The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Your game-getting strategy.

The Last GentThe Last Gent Registered User regular
edited March 2008 in Games and Technology
Couldn't really think of a better title, so bear with me here.

The recent slew of new releases for the Wii (my console of choice), plus the fact that my younger brother is now of the age and financial status to go buy games on his own, without waiting for christmas/birthdays, has gotten me thinking about when we get new games. Let me explain:

My bro's new game-getting policy is simply to get any new game he finds awesome right when it comes out. This is the opposite of the way I do it. My policy was always to get a couple of games I liked, and then not get any new ones until I had beaten the ones I was currently playing, to the extent that I intended to beat them (i.e. unlocking everything in Metroid Prime). The exception would be for something like Brawl, which is system defining. However, he doesn't play the way I do, he's the sort of gamer that just buys new releases, and rarely, if ever, actually BEATS a game, typically just stopping when he grows bored of it, or reaches a part he can't immediately pass. As a result, I've acquired a significant list of stuff to beat. I bought Metroid Prime 3 when it came out, and Transformers along with it. Had it been only me, I wouldn't have bought anything else until they were complete, and everything unlocked (to an extent of course. I wouldn't have bothered with the Friend Vouchers in MP3 or the bonuses you earn for doing stunts in Transformers), but my brother buys a slew of games. Before I knew it, we owned Resident Evil 4, Counter Force, and the legendarily rare Guitar Hero 3. And now we've also got Brawl, and a pre order for Mario Kart. It's beginning to feel overwhelming, and I'm essentially being forced into his style of game-getting, one with a short attention span, and a lack of desire to complete anything.

So, I ask you, fellow Penny Arcadians, what's your style of game-getting? Do you buy a couple and wait until you beat them? Do you just buy games when you feel like it? Do you complete them? Something in between?

The Last Gent on
«1

Posts

  • shyguyshyguy Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I basically have the same strategy as your brother.

    Someone on this forum said once that very few games have gameplay engaging enough to justify their length, and I agree with that whole-heartedly. I generally try to beat the games that I buy, but I don't particularly care if I don't.

    This is particularly the case with DS games. Since they're so cheap, I have few qualms about leaving a DS game partially or largely unfinished.

    And while I would frequently concern myself with things like bonus content or collecting all 100 whatevers in a given game back in high school when I had tons of time to play, I virtually never bother with that kind of stuff now. The very, very rare exceptions are something like Mario Galaxy, which was fun enough to justify exploring it (although no way in hell would I go and do the whole thing again with Luigi), and Elite Beat Agents, which I played to death trying to S-rank every mission and improve my high score.

    In general, the fact that I have very, very little time to play games means that I will have to leave some games unfinished out of necessity if I want to try them all.

    shyguy on
  • NicholasNicholas Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I buy way too many, then slowly but surely get to them by priority. I almost wish I was back in High School when I had a lot less money to spend on them, getting a new game used to be exciting...I used to run home and play it. I've had new games now that don't get the seal broken for weeks or months. My record was probably with Socom Combined Arms which I had for over a year before I even opened it. Definitely feels wasteful sometimes.

    Nicholas on
  • SnareSnare Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Great OP!
    I'm terrible at buying games. I buy them on a whim, bore quickly, then leave them. Only recently have I started completing games (not 100%, just end of story) and that's because I'm pretty much always broke.
    At the moment I think there's only a few games that I actually own that I've left incomplete, but I'm always looking for new ones to poke at. I wish I bought one, then 100% then moved on.

    Snare on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I buy games at release if and only if they have Valve, Resident Evil 4 or Zelda on the box, or some specific promotion or at a really good price.

