The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Vista on 360: Will it Happen?

WildaliWildali Registered User regular
edited March 2008 in Games and Technology
This is something that I worry about, because it seems that Microsoft is in a position to allow themselves more money if they took that route. Think about it. The system has a hard drive already installed (or made available). There's a keyboard attachment for the controller. The mouse could easily be emulated by the 360 controller as well.

It would seem that MS could just release a streamlined, gutted version of Windows Vista for lessay...$79.99 at your local Best Buy. With USB ports, internet connectivity and a keyboard/mouse solution standard on all 360s, why wouldn't Vista on 360 be possible? Obviously an OS running on a console isn't impossible; just look at PS3 and its Linux platform. That's not really the point somuch as will MS consider releasing a 360 Vista kit somewhere down the line.

Im gonna get creative here and make some educated guesses. If Microsoft were to release MS Vista for the X360, it would greatly increase slagging Vista sales. There's also the possibility that it could destroy the PC gaming industry as we know it, but maybe it's time for a change on the PC front. Incompatible hardware and buggy software are common practice. Making the 360 a secondary alternative for good ol PC gaming could pay off handsomely. Who's to say that PC enthusiasts won't keep PC gaming around regardless of what happens?


There will always be enthusiasts on both sides who will unerringly back their chosen "team", but we've gotta look at the mainstream here. Vista on 360 could introduce a whole new generation of kids to classic PC games like Baldur's Gate and Total Annihilation. Y'know - kids who wouldn't dream of touching a PC because it's too nerdy or whatever.

And yes I know there are positives and negatives to releasing a functional Vista platform on the 360.



Pros:

*Greatly increase sales of Vista period.*
*Would almost certainly ensure Microsoft's dominance in the OS production industry. So many people would be using Vista that MacOS and Linux would most likely be relegated to second-tier forever.*
*Lower price tag and lack of PC hassle (upgrading, repairs, viruses) could bring in new blood for the OS.*
*Most likely would solve hardware compatibility issues instantly.*
*Would allow classic PC games that will never be released for 360 to be played on the system, if you wanted.*
*Could potentially allow for the installing of 360 games to HD for faster loading/startup.*

Cons:

*Some games would just flat out not work (nVidia cards only, certain soundcard required) and would never be patched to work.*
*Low bugdet gaming PC makers (Dell, HP, mom & pop cpu shops) could potentially be put out of business. Microsoft stands to gain all their customers, however.*
*Would kinda render PC to 360 ports useless. And while opening the X360 up to a TON of awesome indie projects, could also render XNA Creator Club useless as well (just make it for PC and advertise it more).*
*Could create some uhh...interesting conflicts of interest for MS (such as running Playstation/Nintendo emulators on the X360 and of course BitTorrent.*
*Speaking of BitTorrent, the possibility of 360 game piracy might increase A WHOLE LOT if security measures aren't put into play.*


These things would come up, but Microsoft should be adept in developing a Vista platform for X360 that would limit enough functionality to keep things in check. They could deny certain things like BitTorrent from installing. They could also strip out enough features of 360 Vista to make PC Vista still worth owning, but also to allow the 360 to get in on the action as well. Make it more of a media box like the PS3 and more competitive in the process.

Wildali on
«1

Posts

  • ben0207ben0207 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Physically impossible. Even if they got Vista running, none of the apps would be.

    ben0207 on
  • chasmchasm Ill-tempered Texan Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    ...what.

    chasm on
    steam_sig.png
    XBL : lJesse Custerl | MWO: Jesse Custer | Best vid ever. | 2nd best vid ever.
  • DashuiDashui Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    chasm wrote: »
    ...what.

    Dashui on
    Xbox Live, PSN & Origin: Vacorsis 3DS: 2638-0037-166
  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Dashui wrote: »
    chasm wrote: »
    ...what.

    Also, why? Seems pretty pointless.

    cloudeagle on
    Switch: 3947-4890-9293
  • RakaiRakai Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    First off, OS sales figures dwarf console sales figures. If you mean by slagging vista sales outselling the entire install base of the 360 in one month, allowing them to run on a 360 wouldn't change that. It would also make piracy on consoles much easier as anyone could download software and get it running on a 360. Unless Microsoft completely blocked off the main hardware while the OS is running, a simple program could enable people to run pirated 360 games with ease and blocking off hardware would defeat any purpose of running it in the first place.

