The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Chloe Marshall: Finished 2nd Place in Miss England

1235718

Posts

  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    The Cat wrote: »
    Plus sized models are usually still way under the norm. I don't really understand what's plus size about them at all. ):

    She looks about average for what I see on the street. I wouldn't be comfortable at that size, and I don't think she's likely to be the paragon of health, but I also don't think that people are failures if they aren't thin enough. I've seen photos of women her size winning triathlons, and I've seen photos of size 2's that wouldn't make it up a flight of stairs. Fat and fit are not the same.

    That said, there do exist fat-acceptance activists that take it waaaay too far. She's just not one of them.

    But one thing is that average isn't necessarily good, and if I wanted to see an average American build, I'd go to a Walmart in Wisconsin or Texas.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • MendrianMendrian Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    I'm confused how this warrants so much discussion.

    Let's say her presence does teach thousands of little girls that being overweight is attractive. How is that any more destructive than teaching thousands of little girls that being underweight is attractive? It's the focus on body image that is the problem in the first place. Being focused on a body image has nothing to do with fitness. If you're obsessed with being thin, you'll do whatever you have to in order to get there - it's not about health, so why use healthy options? I mean, basically what you're saying if you think this girl negatively impacts impressionable minds is either a.) that seeing an overweight girl will suddenly encourage girls who didn't have eating disorders before to start stuffing their face or b.) that it will encourage girls to stop starving themselves. Is that really so negative? Or are we in a position where we think the best motivator to get people in shape is fear of being rejected?

    What is the realistic worse case scenario here? Girls stop equating their size with their value? Oh no, heavens forbid!

    Mendrian on
  • MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited July 2008
    There's a few posts in here regarding the fact that the author of this article just makes the (false) assumption that this girl is lazy and weak, and I agree, but I'm also a little disappointed that people have automatically assumed that the rest of the girls are suffering from Anorexia or Bulimia. Look for some pictures of the rest of them. It's entirely possible to look like that and be perfectly healthy simply by eating well, getting enough exercise, and starting out with the right genes.

    And Mendrian, yes, the best motivator to get people to do just about anything is make them afraid of being rejected. I don't see why that is a question in your mind. EDIT: That doesn't mean it should be a bad thing. If attractiveness was pegged to physical health in our culture, then people would try to get healthy rather than skinny.

    MrMonroe on
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    The Cat wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    ege02 wrote: »
    Apothe0sis wrote: »
    I don't think personal worth translates to percentage of excess fat.

    Nice strawman.

    It's not about personal worth. It's about health.

    It's not about health it's about quality of life.

    Health is one of the most important factors in quality of life measurements.

    But it doesn't correlate with fatness.

    It doesn't? I was under the impression that excess body fat is an individual risk factor.

    Partly but BMI is hardly a true measurement of a person's fitness. It's totally possible to be a few pounds overweight and be in fine health. Likewise it's possible to be skinny and in terrible health. Weight becomes a predominant health issue at the real extremes. Before you reach that there's plenty of other major indicators of health that aren't as obvious visually.

    Hmm...I wonder what it would be like if all such indicators were obvious visually?

    Hexmage-PA on
  • MendrianMendrian Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    There's a few posts in here regarding the fact that the author of this article just makes the (false) assumption that this girl is lazy and weak, and I agree, but I'm also a little disappointed that people have automatically assumed that the rest of the girls are suffering from Anorexia or Bulimia. Look for some pictures of the rest of them. It's entirely possible to look like that and be perfectly healthy simply by eating well, getting enough exercise, and starting out with the right genes.

    And Mendrian, yes, the best motivator to get people to do just about anything is make them afraid of being rejected. I don't see why that is a question in your mind. EDIT: That doesn't mean it should be a bad thing. If attractiveness was pegged to physical health in our culture, then people would try to get healthy rather than skinny.