    LewieP on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I bought Metroid Prime 3 when it came out, and Transformers along with it. Had it been only me, I wouldn't have bought anything else until they were complete, and everything unlocked (to an extent of course. I wouldn't have bothered with the Friend Vouchers in MP3 or the bonuses you earn for doing stunts in Transformers)

    You will never have time to complete every single good game out there, man. Don't succumb to this desire! Play through it until you beat it (or get bored of it) and move on. Seriously, there's just too many damn games out there for one person to play through literally everything about every game.

    urahonky on
  • GyralGyral Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I rarely buy new games at launch, unless it's something I know I want to invest my time in (Bioshock, Mass Effect, anything Shin Megami). I keep a list of games I want and will pick up when they go down in price. I also tend to pick up used games based on the fact that I might want to play them sometime in the future. The only games I would buy full price new and might NOT play right then right there are Atlus games because we all know those don't stay readily available for long.

    Gyral on
    25t9pjnmqicf.jpg
  • PureauthorPureauthor Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    New games don't exist until I finish my current ones.

    (Of course, I have a flexible definition of 'finish', which is either 'complete game in normal mode once' or 'I get bored of playing it')

    Pureauthor on
    SS FC: 1334 0950 5927
    Platinum FC: 2880 3245 5111
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    when I have the dough, I buy games on a whim. usually, I'm frugal though. Lately, I've sworn off buying console games, electing to just gamefly them until I'm bored with them instead.

    DiscoZombie on
  • subediisubedii Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I tend to buy only a few games at a time, but I largely buy them as soon as I want them. I like to have a few games to play through at any one time, so I can switch between them when I get bored of one. If I buy too many games it just builds up a backlog. I find in general there's far too many good games out there that I might be interested in, so I guess this makes me limit myself to just the best ones at any given point.

    This policy helps during "dry" spells, since there's usually a few November / December blockbusters that I had to miss out on at the time. And hey, they've often dropped in price by then.

    subedii on
  • RyadicRyadic Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    If it's a game I can't wait to play or have been waiting for for a while I will get it right away. God of War Chains of Olympus is a game I just recently got. I will do the same for Crisis Core, Spore, Starcraft 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, and Grand Theft Auto 4 when they come out later this year (or whenever Starcraft 2 comes out). Other than that, if it's a game I really wanna play, but don't have the money or can't really justify paying $50 for it, I'll wait for price to go down or get it used. Heavenly Sword is an example of this, I will get it when the price is reasonable. I don't really think about what games I'm playing and if I've beat them or not prior to making a new purchase. So that's why my back log is full of unfinished games or games I played only a few hours of.

    Ryadic on
    steam_sig.png
  • KyanilisKyanilis Bellevue, WARegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I definitely have the same strategy as your brother, maybe even worse. Anyone that knows me gets quite surprised if I sit down and finish a game, but I've got so many games...

    I think the worst part is I'm at the very end of several games, I just haven't brought myself to finish them.

    Kyanilis on
  • elizabexelizabex Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I'll also buy games on whims ~ I'm usually pretty good at only buying games that I know I'll like.. and I'm also good at putting games aside, knowing that I'll come back to them later. Case in point: I bought Gears of War when I first bought my 360, played it for a few minutes when I brought it home, and then came back to something like 9 months later and have since played through it several times.

    ...I'll also note that as I was writing the above, I was like...... "...did I list my copy of Eternal Sonata on eBay and then forget about it?" and had a very significant panic moment. Eek!

    elizabex on
    elizabex.png
  • RonenRonen Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I buy the one game I'm most anticipating each month. If there are no games coming out that month and I'm itching for a new game, I'll go back and grab a game that I wanted but couldn't fit into my schedule.

    This month is an exception as I got both Ace Attorney 4 and Smash Bros. I justify it to myself by saying that Smash Bros is more of a long term investment than a game purchase.

    Ronen on
    Go play MOTHER3

    or Brawl. 4854.6102.3895 Name: NU..
  • DoronronDoronron Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I recently picked up a 360, and suddenly my options on upcoming releases ballooned.

    However, I did run into issues with game purchases on PC over the last several years. In general, I found that two out of every three games I bought would get played for a few weeks, then put in the closet, later to be sold.

