The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

HD noob TV setup

DelzhandDelzhand Registered User, Transition Team regular
My father in law gave us a Hitachi C29-F800SNT today because he got a new TV. I have no idea what the different inputs, HD, resmolutions are. I've used the trusty Red Yellow and White cables since the SNES days.

On the back of the TV there are blue, green, and red plugs marked cb, cr, y, and two red and white audio underneath them. But when I plug the matching plugs on my Xbox 360 into them and turn the TV on to the ycbcr input channel, I just get a blue screen that says HITACHI. I've got the switch on the back of the Xbox cord set to HDTV, but there's no sound, no visual.

I can plug the red/white/yellow cables into AV1 and everything works fine when the Xbox cord is switched to TV.

I don't have a user guide for the TV or a remote, and I followed the instructions in the Xbox manual to the letter. Is ycbcr not necessarily HD? Am I doing something wrong?

Edit: If I leave the xbox cord set to TV, then the Ycbcr input channel works just like normal. Is it possible my tv only supports 420 somethingorothers?

Delzhand on

Posts

  • ImprovoloneImprovolone Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    YcBcR, or Blue Green Red, are known as component. They transfer the video signal in three different colors, providing a better picture than a Composite (yellow) or S-video (yellow with fancy end) cable. I think there is a setting, possibly within the XBox dash that will output on component.
    Edit: Oh, you fixed it. Component is analog, not digital. HDMI on the other hand, which I assume is the4 only HD option available for the XBox is a digital signal.

    If you TV does not have HDMI, I would be surprised if it was 720p (pixel density, basically).

    Since you seem to be new to this stuff, www.monoprice.com for all of your cables. Buy the cheapest stuff you can get there that will meet your needs.

    Improvolone on
    Voice actor for hire. My time is free if your project is!
  • Dark ShroudDark Shroud Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    You might have the red colors flipped. It happens some times.

    Dark Shroud on
  • RaynagaRaynaga Registered User regular
    edited December 2008

    If you TV does not have HDMI, I would be surprised if it was 720p (pixel density, basically).

    Not necessarily true. A large amount of the first generation sets didn't ship with HDMI. My first one was a rear projection set right when HD hit the public; did up to 1080i but was component only.

    To the OP, since you didn't mention seeing an HDMI port I assume there aren't any back there? If you look and you find that there are, that is by far your best/easiest solution.

    EDIT: Improv, just realized that you probably meant that it skips the 720p resolution in favor of something like the 1080i, not that it couldn't do an HD signal. I'm an idiot.

    Raynaga on
  • ImprovoloneImprovolone Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    No, you were right. I thought component could only do up to 480.

    Improvolone on
    Voice actor for hire. My time is free if your project is!
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    My father in law gave us a Hitachi C29-F800SNT today because he got a new TV. I have no idea what the different inputs, HD, resmolutions are. I've used the trusty Red Yellow and White cables since the SNES days.

    On the back of the TV there are blue, green, and red plugs marked cb, cr, y, and two red and white audio underneath them. But when I plug the matching plugs on my Xbox 360 into them and turn the TV on to the ycbcr input channel, I just get a blue screen that says HITACHI. I've got the switch on the back of the Xbox cord set to HDTV, but there's no sound, no visual.

    I can plug the red/white/yellow cables into AV1 and everything works fine when the Xbox cord is switched to TV.

    I don't have a user guide for the TV or a remote, and I followed the instructions in the Xbox manual to the letter. Is ycbcr not necessarily HD? Am I doing something wrong?

    Edit: If I leave the xbox cord set to TV, then the Ycbcr input channel works just like normal. Is it possible my tv only supports 420 somethingorothers?
    When you say the YcBcR input works with the Xbox cable in TV mode, do you still have it plugged into the RCA jacks? If so, it sounds like you just need to change the source to component. There should be a button on the TV that says "TV/VIDEO" or "SOURCE" or "INPUT". Press it.

    Azio on
  • DelzhandDelzhand Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    The "input" button cycles from Normal (cable tv), AV1, AV2, S-VIDEO, and YCBCR. I've got the green banded plug in Y, the red banded plug in Cr, the blue banded plug in Cb, solid red in Audio-L, solid white in Audio-R. The switch on the back of the cord, right where it plugs in to the XBOX, is set to TV and it works. That's what I meant by TV mode. But if I switch that toggle to HDTV, I get nothing, including no sound.

    If HDMI is a small, trapezoidal input, yeah, there isn't anything like that back there.

    Delzhand on
  • maximumzeromaximumzero I...wait, what? New Orleans, LARegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    So after googling the model # you supplied...

    You do realize that you TV you have isn't HD, right?

