liked this film as well. It had the energy and zaniness of a musical without actually being one, and was a lot of fun.

    thanimations on
  • Jurassic SpaceprancerJurassic Spaceprancer Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Does anyone else think Under the Same Moon looks maybe a little trite, but still heartwarming? I want to see it pretty badly after watching the trailer.

    Jurassic Spaceprancer on
    Bulbaz0r.png
  • theavenger121theavenger121 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    has anyone noticed that the two epics we've been waiting for for over 3 years now are scheduled for the same month in 2009? august is when both tekken and the hobbit are on schedule for.

    theavenger121 on
    this looks like a super-special-awsome job for limey man... in america
  • ConvaelConvael Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    There is noooooo way The Hobbit is coming out in 2009.

    Convael on
  • DoodmannDoodmann Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Be Kind Rewind is awesome.

    Doodmann on
    Whippy wrote: »
    nope nope nope nope abort abort talk about anime
    I like to ART
  • JastJast Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Watched College Road Trip, good family movie.

    Jast on
    Jast39.png
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Jast wrote: »
    Watched College Road Trip, good family movie.
    You poor, poor bastard.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Someone is turning Tekken into a movie?

    I haven't really ever played the series. What kind of a story can they pull from it? Is it going to be a bunched of wronged people running around seeking vengeance?

    Gim on
  • Gorilla SaladGorilla Salad Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Gim wrote: »
    Someone is turning Tekken into a movie?

    I haven't really ever played the series. What kind of a story can they pull from it? Is it going to be a bunched of wronged people running around seeking vengeance?
    As far as I can remember, there are only 4 or 5 wronged people.

    Wait, shit, they're making a Tekken movie? I remember they made an anime a long time ago, but now an actual movie? Animated or live action?

    Gorilla Salad on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Live action.

    It is going to be horrible.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    There was a bear in one of those games. Is a bear going to go around mauling people? Because I can get behind that, if only to see someone roundhouse combo a bear.

    Gim on
  • Gorilla SaladGorilla Salad Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Live action.

    It is going to be horrible.
    Going to see premiere night, will be buying DVD.

    Gorilla Salad on
  • tardcoretardcore Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Well I haven't seen the original, but I just saw Funny Games. It was pretty awesome, although I could have used more violence on screen instead of off, but all in all a good movie.

    tardcore on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Tard, you missed the point of the movie.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • redfield85redfield85 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Tard, you missed the point of the movie.

    Which was? Just curious, I just saw the movie and loved and hated it at parts.

    redfield85 on
    bYf6vNQ.png
    Tumblr | Twitter | Twitch | Pinny Arcade Lanyard
    [3DS] 3394-3901-4002 | [Xbox/Steam] Redfield85
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    "My films are intended as polemical statements against the American 'barrel down' cinema and its dis-empowerment of the spectator. They are an appeal for a cinema of insistent questions instead of false (because too quick) answers, for clarifying distance in place of violating closeness, for provocation and dialogue instead of consumption and consensus." -Michael Haneke

    Basically, the audience member is supposed to be "tortured" by this movie for wanting to see a movie with extreme violence and torture.

    He does this by omitting most of the violent parts and thus makes fun of the audience member.

    It's pretty awesome, really.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • Zephyr_FateZephyr_Fate Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Ryan Phillippe is just one of the hottest guys on the planet, so I HAVE to see Stop-Loss.

    Zephyr_Fate on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    "My films are intended as polemical statements against the American 'barrel down' cinema and its dis-empowerment of the spectator. They are an appeal for a cinema of insistent questions instead of false (because too quick) answers, for clarifying distance in place of violating closeness, for provocation and dialogue instead of consumption and consensus." -Michael Haneke

    Basically, the audience member is supposed to be "tortured" by this movie for wanting to see a movie with extreme violence and torture.

    He does this by omitting most of the violent parts and thus makes fun of the audience member.

    It's pretty awesome, really.
    So in other words he's a cinematic cock tease? Gotcha.