    I'm attempting to avoid that on the 360 -- if I have even the slightest doubt that I won't get more than one play through on a given game, or that I won't have the time to devote to enjoying or completing the game, I won't buy it.

    My Nintendo game set is incredibly small. Wii Sports, Wii Fit (soon), and LEGO Star Wars are the only physical games I own for it. The rest of my collection has been entirely VC.

    My PC collection has gone through several purges, and to my chagrin, I have rebought some of the games I sold. I don't want to repeat that mistake with either of my consoles. Once Spore is released, my PC collection will freeze as is until Civ 5.

    Doronron on
  • LunkerLunker Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Pureauthor wrote: »
    New games don't exist until I finish my current ones.

    (Of course, I have a flexible definition of 'finish', which is either 'complete game in normal mode once' or 'I get bored of playing it')

    That last part is important; there's a difference between "finishing a game" and "being done with a game," and I've learned to accept far more of the latter than I ever did when I was younger. It's also worth noting that my taste in games has also changed along with it, and I'm honestly not sure which was the cause and which was the effect: I trend toward very pick-up-and-play, short-burst twitch gameplay, like rhythm games and shmups, instead of longer, more narrative-driven affairs like RPGs. Things where the actual act of playing is the main drive of enjoyment, not so much about seeing a build-up of conflict and resolution over time.

    I overloaded myself on trying to buy/experience too many games at once last fall, as I'm sure a ton of gamers did. Games like Zack & Wiki and Trauma Center: New Blood lie on the top of my Pile of Shame, but I also grossly underestimated how much of a hold Rock Band would take on the entirety of my being. So I'm shaving down my backlog (The Backloggery helps a ton in that regard) because there are just too many games I own that I haven't gotten enough out of.

    Lunker on
    Tweet my Face: @heyitslunker | Save money at CheapAssGamer (not an affiliate link)
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator, Administrator admin
    edited March 2008
    shyguy wrote: »
    Someone on this forum said once that very few games have gameplay engaging enough to justify their length, and I agree with that whole-heartedly. I generally try to beat the games that I buy, but I don't particularly care if I don't.

    I do that. Mass Effect was the latest game I bought. Really great, engaging, interesting story.

    I stopped playing after the third planet.

    Echo on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    This links in to something I've been pondering recently.

    I've realised that I'm not much better than a Pirate to any company that sells it consoles at a loss to make it back on software.

    I bought a massively discounted new 360 in sale (£35 under RRP AND came with a free game), and thats is after they alread took a loss on the hardware assuming my game purchases would net them a profit.

    But I only buy 2nd hand games, or new games when they are typically being sold on a loss leading promotion. Bioshock? £20 new within a month of release. Same for Assassin's Creed (£25) and CoD4 (£22.50).

    I won't spend over £25 on a new 360 game period. Because that is what they are worth to me. If Microsoft want to stick a £50 price tag on them, thats fine. They just won't get my money (directly). I'll wait.

    For my DS and Wii thats not been a problem for Nintendo because they made a profit on hardware, but I still by my software when I can get it cheap. Trauma Centre? £15 new. Sonic ATSR and Excite Truck £20 new, at release.

    The only time I buy a game new and at RRP is if I feel it needs support. Like Zack and Wiki.

    And most DS games I now import, because fuck it, if you can manufacture in the cheapest possible country then I've ever right to buy from the cheapest country possible. Hence Space Invaders Extreme and Prof Layton.

    Lave II on
  • DoronronDoronron Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    IRT Echo: I hit that problem with Oblivion and Morrowind. It wasn't the gameplay mechanics that stopped me cold, it was the narrative approach (or lack thereof). It makes me wonder if I should avoid Fallout 3 for the same reason: Different gameplay, but still the same guys writing the story.

    Doronron on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    If retailers were unable to discount, they would want their margins to go up, and so would pay less for games/charge more.

