The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
I have windows vista and I am in the market for a videocard that can run Mass Effect and Team Fortress 2 well. For Mass Effect it says the minimum video cards are NVIDIA GeForce 6800 (7300, 7600 GS, and 8500 are not good enough) or greater or ATI X1300 XT or greater (ATI X1300, x1300 pro, x1600 pro, 2600 hd, hd 2400, are not good enough). So I am looking for a video card to easily run Mass Effect and TF2. Any suggestions? Money is not a factor although it should be within reason... I don't need MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE RARG, I just want to be able to play these two games with most settings on high.
If you want to get a card right now, it's a bit of a bum time as both nVidia and ATi are just about to release new offerings in the $200 sweet zone. ATi's launches next week, the 4850, which looks to be a beast of a card given the pricepoint, only it's ATi drivers which may or may not bother you. nVidia are going to (allegidly) release a 9800GTX+ in July for $220.
At the moment, I still think the 8800GT is the sweet spot, although the prices of them have gone up rather than down recently. Performance wise, it'll kick TF2 into submission (TF2 really doesn't need much horsepower at all) and it'll run Mass Effect with all bells and whistles no problem.
Of course, really you should list your PC specs and Monitor, as there's no point spending large amounts of money if you're just runinng a 17" monitor, and similarly if you have a 30" beast you might need to edge towards the higher end a bit.
Man, regardless of the new cards, he's not looking to break the bank. The 8800 GTS 512 will easily run anything out there. And it's a good price. It's still got a bit of life left in it.
At the moment, I still think the 8800GT is the sweet spot, although the prices of them have gone up rather than down recently. Performance wise, it'll kick TF2 into submission (TF2 really doesn't need much horsepower at all) and it'll run Mass Effect with all bells and whistles no problem.
~$110 after rebate is up? That seems pretty low to me.
But if he's willing to spend more money, yes - wait. The 4850 just came out, check the Tech subforum for reviews, and NVIDIA isn't about to let it go unanswered for long.
PeregrineFalcon on
Looking for a DX:HR OnLive code for my kid brother.
Can trade TF2 items or whatever else you're interested in. PM me.
I suppose I'll just check back in 7 weeks since I'm going to work that long, and due to that fact price isn't of much concern. I just want to be able to run TF2 and ME on max without problems. Also I have a two month old ACER tower so I'm assuming it would have a PCI slot but just to be safe how do I check?
The 8800gt is an awesome price/performance card, also Nvidia just released thhe new 260 and 280 cards which are expensve but very nice. I hate ATI though so my opinion is bias, the cards are ok its the drivers I can't deal with, everytime I get ass raped by them. But yeah the 8800gt will run TF2 and Mass Effect max, well depending on what the other components are I guess. Make sure your PSU is also up to par, low powered PSU is bad, Make sure you've got 26a or higher on the 12v line.
If you can wait, most certainly do. Computer parts only drop in price while increasing in power.
That said, if you want to play today, here are some caveats:
--The 8800GT: be sure to get the 512Mb model and not the 256Mb. It's only a ~$30 difference, but makes a significant performance gain if you have a 19" or greater monitor. Checking dealnews.com, the price for a 8800GT has been around $150 after rebate at Newegg.com.
--The 8800GTS: again, be sure to get the 512Mb model, which features the G92 chip and is superior to the 8800GT, but about $30 more. Just to be confusing, nVidia released an earlier model with 320Mb and 640Mb configurations. Avoid these as performance is worse than the 8800GT.
Most review sites agree that the 8800GT is currently the best deal in terms of price/performance, and if your motherboard can support it, you can get another ~25% performance boost by going SLI if/when the price drops by buying a second card.
If you can wait, most certainly do. Computer parts only drop in price while increasing in power.
That said, if you want to play today, here are some caveats:
--The 8800GT: be sure to get the 512Mb model and not the 256Mb. It's only a ~$30 difference, but makes a significant performance gain if you have a 19" or greater monitor. Checking dealnews.com, the price for a 8800GT has been around $150 after rebate at Newegg.com.
--The 8800GTS: again, be sure to get the 512Mb model, which features the G92 chip and is superior to the 8800GT, but about $30 more. Just to be confusing, nVidia released an earlier model with 320Mb and 640Mb configurations. Avoid these as performance is worse than the 8800GT.
Most review sites agree that the 8800GT is currently the best deal in terms of price/performance, and if your motherboard can support it, you can get another ~25% performance boost by going SLI if/when the price drops by buying a second card.
