The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

a

GPIA7RGPIA7R Registered User regular
edited August 2017 in Debate and/or Discourse
.

GPIA7R on

Posts

  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I am a cloud.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • LuinmacLuinmac Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I am a cloud.

    ... That's nice.


    I honestly expect Monster to back off. This guy sounds like he would love to go to court with Monster Cables.

    Then again, maybe it's just a very well written bluff, /shrug

    Luinmac on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.

    Satan. on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • GPIA7RGPIA7R Registered User regular
    edited August 2017
    .

    GPIA7R on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    Man I didn't even get that far, I heard about it a few days ago on Engadget and couldn't care less.

    Satan. on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    So... Share your opinion?
    I will do no such thing.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • NintoNinto Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I think the response to Monster Cable is mildly funny in a legalese *ownage* sort of way, but the really interesting bit of information here is the potential proof that Monster Cable engages in unethical behaviour. Honestly I kind of wish that the owner of Blue Jeans Cable had acted a bit more as a honeypot and worked to draw them in to actual litigation rather than smacking them down so soundly in the first letter.

    Ninto on
  • TarranonTarranon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    So... Share your opinion?
    I will do no such thing.

    Then stop trolling the fucking thread.

    Tarranon on
    You could be anywhere
    On the black screen
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Tarranon wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    So... Share your opinion?
    I will do no such thing.

    Then stop trolling the fucking thread.
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • JamesKeenanJamesKeenan Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Tarranon wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Satan. wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    That's all you got?

    I'm Satan.
    So I read the article, but then I felt bad for providing this dude with traffic to his site.

    So... Share your opinion?
    I will do no such thing.

    Then stop trolling the fucking thread.
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    Yessiree, 'cause we're eezy as Sundee mornin'

    JamesKeenan on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    That's what we've been doing. Kinda waiting for a mod to smack this one around I guess.

    Satan. on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    That's what we've been doing. Kinda waiting for a mod to smack this one around I guess.
    According to Tarranon I am a troll for posting, yet you are not a troll for posting. o_O

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • GPIA7RGPIA7R Registered User regular
    edited August 2017
    .

    GPIA7R on
  • JamesKeenanJamesKeenan Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    There. Fixed OP, and added a reason for you.

    Enjoy, and sorry for breaking your D&D rules. Completely my fault.

    Yes, yes it was. But now you're better.

    JamesKeenan on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Luinmac wrote: »
    I am a cloud.

    ... That's nice.


    I honestly expect Monster to back off. This guy sounds like he would love to go to court with Monster Cables.

    Then again, maybe it's just a very well written bluff, /shrug

    I think Monster will probably pull up anchor and move on to another small business that isn't so up on the law.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    There. Fixed OP, and added a reason for you.

    Enjoy, and sorry for breaking D&D rules by posting without quote. Sorry I didn't research for another link/source. Site-whore? It's not my site, I couldn't care less... It's just one place where I found his response. Completely my fault.

    Not to mention this site is linked on the Slashdot front page today. Fuck, I was going to make a thread about it till I saw this one.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    Yes, this is a poor thread about a relevant topic.

    If you want to post a link to a site with which you're affiliated, clear it with a mod, first. You won't be automatically denied, but we aren't here to feed your site traffic numbers. While you may have been acting innocently, there's definitely a strong element of site-whoring here.

    I'm going to lock this, now. If you want to recreate the thread without linking to your site, you're welcome to do so.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    Wait, is this not the OP's site/article or not? I thought he as much admitted it above.

    Fuck it, I'll unlock it.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • GPIA7RGPIA7R Registered User regular
    edited August 2017
    .

    GPIA7R on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    There. Fixed OP, and added a reason for you.

    Enjoy, and sorry for breaking D&D rules by posting without quote. Sorry I didn't research for another link/source. Site-whore? It's not my site, I couldn't care less... It's just one place where I found his response. Completely my fault.

    Not to mention this site is linked on the Slashdot front page today. Fuck, I was going to make a thread about it till I saw this one.

    Yes, the site was on Slashdot. That's where I found it, and that's why I linked it here.

    So to get that out of the way, those of you above "satan" and "cloud something or other" are wrong to accuse me of site-whoring.

    It was still a shitty OP to begin with. Also, our names really aren't that hard to type.

    On topic: another lawsuit, another day. Welcome to America.

    Satan. on
  • NintoNinto Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Satan. wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    There. Fixed OP, and added a reason for you.

    Enjoy, and sorry for breaking D&D rules by posting without quote. Sorry I didn't research for another link/source. Site-whore? It's not my site, I couldn't care less... It's just one place where I found his response. Completely my fault.

    Not to mention this site is linked on the Slashdot front page today. Fuck, I was going to make a thread about it till I saw this one.

    Yes, the site was on Slashdot. That's where I found it, and that's why I linked it here.

    So to get that out of the way, those of you above "satan" and "cloud something or other" are wrong to accuse me of site-whoring.

    It was still a shitty OP to begin with. Also, our names really aren't that hard to type.

    On topic: another lawsuit, another day. Welcome to America.

    That's the kind of apathy companies like Monster thrive on. Gooooooo Satan!

    Ninto on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    GPIA7R wrote: »
    Yes, because D&D is so big on allowing one link, no quote, semi-site-whore topics.

    There. Fixed OP, and added a reason for you.

    Enjoy, and sorry for breaking D&D rules by posting without quote. Sorry I didn't research for another link/source. Site-whore? It's not my site, I couldn't care less... It's just one place where I found his response. Completely my fault.

    Not to mention this site is linked on the Slashdot front page today. Fuck, I was going to make a thread about it till I saw this one.

    Yes, the site was on Slashdot. That's where I found it, and that's why I linked it here.

    So to get that out of the way, those of you above "satan" and "cloud something or other" are wrong to accuse me of site-whoring.

    Now, back on TOPIC:

    I'm not sure if Blue Jeans drawing them into the case would have been as satisfying as this. If that had happened, I doubt we would have heard much about the humiliation that Mr. Blue Jeans would have dealt to Monster

    Perhaps. I do appreciate that he is keeping the entire affair open to the public. It's nice to see the little guy fight back against the corporate whoremongers.

    The way Monster stomps around trying to crush upstart competitors really shows how scared they are that their customers will figure out they're getting totally bent over a barrel with their tender asses just waiting to be pulverized by Monster's thrusting manhood.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • PataPata Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I like the way the letter gradually goes from simply refuting every single claim Monster makes to him describing just why and how he will fight back and why they should back down.

    Pata on
    SRWWSig.pngEpisode 5: Mecha-World, Mecha-nisim, Mecha-beasts
  • AbsurdistAbsurdist Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I think reading the entire letter by the fellow from BJC is pretty damn worthwhile, mostly because of his clear, concise description of how hit-and-run licensing/litigation tactics work. That sort of thing's pretty common these days; I'd recommend that letter to anyone running a small start-up in case of infringement threats by larger companies.

    Absurdist on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.