    Are you saying it's a positive thing that the reason people get healthy is a paranoid fear of failure or not? I think that the desperate desire to be loved leads to obsession and eating disorders, but hell, what do I know? I think wanting to be healthy because it's, you know, healthy, is probably the best possible motivator. And if that were the case we wouldn't rate attractiveness with health. I've seen a lot of these BMI to Diabetes research things before, and while I concede there is certainly a correlation between weight and health, I don't think it's as strong as the media seems to purport.

    "I need to be skinny or I'll never be pretty" is not a positive thing to build your image upon. "I like me enough that I want to feel good" is a much healthier motivator. So I ask again, are we afraid slightly overweight girls everywhere will stop hating themselves? Is that so unhealthy?

    Mendrian on
  • an_altan_alt Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    The Cat wrote: »
    You're absolutely right that being fitter, eating well, and exercising makes you feel and function better. Our bodies like working hard. Its good for them, and when your body is happy your brain is happy too.

    But that doesn't directly translate into looking fit and attractive for a lot of people, especially in terms of body proportions - skin and hair tone can improve, but that's not as noticeable and certainly not as significant as waist size to most observers. I'm improving my fitness rapidly, but I'm still all lumpy round the hips'n'thighs. I don't look like an athlete or a 'healthy' model, and I probably never will. People looking at me now will lump me into the same category as people who eat cheetos for breakfast, even though I'm not one of those people.

    Even carrying extra pounds around the hips and thighs, you most likely look better than if you had the same size, but didn't exercise. In baggy clothes the figures look about the same, but in beachwear the difference is obvious. It's much like a well tailored dress or suit that hangs properly - even if you don't know what to look for, it looks much better. This is in addition to the skin tone, energy, and confidence.

    Also, curves are sexy. Note that the women in beer commercials don't look like clothing models. Chloe Marshall, however, is fat. If she weighs 176 pounds, the only muscle tone in her body comes from moving a fork to her mouth. Toccara Jones on the other hand is curvy and sexy. Whoever said there were far more attractive plus sized models than CM is exactly right.

    an_alt on
    Pony wrote:
    I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
    Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
    If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
  • FirstComradeStalinFirstComradeStalin Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    The real problem here is that there are way cuter overweight girls than her.

    This I agree with. While ostensibly pageants are about finding the most fuckable girl (as much of a travesty that is), in nearly every one I see what they define as fuckable is pretty bizarre, and the most unusual girls end up inexplicably winning.

    FirstComradeStalin on
    Picture1-4.png
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    ege02 wrote: »
    Also, for the record, I mostly agree with the author of that Daily Mail article. The only contention I'd raise would be her over-reliance on BMI as a measure of health.

    The problem with the overweight girl isn't that her BMI is 26 instead of 20 and she had the guts to compete all the way to the finals. That is commendable. The problem is that she is showing young girls that it is not only OK but also fashionable to be overweight, that it is acceptable to be out-of-control when it comes to eating if you exercise enough. This is ridiculous, and is precisely the wrong message to give. It's an attempt to knock down one harmful message with another.

    This argument might hold some water if she had a BMI of 30 or more. Looking at her, I'm under no impression that she is at an unhealthy weight.
    an_alt wrote: »
    Also, curves are sexy. Note that the women in beer commercials don't look like clothing models. Chloe Marshall, however, is fat. If she weighs 176 pounds, the only muscle tone in her body comes from moving a fork to her mouth. Toccara Jones on the other hand is curvy and sexy. Whoever said there were far more attractive plus sized models than CM is exactly right.

    Maybe I'm not understanding what plus-sized is, but Toccara Jones isn't fat. Chloe Jones is, but still very attractive.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    There's a few posts in here regarding the fact that the author of this article just makes the (false) assumption that this girl is lazy and weak, and I agree, but I'm also a little disappointed that people have automatically assumed that the rest of the girls are suffering from Anorexia or Bulimia. Look for some pictures of the rest of them. It's entirely possible to look like that and be perfectly healthy simply by eating well, getting enough exercise, and starting out with the right genes.