    Rakai on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]XBL: Rakayn | PS3: Rakayn | Steam ID
  • GyralGyral Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I can't imagine where MS would want to do this, if only for the gigantic Pandora's Box of Piracy that this would open.

    Gyral on
    25t9pjnmqicf.jpg
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wildali wrote:
    This is something that I worry about

    Yeah, I don't think you have to worry about this too much. A desktop operating system is the wrong thing for Microsoft to put on a console. Yes, they might be able to do it (memory would likely be an issue, as would disk storage space) but there's no real business reason to do it. Their current 360 OS works just fine and is a much better fit for the console market.

    I also don't buy your claim that it would "greatly increase slagging Vista sales." Who's going to buy Vista for their 360? Why would you do this? And, as has been pointed out, the amount of 360 users who would buy Vista would not make up for any sales shortfall.

    For Microsoft, trying to shoehorn in old games (that they didn't even develop!) into this sort of system doesn't make a lot of sense either. People aren't going to say, "Oh, I can play Baldur's gate on the 360 now!" and then go out and buy Vista for the 360. No, they'll borrow (or pirate) the game and play it on their PC.

    mrflippy on
  • Spacehog85Spacehog85 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Christ, will the OP send me a tinfoil hat, or should I make my own.

    Spacehog85 on
  • OremLKOremLK Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    What the heck?

    Never happen, and you're crazy if you think it will. MS is dead set on keeping the 360 a closed platform. And for good reason.

    OremLK on
    My zombie survival life simulator They Don't Sleep is out now on Steam if you want to check it out.
  • lowlylowlycooklowlylowlycook Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    So the idea is that the 360 would emulate the i386 archictecture? Or would all apps be recompiled and offered in normal and 360 versions? One of the nice things about linux is you have the source code for most things so you have at least a fighting chance to port any apps once you have the compiler working.

    I think you can let your mind rest easy on this one. I'd start worrying about Sony steering a asteroid to hit Nintendo's HQ instead.

    lowlylowlycook on
    steam_sig.png
    (Please do not gift. My game bank is already full.)
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Um, you're aware that the CPU in the Xbox 360 and the CPU in a computer are completely different and use a completely different instruction set, right? Even if they ported Windows over (why?) it's not like any already-made Windows programs would run on the thing, at least not without running through an emulator that would need to be so god-awful it would make the existing Xbox 360 backwards compat emulator look good.

    How can people on a gaming forum know so little about how CPUs work?

    Daedalus on
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Sony steering a asteroid to hit Nintendo's HQ
    There needs to be a video game involving this.

    mrflippy on
  • DashuiDashui Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    It doesn't make any sense, for countless reasons. The 360 already has an operating system, and it's highly integrated into everything, even while you're playing a game. Lock thread?

    Dashui on
    Xbox Live, PSN & Origin: Vacorsis 3DS: 2638-0037-166
  • ben0207ben0207 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Hey hey hey, it's just the OP that lives in a bizarre dreamland! The rest of us know the difference between a POWER and an x86 processor (especially us Mac people, these last 2 years)

    ben0207 on
  • JCRooksJCRooks Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    No.

    This is way too silly.

    There many other things I'd rather work on than making Vista available on the 360. Not to mention that it opens up a huge can of worms, many of which you've already pointed out.

    So, no.

    JCRooks on
    Xbox LIVE, Steam, Twitter, etc. ...
    Gamertag: Rooks
    - Don't add me, I'm at/near the friend limit :)

    Steam: JC_Rooks

    Twitter: http://twitter.com/JiunweiC

    I work on this: http://www.xbox.com
  • Spacehog85Spacehog85 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    mrflippy wrote: »
    Sony steering a asteroid to hit Nintendo's HQ
    There needs to be a video game involving this.

    Why? Reggie would just stare it down anyway.

    Spacehog85 on
  • TVs_FrankTVs_Frank Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    mrflippy wrote: »
    Sony steering a asteroid to hit Nintendo's HQ
    There needs to be a video game involving this.

    Maybe Final Fantasy 7 was allegory.

    TVs_Frank on
  • lowlylowlycooklowlylowlycook Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Um, you're aware that the CPU in the Xbox 360 and the CPU in a computer are completely different and use a completely different instruction set, right? Even if they ported Windows over (why?) it's not like any already-made Windows programs would run on the thing, at least not without running through an emulator that would need to be so god-awful it would make the existing Xbox 360 backwards compat emulator look good.

