The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Maths is the new black and evolution is SO five minutes ago
Cliff notes: Richard Dawkins has retired from being the inaugural chair for the public understanding of science at Oxford, or "Captain Science To You And Stop Taking What I Said Out Of Context". Oxford has just appointed the mathematician Marcus du Sautoy to take his place.
What a dish. My hard on for science was waning to a semi but I'm back to full mast now.
I have read a few book written by Dawkins and I have no idea where people come up with the idea that he's such a bastard. Granted I have not gotten to The God Delusion yet, but everything I have read so far is no worse than Carl Sagan in The Demon Haunted World.
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
I wouldn't call them that important. From a scientific perspective Dawkin's views are moot. You can neither prove nor disprove the existance of an intangible, non-empirical entity, placing it outside the realm of science. From an ontological/philosophical standpoint, yeah Dawkin's is pretty important.
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
I wouldn't call them that important. From a scientific perspective Dawkin's views are moot. You can neither prove nor disprove the existance of an intangible, non-empirical entity, placing it outside the realm of science. From an ontological/philosophical standpoint, yeah Dawkin's is pretty important.
He's written like one book specifically about religion. His earlier work is some pretty good science.
I have read a few book written by Dawkins and I have no idea where people come up with the idea that he's such a bastard. Granted I have not gotten to The God Delusion yet, but everything I have read so far is no worse than Carl Sagan in The Demon Haunted World.
People love to paint Dawkins badly, but they seem to forget that all their other idols (Asimov, Sagan, etc) all had some pretty negative things to say about religion. People are just too touchy.
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
I wouldn't call them that important. From a scientific perspective Dawkin's views are moot. You can neither prove nor disprove the existance of an intangible, non-empirical entity, placing it outside the realm of science. From an ontological/philosophical standpoint, yeah Dawkin's is pretty important.
What?
Have you read The Selfish Gene? The Blind Watchmaker? The Ancestor's Tale?
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
you're grossly overstating Dawkins' importance
thank you, I approve of Druhim's assertion
Dawkins is more a philosopher than a scientist and he's not that fantastic. I know atheists have boners for him, but he hasn't had any unique scientific discoveries.
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
you're grossly overstating Dawkins' importance
thank you, I approve of Druhim's assertion
Dawkins is more a philosopher than a scientist and he's not that fantastic. I know atheists have boners for him, but he hasn't had any unique scientific discoveries.
While I agree that Dublo is exaggerating a bit. By what reasoning do you claim he is more of a philosopher than scientist?
A man that's written some of the most important books in human history, and you've reduced him to smelling as dirt.
Amazing.
you're grossly overstating Dawkins' importance
thank you, I approve of Druhim's assertion
Dawkins is more a philosopher than a scientist and he's not that fantastic. I know atheists have boners for him, but he hasn't had any unique scientific discoveries.
So you have to have taken part in a unique scientific discoveries in order to be a great scientist?
You also don't seem to get the real impact of The Selfish Gene. It changed the way people and other scientists thought about evolution and biology, almost as a whole.
And yeah, maybe I'm exaggerating a little bit, but hey... that's what I do.
I feel there somewhere is a joke connection to Dru and Dirt that fits with Smelling like dirt but I can't for the life of me think of it.
He smells like dirt because he hasn't showered in a while?
He has but admittedly I didn't scrub too hard.
How hard can you scrub with a sponge? I would think not every, you don't want to bruise him.
Also, be careful helping him in and out of the tub. Old people be feeble as shit.
Auntie Shibby on
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
I have a couple of glass ones too, but they're still at the office of patent assholes who work at the pace of a snail riding a glacier stuck in molasses in January.
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
I have a couple of glass ones too, but they're still at the office of patent assholes who work at the pace of a snail riding a glacier stuck in molasses in January.
Yes, yes it does. I hope you are publishing or patenting your results.
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
Does it get us any closer to:
Laser guns
X-Wings
Lightsabers
The Enterprise
Teleporters
a Stargate
Food replicators
or
Cyborgs?
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
Does it get us any closer to:
Laser guns
X-Wings
Lightsabers
The Enterprise
Teleporters
a Stargate
Food replicators
or
Cyborgs?
If not then no, why did you waste your time?
No, but it is used in breathable films that keep wrapped produce fresher and for products like diapers that allow you to know there's a surprise inside without having it leak out to confirm it.
My other invention is amorphous metals, so we can build a containment unit for humpback whales on your starship of choice.
Cliff notes: Richard Dawkins has retired from being the inaugural chair for the public understanding of science at Oxford, or "Captain Science To You And Stop Taking What I Said Out Of Context". Oxford has just appointed the mathematician Marcus du Sautoy to take his place.