    Hacksaw on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Ryan Phillippe is just one of the hottest guys on the planet, so I HAVE to see Stop-Loss.

    I'm seeing it for Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Channing Tatum. They are both up-and-comers.

    Tatum may have been in Step Up, but he was also amazing in A Guide to Recognising Your Saints.

    Levitt played great roles in Manic, Brick and The Lookout.

    Phillippe is an alright actor, but these kids look as if they are going to grow up to be better than he is.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Oh shit:

    Gordon-Levitt has been cast in the G.I. Joe live action film as Rex/Cobra Commander. It has also been reported that Levitt is casted as Tetsuo Shima in the live-action production of the sci-fi cyberpunk manga and anime Akira produced by Leonardo DiCaprio.

    This kid really is after my heart.

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • FuruFuru Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Oh shit:

    Gordon-Levitt has been cast in the G.I. Joe live action film as Rex/Cobra Commander. It has also been reported that Levitt is casted as Tetsuo Shima in the live-action production of the sci-fi cyberpunk manga and anime Akira produced by Leonardo DiCaprio.

    This kid really is after my heart.

    bawhaaaaaaa

    Furu on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    "My films are intended as polemical statements against the American 'barrel down' cinema and its dis-empowerment of the spectator. They are an appeal for a cinema of insistent questions instead of false (because too quick) answers, for clarifying distance in place of violating closeness, for provocation and dialogue instead of consumption and consensus." -Michael Haneke

    Basically, the audience member is supposed to be "tortured" by this movie for wanting to see a movie with extreme violence and torture.

    He does this by omitting most of the violent parts and thus makes fun of the audience member.

    It's pretty awesome, really.

    *eyeroll* Gotcha, Haneke is a prick. Stay in Europe and make films if you hate the American spectator so much, buddy.

    Satan. on
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    He's a prick for wanting to make provocative movies that ask questions instead of providing easy answers?

    Well, okay.

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    He's a prick for wanting to make provocative movies that ask questions instead of providing easy answers?

    Well, okay.
    He's a prick for trying to purposely mislead his audience to ask said questions. Cinema in America is a form of entertainment first and a form of art second in this day and age. Some European director coming over and going "gotcha!" is only going to serve to piss off people and not sway them back to European schools of thought regarding cinema.

    Satan. on
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    So don't challenge expectations, don't rock the boat, etc.?

    Well, okay.

    PS I haven't even seen Funny Games, but I don't really see how this is "misleading" the audience

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    So don't challenge expectations, don't rock the boat, etc.?

    Well, okay.

    PS I haven't even seen Funny Games, but I don't really see how this is "misleading" the audience
    Can you stop shoving words down my throat and going "well, OK"? If you're going to keep doing that, there is no point in having this discussion.

    There's a way to do it and there is a way not to do it. "Gotcha" is rarely a way to accomplish a critical point in cinema. Any course in film history will tell you this. Saying this
    They are an appeal for a cinema of insistent questions instead of false (because too quick) answers, for clarifying distance in place of violating closeness, for provocation and dialogue instead of consumption and consensus.

    and then making Funny Games is being a dick about it.

    Satan. on
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I just don't think that challenging expectations is the same as saying "Gotcha!"

    If he knows that audiences are used to movies of this genre having extreme violence, and he purposely counteracts that because of some artistic opinion of his, I don't really see what the problem with that is.

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    God, I'm glad it's pissing some people off. More power to you, Haneke.

    Gim on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    I just don't think that challenging expectations is the same as saying "Gotcha!"

    If he knows that audiences are used to movies of this genre having extreme violence, and he purposely counteracts that because of some artistic opinion of his, I don't really see what the problem with that is.
    I see a problem with that, especially when you're misleading people to go to your film in the first place.

    Satan. on
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    From all the publicity I've seen Naomi Watts doing, she keeps mentioning Haneke's intent with the film. I'd be curious to know how many people walk into this movie without at least some idea of its history or purpose.

