The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Gay. Yay or Nay

rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
edited April 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
Who else is sick of the use of this word as a derogatory term? Maybe I'm being prejudiced but even the thought of hearing this usage, usually in a shrill voice, over Xbox Live just makes me disappointed. Is it on the way out? Is it in vogue? What's going on? I'm really not pushing some PC agenda here. As an expression though I think it's beyond lazy. I mean use a real expletive.

The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
________________
rvcontre78 on
«13456716

Posts

  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I'm really not pushing some PC agenda here.

    Yes you are. And it's perfectly fine.

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I'm really not pushing some PC agenda here.

    Yes you are. And it's perfectly fine.

    Well as far as being politically correct, I guess there has to be some truth to that but honestly it irritates me in the same way that excessive fart jokes in a movie irritates me. Now... well thought out fart joke? Good stuff. Lazy fart joke? Irritating. That's the difference I'm trying to discern here.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    This thread is so






    PC.

    Drez on
    Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Drez wrote: »
    This thread is so






    PC.

    I'm really not going for that though. I mean no one else thinks it's just lazy to call something gay? Fuck has infinitely more entertainment value. It just doesn't go out of style.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • HachfaceHachface Not the Minister Farrakhan you're thinking of Dammit, Shepard!Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Most people here probably agree with you. My pet peeve is people who claim that the "meaning of the word has changed," so it's okay to use it as a synonym for stupid or lame.

    edit: the problems with gay as an epithet are much deeper than being "lazy."

    Hachface on
  • HeartlashHeartlash Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I've heard it used less and less as a derogatory term as I've gotten older and older. It's one of those things young men aren't likely to stop doing for some time, though.

    Granted, we can all do our part.

    Heartlash on
    My indie mobile gaming studio: Elder Aeons
    Our first game is now available for free on Google Play: Frontier: Isle of the Seven Gods
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Hachface wrote: »
    Most people here probably agree with you. My pet peeve is people who claim that the "meaning of the word has changed," so it's okay to use it as a synonym for stupid or lame.

    edit: the problems with gay as an epithet are much deeper than being "lazy."

    This is very, very true. I'm just trying to attack it from a different angle. I wholeheartedly agree with it being completely offensive to everyone who has a sense of decency but the fact that it also has very little comedic impact now and is still used all the time just baffles me.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • DjiemDjiem Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Drez wrote: »
    This thread is so






    PC.

    I'm really not going for that though. I mean no one else thinks it's just lazy to call something gay? Fuck has infinitely more entertainment value. It just doesn't go out of style.

    It's lazy alright, but just saying it as part of a sentence doesn't bother me. Many times will my brother tell me a bothersome new and I'll just say "Aw, gay, [insert rest of sentence]", or vice-versa. I guess the thing is that it's just too well installed in our vocabulary now that we don't even notice it. I guess that's it. I don't cringe each time I hear it because I don't notice it at all.

    If someone was trying to be offensive (or funny) simply by saying something is gay, though, yeah, that's lame. If the focus of the insult or joke is "gay", it is hard not to pay attention to it. And then it's very lazy.

    I'm all for clever and witty gay jokes, however.

    Edit: About offensiveness, I don't give a shit if anything I say is offensive to someone I don't care about personally. Plus, I completely disagree that the word is completely offensive to "anyone with a sense of decency". You're not the moral compass of the universe.

    Djiem on
  • MgcwMgcw Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Hachface wrote: »
    Most people here probably agree with you. My pet peeve is people who claim that the "meaning of the word has changed," so it's okay to use it as a synonym for stupid or lame.

    edit: the problems with gay as an epithet are much deeper than being "lazy."

    This is very, very true. I'm just trying to attack it from a different angle. I wholeheartedly agree with it being completely offensive to everyone who has a sense of decency but the fact that it also has very little comedic impact now and is still used all the time just baffles me.

    "comedic impact"? The fuck? No one I know uses ''gay'' to mean actually homosexual. Faggot is the choice epithet and a word I myself hate to hear and it grates me. Gay is just another word now due to many factors.

    Also, it's yea not "yay".

    Mgcw on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Heartlash wrote: »
    I've heard it used less and less as a derogatory term as I've gotten older and older. It's one of those things young men aren't likely to stop doing for some time, though.

    Granted, we can all do our part.

