The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
FOR those of us old enough to remember the 1980 presidential primaries, John McCain's suspension of his campaign has an historical precedent. Amid a bad economy, a hostage crisis and an official malaise, Jimmy Carter chose to stay at the White House to work for the American people rather than contend the primaries against Ted Kennedy. This became known as the "Rose Garden strategy".
John McCain is certainly old enough to remember the Rose Garden strategy, as well as the outcome of the 1980 presidential election.
In the words of Clay Davis John McCain is thinking short when he should be thinking long. If this debate ends up being postponed, over Barack Obama's objections and because George Bush called the meeting that Mr McCain asked for, that provides Mr Obama's campaign a sterling opportunity to tie Mr McCain to the president: not just in terms of policies and past votes, but by pointing out that the president seems to be taking direction from Mr McCain's campaign. Far from putting himself "above politics", whatever that means (and as a sidenote, if a presidential candidate disdains politics so much, isn't he in the wrong line of work), Mr Bush's move drops presidential politics directly onto what should be a legislative debate. This is yet another move from Mr McCain's campaign to seize the news cycle (cf Sarah Palin), but which will ultimately come back to haunt him.
The McCain/Palin ticket is totally indefensible at this point. You really can't expect Deacon or ironzerg to do anything but play the Obama hypocrisy scavenger hunt, since that's really all they've got. I would ignore them unless they make a point that's actually interesting to debate--i.e. a point that won't provoke a page of Obama supporters repeating the same refutation over and over again, waiting in vain for it to be addressed.
I can't remember the last time I read a positive post about McCain here. No one's for McCain, they're just against Obama. The closest I've seen is London being proud of a 25k/40k/60k/however many people rally.
I've posted many times on why I'm voting for McCain.
+ Comprehensive energy policy that includes utilizing off-shore drilling and other fossil fuels.
+ Better position on Iraq.
+ Understands and supports the role of corporations in America.
+ Seek to reduce, not increase, government spending.
His energy plan is not comprehensive, he refuses to actually say what his position is in Iraq other than "win", by his own admission his knowledge of economics is weak and his policy on corporations in the past 10 days alone is rife with contradiction and he seeks to increase government spending by his own policy statements.
Maybe I can put this in terms that ironzerg will better understand.
Ironzerg, just think of the border incursions as a Surge of troops whose presence is meant to increase security around the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. You're not against the Surge, are you?
Security and more troops around our side of the border is fine.
Sending troops across the border against the direct wishes of the other country is not.
Tangentially, if this is your stance on Pakistan, then it follows that you agree that we need to pull out of Iraq soon because the Iraqis want us out within the next 18 months.
Also, in this case, I think the saying "I'd rather beg forgiveness than ask permission" is most apt. Seriously, though, Republicans are supposed to be gung ho tough guys. You're going to let a border and a little diplomatic difficulty stop you from getting terrorists?
The McCain/Palin ticket is totally indefensible at this point. You really can't expect Deacon or ironzerg to do anything but play the Obama hypocrisy scavenger hunt, since that's really all they've got. I would ignore them unless they make a point that's actually interesting to debate--i.e. a point that won't provoke a page of Obama supporters repeating the same refutation over and over again, waiting in vain for it to be addressed.
I can't remember the last time I read a positive post about McCain here. No one's for McCain, they're just against Obama. The closest I've seen is London being proud of a 25k/40k/60k/however many people rally.
I've posted many times on why I'm voting for McCain.
+ Comprehensive energy policy that includes utilizing off-shore drilling and other fossil fuels.
+ Better position on Iraq.
+ Understands and supports the role of corporations in America.
+ Seek to reduce, not increase, government spending.
Oh, right, you're the dude who has more faith in corporations than government services to solve people's problems, aren't you.
I have no idea how they earned that faith from you.
Well the other issue is that we said we'd sit down and form a joint task force to do these hunts, and then the next day did a helicopter raid. That was stupid, and showed us to be acting in bad faith. The government said "hey, we want to cooperate and help" and we pretty much said yes, but fuck you we're doing it ourselves anyways.