    And Mendrian, yes, the best motivator to get people to do just about anything is make them afraid of being rejected. I don't see why that is a question in your mind. EDIT: That doesn't mean it should be a bad thing. If attractiveness was pegged to physical health in our culture, then people would try to get healthy rather than skinny.

    Possible yes, but it's neither a requirement for their entry into or a judging factor for the beauty pageant.

    Which makes the whole 'promoting bad health' funny because beauty pageants have never promoted good health.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • an_altan_alt Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Septus wrote: »
    an_alt wrote: »
    Also, curves are sexy. Note that the women in beer commercials don't look like clothing models. Chloe Marshall, however, is fat. If she weighs 176 pounds, the only muscle tone in her body comes from moving a fork to her mouth. Toccara Jones on the other hand is curvy and sexy. Whoever said there were far more attractive plus sized models than CM is exactly right.

    Maybe I'm not understanding what plus-sized is, but Toccara Jones isn't fat. Chloe Jones is, but still very attractive.

    I said Toccara Jones is curvy and sexy. Chloe Marshall is fat though she does have a pretty face. Who's Chloe Jones?

    Plus sized models range from "well, fat for a model, I guess" to "please leave your clothes on". Wiki tells me size 8+, so both TJ and CM fit into that category as do a whole lot of women with far more attractive figures than Chloe Marshall.

    an_alt on
    Pony wrote:
    I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
    Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
    If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
  • MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Mendrian wrote: »
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    There's a few posts in here regarding the fact that the author of this article just makes the (false) assumption that this girl is lazy and weak, and I agree, but I'm also a little disappointed that people have automatically assumed that the rest of the girls are suffering from Anorexia or Bulimia. Look for some pictures of the rest of them. It's entirely possible to look like that and be perfectly healthy simply by eating well, getting enough exercise, and starting out with the right genes.

    And Mendrian, yes, the best motivator to get people to do just about anything is make them afraid of being rejected. I don't see why that is a question in your mind. EDIT: That doesn't mean it should be a bad thing. If attractiveness was pegged to physical health in our culture, then people would try to get healthy rather than skinny.

    Are you saying it's a positive thing that the reason people get healthy is a paranoid fear of failure or not? I think that the desperate desire to be loved leads to obsession and eating disorders, but hell, what do I know? I think wanting to be healthy because it's, you know, healthy, is probably the best possible motivator. And if that were the case we wouldn't rate attractiveness with health. I've seen a lot of these BMI to Diabetes research things before, and while I concede there is certainly a correlation between weight and health, I don't think it's as strong as the media seems to purport.

    "I need to be skinny or I'll never be pretty" is not a positive thing to build your image upon. "I like me enough that I want to feel good" is a much healthier motivator. So I ask again, are we afraid slightly overweight girls everywhere will stop hating themselves? Is that so unhealthy?

    I'm arguing from Utilitarianism, not Platonism. "Because it's healthy" is the "best" motivator in the sense that it is probably going to make the person feel the best about themselves, and they are doing it with true knowledge of why it is good, but "because I'll be lonely if I don't" is the "best" motivator in the sense that it is most likely to effect consistent results. (this assumes that the person is equating health with not being lonely rather than just being skinny)

    The point I was making is that regardless of what the image of attractiveness is in our society, a person's fear of being rejected is going to be about the best motivator to get them to do anything. People have abused people, bullied, killed to keep from being rejected. It shouldn't be surprising that they are willing to go to great lengths to look good.

    A little bit of this fear is entirely normal, and if it results in getting a bit of exercise and eating better, in trying to be a nicer person, or in improving oneself in some other way, than it can't be a bad thing. A lot of this fear becomes a compulsive psychological disorder, and that's bad no matter what direction it is translated into. However, I don't really think that beauty pageants push people towards compulsive behavior so much as they give them an idea of what to compulse over. (It's a word now. Deal with it) A person's personal life and their peers probably have a much higher impact on whether they develop a compulsion than the Miss Britain contest.