    I think that young men is awfully kind of you to use in this sense. I remember talking to someone trying to use the whole, "Well it's just what the word means now." applied to "Jew". I guess I'm just venting now as no one in their right mind is going to come into this thread and be the defender of that usage.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Mgcw wrote: »
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Hachface wrote: »
    Most people here probably agree with you. My pet peeve is people who claim that the "meaning of the word has changed," so it's okay to use it as a synonym for stupid or lame.

    edit: the problems with gay as an epithet are much deeper than being "lazy."

    This is very, very true. I'm just trying to attack it from a different angle. I wholeheartedly agree with it being completely offensive to everyone who has a sense of decency but the fact that it also has very little comedic impact now and is still used all the time just baffles me.

    "comedic impact"? The fuck? No one I know uses ''gay'' to mean actually homosexual. Faggot is the choice epithet and a word I myself hate to hear and it grates me. Gay is just another word now due to many factors.

    Also, it's yea not "yay".

    I like how "Yay" looks though.
    And due to many factors? Like what?

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • CervetusCervetus Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I think we should go back to gay meaning happy. Why the fuck do homosexuals get to reacquisition happiness?

    Cervetus on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Djiem wrote: »
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Drez wrote: »
    This thread is so






    PC.

    I'm really not going for that though. I mean no one else thinks it's just lazy to call something gay? Fuck has infinitely more entertainment value. It just doesn't go out of style.

    It's lazy alright, but just saying it as part of a sentence doesn't bother me. Many times will my brother tell me a bothersome new and I'll just say "Aw, gay, [insert rest of sentence]", or vice-versa. I guess the thing is that it's just too well installed in our vocabulary now that we don't even notice it. I guess that's it. I don't cringe each time I hear it because I don't notice it at all.

    If someone was trying to be offensive (or funny) simply by saying something is gay, though, yeah, that's lame. If the focus of the insult or joke is "gay", it is hard not to pay attention to it. And then it's very lazy.

    I'm all for clever and witty gay jokes, however.

    I think the reason that it's being used this way now is everyone's acceptance of it in that way. Does that mean it's right? I'll use "jew" as an example again I mean you just don't hear that used anymore without a lot of cringing and I hope that it gets that way.
    Now as far as gay jokes go though, that's a different subject. I have the same issue with "gay" jokes as I would with polish, black, blonde, jokes which is to say there can be appropriate times. (Appropriate being italicized to cover a range of... appropriateness.)

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • AJAlkaline40AJAlkaline40 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    I've eliminated that usage of the term gay from my vocabulary. It wasn't even very hard or anything, and required something like a week's worth of conscious effort. All you have to do is stop yourself when you'd say "gay" and say "lame" instead. It's not hard to do and it eliminates a ridiculous homophobic undertone in your everyday speech. It's just stupid to tolerate the use of the word when there's another word that's perfectly acceptable to use in every day conversation that means the exact same thing.

    AJAlkaline40 on
    idiot.jpg
  • DjiemDjiem Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I don't mind the "jew" usage. Not even the n-word usage.

    If I actually knew that someone was sensitive about these words, I wouldn't use them around him or her (unless I actually want to bother that person because I hate him/her). I simply can't agree with this thread being about "Saying or doing this is wrong. Let's discuss why it's wrong."

    Does it mean it's right? No, it doesn't. But I think it's right. Or at least not wrong.

    Djiem on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Well again, sense of decency has a wide range. I think that commonly people associate that phrase with unnecessarily overwhelming wholesomeness but I just mean it in the sense of not trying to be an asshat.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • Ethan SmithEthan Smith Origin name: Beart4to Arlington, VARegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Appropriate use of 'gay' in the typical male conversation-

    Male1-So I went shopping today
    Male2-Gaaayyyy
    Male1-It's ok, it was with my brother
    Male2-Gaaaaaaaaaayyyy...
    Male1-Then, to pay him for my new clothes, I gave him a blowjob
    Male2-yyyyyyy-Wait what?

    Ethan Smith on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Djiem wrote: »
    I don't mind the "jew" usage. Not even the n-word usage.

    If I actually knew that someone was sensitive about these words, I wouldn't use them around him or her (unless I actually want to bother that person because I hate him/her). I simply can't agree with this thread being about "Saying or doing this is wrong. Let's discuss why it's wrong."

    Does it mean it's right? No, it doesn't. But I think it's right. Or at least not wrong.