Obama's policy was based around the other government saying no to helping us, and stating he'd make surgical strikes Anyways if the evidence was good enough.
FOR those of us old enough to remember the 1980 presidential primaries, John McCain's suspension of his campaign has an historical precedent. Amid a bad economy, a hostage crisis and an official malaise, Jimmy Carter chose to stay at the White House to work for the American people rather than contend the primaries against Ted Kennedy. This became known as the "Rose Garden strategy".
John McCain is certainly old enough to remember the Rose Garden strategy, as well as the outcome of the 1980 presidential election.
In the words of Clay Davis John McCain is thinking short when he should be thinking long. If this debate ends up being postponed, over Barack Obama's objections and because George Bush called the meeting that Mr McCain asked for, that provides Mr Obama's campaign a sterling opportunity to tie Mr McCain to the president: not just in terms of policies and past votes, but by pointing out that the president seems to be taking direction from Mr McCain's campaign. Far from putting himself "above politics", whatever that means (and as a sidenote, if a presidential candidate disdains politics so much, isn't he in the wrong line of work), Mr Bush's move drops presidential politics directly onto what should be a legislative debate. This is yet another move from Mr McCain's campaign to seize the news cycle (cf Sarah Palin), but which will ultimately come back to haunt him.
I hope that is the medias response to this utter bullshit. Especially today since McCain hasn't suspended jack shit.
Preacher on
I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.
I'm sorry but anyone FUH FUH FUHing about Pakistan's sovereignty can fuck right off. Their government is ridiculously corrupt (which we've turned a blind eye to because we need them to support our operations in Afghanistan), their western provinces are terrorist havens, their border with Afghanistan is so porous that an armored division could do the goddamned Charleston all over it.
They are harboring the terrorists that attacked America. They have not shown sufficient interest in the last several years in doing anything about it.
I'm 100% fine with Obama's plan to strike at the terrorists where they now live. I'm 100% fine with Bush's co-opting of that plan.
I just wish we hadn't wasted all that time and money in Iraq that could have been used to finish this already.
+ Comprehensive energy policy that includes utilizing off-shore drilling and other fossil fuels.
His stance on Nuclear Power is that the US taxpayer will insure the companies that build. Not a good idea.
+ Better position on Iraq.
If by better you mean "throw money and soldiers at it until I can come up with a plan", then you should redefine your idea of "better".
+ Understands and supports the role of corporations in America.
The fundamentals of our economy are strong. Wait, no, they aren't. We shouldn't bail out AIG. Wait, we should. I hate over sight and regulation. That's why my bailout plan creates a committee to regulate the companies.
+ Seek to reduce, not increase, government spending.
Can't do that AND be supportive of the war in Iraq. Haven't you noticed that this puts us in a huge deficit?
You're not making very good judgment calls here.
Wtf! I was really looking forward to watching the debate tomorrow with the wife!
Fucking McCain!
Oxford MS was going berserk over it. Tons of people were setting up business and preparing. Now McCain is just gonna cause all of that to go to waste.
I hope that is the medias response to this utter bullshit. Especially today since McCain hasn't suspended jack shit.
You forget, John McCain doesn't speak for the Campaign of John McCain.
John McCain is just an innocent bystander and would really like it if those mean old people running his campaign would stop being so negative but, hey, Barack Obama refused to do town hall meetings so what can he do? Poor guy.
sdrawkcaB emaN on
0
HachfaceNot the Minister Farrakhan you're thinking ofDammit, Shepard!Registered Userregular
edited September 2008
ironzerg, I still don't understand your love of corporations. Granted, it's grating when dumb people blame "the corporations" for all of society's problems. But at the same time it's pretty obvious that the influence of big business in this country eclipses that of any other interest group. This is basically undemocratic, since the interests of big business serve a comparatively tiny slice of the American population. What do corporations provide for the citizenry that justifies their prominent--even indomitable--position of power?