    Of course, it doesn't really work for me because I find most of them so awful and unattractive. I must have trace amounts of tinfoil in my scalp or something.

    MrMonroe on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    an_alt wrote: »
    Septus wrote: »
    an_alt wrote: »
    Also, curves are sexy. Note that the women in beer commercials don't look like clothing models. Chloe Marshall, however, is fat. If she weighs 176 pounds, the only muscle tone in her body comes from moving a fork to her mouth. Toccara Jones on the other hand is curvy and sexy. Whoever said there were far more attractive plus sized models than CM is exactly right.

    Maybe I'm not understanding what plus-sized is, but Toccara Jones isn't fat. Chloe Jones is, but still very attractive.

    I said Toccara Jones is curvy and sexy. Chloe Marshall is fat though she does have a pretty face. Who's Chloe Jones?

    Plus sized models range from "well, fat for a model, I guess" to "please leave your clothes on". Wiki tells me size 8+, so both TJ and CM fit into that category as do a whole lot of women with far more attractive figures than Chloe Marshall.

    Whoops, Chloe Marshall.

    I would never have called Toccara Jones plus-sized(or compared her to Chloe's body at all), but I guess I'm not aware of how it's classified in terms of models, when the norm is like 7% body fat.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    MrMister wrote: »
    I find the moral opprobrium that people hold towards the overweight to be creepy and messed up. American culture now conflates physical shape with personal worth, and people who don't fit a certain model are viewed as weak in spirit and pathetic. However, it is a valid lifestyle choice to forgo the gym, or to allow oneself fattier foods. For instance, many lost-in-the-clouds professors aren't going to go to do freeweights every day, because they're simply more interested in the life of the mind. This is not to say that everyone who is overweight is so because of a well-reasoned choice that they've made, however, it is to point out that physical fitness is not a universal value held to a universal degree.

    I think you're establishing a false dichotomy here between physical vs. mind. There are plenty of academicians who are brilliant and fit-and-active. Lifting weights for half an hour everyday doesn't take away from anyone's "life of the mind." On the contrary, research is showing again and again that regular physical activity improves one's mental functions by not only allowing them to perform better intellectually in short-term, but also by preventing brain decay in the long term.
    I don't think that this moral opprobrium that people hold against the overweight can be justified by reference to health, either. For instance, many extreme sports are more dangerous to participate in than it is dangerous to be overweight, yet we don't classify those people as being weak or pathetic in the way that we do the overweight. Similarly, travel abroad can be dangerous, as can tanning. Tanning, however, is viewed as actively attractive. So, I don't see the relevant difference between someone who tans regularly and someone who is overweight when it comes to health.

    First of all let me say that I find tanning stupid, and I think the fact that we attach an attractiveness value to it is horrifying.

    Extreme sports however I'm fine with to a large extent (though not fully, and not with every one). Because when you compare eating like shit to extreme sports, you'll find that eating like shit does not have any benefits for the body. It's just outright bad for you, period. Whereas extreme sports are, well, sports, and while dangerous, they do have real benefits. Besides, there are certain things you can do to minimize the risk: wearing protective gear, checking your harness, doing it with other people, etc. When a person eats like shit though they're pretty much saying "I want to die early, and I want the journey to be as full of complications as possible."
    Finally, as has been mentioned before, I don't think that this moral opprobrium, the accusations of weak-will and lack of self-respect, does anything to help the overweight. Instead, it merely instills the very lack of self-respect it accuses them of having in the first place.

    I agree, but what about the people it truly motivates to lose their excess weight and become healthier? You're only focusing on the negative here and are not being honest to both sides of the debate.

    ege02 on
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    I think it's important to keep in mind that she's quite tall for a woman - 5'10" (or 70 inches).

    According to this chart, that puts her . . . well, off the scale.
    WomenHeightWhite.gif

    BMI is a poor tool as it is, doubly so when dealing with someone of her height.