    Gim on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Gim wrote: »
    From all the publicity I've seen Naomi Watts doing, she keeps mentioning Haneke's intent with the film. I'd be curious to know how many people walk into this movie without at least some idea of its history or purpose.
    *raises hand* There's one, at least.

    I go to films because the trailers look interesting or just for the shit of it (film student, that's what I do). I rarely look at the publicity around a film because if the 1920s and 30s in Hollywood taught us anything, marketing of a film is just like a politician spinning a brutal loss to look positive for themselves: everyone does it and you can't rely on people directly involved with it to give you a fair shake.

    Satan. on
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    I just don't think that challenging expectations is the same as saying "Gotcha!"

    If he knows that audiences are used to movies of this genre having extreme violence, and he purposely counteracts that because of some artistic opinion of his, I don't really see what the problem with that is.
    I see a problem with that, especially when you're misleading people to go to your film in the first place.

    If you go into a movie expecting a lot of violence and gore, that's your own fault, not the filmmaker misleading you.

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • JastJast Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    Gim wrote: »
    From all the publicity I've seen Naomi Watts doing, she keeps mentioning Haneke's intent with the film. I'd be curious to know how many people walk into this movie without at least some idea of its history or purpose.
    *raises hand* There's one, at least.

    I go to films because the trailers look interesting or just for the shit of it (film student, that's what I do). I rarely look at the publicity around a film because if the 1920s and 30s in Hollywood taught us anything, marketing of a film is just like a politician spinning a brutal loss to look positive for themselves: everyone does it and you can't rely on people directly involved with it to give you a fair shake.

    Yeah, especially with The Dark Knight. I really want to see it, but I'm tired of everyone involved in it calling it an epic and breathtaking movie.

    Jast on
    Jast39.png
  • flamebroiledchickenflamebroiledchicken Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Reading about Funny Games on Wikipedia, it seems like the whole point of the movie is to play with cinematic and storytelling conventions, since one of the guys constantly breaks the fourth wall and all that.

    flamebroiledchicken on
    y59kydgzuja4.png
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    I just don't think that challenging expectations is the same as saying "Gotcha!"

    If he knows that audiences are used to movies of this genre having extreme violence, and he purposely counteracts that because of some artistic opinion of his, I don't really see what the problem with that is.
    I see a problem with that, especially when you're misleading people to go to your film in the first place.

    If you go into a movie expecting a lot of violence and gore, that's your own fault, not the filmmaker misleading you.

    When that's how the film is sold to me in a trailer, how it is advertised through the trailer and how the narrative in the film leads me all the damn time, that's the filmmaker misleading me.

    Satan. on
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Whoa, wait a minute here. How the narrative in the film leads you? You haven't even seen the film yet. This sounds more like the marketing department doing their best to get this out there, even if it means lying, not the fault of the director's.

    Gim on
  • redfield85redfield85 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    You know, I went in thinking Funny Games was a new version (but not really) of Clockwork Orange. Meh. I didn't really read anything on the movie before I went to see it and I thought it was a good movie overall.

    redfield85 on
    bYf6vNQ.png
    Tumblr | Twitter | Twitch | Pinny Arcade Lanyard
    [3DS] 3394-3901-4002 | [Xbox/Steam] Redfield85
  • Zephyr_FateZephyr_Fate Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Ryan Phillippe is just one of the hottest guys on the planet, so I HAVE to see Stop-Loss.

    I'm seeing it for Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Channing Tatum. They are both up-and-comers.

    Tatum may have been in Step Up, but he was also amazing in A Guide to Recognising Your Saints.

    Levitt played great roles in Manic, Brick and The Lookout.

    Phillippe is an alright actor, but these kids look as if they are going to grow up to be better than he is.

    I thought Joseph Gordon-Levitt was better in Mysterious Skin, to be honest.

    Zephyr_Fate on
Sign In or Register to comment.