    How can people on a gaming forum know so little about how CPUs work?

    Have you read the OPs list of pros and cons for this? I'm not sure that lack of knowledge about CPUs is his biggest problem.

    lowlylowlycook on
    steam_sig.png
    (Please do not gift. My game bank is already full.)
  • mrflippymrflippy Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Spacehog85 wrote: »
    mrflippy wrote: »
    Sony steering a asteroid to hit Nintendo's HQ
    There needs to be a video game involving this.

    Why? Reggie would just stare it down anyway.

    Why not?

    Sony vs. Nintendo + Asteroids.

    Pretty much a no-brainer for me.

    mrflippy on
  • RoshinRoshin My backlog can be seen from space SwedenRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Have you read the OPs list of pros and cons for this? I'm not sure that lack of knowledge about CPUs is his biggest problem.

    I started tearing the list apart, but I felt bad about it. It was like kicking a puppy. I did like the bit about how a Vista port to the 360 would "most likely would solve hardware compatibility issues instantly".

    Ace, that.

    Roshin on
    steam_sig.png
  • Greg USNGreg USN Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Vista. Do you want it?
    No...

    Greg USN on
    FFXIV Petra Ironheart
    Infinity Mog 21 and over Free Company Sargatanas Server. Recruitment currently closed.
    m1LuFkU.jpg
  • PikaPuffPikaPuff Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Very interesting first post. Waited 15 days before posting, too. The bolding of game names killed it, though. Pretty clear indicator that something was up.

    Also, vista on 360 isn't going to happen.

    PikaPuff on
    jCyyTSo.png
  • Squirminator2kSquirminator2k they/them North Hollywood, CARegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wildali wrote:
    Vista on 360: Will it Happen?
    No.

    Squirminator2k on
    Jump Leads - a scifi-comedy audiodrama podcast
  • WildaliWildali Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    PikaPuff wrote: »
    Very interesting first post. Waited 15 days before posting, too. The bolding of game names killed it, though. Pretty clear indicator that something was up.

    Also, vista on 360 isn't going to happen.


    I don't claim to have all the answers. I'm thinking more along the lines of consoles are easily starting to approach PC's graphic capability. When we hit that spot where graphics see consistant diminishing returns, consoles will be able to push the same graphics that a pimped-out PC can. Hell, we're nearly there already. Some would argue we are there; I disagree for now. Point is, when consoles can deliver what PCs deliver IN TOTAL, they're most likely on their way out.

    If you could get Vista running on the XBox720 or whatever, you could probably keep PC gaming alive for a bit longer instead of the mass PC gamer migration that we will no doubt see come next-gen. Getting Vista working on a console would increase the PC game install base by virtue of Vista still being supported instead of relegated to second-tier niche market like we're seeing come to fruition.

    I'm just saying. Get Vista on the 360's successor, if not on the 360 itself. Secure it, make it work somehow. You gotta give PC game developers some kinda reassurance to stay in the PC game market. Because if the PC market loses its hardcore gamer demographic, then the PC is doomed to fail in the US.

    Wildali on
  • LoathingLoathing Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wildali wrote: »
    I don't claim to have all the answers. I'm thinking more along the lines of consoles are easily starting to approach PC's graphic capability. When we hit that spot where graphics see consistant diminishing returns, consoles will be able to push the same graphics that a pimped-out PC can. Hell, we're nearly there already. Some would argue we are there; I disagree for now. Point is, when consoles can deliver what PCs deliver IN TOTAL, they're most likely on their way out.

    How's does that work? Sure a console can have the same visual effect just as you have on the PC (so graphics) but a console can't keep up a game load while a powerful PC can easily take it an then some. Lemme list an example:

    Two Worlds on the 360 - when too much shit was happening at once, the game either slowed to a crawl or just froze outright.
    Two Worlds on the PC - if you have a good PC, no problems running it at all - minus the fact that the game itself sucks ass.

    So sure consoles can somewhat match the PC in graphics but not in load bearing.

    Another point - if a console is made powerful enough to match the PC, a few weeks, a month down the road the PC will already by better anyways because new tech is always coming out that lets you upgrade them. Yes its expensive and not everyone is able to do it, but the option is still there. This also raises the fact that consoles are cheaper then the PC - yes this is true, but the PC can do a lot more.