    That said, she might be a little on the heavy side but nothing shockingly so. And I say this as someone who is quite disturbed by the fattening of western society - and the pressure by some to embrace or accept it. People like her are hardly examples of the problem.

    It's strange how body types work though. My girlfriend is a couple of inches shorter and only about 10 pounds lighter, maybe 15, but looks quite different - albeit she's very active and works out a lot so much of the mass is likely muscle. No one would descrive her as fat or overweight (and no, she doesn't read my posts, to the best of my knowledge :P )

    Andrew_Jay on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    BMI is somehow less accurate the taller you are?

    I thought the only significant problematic factor was muscle mass. Do taller people have a disproportionate amount of muscle?

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    an_alt wrote: »
    Septus wrote: »
    an_alt wrote: »
    Also, curves are sexy. Note that the women in beer commercials don't look like clothing models. Chloe Marshall, however, is fat. If she weighs 176 pounds, the only muscle tone in her body comes from moving a fork to her mouth. Toccara Jones on the other hand is curvy and sexy. Whoever said there were far more attractive plus sized models than CM is exactly right.

    Maybe I'm not understanding what plus-sized is, but Toccara Jones isn't fat. Chloe Jones is, but still very attractive.

    I said Toccara Jones is curvy and sexy. Chloe Marshall is fat though she does have a pretty face. Who's Chloe Jones?

    Plus sized models range from "well, fat for a model, I guess" to "please leave your clothes on". Wiki tells me size 8+, so both TJ and CM fit into that category as do a whole lot of women with far more attractive figures than Chloe Marshall.

    Does Yao Ming count as plus sized?

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    I think it's important to keep in mind that she's quite tall for a woman - 5'10" (or 70 inches).

    According to this chart, that puts her . . . well, off the scale.
    WomenHeightWhite.gif

    BMI is a poor tool as it is, doubly so when dealing with someone of her height.

    That said, she might be a little on the heavy side but nothing shockingly so. And I say this as someone who is quite disturbed by the fattening of western society - and the pressure by some to embrace or accept it. People like her are hardly examples of the problem.

    It's strange how body types work though. My girlfriend is a couple of inches shorter and only about 10 pounds lighter, maybe 15, but looks quite different - albeit she's very active and works out a lot so much of the mass is likely muscle. No one would descrive her as fat or overweight (and no, she doesn't read my posts, to the best of my knowledge :P )

    I would, just because I love schadenfreude.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Septus wrote: »
    BMI is somehow less accurate the taller you are?
    BMI uses weight and height to generate a figure - I think it's safe to assume that such a rough guide is less useful when dealing with outliers.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    Septus wrote: »
    BMI is somehow less accurate the taller you are?
    BMI uses weight and height to generate a figure - I think it's safe to assume that such a rough guide is less useful when dealing with outliers.

    Oh, I guess I assumed that 5'10'' wasn't so rare as to create a significant difference in body proportions...like Yao Ming would.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    Sweet I'm off the chart too!

    Medopine on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Well, she's setting an example as a beautiful, albeit chubby girl. If anything, she'll inspire fat children and increase their self-esteem, which is always a good thing. She's not exactly extolling the virtues of being unhealthy.

    BMI is totally unreliable; for example, as a tall, lanky guy I was on the 'anorexic' side of the scale according to a brochure in Health class.

    I weigh 135 lbs at 6'1"ish, so I find the notion that I'm anorexic ridiculous.

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Well, she's setting an example as a beautiful, albeit chubby girl. If anything, she'll inspire fat children and increase their self-esteem, which is always a good thing. She's not exactly extolling the virtues of being unhealthy.

    BMI is totally unreliable; for example, as a tall, lanky guy I was on the 'anorexic' side of the scale according to a brochure in Health class.

    I weigh 135 lbs at 6'1"ish, so I find the notion that I'm anorexic ridiculous.
    I'm 150 lbs at 5'10 and I'm pretty damn skinny.