SLI is not worth it. You can't use multiple monitor setups, theres a good chance the game you are playing doesn't support it. Age of Conan doesn't as well as many others and the overall performance gain isn't worth the extra card, at that point you also have to get a PSU that can handle both. It's better to just save the money and put it towards the next card you get which will prob be twice as good as the SLI config you would of had.
acidlacedpenguinInstitutionalizedSafe in jail.Registered Userregular
edited June 2008
pop the case open, there should be 2-4 regular pci slots, bought 4 inches long, with a notch. if there's one like that except longer and the notch is backwards from the others, that should be a pcie x8/x16 slot.
also if there's one thats like that except extremely small and has 2 tabs, that's a pcie x1, and generally if you have one of them then you have a pcie x8/x16 slot.
edit: also, typed that stuff out before I went to wikipedia and searched "pcie" to get the images.
agreed that an 8800 is worth getting. it maxes everything on my 19" monitor, but a mate with the same card and a 1920 res widescreen needs to turn the detail on company of heroes down, so this sort of stuff really matters if you want high res gaming.
If you can wait, most certainly do. Computer parts only drop in price while increasing in power.
Ugh, I HATE it when people say this. Really, it's a universal constant but if you keep waiting you never get to play a game.
I was looking into a nvidia 9600gt card, up in Canada they run you about $160 but it seems you can get an 8800gt for about that price anyways (least on sale) so might as well go with that if you're buying now.
SLI is not worth it. You can't use multiple monitor setups, theres a good chance the game you are playing doesn't support it. Age of Conan doesn't as well as many others and the overall performance gain isn't worth the extra card, at that point you also have to get a PSU that can handle both. It's better to just save the money and put it towards the next card you get which will prob be twice as good as the SLI config you would of had.
You can create a profile for any game you want in the nVidia Control Panel, and subsequently use SLI with it, whether it's officially supported or not.
And some quick Googling disagrees with your Age of Conan claim.
SLI is not worth it. You can't use multiple monitor setups, theres a good chance the game you are playing doesn't support it. Age of Conan doesn't as well as many others and the overall performance gain isn't worth the extra card, at that point you also have to get a PSU that can handle both. It's better to just save the money and put it towards the next card you get which will prob be twice as good as the SLI config you would of had.
You can create a profile for any game you want in the nVidia Control Panel, and subsequently use SLI with it, whether it's officially supported or not.
And some quick Googling disagrees with your Age of Conan claim.
You can turn on the SLI in the control panel but that doesn't mean it's going to work the software still has to support it...
As for AoC no it doesn't support SLI, I use an SLI configuration, the game gets a very minimal boost in performance just from the straightforward power of the card, but the game doesn't officialy support SLI and wasn't made to. It's like a game that wasn't designed for dual cores, you still may get a small performance boost from having two cores but it wouldn't nearly as good if the game had been built around the dual core setup.
If you can wait, most certainly do. Computer parts only drop in price while increasing in power.
Ugh, I HATE it when people say this. Really, it's a universal constant but if you keep waiting you never get to play a game.
I was looking into a nvidia 9600gt card, up in Canada they run you about $160 but it seems you can get an 8800gt for about that price anyways (least on sale) so might as well go with that if you're buying now.
yea, but see, it's not like we're saying "wait 4 months for the next card to come out." We are saying "Wait 4 days for the next card to come out.
the 8800gt and GTS are great choices, but yeah, I would wait at least another month. I upgraded February but I am waiting till the fall when the new Geforce xxx line drops in price.
No, the 9600 GT has fewer stream processors than the 8800 GTS. It's not a bad card, but stick with the 8800 GT or GTS if you're looking for a midrange card at a good price.
If you're having trouble discovering which card is better, google some reviews for some comparisons, or check out the official specs. More stream processors and higher clock speeds generally equals better, at least as far as Nvidia is concerned. I forget what ATI is referring to their pixel and texture engines as now.
EDIT: Yeah, CmdPrompt lays it out nicely right below my post.
brynstar on
Xbox Live: Xander51
PSN ID : Xander51 Steam ID : Xander51
Yeah you have to remember the first number has very little impact on the performance of the card
A 7900gt is a lot better then a 8500gt by miles. The best way to look at it is the first number in the model number represents what sort of software features it has. For example the 8xxx series brings DX10 and model shader 4. Then the second number represents the power that the card can put out. Thats the way I always describe it to. Sometimes things get a little skewed but I like to think thats the best way to put it.
Posts
At the moment, I still think the 8800GT is the sweet spot, although the prices of them have gone up rather than down recently. Performance wise, it'll kick TF2 into submission (TF2 really doesn't need much horsepower at all) and it'll run Mass Effect with all bells and whistles no problem.