I'll grant that "big business" is a large label that encompasses a wide range of sectors: insurance, pharmaceutical, energy, retail, financial services, the list goes on. But my point is that when a bill reaches Congress that involves any of those domains, the captains of industry inevitably have greater access to lawmakers by virtue of nothing other than their immense resources. It doesn't seem to bother you that John McCain surrounds himself with people whose very job is to ensure that corporate access to lawmakers continues unchallenged. Again, why do corporations deserve that kind of influence?
I submit that yesterday was the greatest day in the history of politics. It was like a Coen brothers movie.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
I'm sorry but anyone FUH FUH FUHing about Pakistan's sovereignty can fuck right off. Their government is ridiculously corrupt (which we've turned a blind eye to because we need them to support our operations in Afghanistan), their western provinces are terrorist havens, their border with Afghanistan is so porous that an armored division could do the goddamned Charleston all over it.
They are harboring the terrorists that attacked America. They have not shown sufficient interest in the last several years in doing anything about it.
I'm 100% fine with Obama's plan to strike at the terrorists where they now live. I'm 100% fine with Bush's co-opting of that plan.
I just wish we hadn't wasted all that time and money in Iraq that could have been used to finish this already.
No they couldn't, the Charleston is too compact. Now, the flying Charleston, that's a different story.
They've just said that a deal on the bailout has pretty much been reached and it'll be on Bush's desk on Saturday.
McCain (as far as I can tell) is still in New York, or at any rate will be arriving shortly after the fact.
Now, we're in some kind of bizarre zen koan. If the economic crisis solution has been reached before you could actually suspend your campaign, but after you had said you did, did you really suspend your campaign?
I'm hoping we hear a lot more about how McCain "suspended" his campaign by giving a major speech, having his VP hold a large rally, running attack ads in all the swing states he was up in the day before, and sending campaign surrogates on all the news shows.
When this is what we get when McCain isn't campaigning, just wait until he starts back up again!
I've posted many times on why I'm voting for McCain.
+ Comprehensive energy policy that includes utilizing off-shore drilling and other fossil fuels.
+ Better position on Iraq.
+ Understands and supports the role of corporations in America.
+ Seek to reduce, not increase, government spending.
It's not comprehensive to waste time extracting the oil that's sitting off-shore when that time and money could be better spent investing in green technology and alternative energies. It's not better just because it includes all the stupid ideas in one place.
Better in what respect? He didn't show the right judgement in the first place in keeping us out of Iraq. He doesn't have a cogent plan for getting us out now. He's parroting the PNAC line for keeping permanent bases on Iraqi soil, thus guaranteeing a permanent insurgency that wants to kick our asses out of the country. How is this better?
By his own admission, he doesn't understand the economy very well. His consistent call for deregulation of Wall Street and corporate America, particularly considering the fallout we are now dealing with should show you the massive error in judgement regarding McCain's grasp of the economy. Additionally, his plans to further cut taxes on the corprorations and wealthy elite who have been bleeding this country dry for the last 8 years further shows just how unfit his economic ideas are.
This one's the dinner winner. Obviously you've bought into his balloon-juice about "fighting pork-barrel spending". Funny how this vague idea of "pork" doesn't show up until Congress is in the hands of the opposition. If you gave a damn about decreasing government spending, you wouldn't be voting for a man guaranteed to continue throwing our money down the toilet in Iraq, giving it back to people who can most easily afford to pay taxes, and continuing this retarded stranglehold that corporate America has over Main Street.
I guess I'm not sure why McCain would need to "suspend" his campaign.
Well, other than to make people think he knows what he's doing when it comes to the economy and potentially avoid a critical debate with Barack Obama where the subject would likely come up and he would need to stop changing his mind on whether regulation is bad but he supports it but there shouldn't be bailout but there should otherwise he'll look like an even bigger fool, not to mention that if Barack doesn't let the debate go McCain can then start saying he puts the country first war-wise and economy-wise whereas Obama wants to kills puppies on your tax dollars rather than put the country firstRUN-ON SENTENCE ON VERGE OF BORKING .