    So in short, you can still use component, as it provides a better quality image, but you want to set the switch on the end of the cable to "TV", not "HDTV".

    maximumzero on
    FU7kFbw.png
    Switch: 6200-8149-0919 / Wii U: maximumzero / 3DS: 0860-3352-3335 / eBay Shop
  • maximumzeromaximumzero I...wait, what? New Orleans, LARegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Image from the PDF I found follows:
    picture2pt1.png

    maximumzero on
    FU7kFbw.png
    Switch: 6200-8149-0919 / Wii U: maximumzero / 3DS: 0860-3352-3335 / eBay Shop
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    I love that. "Flat Look."

    TV makers are such dicks.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • DelzhandDelzhand Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Delzhand on
  • maximumzeromaximumzero I...wait, what? New Orleans, LARegistered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    maximumzero on
    FU7kFbw.png
    Switch: 6200-8149-0919 / Wii U: maximumzero / 3DS: 0860-3352-3335 / eBay Shop
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    I had a CRT that was HD, but it was 16:9. 4:3 + CRT definitely means non-HD, though.

    And for the record, I never realized how terrible HD looks on a CRT until I upgraded to an LCD. Wow.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • NatheoNatheo Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    I have an older samsung 27 inch that's 4:3 and crt, and 1080i. Not to be a dick. Just saying they exist.

    Obviously it's not 1920x1080, and yes my games are cut off on the sides slightly.

    Natheo on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    Natheo wrote: »
    I have an older samsung 27 inch that's 4:3 and crt, and 1080i. Not to be a dick. Just saying they exist.

    Obviously it's not 1920x1080, and yes my games are cut off on the sides slightly.

    Having 1080 scanlines doesn't mean it's HD. Losing a quarter of your video source should make that apparent. Anyone that markets that as HD is a scam artist.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • BubbaTBubbaT Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    I had a CRT that was HD, but it was 16:9. 4:3 + CRT definitely means non-HD, though.

    And for the record, I never realized how terrible HD looks on a CRT until I upgraded to an LCD. Wow.

    You might have just had a crummy CRT then. Sony makes, or made, beautiful HD CRT screens that still more than hold their own against any flat panel.

    It's just that most folks don't think picture quality is worth having a TV that weighs more than an offensive linemen.

    BubbaT on
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    BubbaT wrote: »
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    I had a CRT that was HD, but it was 16:9. 4:3 + CRT definitely means non-HD, though.

    And for the record, I never realized how terrible HD looks on a CRT until I upgraded to an LCD. Wow.

    You might have just had a crummy CRT then. Sony makes, or made, beautiful HD CRT screens that still more than hold their own against any flat panel.

    It's just that most folks don't think picture quality is worth having a TV that weighs more than an offensive linemen.

    That's true. Mine was pretty mid-range at best.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • shadydentistshadydentist Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    I had a CRT that was HD, but it was 16:9. 4:3 + CRT definitely means non-HD, though.

    And for the record, I never realized how terrible HD looks on a CRT until I upgraded to an LCD. Wow.

    Really? CRT offers way better picture quality, lower lag, and higher dynamic contrast than any other TV type. They've only fallen out of disfavor because of their large size and weight.

    shadydentist on
    Steam & GT
    steam_sig.png
    GT: Tanky the Tank
    Black: 1377 6749 7425
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I googled the TV, but until HD became a big deal, it's not like manufacturers went around labelling their stuff "STANDARD DEF!". I thought Component was HD, I didn't realize they were independent features.

    Good thing I got it for free. If I was paying for it I'd probably have been scammed into thinking I bought an HD tv. Well, not really, because I would have done research before making a purchase.

    Anyway, thanks for the help! Just out of curiosity, what about that PDF gives away that it isn't HD, other than the fact that it doesn't say "this tv has HD capabilities"? Or is it just obvious by omission?

    Well, the biggest tip-offs is that it's not 16:9 and it's a CRT.

    While there are some HDTVs that are CRTs and some that aren't 16:9, they're not very common.

    Otherwise, there would be a listing in the specs about resolution and what standards are supported (480p, 720p, 1080i/p)

    I had a CRT that was HD, but it was 16:9. 4:3 + CRT definitely means non-HD, though.

    And for the record, I never realized how terrible HD looks on a CRT until I upgraded to an LCD. Wow.

    Really? CRT offers way better picture quality, lower lag, and higher dynamic contrast than any other TV type. They've only fallen out of disfavor because of their large size and weight.

    I basically had problems like SD users see on a lot of HD games. Some text was way too small or distorted. Map icons in thing like GTA4 were unreadable blotches. There was lots of blur that I no longer see on my LCD.

    It was almost like I was stuck in some sort of limbo between SD and HD.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    I love that. "Flat Look."

    TV makers are such dicks.
    Oh wow.

    But to be fair they have been making these "flat CRTs" for ages, my parents still have one

    Azio on
  • BubbaTBubbaT Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Azio wrote: »
    I love that. "Flat Look."

    TV makers are such dicks.
    Oh wow.

    But to be fair they have been making these "flat CRTs" for ages, my parents still have one

    Back in the CRT-dominated days, flat screens were pretty useful in terms of reducing glare and image distortion. In my experience, the improvement in distortion/geometry was minimal, but the improvement in glare was significant.