What a dish. My hard on for science was waning to a semi but I'm back to full mast now.
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
Does it get us any closer to:
Laser guns
X-Wings
Lightsabers
The Enterprise
Teleporters
a Stargate
Food replicators
or
Cyborgs?
If not then no, why did you waste your time?
No, but it is used in breathable films that keep wrapped produce fresher and for products like diapers that allow you to know there's a surprise inside without having it leak out to confirm it.
My other invention is amorphous metals, so we can build a containment unit for humpback whales on your starship of choice.
what about sex robots? any progress on that front without coming up with sex robots that haunt a man's nightmares? dang japanese
Cliff notes: Richard Dawkins has retired from being the inaugural chair for the public understanding of science at Oxford, or "Captain Science To You And Stop Taking What I Said Out Of Context". Oxford has just appointed the mathematician Marcus du Sautoy to take his place.
What a dish. My hard on for science was waning to a semi but I'm back to full mast now.
Dude looks like Sting
Nuh uh.
Simon Pegg + Putin.
ChicoBlue on
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
edited October 2008
I'm leaning more torwards sex holograms. I always felt the holodeck on Deep Space 9 was both awesome and disgusting at the same time. Imagine having to hose that thing out after every dude on the station went in there to bone holo-chicks. What a way to earn your gold pressed latinum.
I invented a way to increase the melt flow properties of ground and precipitated calcium carbonate particles in a polypropylene resin system for use in plastic films, does that count as a unique scientific discovery?
I have a couple of glass ones too, but they're still at the office of patent assholes who work at the pace of a snail riding a glacier stuck in molasses in January.
Is this just fancy talk for making a glass dildo, science man?
I have read a few book written by Dawkins and I have no idea where people come up with the idea that he's such a bastard. Granted I have not gotten to The God Delusion yet, but everything I have read so far is no worse than Carl Sagan in The Demon Haunted World.
The difference between Carl Sagan and Richard Dawkins is that a) Carl Sagan was actually a pretty spiritual guy and b) Richard Dawkins is a douche
Also Carl Sagan was way handsomer and had a prettier voice
Posts
I mean the smell of freshly turned soil can be pleasant.
cite please
Amazing.
How convenient.
He's written like one book specifically about religion. His earlier work is some pretty good science.
People love to paint Dawkins badly, but they seem to forget that all their other idols (Asimov, Sagan, etc) all had some pretty negative things to say about religion. People are just too touchy.
What?
Have you read The Selfish Gene? The Blind Watchmaker? The Ancestor's Tale?
That show about his creek was pretty great. Was that based on one of his books?
Dawkins is more a philosopher than a scientist and he's not that fantastic. I know atheists have boners for him, but he hasn't had any unique scientific discoveries.
While I agree that Dublo is exaggerating a bit. By what reasoning do you claim he is more of a philosopher than scientist?
You also don't seem to get the real impact of The Selfish Gene. It changed the way people and other scientists thought about evolution and biology, almost as a whole.
And yeah, maybe I'm exaggerating a little bit, but hey... that's what I do.
No 'cause Dru is old as dirt.
this guy smells like dirt
something something punchline.
He has but admittedly I didn't scrub too hard.
Also, be careful helping him in and out of the tub. Old people be feeble as shit.
I have a couple of glass ones too, but they're still at the office of patent assholes who work at the pace of a snail riding a glacier stuck in molasses in January.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Does it get us any closer to:
Laser guns
X-Wings
Lightsabers
The Enterprise
Teleporters
a Stargate
Food replicators
or
Cyborgs?
If not then no, why did you waste your time?
No, but it is used in breathable films that keep wrapped produce fresher and for products like diapers that allow you to know there's a surprise inside without having it leak out to confirm it.
My other invention is amorphous metals, so we can build a containment unit for humpback whales on your starship of choice.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Dude looks like Sting
I forgot shields.
Does it get us any closer to force fields or shield emitters?
what about sex robots? any progress on that front without coming up with sex robots that haunt a man's nightmares? dang japanese
Nuh uh.
Simon Pegg + Putin.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Is this just fancy talk for making a glass dildo, science man?
It created the illusion that you were constantly posting from a forge
I was going to say something about River Out Of Eden and then the penny dropped. Good show old sport.
Sir, that was HK-47 from KOTOR and KOTOR 2. The most ass kicking killer robot in the galaxy.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
The difference between Carl Sagan and Richard Dawkins is that a) Carl Sagan was actually a pretty spiritual guy and b) Richard Dawkins is a douche
Also Carl Sagan was way handsomer and had a prettier voice
PSN ID : DetectiveOlivaw | TWITTER | STEAM ID | NEVER FORGET