    Publishers benefit from retailers being able to discount games.

    By shopping around and buying from the cheapest places, you are also rewarding those retailers which are most efficient and pass those savings on to consumers. Essentially increasing the profitability of any retailer who offers good prices, thus making retailers more inclined to lower prices.

    LewieP on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Lunker wrote: »
    Pureauthor wrote: »
    New games don't exist until I finish my current ones.

    (Of course, I have a flexible definition of 'finish', which is either 'complete game in normal mode once' or 'I get bored of playing it')

    That last part is important; there's a difference between "finishing a game" and "being done with a game," and I've learned to accept far more of the latter than I ever did when I was younger. It's also worth noting that my taste in games has also changed along with it, and I'm honestly not sure which was the cause and which was the effect: I trend toward very pick-up-and-play, short-burst twitch gameplay, like rhythm games and shmups, instead of longer, more narrative-driven affairs like RPGs. Things where the actual act of playing is the main drive of enjoyment, not so much about seeing a build-up of conflict and resolution over time.

    I overloaded myself on trying to buy/experience too many games at once last fall, as I'm sure a ton of gamers did. Games like Zack & Wiki and Trauma Center: New Blood lie on the top of my Pile of Shame, but I also grossly underestimated how much of a hold Rock Band would take on the entirety of my being. So I'm shaving down my backlog (The Backloggery helps a ton in that regard) because there are just too many games I own that I haven't gotten enough out of.

    I like to think of Lunker as the American version of me.

    Just remove my Top Hat and monocle and add a trucker cap and a string vest.

    Oh. And Rock Band.

    The Cunt.

    But, yeah, my experience is very much the same. A defining experience was with Oblivion, which is, for the first time in about 5 years, an RPG I enjoyed, but I've still given up on it because it needs at least a two hour sessions to produce that feeling of achievement that I can get in twenty minutes picking up a new star on Mario Galaxy, or completing another set of levels on N+. Or bumping my score up on Pac Man CE.

    Lave II on
  • LunkerLunker Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Echo wrote: »
    shyguy wrote: »
    Someone on this forum said once that very few games have gameplay engaging enough to justify their length, and I agree with that whole-heartedly. I generally try to beat the games that I buy, but I don't particularly care if I don't.

    I do that. Mass Effect was the latest game I bought. Really great, engaging, interesting story.

    I stopped playing after the third planet.

    Mass Effect is actually a grand argument against completionism. If you're too hung up in completing all of the fetch-quest subplots on the Citadel or mindlessly landing on every single uncharted planet you find, you're going to sink 40+ hours and be bored for two-thirds of it. Instead, if you only do the stuff that's interesting and focus mostly on the "story" planets (the main quest), it's a 12-15 hour game that's all killer, no filler. I started ignoring all non-story related items halfway through the game, and I wish I had done it sooner because the last 4-5 hours proper of the game are just fantastic.

    Lunker on
    Tweet my Face: @heyitslunker | Save money at CheapAssGamer (not an affiliate link)
  • FrabbaFrabba Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Whim purchasing for me. Granted, these whims have decrease quite signifigantly since I stopped working at gamestop and being around games 24/7.

    Frabba on
    I'm big in Internet Spaceships.
  • The Last GentThe Last Gent Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Yeah, see, I should have clarified, I only fully complete what I intend to complete in a game. For example, on Zelda TP, I got all the heart pieces and Poes, but I never completed my fishing journal or the Rollgoal mini-game, they simply didn't hold any interest for me. Essentially, I'm talking about getting too many games BEFORE I reach that point of completion/lost interest, which is obviously far longer than my bro's.

    The Last Gent on
  • ReznikReznik Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I usually rent or play demos first unless it's a game in a series I know is good (Metal Gear Solid, for example). I very rarely buy a game without reading up on it a lot first, and exceptions to this are almost always cheap, used games (Shadow of the Colossus, Okami).