Other than that, I just can't see it.
Oh, and McCain wouldn't get to have his nap on Friday before the debate. Forgot about that.
Omeks on
Online Info (Click Spoiler for More): |Xbox Live Tag: Omeks |PSN Tag:Omeks_R7 |Rock Band:Profile|DLC Collection
If anyone can even consider voting for a candidate who is willing to cancel what is actually the only real part of the run up to the elections, the debates, then I am shocked. McCain doesn't seem to understand that partisan politics can be both good and bad, bad partisan politics is when you attack your opponent and reject his plans for no reason other than the fact he is your opponent. Good partisan politics is when you reject your opponents plans because you believe yours are better. What we definately need right now is a debate. A stop-gap solution to the banking crisis has been proposed, and I think we can have some belief that it will work for now, since a similar bailout occurred in Japan. There is room for negotiation over what we should get in return for this bailout, whether we should curb executive pay, or demand certain legislation be supported by the industry, however this isn't where we need our candidates right now.
We need them to talk to us about how they intend to move this countries economy forward, how they intend to break the cycle of demanding 3% year on year real growth or decreeing failure, how they intend to work to improve the infrastructure of this country and to encourage long term investment. If McCain had said "I am going to ask for this debate to be solely based on the economy", or "I am going to ask for an additional debate, which will be designed solely to address the challenges of turning this economic problem into new growth for America. I am willing to have this debate in whichever format my opponent chooses" then I would have applauded him wholeheartedly.
As it is now I think Obama should simply be given the 2 hour slot to detail his plan for the country on national TV. I hope he responds with an offer to debate any other serious Republican.
They've just said that a deal on the bailout has pretty much been reached and it'll be on Bush's desk on Saturday.
McCain (as far as I can tell) is still in New York, or at any rate will be arriving shortly after the fact.
Now, we're in some kind of bizarre zen koan. If the economic crisis solution has been reached before you could actually suspend your campaign, but after you had said you did, did you really suspend your campaign?
It really depends if his campaign canceled their ads and I get a few merciful days without them while he re-orders them all.
enlightenedbum on
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Barack Obama is committed to hosting a public, televised event Friday night in Mississippi even if John McCain does not show up, an official close to the Obama campaign tells the Huffington Post.
In McCain's absence, the Senator is willing to make the scheduled debate a townhall meeting, a one-on-one interview with NewsHour's Jim Lehrer, or the combination of the two, the official said.
Posts
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
Tangentially, if this is your stance on Pakistan, then it follows that you agree that we need to pull out of Iraq soon because the Iraqis want us out within the next 18 months.
Also, in this case, I think the saying "I'd rather beg forgiveness than ask permission" is most apt. Seriously, though, Republicans are supposed to be gung ho tough guys. You're going to let a border and a little diplomatic difficulty stop you from getting terrorists?
Also, the new Pakistani PM is not all that popular and is backing off the Pro-American stance because of that.
Oh, right, you're the dude who has more faith in corporations than government services to solve people's problems, aren't you.
I have no idea how they earned that faith from you.
Obama's policy was based around the other government saying no to helping us, and stating he'd make surgical strikes Anyways if the evidence was good enough.
Fucking McCain!
I hope that is the medias response to this utter bullshit. Especially today since McCain hasn't suspended jack shit.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Isn't McCain the one whose proposed policies would cost 300B more than Obama's while cutting taxes?
They are harboring the terrorists that attacked America. They have not shown sufficient interest in the last several years in doing anything about it.
I'm 100% fine with Obama's plan to strike at the terrorists where they now live. I'm 100% fine with Bush's co-opting of that plan.
I just wish we hadn't wasted all that time and money in Iraq that could have been used to finish this already.
Yep, that's me.
His stance on Nuclear Power is that the US taxpayer will insure the companies that build. Not a good idea.
If by better you mean "throw money and soldiers at it until I can come up with a plan", then you should redefine your idea of "better".
