bel I'll have you know you got my fursona so wrong
The Lovely Bastard on
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
I used to think A-wings sucked the worst of all. Then I was playing Star Wars: Rogue Squadron 3 multiplayer with a friend, and I was in RS 2's Battle of Endor. Since I'd already unlocked everything there wasn't a second X-Wing, so I had to use the A-Wing. That thing was all kinds of awesome in that battle, and I don't know why. Well, it sucked during the second part when you have to take out the Star Destroyers, but the first part was just like 5 minutes of me being awesome.
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
Antimatter on
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
Potatoe, that is a rather large TIE bomber without the bomb cache, what are you doing.
It looks like the prototype tie advanced flown by Vader.
And on that amazingly nerdy bombshell, i say we talk about TIE FIGHTER in this thread. Because its an awesome game and you should all play it.
The prototype TIE advanced had sharper wing angles, it was more of a [-o-] than a (-o-)
Oh and i forgot about the <>s
INTERCEPTORS HO <-o->
IF YOU FLY A TIE INTERCEPTOR YOU DO NOT FEAR DEATH BY DEFINITION
Oh come on it was way worse flying a standard TIE FIGHTER. You were slower and had half the laser cannons.
So for obvious reasons i prefered the interceptor.
A TIE fighter meant you were cannon fodder.
A TIE interceptor meant that you knew you were going to die and wanted to do it in the best way possible.
I'm pretty sure you steered interceptors using an Electric Guitar, so that when you inevitably crash or get hit by an errant piece of shrapnel, your exploding corpse flies through the galaxies forever welded to your axe, forever rocking out in space as you journey into eternity.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
An A-wing killed Vader's Super Star Destroyer (admittedly it too was destroyed in the kamikaze attack initiated by an asian person - don't think I didn't notice that Lucas) which didn't have an easily-exploitable weakness like the Death Star.
Terrendos on
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
An A-wing killed Vader's Super Star Destroyer (admittedly it too was destroyed in the kamikaze attack initiated by an asian person - don't think I didn't notice that Lucas) which didn't have an easily-exploitable weakness like the Death Star.
You don't count a single starfighter breaking a window to be an easily exploitable weakness?
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
man, are you downplaying tycho celchu's mad gambit of leading several tie fighters in a merry chase through the death star to let Lando and Wedge in their slower, but more heavily armed, craft be safe to blow the second death star?
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
An A-wing killed Vader's Super Star Destroyer (admittedly it too was destroyed in the kamikaze attack initiated by an asian person - don't think I didn't notice that Lucas) which didn't have an easily-exploitable weakness like the Death Star.
You don't count a single starfighter breaking a window to be an easily exploitable weakness?
Well weren't the bridge shields already down? That was kind of an important first step
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
pssh, let's see you modify your firing arc by 45 degrees.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
An A-wing killed Vader's Super Star Destroyer (admittedly it too was destroyed in the kamikaze attack initiated by an asian person - don't think I didn't notice that Lucas) which didn't have an easily-exploitable weakness like the Death Star.
You don't count a single starfighter breaking a window to be an easily exploitable weakness?
Well weren't the bridge shields already down? That was kind of an important first step
Well now you're just discounting the entire ground operation on Endor! You are terrible at debating!
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
0
Options
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
edited January 2009
Unless the weakness mentioned is 'Many Bothans,' I hardly would describe it as easily exploitable.
Oh ho ho.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
edited January 2009
We're talking about easily exploitable weaknesses.
Comparing DS I and II to the Executor.
Since II had a moon shield I would count that higher than bridge shields, if they were up.
But still. A window! What cockfag builds a capital starship the size of Texas and doesn't have an auxillary bridge?
I'll tell you what kind: the kind that has shitty acting in three prequels!
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
the best part is that it doesn't matter what kind of paint job you put on an A-wing, you're not hanging around long enough for anyone to see.
obviously you haven't flown an a-wing properly :smug:
you mean I haven't performed an akbar slash starting from the opposite end of the battlefield and decimating an entire TIE squadron before they knew we were even there?
Posts
3 wings, more artillery than a B-wing, about as fast as an interceptor, and it had shields
Thanks, Terrendos and Munkus.
Oh come on it was way worse flying a standard TIE FIGHTER. You were slower and had half the laser cannons.
So for obvious reasons i prefered the interceptor.
The assault gunboat.
man, i know, but i just couldn't get the lightning bolt pattern in your fur right
I think we all know that in starfighter-level combat, the A-Wing beats everything else hands down, if only because of pure speed.
However, let's not forget the awesome strength of the later generation B-Wings when it comes to assaulting a capital ship.
What destroyed the first Death Star? Was it an A-Wing? Was it a shitty Y-Wing? No, it was a goddamned X-Wing!
A TIE fighter meant you were cannon fodder.
A TIE interceptor meant that you knew you were going to die and wanted to do it in the best way possible.
I'm pretty sure you steered interceptors using an Electric Guitar, so that when you inevitably crash or get hit by an errant piece of shrapnel, your exploding corpse flies through the galaxies forever welded to your axe, forever rocking out in space as you journey into eternity.
A wings were not in production yet.
Y-wings were chosen to do the trench run.
An A-wing killed Vader's Super Star Destroyer (admittedly it too was destroyed in the kamikaze attack initiated by an asian person - don't think I didn't notice that Lucas) which didn't have an easily-exploitable weakness like the Death Star.
You don't count a single starfighter breaking a window to be an easily exploitable weakness?
also, motherfucking executor, bitch.
Well weren't the bridge shields already down? That was kind of an important first step
Well now you're just discounting the entire ground operation on Endor! You are terrible at debating!
Oh ho ho.
I'm speaking solely about the destruction of the Executor here
Far be it from me to belittle the hardships and sacrifices the ground team had to face
Motherfucker you did not just say that.
Comparing DS I and II to the Executor.
Since II had a moon shield I would count that higher than bridge shields, if they were up.
But still. A window! What cockfag builds a capital starship the size of Texas and doesn't have an auxillary bridge?
I'll tell you what kind: the kind that has shitty acting in three prequels!
Missile Boat.
B-wings were the A/V crew of starships.
Nobody wanted them.
Ever.
The Pittsburgh Steelers had a regular season record of 12 wins and 4 losses.
and yeah, b-wings fly fucking weird
seriously what the fuck
obviously you haven't flown an a-wing properly :smug:
my favorite is the y-wing
psssshklkkaawwwoow.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
NO I DON'T THINK I DID
I'm not talking about B-wings.
This is a B-wing
This is a Missile Boat
This is correct.
Yeah technically win and fail can be nouns but not in the "Made of win! This is full of fail!" type of speech.
It's a hell of weird thing to say, droogie.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I'm sorry to tell you this, but they were designed to crash and burn.
cause that's how you fly an a-wing