The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I have always used Rank - Last Name system of nomenclature when dealing with Army and NG personel in a professional setting, and I have seen others do so as well.
muninn on
0
kaliyamaLeft to find less-moderated foraRegistered Userregular
edited November 2008
Its' their title, so in my experience, I can't go wrong doing it though usually officers I speak to put me on a first name basis. If you want to direct your google-fu, I would do searches for the protocol departments of each branch. Feel free to call a protocol officer, too.
As for enlisted... would you be speaking to them in regards to some aspect of their service? If so, then it'd probably be good etiquette to refer to them by their rank. But, honestly, most enlisted people won't really care either way (unless they're al ate up).
I work in a government facility that has a lot of active duty members and we are always to adress them by their rank. Hell my dad works with me (waaaaay above me I should say) and even though he's retired people still refer to him as ltc so and so.
I hate that shit. Look, dude, I had a hard enough time memorizing my own service's rank structure. I'm sure as hell not gonna spend my time learning yours as well. Marines. Gah! Am I right?
Op: Are you gonna be dealing with one service in particular, or the whole spectrum of services?
It also depends on the service. In the Air Force, we're much less rank conscious. The Army on the other hand is SUPER rank conscious, to the point where I've had people not talk to me because I'm "subordinate" to them. pfft.
Anyways, yes, Warrant Officers go by "Mr." or "Chief" if they're a Chief.
In the AF enlisted ranks, anything below Staff Sgt is "Airman", Staff, Technical, and Master Sergeant are usually just "Sergeant" while Senior Master Sgt and Chief Master Sgt can be called "Senior" or "Chief" respectively (though "senior" is much less common, I usually just say Sergeant).
And yes, various different services having different enlisted names is silly I agree.
Really? Any particular reason? I think it shows that they care a little more, and took the time to learn what i means at least on the surface. That's just me though.
Ah...I can see that. I guess I'd just say don't take it the wrong way.
I know what you mean though, some people make a point of saying the rank whenever they're speaking as a way of saying "I'm up here, you're down there." kinda thing. SO stupid.
At least in the Navy/CG, officers who are Lieutenant Commander and below should be addressed as "Mr." or "Ms." It's kind of condescending to call them by rank.
At least in the Navy/CG, officers who are Lieutenant Commander and below should be addressed as "Mr." or "Ms." It's kind of condescending to call them by rank.
By other members of the service, once you know them. If you're addressing someone for the first time, it's pretty much always proper to call them Rank Lastname.
Posts
As for enlisted... would you be speaking to them in regards to some aspect of their service? If so, then it'd probably be good etiquette to refer to them by their rank. But, honestly, most enlisted people won't really care either way (unless they're al ate up).
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I hate that shit. Look, dude, I had a hard enough time memorizing my own service's rank structure. I'm sure as hell not gonna spend my time learning yours as well. Marines. Gah! Am I right?
Op: Are you gonna be dealing with one service in particular, or the whole spectrum of services?
calling privates by their rank always seemed weird to me
Anyways, yes, Warrant Officers go by "Mr." or "Chief" if they're a Chief.
In the AF enlisted ranks, anything below Staff Sgt is "Airman", Staff, Technical, and Master Sergeant are usually just "Sergeant" while Senior Master Sgt and Chief Master Sgt can be called "Senior" or "Chief" respectively (though "senior" is much less common, I usually just say Sergeant).
And yes, various different services having different enlisted names is silly I agree.
I know what you mean though, some people make a point of saying the rank whenever they're speaking as a way of saying "I'm up here, you're down there." kinda thing. SO stupid.
I think Officers, and maybe Sergeant Majors/Master Gunnery Sergeants, tend to like their rank being used more in official business.
Steam
By other members of the service, once you know them. If you're addressing someone for the first time, it's pretty much always proper to call them Rank Lastname.