    Bama on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Well, she's setting an example as a beautiful, albeit chubby girl. If anything, she'll inspire fat children and increase their self-esteem, which is always a good thing. She's not exactly extolling the virtues of being unhealthy.

    BMI is totally unreliable; for example, as a tall, lanky guy I was on the 'anorexic' side of the scale according to a brochure in Health class.

    I weigh 135 lbs at 6'1"ish, so I find the notion that I'm anorexic ridiculous.

    Well, you do seem like you'd be really skinny.

    But then, I think there's been a shift away from underweight classifications. I think it used to be common to have a person classified as underweight, even if they had healthy eating habits, but that was before the statistics were fully taking the effects of smoking into account.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2008
    I don't have much issue with Chloe and the pageant itself. But following some of the commentary on various websites is disturbing. A lot of folks seem to be saying, "What, she's perfectly average! She's not fat, it's just that everyone else is anorexic!"

    Chloe is very pretty. She is also overweight enough to qualify as "fat". She's not of average weight, and if she is, that's fucking depressing. I don't like the implications by some that we should embrace people of Chloe's girth as the new average. She's unhealthily overweight, and someone who is that large in the middle of her teens will, unless she changes her habits, likely be huge by the time she hits her mid-to-late twenties. It's not exactly a lifestyle we should be endorsing. I think the proper message is, "You're a nice girl and very pretty, but seriously, fix your diet and exercise regimen."

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    She's unhealthily overweight...

    Just barely. She's a BMI 26.

    Hexmage-PA on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Maybe it's just really good selection of clothing, but she looks significantly larger in the first picture on that article, as she does in several other pictures I saw from a google search.

    The first picture does look to me like an unhealthy weight as opposed to a little chubby or a little fat.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    I don't have much issue with Chloe and the pageant itself. But following some of the commentary on various websites is disturbing. A lot of folks seem to be saying, "What, she's perfectly average! She's not fat, it's just that everyone else is anorexic!"

    Chloe is very pretty. She is also overweight enough to qualify as "fat". She's not of average weight, and if she is, that's fucking depressing. I don't like the implications by some that we should embrace people of Chloe's girth as the new average. She's unhealthily overweight, and someone who is that large in the middle of her teens will, unless she changes her habits, likely be huge by the time she hits her mid-to-late twenties. It's not exactly a lifestyle we should be endorsing. I think the proper message is, "You're a nice girl and very pretty, but seriously, fix your diet and exercise regimen."

    This.

    ege02 on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Bama wrote: »
    Ergandar wrote: »
    BMI is totally unreliable; for example, as a tall, lanky guy I was on the 'anorexic' side of the scale according to a brochure in Health class.

    I weigh 135 lbs at 6'1"ish, so I find the notion that I'm anorexic ridiculous.
    I'm 150 lbs at 5'10 and I'm pretty damn skinny.

    Hell, I have moobs.

    Her weight becoming the norm would be somewhat disgusting, I agree.

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Are your moobs filled with helium or something? Do you only have one leg?

    Bama on
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Bama wrote: »
    Are your moobs filled with helium or something? Do you only have one leg?

    I have no goddamn clue-it's like the sole area where my body fat stocks up.

    Or, it could be part of the wackiness of puberty

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2008
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    She's unhealthily overweight...

    Just barely. She's a BMI 26.

    Right. For now. You omitted the part where I mentioned that in ten years, barring lifestyle changes, she'll probably be Orca-fat. Metabolisms slow down with age.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2008
    Bama wrote: »
    Ergandar wrote: »
    Well, she's setting an example as a beautiful, albeit chubby girl. If anything, she'll inspire fat children and increase their self-esteem, which is always a good thing. She's not exactly extolling the virtues of being unhealthy.

    BMI is totally unreliable; for example, as a tall, lanky guy I was on the 'anorexic' side of the scale according to a brochure in Health class.

    I weigh 135 lbs at 6'1"ish, so I find the notion that I'm anorexic ridiculous.
    I'm 150 lbs at 5'10 and I'm pretty damn skinny.