    Well I'm not going to search through my random ranting again but I don't mean to say that it's wrong. It's an opinion thread just like any other to gather other opinions.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • DjiemDjiem Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    Djiem on
  • DasUberEdwardDasUberEdward Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I don't get it. If anything such words are the most basic and lowly insults. Why should they have sting? It'd be akin to me insulting you for the color of your eyes or actually trying to making a valid criticism of a human being in relation to their favorite type of jelly bean.

    I just don't understand it.

    DasUberEdward on
    steam_sig.png
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Djiem wrote: »
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    This isn't an attack on you and I certainly don't claim to be above this even in this context but it's difficult to discern when a person who's isn't homosexual using the word "gay" isn't being genuinely homophobic. I saw that you used the phrase N-word instead of (edited). Why is that?

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • Toxic ToysToxic Toys Are you really taking my advice? Really?Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Are you gay? You want to make out you fag?

    Really, a word only hurts if you let it. I really don't care if some says "gay" to a lame idea or my blowing some dude.

    It might be the way I feel, but sticks and stones. I really don't care. I call things gay all the time. At the same time I take dick in the ass, which is totaly homo. And gay, as you would call it.

    Slang is all ways changing.

    Toxic Toys on
    3DS code: 2938-6074-2306, Nintendo Network ID: ToxicToys, PSN: zutto
  • MgcwMgcw Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Djiem wrote: »
    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    Yup, and in my opinion it's not really hard to tell the difference by the way one speaks.

    I think people are getting offended on behalf of gay people when gays themselves, I assume, probably don't even care.

    Mgcw on
  • edited April 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    If gay friends of mine I didn't use it I might feel bad. But they do. So I don't.

    Quid on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I don't get it. If anything such words are the most basic and lowly insults. Why should they have sting? It'd be akin to me insulting you for the color of your eyes or actually trying to making a valid criticism of a human being in relation to their favorite type of jelly bean.

    I just don't understand it.

    Because making a valid criticism isn't in the nature of stereotyping and being valid would be much more preferable in most cases. If I'm a cheater and you call me a cheater I might be pissed but you'd still be correct.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Okay so gay still has the homophobic undertones for people?

    Because it seems pretty common among non-homophobic people, and frankly the idea of censoring an insult because it's insulting is ri-damn-diculous to me.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Mgcw wrote: »
    Djiem wrote: »
    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    Yup, and in my opinion it's not really hard to tell the difference by the way one speaks.

    I think people are getting offended on behalf of gay people when gays themselves, I assume, probably don't even care.

    Well, why make that assumption. That's like saying that only black people have the right to be offended by black jokes.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Djiem wrote: »
    It's lazy alright, but just saying it as part of a sentence doesn't bother me. Many times will my brother tell me a bothersome new and I'll just say "Aw, gay, [insert rest of sentence]", or vice-versa. I guess the thing is that it's just too well installed in our vocabulary now that we don't even notice it. I guess that's it. I don't cringe each time I hear it because I don't notice it at all.

    If someone was trying to be offensive (or funny) simply by saying something is gay, though, yeah, that's lame. If the focus of the insult or joke is "gay", it is hard not to pay attention to it. And then it's very lazy.

    I'm all for clever and witty gay jokes, however.

    Edit: About offensiveness, I don't give a shit if anything I say is offensive to someone I don't care about personally. Plus, I completely disagree that the word is completely offensive to "anyone with a sense of decency". You're not the moral compass of the universe.

    I agree.

    Really, it's all in how it's used. It's just like the word "fuck". Sometimes it's an insult. And sometimes, it's just a fucking comma.

    shryke on
  • NerissaNerissa Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Djiem wrote: »
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    This isn't an attack on you and I certainly don't claim to be above this even in this context but it's difficult to discern when a person who's isn't homosexual using the word "gay" isn't being genuinely homophobic. I saw that you used the phrase N-word instead of (edited). Why is that?

    because using that word will get you in trouble here... you might want to edit out your post

    Nerissa on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I try not to use gay as an insult these days but it's pretty context dependent. I mean, depending on circumstance and company I have a wide range of completely inappropriate words used precisely because they're completely inappropriate.

    Now this I can totally understand. I guess my lesson to learn is that when you go into a video game forum you're about to enter a whole new set of arrangements. Now, should I adjust? Sure, but that doesn't mean that I should start agreeing with the normals that are here. Also, I can voice my opinion and see what the reactions are too. : )

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • ArkadyArkady Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I vote yay, even though it does bother me and I try to not use it's popular slang meaning. Because if you're going to go to bat for gay, then you need to be ready to go to bat for sucks, lame, weak, retarded, stupid, blows, pussy (as an insult) and a few more I'm sure I'm missing. Frankly, that strikes me as a bit much.