    Loathing on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Loathing wrote: »
    Wildali wrote: »
    I don't claim to have all the answers. I'm thinking more along the lines of consoles are easily starting to approach PC's graphic capability. When we hit that spot where graphics see consistant diminishing returns, consoles will be able to push the same graphics that a pimped-out PC can. Hell, we're nearly there already. Some would argue we are there; I disagree for now. Point is, when consoles can deliver what PCs deliver IN TOTAL, they're most likely on their way out.

    How's does that work? Sure a console can have the same visual effect just as you have on the PC (so graphics) but a console can't keep up a game load while a powerful PC can easily take it an then some. Lemme list an example:

    Two Worlds on the 360 - when too much shit was happening at once, the game either slowed to a crawl or just froze outright.
    Two Worlds on the PC - if you have a good PC, no problems running it at all - minus the fact that the game itself sucks ass.

    So sure consoles can somewhat match the PC in graphics but not in load bearing.

    Wait, what?

    I think you have that backwards, buddy. First, let's pick a game that doesn't suck. Then, let's compare the console version to it running on an average computer. You'll find that the console version has been carefully optimized to run on a fixed hardware platform (unless, as with Two Worlds, it was designed and programmed by retarded monkeys), whereas the PC version will chug along with a low framerate and constant swapping to the hard disk if you try and run it on a computer that meets what the box jokingly considers "minimum hardware specifications".

    Daedalus on
  • LoathingLoathing Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Daedalus wrote: »
    Loathing wrote: »
    Wildali wrote: »
    I don't claim to have all the answers. I'm thinking more along the lines of consoles are easily starting to approach PC's graphic capability. When we hit that spot where graphics see consistant diminishing returns, consoles will be able to push the same graphics that a pimped-out PC can. Hell, we're nearly there already. Some would argue we are there; I disagree for now. Point is, when consoles can deliver what PCs deliver IN TOTAL, they're most likely on their way out.

    How's does that work? Sure a console can have the same visual effect just as you have on the PC (so graphics) but a console can't keep up a game load while a powerful PC can easily take it an then some. Lemme list an example:

    Two Worlds on the 360 - when too much shit was happening at once, the game either slowed to a crawl or just froze outright.
    Two Worlds on the PC - if you have a good PC, no problems running it at all - minus the fact that the game itself sucks ass.

    So sure consoles can somewhat match the PC in graphics but not in load bearing.

    Wait, what?

    I think you have that backwards, buddy. First, let's pick a game that doesn't suck. Then, let's compare the console version to it running on an average computer. You'll find that the console version has been carefully optimized to run on a fixed hardware platform (unless, as with Two Worlds, it was designed and programmed by retarded monkeys), whereas the PC version will chug along with a low framerate and constant swapping to the hard disk if you try and run it on a computer that meets what the box jokingly considers "minimum hardware specifications".

    Well, I guess that was a bad example since Two Worlds sucks so much ass, but anyways you'd also have to look at something else.

    Half of the time when a game is made for the PC, when it gets converted to the console you have a good chance of it sucking and this also applies when going from the Console to the PC. Halo on the console, great. On the PC, not so much. Worms on the PC, great, on the Console, not so much (i'm just looking at my desktop atm =/).

    Personally I think that some games are just better on one platform then on the other, but thats just me. And I still stand by the fact that a PC will handle better then a console, as long as its a good PC. I've seen plenty of games chugging on the console (not that it makes bad, unless its TW) and I just think some of them would of run fine on a computer.

    Loathing on
  • chasmchasm Ill-tempered Texan Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    How the fuck is this thread still active?

    chasm on
    steam_sig.png
    XBL : lJesse Custerl | MWO: Jesse Custer | Best vid ever. | 2nd best vid ever.
  • LoathingLoathing Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Fuck if I know. I started rambling on about something, and then something else happened.

    Lock this thread before I do something else stupid, it's hard to help myself. D:

    Loathing on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Thing is, with the PC, the developers can always use the excuse "well, I guess you should have gotten a good computer" for their poorly-optimized bloated shitty code, and since the reviewers are typically running computers that you and I will never afford in our lives, they'll get away with it. On the console, there are no such excuses; everyone is running on the same hardware.