    I try to buy cheap/used as much as possible unless it's a game I have to have -now-, like Rock Band or Crisis Core, and soon to be MGS4 and FF13.

    Lately I've been buying more games since I have a job, but I still don't buy very many games. I don't understand how you guys can buy so many games and just leave them sitting around for so long while you play other stuff. Wouldn't it be cheaper to finish the stuff you have first, and then buy the other games when their prices drop?

    Now that I'm signed up on Goozex, I'm buying even fewer new games and mostly trying to fill up my PS1 collection (goddammit FFVII, Xenogears and Bushido Blade, be available now and cheaper!).

    Reznik on
    Do... Re.... Mi... Ti... La...
    Do... Re... Mi... So... Fa.... Do... Re.... Do...
    Forget it...
  • RainbowDespairRainbowDespair Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I've long given up trying to finish every game I own. I play games for fun. When a game stops being fun, I stop and usually end up selling or trading it (Goozex rocks!) to help fund more games. If a game continues to be fun even after I've technically beaten it, I continue playing it. This results in things like me spending more time on say Triggerheart Exelica (a game that just about every official review thrashed for being short) than I have on many long involved RPGs. Or the fact that I've spent over a hundred hours on RE4 and hundreds of hours on Civilization IV and Titan Quest.

    Heck, I loved Persona 3 for the first 20-30 hours, but around that time, the game started to become a chore for me. Off it went to Goozex.

    In general, my game-getting strategy is to buy the occasional game supplemented by Goozex trades & GameTap. Recently, I had an anomaly as we got a ton of money back for our tax refund and I went a little wild. In the course of about a week, I bought:

    Lost Odyssey (360)
    Smash Bros Brawl (Wii)
    A year subscription to GameTap ($60)
    $75 worth of MS points for buying XBLA games (bought Triggerheart Exelica, N+, Rocketmen, and Poker Smash so far)
    Wild Arms 5 (PS2 - Found it new for under $30 since I really like WA4)
    Raiden III (PS2 - Found it new for $15 - Really fun straightforward shmup)

    But that's an exception to the rule.

    RainbowDespair on
  • MundaneSoulMundaneSoul fight fighter Daehan MingukRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    There are usually only a few games every year that I buy on release day. This year it'll be GTA IV (already reserved) and Fable II/Fallout 3 if they're released this year. But for the most part, if I'm excited about a game I'll buy it for 30 or 40 bucks used. Other games that I think, "Oh, that looks interesting," I'll wait and buy a few years down the road when they've dropped into the 10 to 20 dollar price range.

    I'd like to say I'm a completionist like you, that I buy a game and don't get another until I finish it, because I wish that I could be that way. But I'm totally like your brother. I play a game until it starts to bore me and then move on. Most of the time they're great games too. I always end up coming back at some point for the great ones, and if I'm really involved in the game (usually RPGs or Adventure-types) then I'll end up finishing it, like I did most recently with Mass Effect. That game caught a hold of my nuts and wouldn't let go.

    The other exception for me is short games, and they tend to end up being some of my favorites for some reason. Sure, I can play Jak 3 to 100% in 10 hours or so, but I LIKE it that way. Also, games that I can play in short bursts without worrying about progress, like Rock Band or Smash, are a win.

    Wait. Did I just admit to loving Jak 3?

    MundaneSoul on
    steam_sig.png
  • BubbaTBubbaT Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    LewieP wrote: »
    If retailers were unable to discount, they would want their margins to go up, and so would pay less for games/charge more.

    Publishers benefit from retailers being able to discount games.

    By shopping around and buying from the cheapest places, you are also rewarding those retailers which are most efficient and pass those savings on to consumers. Essentially increasing the profitability of any retailer who offers good prices, thus making retailers more inclined to lower prices.