Of course, really you should list your PC specs and Monitor, as there's no point spending large amounts of money if you're just runinng a 17" monitor, and similarly if you have a 30" beast you might need to edge towards the higher end a bit.
Yeah, it's also on the P43 and P45 as well.
Honestly, wait about a month before you buy, new cards are coming out from both nVidia and ATI. Hands on previews are already being done on them.
~$110 after rebate is up? That seems pretty low to me.
But if he's willing to spend more money, yes - wait. The 4850 just came out, check the Tech subforum for reviews, and NVIDIA isn't about to let it go unanswered for long.
Can trade TF2 items or whatever else you're interested in. PM me.
That said, if you want to play today, here are some caveats:
--The 8800GT: be sure to get the 512Mb model and not the 256Mb. It's only a ~$30 difference, but makes a significant performance gain if you have a 19" or greater monitor. Checking dealnews.com, the price for a 8800GT has been around $150 after rebate at Newegg.com.
--The 8800GTS: again, be sure to get the 512Mb model, which features the G92 chip and is superior to the 8800GT, but about $30 more. Just to be confusing, nVidia released an earlier model with 320Mb and 640Mb configurations. Avoid these as performance is worse than the 8800GT.
Most review sites agree that the 8800GT is currently the best deal in terms of price/performance, and if your motherboard can support it, you can get another ~25% performance boost by going SLI if/when the price drops by buying a second card.
SLI is not worth it. You can't use multiple monitor setups, theres a good chance the game you are playing doesn't support it. Age of Conan doesn't as well as many others and the overall performance gain isn't worth the extra card, at that point you also have to get a PSU that can handle both. It's better to just save the money and put it towards the next card you get which will prob be twice as good as the SLI config you would of had.
also if there's one thats like that except extremely small and has 2 tabs, that's a pcie x1, and generally if you have one of them then you have a pcie x8/x16 slot.
edit: also, typed that stuff out before I went to wikipedia and searched "pcie" to get the images.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121253&CMP=AFC-C8Junction
That's pretty much the fastest I've ever seen a rebate come out on a new GPU, and at that price point it's pretty much a no-brainer over the 8800GTS.
This.
One hundred times.
It's amazing.
Epic Win.
Can trade TF2 items or whatever else you're interested in. PM me.
Ugh, I HATE it when people say this. Really, it's a universal constant but if you keep waiting you never get to play a game.
I was looking into a nvidia 9600gt card, up in Canada they run you about $160 but it seems you can get an 8800gt for about that price anyways (least on sale) so might as well go with that if you're buying now.
You can create a profile for any game you want in the nVidia Control Panel, and subsequently use SLI with it, whether it's officially supported or not.
And some quick Googling disagrees with your Age of Conan claim.
You can turn on the SLI in the control panel but that doesn't mean it's going to work the software still has to support it...
As for AoC no it doesn't support SLI, I use an SLI configuration, the game gets a very minimal boost in performance just from the straightforward power of the card, but the game doesn't officialy support SLI and wasn't made to. It's like a game that wasn't designed for dual cores, you still may get a small performance boost from having two cores but it wouldn't nearly as good if the game had been built around the dual core setup.
yea, but see, it's not like we're saying "wait 4 months for the next card to come out." We are saying "Wait 4 days for the next card to come out.
I think that's acceptable.
T-Nation blog
No, no, 1000x no.
Just no.
more MB does not always mean better card. the 8500 is a piece of shit and anyone who buys one deserves to be taken behind a barn and shot.
Point taken, how about the 9600GT? Is it superior? I'm having a really difficult time trying to find out how to tell if a cards better or worse haha.
My 8800 320mb GTS runs shit in an awesome manner, and it's inferior to the 512 and 640 versions.
If you're having trouble discovering which card is better, google some reviews for some comparisons, or check out the official specs. More stream processors and higher clock speeds generally equals better, at least as far as Nvidia is concerned. I forget what ATI is referring to their pixel and texture engines as now.
EDIT: Yeah, CmdPrompt lays it out nicely right below my post.
PSN ID : Xander51 Steam ID : Xander51
320MB\640M 8800GTS < 9600GT < 8800GT < 512MB 8800GTS (G92) < 9800GTX
We've had this discussion a lot in the computer build thread.
A 7900gt is a lot better then a 8500gt by miles. The best way to look at it is the first number in the model number represents what sort of software features it has. For example the 8xxx series brings DX10 and model shader 4. Then the second number represents the power that the card can put out. Thats the way I always describe it to. Sometimes things get a little skewed but I like to think thats the best way to put it.