    Of course these days LCDs are almost universally matte screens, so CRT's not going to win any battles in over-lighted rooms.

    BubbaT on
  • Dark ShroudDark Shroud Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    There is only one thing worse than SD TVs with component inputs that will play 480p signals that almost nothing supports. The 720p HD TVs that accept 1080i and downscale it to 720p output. These TVS are sold as 1080i HD TVs. Which is why you never buy an HD TV from Wal-mart. Cosco carries or used to carry Vizios that did this.

    I have a 32" Sony Wega CRT that is 4:3, and does 480, 720, & 1080i. It has one HDMI, 2 component, & 4 composite (3 with s-video) inputs. It's a few years old and my only complaint with it is over scan. The thing weighs around 235 pounds and I had to take the railing off my stairs just so my brother and I could get it into our front room.

    It's big and bulky and our mother hated it. She said it felt too big in the front room. She's in her 50s can't live alone and it just over whelmed her. That was until she went to a friends house who had a little 24" SD in their front room aways away from their couch. She came home sat in front of the TV watching an HD news feed and declared her friends TV was too damn small. She became hooked on HD without even realizing it.

    Dark Shroud on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    YcBcR, or Blue Green Red, are known as component. They transfer the video signal in three different colors, providing a better picture than a Composite (yellow) or S-video (yellow with fancy end) cable.

    Minor nitpick:

    Component cables can transfer a picture as three colors, but the most common variety used in US TVs, and the kind on the OP's TV, doesn't. Y/Cb/Cr sends the signal as image brightness (the Y), the difference in the color from blue (the Cb), and the difference in the color from red (the Cr).

    You can also have Y/Pb/Pr, which is the same thing only analog.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ImprovoloneImprovolone Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    So some component are digital, and come are analog?
    Neat.

    Improvolone on
    Voice actor for hire. My time is free if your project is!
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Analog is the most common, but digital is making some headway. Not sure why, when we have DVI and HDMI already.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • NatheoNatheo Registered User regular
    edited December 2008

    Having 1080 scanlines doesn't mean it's HD. Losing a quarter of your video source should make that apparent. Anyone that markets that as HD is a scam artist.

    It's a high resolution display. I could care less if it fit into whatever the marketing defines HD as. My samsung looks better then my buddies 1080p lg, for whatever it's worth.

    Natheo on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • minor incidentminor incident expert in a dying field ---Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2008
    Natheo wrote: »
    I could care less if it fit into whatever the marketing defines HD as. My samsung looks better then my buddies 1080p lg, for whatever it's worth.

    That's all that really matters, then.

    minor incident on
    Ah, it stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Natheo wrote: »
    I have an older samsung 27 inch that's 4:3 and crt, and 1080i. Not to be a dick. Just saying they exist.

    Obviously it's not 1920x1080, and yes my games are cut off on the sides slightly.

    Having 1080 scanlines doesn't mean it's HD. Losing a quarter of your video source should make that apparent. Anyone that markets that as HD is a scam artist.

    Actually, having 1080 scanlines means it's HD pretty much by definition. HD doesn't mean "widescreen" and it doesn't mean "progressive scan", it means that the display has 720 or more lines of vertical resolution.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    Right, but to advertise something as being HD when it does not in fact support the majority of HD content is pretty misleading.

    Azio on
  • Casually HardcoreCasually Hardcore Once an Asshole. Trying to be better. Registered User regular
    edited December 2008
    I basically had problems like SD users see on a lot of HD games. Some text was way too small or distorted. Map icons in thing like GTA4 were unreadable blotches. There was lots of blur that I no longer see on my LCD.

    Your T.V. mighta needed to be calibrated by a pro. My Panasonic Tau had those problem, and a huge overscan problem. It was all fixed once I gotten it calibrated.

    Casually Hardcore on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    Azio wrote: »
    Right, but to advertise something as being HD when it does not in fact support the majority of HD content is pretty misleading.

    It does support it. It can display the images. Just not in an optimal manner.

    I'm not disagreeing that 4:3 HD displays are stupid, since almost all HD content is 16:9. But it is, legitimately, HD, and it's not disingenuous about anything. Especially since HD CRTs were sold at a time when there really wasn't any HD content anywhere, so making a 4:3 display was slightly less retarded.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2008
    I basically had problems like SD users see on a lot of HD games. Some text was way too small or distorted. Map icons in thing like GTA4 were unreadable blotches. There was lots of blur that I no longer see on my LCD.

    Your T.V. mighta needed to be calibrated by a pro. My Panasonic Tau had those problem, and a huge overscan problem. It was all fixed once I gotten it calibrated.

    You may be able to calibrate the overscan without a pro. My TV allows that sort of tweak. Fool around with your menus before you drop $300 on a pro, but make sure you record your settings if you plan to go crazy, so you can undo anything you did.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
Sign In or Register to comment.