    Plus it's not like the publishers aren't getting paid when the retailer has a sale. The retailer just makes a smaller profit per sale. Gamestop doesn't want to give up that margin, but Fry's, Lion Games, and Family Video are constantly discounting new and pre-order games that I'm sure they're paying full wholesale price for. Now Circuit City and Toys R Us are getting into the act - Toys R Us this week was offering SSBB + GH3 bundle for ~$110. Even Best Buy is constantly circulating 10% off coupons, knocking $6 off 360/PS3 games and $5 off Wii games.

    I don't think I've paid full price at release since Diablo 2.

    BubbaT on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Aye, your both right, at worse I'm only hurting the shop not the developer.

    And to be honest, I don't really care if I hurt the monopoly that is game any more.

    Lave II on
  • Local H JayLocal H Jay Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I get a game as near to release as possible if I can.
    If I don't, then I wait 'till I can find it used.
    I generally play a game until I beat it, then dig into multiplayer.
    Only games I've purchased and NOT completed fully are The Orange Box (Stopped in HL2 somewhere, beat Portal, haven't touched the Episodes), and New Super Mario Brothers (lost interest).
    Otherwise, I rent. If I like it, I might buy it.
    Like COD4, I liked it alot when I rented it, so I know to eventually buy it. (And DMC4, Army of Two, etc...)

    Local H Jay on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Also, my PhD is rapidly coming to an end (all going to plan* I'll be taking my chances with getting tube to name me Dr Lave).

    This means soon I'll be poorer than a poor thing. But thankfully I've a pretty sizeable back log of games to keep me going (not that I'll have time to play them). As such I'm not buying any game unless:
    • It's a ridiculous bargin.
    • It's Mario Kart
    • It's WiiFit - because I'll need to do at least some exercise when I'm nocturnally writing up and I work best at night, when it's probably best not to go for a run.
    • Resident Evil 5 accidentally gets released a year early.
    • It's a DS game that I can play on my commute, and it's cheap.

    Watch me fail.



    *Extremely unlikely.

    Lave II on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Lave II wrote: »
    It's a ridiculous bargin.

    I'll take the case

    Edit: did you ninja edit that in, or am I blind?

    LewieP on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I get a game as near to release as possible if I can.
    If I don't, then I wait 'till I can find it used.
    I generally play a game until I beat it, then dig into multiplayer.
    Only games I've purchased and NOT completed fully are The Orange Box (Stopped in HL2 somewhere, beat Portal, haven't touched the Episodes), and New Super Mario Brothers (lost interest).
    Otherwise, I rent. If I like it, I might buy it.
    Like COD4, I liked it alot when I rented it, so I know to eventually buy it. (And DMC4, Army of Two, etc...)

    Interestingly NSMB is the only game since, er, forever that I've 100%'ed.

    Beautiful.

    Lave II on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    LewieP wrote: »
    Lave II wrote: »
    It's a ridiculous bargin.

    I'll take the case

    Edit: did you ninja edit that in, or am I blind?

    N+ for life baby.

    Lave II on
  • slash000slash000 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I tend to only buy the games that I know that I want. I usually am only playing 2 games at any given time.

    I tend to hold off on buying new games until I've at least beaten (first playthrough) one of my two current games.

    That way I feel comfortable shelving one of the two 'current' games and starting the new one. And if I feel like digging back into the previous one for replay value, I can do so, without feeling like I'm missing anything.


    I try to get the most out of my games and enjoy them to the fullest without ending up with 'too many games' to ultimately not ever finish any of them.

    slash000 on
  • Lave IILave II Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I've managed to break 'buying a game' equating to 'playing that game next.' For instance, I bought Zack and Wiki back in feb, but I'll not get to play it till easter - when it can have the attention it deserves.

    But crucially I've not done that thing where you play the first few hours. If I do that, I'll rarely come back to a game. So it's sitting their. Wrapped. Tempting me.

    And thats special and better and fun.

