The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The Clean Elections movement and you

Ethan SmithEthan Smith Origin name: Beart4toArlington, VARegistered User regular
edited November 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
In 7 states in America (Arizona, N. Carolina, Maine, Connecticut, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the positions in Portland, OR), the state legislature has passed a bill that allows for a candidate to campaign 'cleanly', that is, to accept public funding for their campaigns. This money is determined by the average amount of money spent in a campaign in the district.

The most recent state, Connecticut, passed the law last year in response to a scandal. After this election, 82% of all of the state congressmen in Connecticut got into office without a single donation from a lobbyist. In Maine, where the law was passed in '98, 90% of their congressmen run clean, and they also have the lowest average age for their state legislature.

I recently came across this movement at the SUNY Social Justice convergence...thing. They do paid internships to anyone who wants to make a chapter in their school, and I think that, with the new Democratic hatred of lobbies, we could push this through, on the state if not on the national level.

Ethan Smith on

Posts

  • Ethan SmithEthan Smith Origin name: Beart4to Arlington, VARegistered User regular
    edited November 2008
    I'd like to plug this one last time by saying that you hardly have to pay more than 10 dollars in each of these states for this increasingly lobby free movement in the states.

    and the ubiquiotous wiki link-
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Elections

    Ethan Smith on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited November 2008
    ...I think this past election absolutely killed the idea of public finance for a long while.

    Fencingsax on
  • DerrickDerrick Registered User regular
    edited November 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    ...I think this past election absolutely killed the idea of public finance for a long while.

    Maybe for President.

    You can't really say that the same can be said of state positions.

    Derrick on
    Steam and CFN: Enexemander
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited November 2008
    Sounds interesting, since I think Election Campaigns are the only time that Lobbyist are allowed to donate/give money to politicians, every other time falls under bribery doesnt it? Otherwise it just means the greased palms go towards adding another level to your house / golfing resort getaway "conferences".

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • NocturneNocturne Registered User regular
    edited November 2008
    Sounds interesting, since I think Election Campaigns are the only time that Lobbyist are allowed to donate/give money to politicians, every other time falls under bribery doesnt it? Otherwise it just means the greased palms go towards adding another level to your house / golfing resort getaway "conferences".

    Ted Stevens might think otherwise.

    I think the fact that one is legal and the other illegal make a bit of difference, even if it doesn't outright stop lobbying.

    I support this idea.

    Nocturne on
  • real_pochaccoreal_pochacco Registered User regular
    edited November 2008
    Well public financing for the presidency also works differently right? Because you can still receive donations, there's just a limit, whereas in this program the politicians aren't allowed to receive any donations.

    real_pochacco on
Sign In or Register to comment.