    So I find it somewhat hard to swallow when, say, Bethesda starts telling me "oh, yeah, you can't have HDR lighting without a Shader Model 3.0 graphics card. Just can't do it. It's unpossible. Not our fault. Get a better computer," and then I look over at my goddamn PS2, which, if my memory serves me right, has 32 whole megabytes of RAM, which is one thirty-second of what my PC has, and 4 megabytes of video RAM, which is one sixty-fourth of what my PC has, and see that Team Ico managed to get HDR lighting on that ancient thing.

    edit: sometimes a thread with an abysmally stupid first post can somehow cling to life. It's weird.

    Daedalus on
  • LoathingLoathing Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Well no you're right there but that comes down to the companies having a dick measuring contest about who can make a game that looks better. Sure it looks great and you can do who the fuck knows with it, but not everyone will be able to run it.

    Loathing on
  • BartholamueBartholamue Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    All I really care about is getting an internet browser on the thing. They can make it work.

    Bartholamue on
    Steam- SteveBartz Xbox Live- SteveBartz PSN Name- SteveBartz
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Vista on the 360? Not with that dinky 20GB HDD.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • ThreepioThreepio New Westminster, BCRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Yes. Pushing Vista out to a 10 Million User base console market will definitely secure them first place in the OS market forever.

    Palm, meet face.

    Threepio on
    142.jpg
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Threepio wrote: »
    Yes. Pushing Vista out to a 10 Million User base console market will definitely secure them first place in the OS market forever.

    Palm, meet face.

    because Microsoft's home OS monopoly has been ever been in doubt at any point in the past twenty years.

    But hey, making fun of the OP is so page 1.

    Daedalus on
  • RoshinRoshin My backlog can be seen from space SwedenRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wildali wrote: »
    ...you could probably keep PC gaming alive for a bit longer instead of the mass PC gamer migration that we will no doubt see come next-gen...

    So the PC is dying again?

    Jesus fucking christ, I don't know how many times the PC has been declared dead or dying over the years and yet the corpse is still looking remarkably healthy. I've been a PC gamer since before the dinosaurs and every damn time a console is released, someone sticks their head up and says that the PC is surely doomed now. It's inevitable! Just look at what these consoles can do! When a console starts too approach the lifespan and software library of a PC, PM me.

    Roshin on
    steam_sig.png
  • Mr_GrinchMr_Grinch Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    This thread is utterly ridiculous.

    I'm afraid that's pretty much all I have to say on the subject, but it was so important I felt it needed saying.

    Mr_Grinch on
    Steam: Sir_Grinch
    PSN: SirGrinchX
    Oculus Rift: Sir_Grinch
  • OakeyOakey UKRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Wildali wrote: »
    This is something that I worry about...

    Really? Is your life really so dull, boring and uneventful that this is something you worry about? Does it keep you awake at night? Do you sit there with the blinds closed, sweating, head in your hands with a nervous tick as you contemplate this issue?

    Because really, this scenario, it's something you just pulled out your ass and if it's something you really worry about? Well, god help you when you arrive in the real world. I don't think your delicate mind will be able to handle some of lifes more pressing problems.

    Oakey on
  • ben0207ben0207 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Oakey wrote: »
    Wildali wrote: »
    This is something that I worry about...

    Really? Is your life really so dull, boring and uneventful that this is something you worry about? Does it keep you awake at night? Do you sit there with the blinds closed, sweating, head in your hands with a nervous tick as you contemplate this issue?

    Because really, this scenario, it's something you just pulled out your ass and if it's something you really worry about? Well, god help you when you arrive in the real world. I don't think your delicate mind will be able to handle some of lifes more pressing problems.
    Does the fridge lighg stay on after I close the door?

    ben0207 on
  • OakeyOakey UKRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    ben0207 wrote: »
    Oakey wrote: »
    Wildali wrote: »
    This is something that I worry about...

    Really? Is your life really so dull, boring and uneventful that this is something you worry about? Does it keep you awake at night? Do you sit there with the blinds closed, sweating, head in your hands with a nervous tick as you contemplate this issue?

    Because really, this scenario, it's something you just pulled out your ass and if it's something you really worry about? Well, god help you when you arrive in the real world. I don't think your delicate mind will be able to handle some of lifes more pressing problems.
    Does the fridge lighg stay on after I close the door?

    Are you worrying about this? Why not empty your fridge, climb inside and close the door behind you? You could tell the world your findings and sleep better afterwards.

    Oakey on
This discussion has been closed.