The fundamentals of our economy are strong. Wait, no, they aren't. We shouldn't bail out AIG. Wait, we should. I hate over sight and regulation. That's why my bailout plan creates a committee to regulate the companies.
Can't do that AND be supportive of the war in Iraq. Haven't you noticed that this puts us in a huge deficit?
You're not making very good judgment calls here.
Oxford MS was going berserk over it. Tons of people were setting up business and preparing. Now McCain is just gonna cause all of that to go to waste.
Hey look at Wall Street now, its the great American success story.
Wait a second. Scratch that. Reverse it. /wonka
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
Honestly the most damning I saw was letterman last night. I mean he was flabbergasted by what happened and just savaged McCain.
pleasepaypreacher.net
Letterman already slammed him for it, we'll see what the fallout is on other channels tonight.
It'd be hilarious if the Ds got 60 in the Senate because McCain pissed off the Republicans in Mississippi enough that MS2 went Dem.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
Obama wants to tax us to pay for stuff. McCain will just print more money.
pleasepaypreacher.net
John McCain is just an innocent bystander and would really like it if those mean old people running his campaign would stop being so negative but, hey, Barack Obama refused to do town hall meetings so what can he do? Poor guy.
I'll grant that "big business" is a large label that encompasses a wide range of sectors: insurance, pharmaceutical, energy, retail, financial services, the list goes on. But my point is that when a bill reaches Congress that involves any of those domains, the captains of industry inevitably have greater access to lawmakers by virtue of nothing other than their immense resources. It doesn't seem to bother you that John McCain surrounds himself with people whose very job is to ensure that corporate access to lawmakers continues unchallenged. Again, why do corporations deserve that kind of influence?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/18/AR2008021802500.html
No they couldn't, the Charleston is too compact. Now, the flying Charleston, that's a different story.
McCain suspends his campaign.
They've just said that a deal on the bailout has pretty much been reached and it'll be on Bush's desk on Saturday.
McCain (as far as I can tell) is still in New York, or at any rate will be arriving shortly after the fact.
Now, we're in some kind of bizarre zen koan. If the economic crisis solution has been reached before you could actually suspend your campaign, but after you had said you did, did you really suspend your campaign?
When this is what we get when McCain isn't campaigning, just wait until he starts back up again!
Well, other than to make people think he knows what he's doing when it comes to the economy and potentially avoid a critical debate with Barack Obama where the subject would likely come up and he would need to stop changing his mind on whether regulation is bad but he supports it but there shouldn't be bailout but there should otherwise he'll look like an even bigger fool, not to mention that if Barack doesn't let the debate go McCain can then start saying he puts the country first war-wise and economy-wise whereas Obama wants to kills puppies on your tax dollars rather than put the country firstRUN-ON SENTENCE ON VERGE OF BORKING .
Other than that, I just can't see it.
Oh, and McCain wouldn't get to have his nap on Friday before the debate. Forgot about that.
|Xbox Live Tag: Omeks
|PSN Tag: Omeks_R7
|Rock Band: Profile|DLC Collection
We need them to talk to us about how they intend to move this countries economy forward, how they intend to break the cycle of demanding 3% year on year real growth or decreeing failure, how they intend to work to improve the infrastructure of this country and to encourage long term investment. If McCain had said "I am going to ask for this debate to be solely based on the economy", or "I am going to ask for an additional debate, which will be designed solely to address the challenges of turning this economic problem into new growth for America. I am willing to have this debate in whichever format my opponent chooses" then I would have applauded him wholeheartedly.
As it is now I think Obama should simply be given the 2 hour slot to detail his plan for the country on national TV. I hope he responds with an offer to debate any other serious Republican.
Dated: Tuesday, February 19, 2008.
Your point being?
Yeah, and it'll be for the $700 billion figure which the Treasury pulled out of their asses.
It really depends if his campaign canceled their ads and I get a few merciful days without them while he re-orders them all.
*breates*
hahahahahahahahahaahaha
Old news.
Look at any article about the United States and Pakistan in the last month, and you see a completely different story.