    Lave II on
  • Dodge AspenDodge Aspen Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I tend to buy games when they first come out. I will usually buy 6-8 games a year on release day, and then save about 5-6 game that I really wanted but not quite as much as the other ones that were coming out around the same time. I like to devote myself to one console game at a time, and one or two quick-session handhelds at a time. As well, there are the occassional XBLA and Virtual Console game that are all impulse buys, and rarely get a priority spot in my play time.

    Right now, it's Brawl, with Contra IV and Professor Layton. Now, I have a problem coming up in April, when Mario Kart and GTA IV come out in the same week. Also, Bionic Commando: Rearmed and the HD Street Fighter II Remix should hit around that time. I think I'll definitely be picking up Mario Kart, and wait a month or two for GTA, since MK will likely be shorter to get through initially, and then be nice to go back to whenever friends are over. That's kind of what I'm hoping Brawl will be like. I want to be able to set it aside by the end of April, knowing it will still be there when I want it for battles with buddies. The online component makes it tough, though.

    EDIT: I've had to hold off on No More Heroes and Bully: Scholarship Edition. I'll probably pick them up near the end of the year, if I can still find them.

    Dodge Aspen on
    Xbox - Dodge Mega
    Switch - SW-3699-5063-5018

  • RainbowDespairRainbowDespair Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Lave II wrote: »
    I've managed to break 'buying a game' equating to 'playing that game next.' For instance, I bought Zack and Wiki back in feb, but I'll not get to play it till easter - when it can have the attention it deserves.

    But crucially I've not done that thing where you play the first few hours. If I do that, I'll rarely come back to a game. So it's sitting their. Wrapped. Tempting me.

    And thats special and better and fun.

    I like that. That's what I'm doing with Mass Effect. I got it from Goozex about a week ago, but I'm not going to play it (aside from briefly sticking it in the system to make sure that it works) until I'm done with Lost Odyssey.

    RainbowDespair on
  • Agent OrangeAgent Orange Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I tend to finish almost all of the games that I buy. However, I buy far fewer games these days than I used to, partly because of time and the increasing cost/decreasing length of games, and partly because the industry seems to be making fewer games that I'm really excited about playing.

    There are a few games that I'll buy on opening day (Bioware games and "western-style" RPGs in general, and probably Resident Evil 5 since I liked 4 so much), but generally I just wait a few months until I can find them for half price on EBay.

    Agent Orange on
  • spookymuffinspookymuffin ( ° ʖ ° ) Puyallup WA Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I try not to get too many games at one time, but I always go on a bender every 4-6 months. Being in Japan, I only really get to get to the good sales and what not when I get back to the U.S., and at those times, I buy way too many games at one time to play through. I'll go the nearest Gamestop/EB, or local used retailer, and spend $200 easy (I save up before hand). I come home with a tower of games, play one or two all the way through, then pick through the rest for an hour each. I always look at my collection with both pride and regret, because it's an awesome mix of games I'll probably never play.

    On the new side, I'll get games that I really want at launch, or games that I see tons of replay in (SSBB or Rock Band).

    spookymuffin on
    PSN: MegaSpooky // 3DS: 3797-6276-7138
    Wii U NNID: MegaSpooky
  • DagrabbitDagrabbit Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I used to buy 3-4 new games a year, and the rest were bought used or heavily discounted (I lived for the 9.99 and under section in EB Games). But even that added up over time, and I quickly realized I was spending too much money on games that I either didn't end up liking very much, or would only play once. Even single-player games I liked a lot, I realized I would almost never replay them. I ended up trading in a lot of games.

    As a result, I switched over to doing almost all of my gaming through Gamefly. I make exceptions for multiplayer games, and I can always pick up a game I rented and do want to replay later on when it becomes really cheap. Now I can play pretty much any game I want and not worry about cost, or wasting money, or having a pile of games I never touch. It also reduces the pressure to keep playing a game I don't like in order to get my money's worth. I just return it.

    Dagrabbit on
Sign In or Register to comment.