    I'm 165 at 5'10" and reasonably well-muscled. I'm pretty toned in the arms and legs, but I have a bit of a tummy. I'd say 155 would be an ideal weight for me right now.

    That all seemed somehow relevant when I started typing.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    She's unhealthily overweight...

    Just barely. She's a BMI 26.

    Right. For now. You omitted the part where I mentioned that in ten years, barring lifestyle changes, she'll probably be Orca-fat. Metabolisms slow down with age.

    What do you know about her lifestyle Jeffe?

    I mean apart from the multitude of things you can apparently infer about it from simply looking at a picture of her on the internet.

    Medopine on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    She's unhealthily overweight...

    Just barely. She's a BMI 26.

    Right. For now. You omitted the part where I mentioned that in ten years, barring lifestyle changes, she'll probably be Orca-fat. Metabolisms slow down with age.

    What do you know about her lifestyle Jeffe?

    I mean apart from the multitude of things you can apparently infer about it from simply looking at a picture of her on the internet.

    I don't think it's a particularly good sign that she has that much fat at age 17. It takes a while to build up, and she's not even at college yet where you don't have parents feeding you at home. I think there's a better chance of her not improving her diet, or worsening it during college.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    What do you know about her lifestyle Jeffe?

    I mean apart from the multitude of things you can apparently infer about it from simply looking at a picture of her on the internet.

    I'm admittedly making assumptions regarding her being a somewhat typical teenager. It's possible that she has a very atypical metabolism, or that her metabolism won't undergo the expected slowing as she ages, or that she's actually an alien from the planet Blimpo where our normal Earth-nutrition doesn't apply. But if she's an average person of that weight, and if she maintains whatever she's doing, she will be much larger down the road.

    Which part of this do you disagree with?

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    All I'm saying is you guys are assuming an awful lot here.

    There is a link between childhood obesity and adult obesity, yes. This does not necessarily mean that Chloe Marshall is destined to become an "orca" by a long shot.

    EDIT: The assuming things part and the calling her a whale part, mostly :P

    Medopine on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    She's unhealthily overweight...

    Just barely. She's a BMI 26.

    Right. For now. You omitted the part where I mentioned that in ten years, barring lifestyle changes, she'll probably be Orca-fat. Metabolisms slow down with age.

    What do you know about her lifestyle Jeffe?

    I mean apart from the multitude of things you can apparently infer about it from simply looking at a picture of her on the internet.

    She claims to do "a lot of exercise." But she is still fat.

    This means that there are some serious problems with her diet.

    If she doesn't change this, like Jeffe says, in ten years she'll be in a much worse condition.

    ege02 on
  • LeitnerLeitner Registered User regular
    edited July 2008
    Septus wrote: »
    BMI is somehow less accurate the taller you are?

    I thought the only significant problematic factor was muscle mass. Do taller people have a disproportionate amount of muscle?

    Other way around actually. Tall people tend to be built much thinner then a shorter person. BMI breaks for them down because it merely scales up shorter people.

    Leitner on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    All I'm saying is you guys are assuming an awful lot here.

    There is a link between childhood obesity and adult obesity, yes. This does not necessarily mean that Chloe Marshall is destined to become an "orca" by a long shot.

    EDIT: The assuming things part and the calling her a whale part, mostly :P

    In order to even hold a conversation on the subject, we have to make some assumptions. Mine are hardly unreasonable.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • themightypuckthemightypuck MontanaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2008
    The Cat wrote: »
    Since when have beauty pageants been about fitness? I'm willing to bet that very few pageant winners have been 'in shape', and that most are thin mainly by virtue of a fast metabolism rather than any kind of discipline in eating and exercising.

    you say fast metabolism, i say cocaine :P

    The last time I was overweight, cocaine and heroin were highly effective.

    themightypuck on
    “Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius

    Path of Exile: themightypuck
Sign In or Register to comment.