    Arkady on
    untitled-1.jpg
    LoL: failboattootoot
  • DjiemDjiem Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Nerissa wrote: »
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Djiem wrote: »
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    This isn't an attack on you and I certainly don't claim to be above this even in this context but it's difficult to discern when a person who's isn't homosexual using the word "gay" isn't being genuinely homophobic. I saw that you used the phrase N-word instead of (edited). Why is that?

    because using that word will get you in trouble here... you might want to edit out your post

    Exactly. This is the only reason I said n-word.

    Djiem on
  • rvcontre78rvcontre78 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Nerissa wrote: »
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Djiem wrote: »
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    This isn't an attack on you and I certainly don't claim to be above this even in this context but it's difficult to discern when a person who's isn't homosexual using the word "gay" isn't being genuinely homophobic. I saw that you used the phrase N-word instead of (edited). Why is that?

    because using that word will get you in trouble here... you might want to edit out your post

    So, I guess that's another thing. Why is one censored and one not? Why are there such differences between these two words as to which one is ok? They both have different levels of offensiveness depending on where you are. I remember when someone (I think about five years ago) used the term niggardly (and correctly about the budget that he was dealing with) and caught a lot of flak. If people's sensitivities to the word is the basis on censorship then that seems to be arbitrary.

    rvcontre78 on
    The Top Ten Neglected NES games by The Gaming Standard
    ________________
  • DukiDuki Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I use it in a derogatory fashion for stuff I don't like, yes. It's obviously offensive though.

    Duki on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Rv, listen to what they're saying. The n-word is banned here and you need to edit it out of your posts. It's not because it was offending people but because it was pulling the forums up on some unwanted google searches.

    Quid on
  • Toxic ToysToxic Toys Are you really taking my advice? Really?Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I try not to use gay as an insult these days but it's pretty context dependent. I mean, depending on circumstance and company I have a wide range of completely inappropriate words used precisely because they're completely inappropriate.

    Toxic Toys on
    3DS code: 2938-6074-2306, Nintendo Network ID: ToxicToys, PSN: zutto
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Nerissa wrote: »
    rvcontre78 wrote: »
    Djiem wrote: »
    Anyway, unlike what I said earlier in the thread (I guess I used the wrong adverb), I seldom (maybe never) use the word outside of my circle of friends or with my bro. The same way I never EVER say "lol" out loud (even if it's ironic) unless I'm with my friends who are internet-savy.

    To be honest, reading "could of / should of / might of" on this forum or others piss me off to no end (like, actually bothers me) so I can understand why some people are annoyed by a word I don't even notice anymore.

    The only homophobic sentences or undertones that bother me are those made by genuinely homophobic people.

    This isn't an attack on you and I certainly don't claim to be above this even in this context but it's difficult to discern when a person who's isn't homosexual using the word "gay" isn't being genuinely homophobic. I saw that you used the phrase N-word instead of (edited). Why is that?

    because using that word will get you in trouble here... you might want to edit out your post

    So, I guess that's another thing. Why is one censored and one not? Why are there such differences between these two words as to which one is ok? They both have different levels of offensiveness depending on where you are. I remember when someone (I think about five years ago) used the term niggardly (and correctly about the budget that he was dealing with) and caught a lot of flak. If people's sensitivities to the word is the basis on censorship then that seems to be arbitrary.

    People are arbitrary, thus things will not always be equal or logical.

    Humanity 101.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Hey Kagera, I'd also recommend you edit out of his posts when you quote him. Case I'm pretty sure adding -ly to the end of the n-word doesn't get someone out of it.

    Quid on
  • DjiemDjiem Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Quid wrote: »
    Rv, listen to what they're saying. The n-word is banned here and you need to edit it out of your posts. It's not because it was offending people but because it was pulling the forums up on some unwanted google searches.

    That's interesting. I never knew that and always disagreed with the word being banned for PC reasons (though I still obey the forum rules, if I'm creating an account here I agree to play by the rules), but now that it's for a completely logical reason, I'm all for it.

    EDIT: Niggardly has absolutely nothing to do with the n-word, Quid.

    Djiem on
This discussion has been closed.