The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
Judge orders Youtube to give user histories to Viacom
I was unaware we were looking for things not posted by record companies...
True, that was never stated. But when the company who has every right to post the video is the one who does it, I would call that "user created content". In this instance, the record company is using youtube to promote their artist, and they have the rights to the property to do so.
Well the Timbaland video posted by 1988basti has 60million views... and I have no idea who that is.
I'm skeptical, I mean, youtube is pretty damn quick to pull a video as soon as a complaint is made. That one has been up for a year. Either the party owning the rights doesn't mind, or they are allowing it (it *is* promotion and many artists fully understand that this exposure can make them money).
Does YouTube have any way to track people who watch clips but DON'T have a YouTube account? Because, uh, if not then Viacom wouldn't be getting an accurate headcount anyway. Not that they need ISPs for a headcount anyway.
Bah, the whole thing is idiotic. WTF indeed.
LadyM on
0
TL DRNot at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered Userregular
Does YouTube have any way to track people who watch clips but DON'T have a YouTube account? Because, uh, if not then Viacom wouldn't be getting an accurate headcount anyway. Not that they need ISPs for a headcount anyway.
Bah, the whole thing is idiotic. WTF indeed.
The specifics are listed earlier in the thread. Google has been ordered to hand over both the user names and IP addresses. So if you logged onto your Youtube account at a coffee shop or library, that information could very well be on its way to Viacom.
Why did I ever patronize that terrorism training facility/sex shop/internet cafe?
Posts
I'm skeptical, I mean, youtube is pretty damn quick to pull a video as soon as a complaint is made. That one has been up for a year. Either the party owning the rights doesn't mind, or they are allowing it (it *is* promotion and many artists fully understand that this exposure can make them money).
Edit: and now to watch Avril Lavigne - Girlfriend.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZA1NoOOoaNw
the lols
they hurt me
:rotate:
awesome! take that viacom!
http://www.groklaw.net/
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yR2jjFB_qnc&feature=related
wtf, judge. wtf.
Bah, the whole thing is idiotic. WTF indeed.
The specifics are listed earlier in the thread. Google has been ordered to hand over both the user names and IP addresses. So if you logged onto your Youtube account at a coffee shop or library, that information could very well be on its way to Viacom.
Why did I ever patronize that terrorism training facility/sex shop/internet cafe?